search
Back to results

CGM/Clarity Use, Glycemic Control and Clinical Outcomes

Primary Purpose

Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Continuous glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity Software
Point of Care (POC) blood glucose
Sponsored by
University of Maryland, Baltimore
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetes Mellitus

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of Diabetes Mellitus type 2 (DM2) on insulin
  • Uncontrolled glycemic control [hyperglycemia defined as Hba1c≥9% in the last 3 months or clinically important hypoglycemia (any reported glucose values less than 54 mg/dl) or severe hypoglycemia (low glucose value that led to a severe event characterized by altered mental status and or physical status requiring assistance)]

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects that have a history of type 1 DM
  • History of type 2 DM, not treated or required to be treated with basal/bolus insulin (i.e diet only, any combination of non insulin antidiabetic drugs only, basal only insulin or bolus/short acting only insulin, or pre-mixed insulins) as these patients are less likely to benefit from CGM use.
  • Pregnant patients
  • Use of Clarity/ Share or follow applications as telehealth/telemedicine to improve DM management during the last 3 months prior to study entry.
  • Extensive skin changes/disease or allergies that preclude wearing the CGM sensor
  • Significant psychiatric illness or any mental condition rendering the subject incapable of understanding the objectives and potential consequences of the study.
  • Subjects without personal computer and internet network access.

Sites / Locations

  • Baltimore VA Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Continuous glucose Monitoring and Clarity

Point of Care Fingerstick Glucose values

Arm Description

Patients with DM2 and abnormal glycemic control followed by Continuous glucose Monitoring, using Clarity software

Patients with DM2 and abnormal glycemic control followed by Point of Care Fingerstick Glucose values

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) among participants who are managed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity versus participants who are managed with Point of Care glucose testing (standard of care)
Change in the number of hypoglycemic episodes among participants who are managed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity versus participants who are managed with Point of Care glucose testing (standard of care)
Change in the number of hospitalizations among participants who are managed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity versus participants who are managed with Point of Care glucose testing (standard of care)
Change in the number of ED visits among participants who are managed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity versus participants who are managed with Point of Care glucose testing (standard of care)
Change in mortality among participants who are managed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity versus participants who are managed with Point of Care glucose testing (standard of care)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
January 28, 2019
Last Updated
September 20, 2023
Sponsor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Collaborators
Baltimore VA Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03827434
Brief Title
CGM/Clarity Use, Glycemic Control and Clinical Outcomes
Official Title
Improving Glycemic Control and Clinical Outcomes in Insulin Treated DM2 Patients Managed With CGM Devices and Clarity, a Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
We did not receive funding to conduct the study
Study Start Date
December 1, 2018 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
October 31, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 31, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Collaborators
Baltimore VA Medical Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is rising and more than 30 million of Americans or 9.4% of the US population has DM. Several large scale randomized clinical trials have found that improved glycemic control reduces the development of complications in patients with DM. However intensive glucose management carries an increased risk of hypoglycemia, a condition that may lead to neurological damage and is associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular events and mortality. Reducing uncontrolled hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia represents therefore an important objective, as may decrease the direct and indirect impact that diabetes has in our health care system. Achieving optimal glycemic control requires frequent blood glucose monitoring by the patients and recurrent clinic visits,which is often difficult to achieve, as access to typical DM clinic is at least sub optimal. m-Health and telemedicine health solutions represent alternative ways to manage patients in the outpatient setting and have been applied in different medical areas, among them in diabetes. However, almost all the telemedicine studies that have been previously performed and recruited DM patients used telemedicine solutions which were based on point of care (POC) finger-stick glucose testing, which are checked infrequently , usually 4-6 times/day. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices offer additional ways to monitor blood glucose values and can provide numerous glucose measurements (as frequent as every 5 min). By using software applications, such as the Clarity (Dexcom), which highlights glucose patterns, trends and statistics in standardized reports, providers can make safe recommendations of adjusting DM medications, especially insulin titration. In this randomized clinical trial investigators propose to use CGM devices and Clarity software as a telemedicine platform in order to improve glycemic control and improve health outcomes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Continuous glucose Monitoring and Clarity
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients with DM2 and abnormal glycemic control followed by Continuous glucose Monitoring, using Clarity software
Arm Title
Point of Care Fingerstick Glucose values
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Patients with DM2 and abnormal glycemic control followed by Point of Care Fingerstick Glucose values
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Continuous glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity Software
Intervention Description
Patients with DM2 at the intervention group will be managed by Continuous glucose Monitoring and Clarity software
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Point of Care (POC) blood glucose
Intervention Description
Testing Blood Glucose levels with Point of Care (POC) blood glucose
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) among participants who are managed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity versus participants who are managed with Point of Care glucose testing (standard of care)
Time Frame
Through study completion, 6 months after randomization
Title
Change in the number of hypoglycemic episodes among participants who are managed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity versus participants who are managed with Point of Care glucose testing (standard of care)
Time Frame
Through study completion, 6 months after randomization
Title
Change in the number of hospitalizations among participants who are managed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity versus participants who are managed with Point of Care glucose testing (standard of care)
Time Frame
Through study completion, 6 months after randomization
Title
Change in the number of ED visits among participants who are managed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity versus participants who are managed with Point of Care glucose testing (standard of care)
Time Frame
Through study completion, 6 months after randomization
Title
Change in mortality among participants who are managed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices and Clarity versus participants who are managed with Point of Care glucose testing (standard of care)
Time Frame
Through study completion, 6 months after randomization

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: History of Diabetes Mellitus type 2 (DM2) on insulin Uncontrolled glycemic control [hyperglycemia defined as Hba1c≥9% in the last 3 months or clinically important hypoglycemia (any reported glucose values less than 54 mg/dl) or severe hypoglycemia (low glucose value that led to a severe event characterized by altered mental status and or physical status requiring assistance)] Exclusion Criteria: Subjects that have a history of type 1 DM History of type 2 DM, not treated or required to be treated with basal/bolus insulin (i.e diet only, any combination of non insulin antidiabetic drugs only, basal only insulin or bolus/short acting only insulin, or pre-mixed insulins) as these patients are less likely to benefit from CGM use. Pregnant patients Use of Clarity/ Share or follow applications as telehealth/telemedicine to improve DM management during the last 3 months prior to study entry. Extensive skin changes/disease or allergies that preclude wearing the CGM sensor Significant psychiatric illness or any mental condition rendering the subject incapable of understanding the objectives and potential consequences of the study. Subjects without personal computer and internet network access.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Baltimore VA Medical Center
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
No, only de-identified data are going to be shared.

Learn more about this trial

CGM/Clarity Use, Glycemic Control and Clinical Outcomes

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs