search
Back to results

BLOCKade of Calcium Channels and Beta Adrenergic Receptors for the Treatment of Hypertension in HFpEF (BLOCK HFpEF)

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Hypertension

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Amlodipine Besylate
Metoprolol Succinate
Sponsored by
University of Pennsylvania
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction focused on measuring Calcium channel blocker, Beta-blocker

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults age 18-90 years
  2. Diagnosis of hypertension defined by at least two of the following: A) ICD-9 (401.0-404.91) or ICD-10 (I10-I13) codes signifying hypertension; B) Treatment with antihypertensive medication other than a loop diuretic for at least two months; C) History of previous blood pressure readings ≥130/80 mmHg at two separate office visits
  3. Stable antihypertensive therapy; defined as no changes in antihypertensive medications in the preceding 30 days
  4. A diagnosis of heart failure
  5. LV ejection fraction >50%
  6. Elevated filling pressures defined by at least one of the following criteria: A) Mitral E/e' ratio (lateral or septal) >8 with low e' velocity (septal e' <7 cm/s or lateral e' <10 cm/s) and at least one of the following: a. Enlarged left atrium (LA volume index >34 ml/m2); b. Chronic loop diuretic use for management of symptoms; c. Elevated natriuretic peptides (BNP levels >100 ng/L or NT-proBNP levels >300 ng/L); B) Mitral E/e' ratio (lateral or septal) >14; C) Previously elevated invasively determined filling pressures based on one of the following criteria: a. Resting LVEDP >16 mmHg; b. Mean PCWP >12 mmHg; c. PCWP or LVEDP ≥25 mmHg with exercise; D) Previous acutely decompensated heart failure requiring IV diuretics;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Systolic BP meeting any of the following criteria: A) Current office systolic BP <100 mmHg; B) Current office systolic BP 100-119 mmHg if not receiving treatment with an antihypertensive agent or if holding antihypertensive medication prior to randomization would be clinically contraindicated, as per the investigator's clinical judgement; C) Current office systolic BP ≥180 mmHg if not receiving treatment with a CCB or β-blocker, or ≥160 mmHg if already receiving a CCB and/or β-blocker prior to the pre-randomization wash-out period; D) Orthostatic hypotension defined as >20 mmHg decline in office systolic BP 3-5 minutes following the transition from sitting to standing position
  2. Resting heart rate <50 or >100 bpm
  3. Contraindication to withholding CCB or β-blocker therapy (e.g. use of non-dihydropyridine CCB [diltiazem or verapamil] or β-blocker for rate control for atrial fibrillation) as per the investigator's clinical judgement
  4. Children, fetuses, neonates, prisoners, and pregnant women (women of childbearing age will undergo a pregnancy test during the screening visit) are not included in this research study.
  5. Inability/unwillingness to exercise
  6. Any the following echocardiographic findings: A) LV ejection fraction <45% on any prior echocardiogram, unless it was in the setting of uncontrolled atrial fibrillation; B) Hypertrophic, infiltrative, or inflammatory cardiomyopathy; C) Clinically significant pericardial disease, as per investigator judgment; D) Moderate or greater left-sided valvular disease, any degree of mitral stenosis, or prosthetic mitral valve; E) Severe right-sided valvular disease; F) Severe right ventricular dysfunction
  7. Active coronary artery disease, defined as any of the following: A) Acute coronary syndrome or coronary intervention in the past 2 months; B) Ischemia on stress testing without either subsequent revascularization or a subsequent angiogram demonstrating the absence of clinically significant epicardial coronary artery disease, as per investigator judgement
  8. Clinically significant lung disease, defined as any of the following: A) Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease meeting GOLD criteria stage III or greater; B) Treatment with oral steroids within the past 6 months for an exacerbation of obstructive lung disease; C) The use of daytime supplemental oxygen
  9. Primary pulmonary arteriopathy
  10. eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2
  11. Any medical condition that, under the investigator's discretion, will interfere with safe completion of the study or validity of the endpoint assessments
  12. Known history of an allergy or clinically significant sensitivity (as determined by the investigator) to either amlodipine besylate or metoprolol succinate

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital of the University of PennsylvaniaRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Amlodipine besylate

Metoprolol succinate

Arm Description

Initial dose 5mg (1 capsule) daily, titrated up to 10mg (2 capsules) daily for a home systolic BP ≥135 mmHg and heart rate ≥50 bpm after the first week of use

Initial dose 100mg (1 capsule) daily, titrated up to 200mg (2 capsules) daily for a home systolic BP ≥135 mmHg and heart rate ≥50 bpm after the first week of use

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in home systolic blood pressure
Mean systolic BP measured using home BP monitoring (Microlife BP 3MX1-4 WatchBP Home N)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in home diastolic blood pressure
Mean systolic BP measured using home BP monitoring (Microlife BP 3MX1-4 WatchBP Home N).
Change in office systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Blood pressure will be measured at rest with a validated oscillometric device (Omron 705IT; HEM-759-E).
Change in peak oxygen consumption (VO2) during a maximal exercise test
We will use a supine cycle ergometer in conjunction with expired gas analysis to assess oxygen consumption (VO2) during exercise. Subjects will perform a maximal exertion-limited exercise test using a graded-exercise protocol.
Change in quality of life
Quality of life will be assessed with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. The responses are categorized under 3 subscales (symptom burden, physical limitation and quality of life) with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100. The total score will be calculated as the mean of the three subscale scores. A mean score of 100 represents the least symptoms and 0 represents the worst symptoms.
Change in systemic vasodilatory response to exercise
Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) will be calculated at rest and at peak exercise as mean arterial pressure / cardiac output. Systemic vasodilatory reserve will be measured as the reduction in SVR during exercise, relative to SVR at rest ([rest SVR - peak exercise SVR] / rest SVR).
Change in arterial wave reflections
We will use a high-fidelity Millar applanation tonometer to record carotid pressure waveforms, which will be calibrated using brachial diastolic and mean pressures.
Change in large artery stiffness
We will use a tonometer to record large artery stiffness determined by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity.
Change in left ventricular filling pressure
We will assess the ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow velocity to mitral annular tissue velocity (a surrogate of LV filling pressures) on echocardiography
Change in myocardial strain
Systolic function will be assessed via systolic myocardial strain using speckle tracking echocardiography

Full Information

First Posted
June 10, 2020
Last Updated
August 16, 2023
Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Collaborators
Julio Chirinos, MD, PhD, Raymond Townsend, MD
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04434664
Brief Title
BLOCKade of Calcium Channels and Beta Adrenergic Receptors for the Treatment of Hypertension in HFpEF
Acronym
BLOCK HFpEF
Official Title
BLOCKade of Calcium Channels and Beta Adrenergic Receptors for the Treatment of Hypertension in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (BLOCK HFpEF) Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
May 1, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Collaborators
Julio Chirinos, MD, PhD, Raymond Townsend, MD

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a critical public health problem. Heart failure (HF) affects over 5 million adults in the United States (US), and is a major source of morbidity, mortality, and impaired quality of life. Approximately half of individuals with HF have a preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), termed HF with preserved EF (HFpEF). While there are several effective pharmacologic therapies for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), none have been identified for HFpEF. Hypertension, which is present in approximately 80% of individuals with HFpEF, is the foremost modifiable risk factor for the development and progression of HFpEF. Despite the clinical importance of hypertension in HFpEF, there is limited information on how common antihypertensive agents, particularly calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and β-blockers, effect pathophysiologic mechanisms of HFpEF. This is a mechanistic investigation of the role of dihydropyridine CCBs compared to β-blockers (commonly used antihypertensive agents in clinical practice) in targeting key physiologic abnormalities in HFpEF.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Hypertension
Keywords
Calcium channel blocker, Beta-blocker

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
For blinding, tablets are placed into oral gelatin capsules with an inert filler (lactose monohydrate). Blinding is performed and maintained by the University of Pennsylvania Investigational Drug Service.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Amlodipine besylate
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Initial dose 5mg (1 capsule) daily, titrated up to 10mg (2 capsules) daily for a home systolic BP ≥135 mmHg and heart rate ≥50 bpm after the first week of use
Arm Title
Metoprolol succinate
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Initial dose 100mg (1 capsule) daily, titrated up to 200mg (2 capsules) daily for a home systolic BP ≥135 mmHg and heart rate ≥50 bpm after the first week of use
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Amlodipine Besylate
Intervention Description
The interventions will be implemented in random order in a crossover (AB-BA) design, separated by an approximately one-week washout period
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Metoprolol Succinate
Intervention Description
The interventions will be implemented in random order in a crossover (AB-BA) design, separated by an approximately one-week washout period
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in home systolic blood pressure
Description
Mean systolic BP measured using home BP monitoring (Microlife BP 3MX1-4 WatchBP Home N)
Time Frame
Measured during the last week of each of the two 4-week intervention phases
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in home diastolic blood pressure
Description
Mean systolic BP measured using home BP monitoring (Microlife BP 3MX1-4 WatchBP Home N).
Time Frame
Measured during the last week of each of the two 4-week intervention phases
Title
Change in office systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Description
Blood pressure will be measured at rest with a validated oscillometric device (Omron 705IT; HEM-759-E).
Time Frame
Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases
Title
Change in peak oxygen consumption (VO2) during a maximal exercise test
Description
We will use a supine cycle ergometer in conjunction with expired gas analysis to assess oxygen consumption (VO2) during exercise. Subjects will perform a maximal exertion-limited exercise test using a graded-exercise protocol.
Time Frame
Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases
Title
Change in quality of life
Description
Quality of life will be assessed with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. The responses are categorized under 3 subscales (symptom burden, physical limitation and quality of life) with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100. The total score will be calculated as the mean of the three subscale scores. A mean score of 100 represents the least symptoms and 0 represents the worst symptoms.
Time Frame
Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases
Title
Change in systemic vasodilatory response to exercise
Description
Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) will be calculated at rest and at peak exercise as mean arterial pressure / cardiac output. Systemic vasodilatory reserve will be measured as the reduction in SVR during exercise, relative to SVR at rest ([rest SVR - peak exercise SVR] / rest SVR).
Time Frame
Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases
Title
Change in arterial wave reflections
Description
We will use a high-fidelity Millar applanation tonometer to record carotid pressure waveforms, which will be calibrated using brachial diastolic and mean pressures.
Time Frame
Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases
Title
Change in large artery stiffness
Description
We will use a tonometer to record large artery stiffness determined by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity.
Time Frame
Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases
Title
Change in left ventricular filling pressure
Description
We will assess the ratio of early diastolic mitral inflow velocity to mitral annular tissue velocity (a surrogate of LV filling pressures) on echocardiography
Time Frame
Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases
Title
Change in myocardial strain
Description
Systolic function will be assessed via systolic myocardial strain using speckle tracking echocardiography
Time Frame
Measured at the end of each of the two 4-week intervention phases

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adults age 18-90 years Diagnosis of hypertension defined by at least two of the following: A) ICD-9 (401.0-404.91) or ICD-10 (I10-I13) codes signifying hypertension; B) Treatment with antihypertensive medication other than a loop diuretic for at least two months; C) History of previous blood pressure readings ≥130/80 mmHg at two separate office visits Stable antihypertensive therapy; defined as no changes in antihypertensive medications in the preceding 30 days A diagnosis of heart failure LV ejection fraction >50% Elevated filling pressures defined by at least one of the following criteria: A) Mitral E/e' ratio (lateral or septal) >8 with low e' velocity (septal e' <7 cm/s or lateral e' <10 cm/s) and at least one of the following: a. Enlarged left atrium (LA volume index >34 ml/m2); b. Chronic loop diuretic use for management of symptoms; c. Elevated natriuretic peptides (BNP levels >100 ng/L or NT-proBNP levels >300 ng/L); B) Mitral E/e' ratio (lateral or septal) >14; C) Previously elevated invasively determined filling pressures based on one of the following criteria: a. Resting LVEDP >16 mmHg; b. Mean PCWP >12 mmHg; c. PCWP or LVEDP ≥25 mmHg with exercise; D) Previous acutely decompensated heart failure requiring IV diuretics; Exclusion Criteria: Systolic BP meeting any of the following criteria: A) Current office systolic BP <100 mmHg; B) Current office systolic BP 100-119 mmHg if not receiving treatment with an antihypertensive agent or if holding antihypertensive medication prior to randomization would be clinically contraindicated, as per the investigator's clinical judgement; C) Current office systolic BP ≥180 mmHg if not receiving treatment with a CCB or β-blocker, or ≥160 mmHg if already receiving a CCB and/or β-blocker prior to the pre-randomization wash-out period; D) Orthostatic hypotension defined as >20 mmHg decline in office systolic BP 3-5 minutes following the transition from sitting to standing position Resting heart rate <50 or >100 bpm Contraindication to withholding CCB or β-blocker therapy (e.g. use of non-dihydropyridine CCB [diltiazem or verapamil] or β-blocker for rate control for atrial fibrillation) as per the investigator's clinical judgement Children, fetuses, neonates, prisoners, and pregnant women (women of childbearing age will undergo a pregnancy test during the screening visit) are not included in this research study. Inability/unwillingness to exercise Any the following echocardiographic findings: A) LV ejection fraction <45% on any prior echocardiogram, unless it was in the setting of uncontrolled atrial fibrillation; B) Hypertrophic, infiltrative, or inflammatory cardiomyopathy; C) Clinically significant pericardial disease, as per investigator judgment; D) Moderate or greater left-sided valvular disease, any degree of mitral stenosis, or prosthetic mitral valve; E) Severe right-sided valvular disease; F) Severe right ventricular dysfunction Active coronary artery disease, defined as any of the following: A) Acute coronary syndrome or coronary intervention in the past 2 months; B) Ischemia on stress testing without either subsequent revascularization or a subsequent angiogram demonstrating the absence of clinically significant epicardial coronary artery disease, as per investigator judgement Clinically significant lung disease, defined as any of the following: A) Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease meeting GOLD criteria stage III or greater; B) Treatment with oral steroids within the past 6 months for an exacerbation of obstructive lung disease; C) The use of daytime supplemental oxygen Primary pulmonary arteriopathy eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 Any medical condition that, under the investigator's discretion, will interfere with safe completion of the study or validity of the endpoint assessments Known history of an allergy or clinically significant sensitivity (as determined by the investigator) to either amlodipine besylate or metoprolol succinate
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jordana Cohen, MD, MSCE
Phone
267-588-7914
Email
jco@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jordana Cohen, MD, MSCE
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julio Chirinos, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Raymond Townsend, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jesse Chittams, MS

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31926856
Citation
Cohen JB, Schrauben SJ, Zhao L, Basso MD, Cvijic ME, Li Z, Yarde M, Wang Z, Bhattacharya PT, Chirinos DA, Prenner S, Zamani P, Seiffert DA, Car BD, Gordon DA, Margulies K, Cappola T, Chirinos JA. Clinical Phenogroups in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Detailed Phenotypes, Prognosis, and Response to Spironolactone. JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Mar;8(3):172-184. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.09.009. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23103044
Citation
Chirinos JA, Kips JG, Jacobs DR Jr, Brumback L, Duprez DA, Kronmal R, Bluemke DA, Townsend RR, Vermeersch S, Segers P. Arterial wave reflections and incident cardiovascular events and heart failure: MESA (Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 20;60(21):2170-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.054. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20733089
Citation
Chirinos JA, Segers P. Noninvasive evaluation of left ventricular afterload: part 1: pressure and flow measurements and basic principles of wave conduction and reflection. Hypertension. 2010 Oct;56(4):555-62. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.157321. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20733088
Citation
Chirinos JA, Segers P. Noninvasive evaluation of left ventricular afterload: part 2: arterial pressure-flow and pressure-volume relations in humans. Hypertension. 2010 Oct;56(4):563-70. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.157339. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25533966
Citation
Zamani P, Rawat D, Shiva-Kumar P, Geraci S, Bhuva R, Konda P, Doulias PT, Ischiropoulos H, Townsend RR, Margulies KB, Cappola TP, Poole DC, Chirinos JA. Effect of inorganic nitrate on exercise capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation. 2015 Jan 27;131(4):371-80; discussion 380. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.012957. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27927683
Citation
Zamani P, Tan V, Soto-Calderon H, Beraun M, Brandimarto JA, Trieu L, Varakantam S, Doulias PT, Townsend RR, Chittams J, Margulies KB, Cappola TP, Poole DC, Ischiropoulos H, Chirinos JA. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Inorganic Nitrate in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Circ Res. 2017 Mar 31;120(7):1151-1161. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309832. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30827125
Citation
Muntner P, Shimbo D, Carey RM, Charleston JB, Gaillard T, Misra S, Myers MG, Ogedegbe G, Schwartz JE, Townsend RR, Urbina EM, Viera AJ, White WB, Wright JT Jr. Measurement of Blood Pressure in Humans: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2019 May;73(5):e35-e66. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000087.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20409919
Citation
White WB, Krishnan S, Giacco S, Mallareddy M. Effects of metoprolol succinate extended release vs. amlodipine besylate on the blood pressure, heart rate, and the rate-pressure product in patients with hypertension. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2008 Sep-Oct;2(5):378-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

BLOCKade of Calcium Channels and Beta Adrenergic Receptors for the Treatment of Hypertension in HFpEF

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs