search
Back to results

Clinical Comparison of Two Multifocal Contact Lenses Made of Silicone Hydrogel Materials

Primary Purpose

Myopia, Presbyopia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lotrafilcon B contact lens
Comfilcon A contact lens
Sponsored by
CIBA VISION
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Myopia focused on measuring Myopia, Presbyopia

Eligibility Criteria

35 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 35 years of age.
  • Spectacle add of +0.50 to +2.50 diopters (inclusive).
  • Currently wearing soft contact lenses at least 5 days per week and at least 8 hours per day.
  • Able to be fit in both eyes with soft multifocal lenses in available powers.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Eye injury or surgery within 12 weeks of enrollment in trial.
  • Currently enrolled in any clinical trial.
  • Astigmatism of 1.00 diopter or more.
  • Currently wearing excluded brands of multifocal lenses, as specified by protocol.
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Other

    Other

    Arm Label

    Lotrafilcon B / Comfilcon A

    Comfilcon A / Lotrafilcon B

    Arm Description

    Lotrafilcon B contact lenses worn first, with comfilcon A contact lenses worn second. Both products worn bilaterally on a daily wear basis for one week each.

    Comfilcon A contact lenses worn first, with lotrafilcon B contact lenses worn second. Both products worn bilaterally on a daily wear basis for one week each.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Corrected Distance Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Distance Visual Acuity
    The participant read a Snellen chart at a 20-foot equivalent distance with both eyes together while wearing study lenses. The Snellen acuity was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equated to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and was considered normal distance eyesight. A positive logMAR value indicated poorer vision, and a negative value denoted better visual acuity.
    Corrected Near Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Near Visual Acuity
    The participant read a Snellen chart at 40 centimeters with both eyes together while wearing study lenses. The Snellen acuity was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equated to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and was considered normal near eyesight. A positive logMAR value indicated poorer vision, and a negative value denoted better visual acuity.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    June 9, 2011
    Last Updated
    June 28, 2012
    Sponsor
    CIBA VISION
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT01371539
    Brief Title
    Clinical Comparison of Two Multifocal Contact Lenses Made of Silicone Hydrogel Materials
    Official Title
    Clinical Comparison of Two Multifocal Contact Lenses Made of Silicone Hydrogel Materials
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    June 2012
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    June 2011 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    August 2011 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    August 2011 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    CIBA VISION

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this study was to compare visual performance measures between two multifocal contact lenses on presbyopic wearers.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Myopia, Presbyopia
    Keywords
    Myopia, Presbyopia

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Crossover Assignment
    Masking
    Participant
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    109 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Lotrafilcon B / Comfilcon A
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    Lotrafilcon B contact lenses worn first, with comfilcon A contact lenses worn second. Both products worn bilaterally on a daily wear basis for one week each.
    Arm Title
    Comfilcon A / Lotrafilcon B
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    Comfilcon A contact lenses worn first, with lotrafilcon B contact lenses worn second. Both products worn bilaterally on a daily wear basis for one week each.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Lotrafilcon B contact lens
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    AIR OPTIX AQUA MULTIFOCAL
    Intervention Description
    Commercially marketed, silicone hydrogel, multifocal contact lens for daily wear use.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Comfilcon A contact lens
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Biofinity Multifocal
    Intervention Description
    Commercially marketed (France), silicone hydrogel, multifocal contact lens for daily wear use.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Corrected Distance Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Distance Visual Acuity
    Description
    The participant read a Snellen chart at a 20-foot equivalent distance with both eyes together while wearing study lenses. The Snellen acuity was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equated to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and was considered normal distance eyesight. A positive logMAR value indicated poorer vision, and a negative value denoted better visual acuity.
    Time Frame
    1 week
    Title
    Corrected Near Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Near Visual Acuity
    Description
    The participant read a Snellen chart at 40 centimeters with both eyes together while wearing study lenses. The Snellen acuity was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equated to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and was considered normal near eyesight. A positive logMAR value indicated poorer vision, and a negative value denoted better visual acuity.
    Time Frame
    1 week

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    35 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: At least 35 years of age. Spectacle add of +0.50 to +2.50 diopters (inclusive). Currently wearing soft contact lenses at least 5 days per week and at least 8 hours per day. Able to be fit in both eyes with soft multifocal lenses in available powers. Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply. Exclusion Criteria: Eye injury or surgery within 12 weeks of enrollment in trial. Currently enrolled in any clinical trial. Astigmatism of 1.00 diopter or more. Currently wearing excluded brands of multifocal lenses, as specified by protocol. Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Stacie Cummings, O.D.
    Organizational Affiliation
    Alcon Research
    Official's Role
    Study Director

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    Clinical Comparison of Two Multifocal Contact Lenses Made of Silicone Hydrogel Materials

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs