Active clinical trials for "Hypoglycemia"

The association of insulin degludec with liraglutide in the same device (IDegLira) is a potent but at the same time safe drug that reduces the risk of hypoglycemia when compared to a basal or basal-bolus insulin schedule. The DUAL (Dual Action of Liraglutide and Insulin Degludec) studies are the pivotal studies of this combination. Specifically, the DUAL VII study has demonstrated that ideglira is a non-inferior drug in terms of glycemic control versus a basal-bolus schedule in patients in the outpatient setting who have failed basal insulin. Although the basal-bolus insulin plus correction schedule is frequently used in hospitalized patients with hyperglycemia, outpatient management with a complex insulin schedule creates challenges that are difficult to mitigate due to limited time for patient education during an acute illness and limited access to the physician responsible for post-discharge diabetes management. The use of IDegLira has not been evaluated in clinical studies in the hospital discharge setting where the authors believe it has great potential because it offers similar potency to the basal-bolus scheme but with greater safety with respect to hypoglycemia and less complexity for the patient because it is associated with fewer applications and less need for capillary self-monitoring. For this reason, in the hospital-home transition scenario, ideglira therapy in patients with poor metabolic control and requiring intensification therapy is proposed as an alternative to the basal-bolus scheme.

The investigators intend to conduct a single-center, prospective, randomized comparative trial of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) who received continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) vs point of care (POC) glucose monitoring. The study will examine relevant outcomes for patients in the ICU with diabetes mellitus and/or hyperglycemia. The primary outcome of the study will be the proportion of time in target range (blood glucose 70-180 mg/dL).

Introduction Diabetes mellitus is a worrying global non-communicable disease where it is affecting 18.3% of Malaysian adults. Poorly managed diabetes leads to an array of serious complications, namely heart attack, kidney failure and stroke. Insulin therapy remains one of the most important medication in treating diabetes especially in the population with high sugar readings or long standing diabetes. Outpatient consultations for T2DM patients are spaced out due to the limited amount of treating physicians and clinic time. This resorts to the importance of outpatient patient-lead insulin titration. Different guidelines from local and international showed different basal insulin titration method in achieving ideal fasting blood sugar. Objective We aim to investigate the difference of basal insulin titration methods in reducing HbA1c among the T2DM patients. Methodology In a parallel group randomized controlled trial, we aim to recruit 70 adult T2DM patients who have poorly controlled T2DM ( HbA1c > 7.5% with FPG >8mmol/L) or newly diagnosed T2DM patients (who are symptomatic or HbA1c >10% or FPG >13 mmol/L). The subjects will be randomized to 2 groups, daily basal insulin titration and 3 daily basal insulin titration. These subjects will be follow up for 12 weeks (4th week and 8th week virtual consultation and 12th week face-to-face consultation). The primary outcome is the HbA1c reduction from baseline to the end of 12weeks intervention. The secondary outcomes are percentage of T2DM patients achieving fasting blood sugar within 4.4-7mmol/L and/or HbA1c <7% within the study period, the incidence of hypoglycemia, total daily basal insulin dosage required to achieve desired fasting blood sugar, duration taken to achieve desired fasting blood sugar, weight changes and satisfaction to the therapy between the 2 intervention groups. Clinical Significance This study enables us to evaluate the efficacy of the different basal insulin titration methods among the T2DM patients.

This is a medical research study to test a medication in adult patients with a disease called medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCADD). The medication is triheptanoin, which is currently FDA approved for the treatment of Long-Chain Fatty Acid Oxidation Disorders. Previous research suggests that triheptanoin may also be effective in the treatment MCADD. This study will investigate the safety and efficacy (how well it works) of triheptanoin in patients with MCADD.

First in Human, pilot investigation An Open Label, Monocentric, Pilot Study Evaluating Safety of ExOlin® in Patients with Poorly Controlled Type 1 Diabetes with High Glucose Fluctuations, Prone to Severe Hypoglycemia

This research study will investigate whether dasiglucagon as a rescue therapy for participants between 1 and 6 years of age works and is safe to use. In addition, the study will investigate how dasiglucagon works in the body (pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics). Participants will receive 1 single dose as an injection under the skin (subcutaneous, s.c.). Participants will have 3 visits with the study team. For each participant, the study will last up to 84 days.

Hypoglycemia can produce a spectrum of pro-inflammatory and pro-atherothrombotic changes. To date no studies appear to have investigated the effects of differing levels of hypoglycemia on the vasculature and pro-atherothrombotic balance during hypoglycemia in healthy man. The specific aim of our study will be to determine the effects of differing levels of hypoglycemia on in-vivo vascular biologic mechanisms in a healthy population.

The investigator propose to test the safety and efficacy of a regimen that combines Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Vitamin D in a design that considers timing and duration of administration in relation to their effects and predicted synergies.

Investigators developed REDCHiP (Reducing Emotional Distress for Childhood Hypoglycemia in Parents), an innovative video-based telemedicine intervention. In the pilot work, investigators found preliminary efficacy for REDCHiP in reducing parental FH, parenting stress, and children's HbA1c. The objective of this clinical trial is to conduct a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing REDCHiP to a relevant attention control intervention (ATTN) in families of young children, thereby continuing to establish its efficacy. The proposed R01 aims are: 1) To evaluate whether parents who receive REDCHiP report reductions in FH and parenting stress at post-treatment compared to parents who receive the ATTN; 2) To evaluate whether children of parents who receive REDCHiP have a lower HbA1c and less glycemic variability at post-treatment compared to children of parents who receive ATTN; 3) To examine whether families who receive REDCHiP maintain reductions in FH, parenting stress, and child HbA1c at a 3-month followup compared to families who receive ATTN.

This study is a RCT of 3 month at home comparing closed-loop control (CLC) system vs sensor and pump therapy (S&P), with a 3-month extension phase, in Type 1 diabetic patient prone to hypoglycemia. After a 2-week run-in phase with blinded CGM, patients who spent 5% or more time below 70mg/dL will be eligible to continue. They will will be randomly assigned 2:1 to the use of closed-loop control (CLC) using Tandem Control-IQ vs S&P for 3 months, which is the timing of the primary outcome for the RCT. After 3 months, the S&P group will use CLC for up to 3 months and the CLC group will continue using CLC for up to 3 additional months.