search
Back to results

Cognitive Training in Parkinson Study (cogtips)

Primary Purpose

Parkinson Disease, Impaired Cognition, Alteration in Cognition

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Online cognitive training 1
Online cognitive training 2
Sponsored by
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Parkinson Disease focused on measuring Parkinson, Cognitive training, Cognitive rehabilitation, Brain networks

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

--- Parkinson's disease patients ---

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjective cognitive complaints, measured by the Parkinson's Disease Cognitive Functional Rating Scale score > 3 (PD-CFRS). A score above 3 indicates significant cognitive complaints, that are milder than complaints associated with Parkinson's disease dementia. This questionnaire is filled in by the patient.
  • Participants' Hoehn & Yahr stage is lower than 4. Patients are stable on dopaminergic medication at least a month before starting the intervention. During the intervention, patient and neurologist will be asked to keep the dopaminergic medication dosage as stable as possible.
  • Participants have access to a computer or tablet, with access to the Internet. If the participant uses a computer, he or she is capable of using a keyboard and computer mouse.
  • Participants are willing to sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

General criteria:

  • Indications for a dementia syndrome, measured by the Self-administered Gerocognitive Examination score < 14 or the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score < 22.
  • Current drug- or alcohol abuse, measured by a score > 1 on the four CAGE AID-questions (according to the Trimbos guidelines).
  • The inability to undergo extensive neuropsychological assessment, or eight weeks of intervention.
  • Moderate to severe depressive symptoms, as defined by the Beck Depression Inventory score > 18.
  • An impulse control disorder, including internet addiction, screened by the impulse control disorder criteria interview.
  • Psychotic symptoms, screened by the Questionnaire for Psychotic Experiences. Benign hallucinations with insight are not contraindicated.
  • Traumatic brain injury, only in case of a contusio cerebri with 1) loss of consciousness for > 15 minutes and 2) posttraumatic amnesia > 1 hour.
  • A space occupying lesion defined by a radiologist, or significant vascular abnormalities (Fazekas > 1).

For participation in MRI research:

  • Severe claustrophobia
  • Metal in the body (for example, deep brain stimulator or pacemaker)
  • Pregnancy
  • Problems with or shortness of breath during 60 minutes of lying still.

    • Healthy control subjects ---

Inclusion criteria:

- Participants are willing to sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Indications for a neurological disease, such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, multiple sclerosis or Huntington's disease;
  • Indications for a dementia syndrome, measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score < 22.
  • Indications for a current stroke or CVA, or in the past.
  • Indications for the presence of a psychotic or depressive disorder, measured with a positive screening on the SAPS-PD (benign hallucinations with insight are not contraindicated) and a BDI > 18 respectively.
  • Current drug- or alcohol abuse, measured by a score > 1 on the four CAGE AID-questions (according to the Trimbos guidelines).
  • The inability to undergo extensive neuropsychological assessment, or eight weeks of intervention.
  • Traumatic brain injury, only in case of a contusio cerebri with 1) loss of conciousness for > 15 minutes and 2) posttraumatic amnesia > 1 hour.
  • A space occupying lesion defined by a radiologist, or significant vascular abnormalities (Fazekas > 1).
  • Contra-indications for participation in MRI scanning (see above)

Sites / Locations

  • VU University Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Online cognitive training 1 (N=70)

Online cognitive training 2 (N=70)

Healthy control subjects (N=30)

Arm Description

Eight-week, three times a week during 45 minutes cognitive training

Eight-week, three times a week during 45 minutes cognitive activities

Reference group to compare cognitive training effects to

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Efficacy of the online cognitive training on executive function (1)
Improvement in executive function after eight weeks of cognitive training as measured by the Tower of London

Secondary Outcome Measures

Efficacy of the online cognitive training on subjective cognitive complaints (1)
Improvement on subjective cognitive complaints after eight weeks of cognitive training, measured by the Parkinson's disease Cognitive Functional Rating Scale (PD-CFRS).
Efficacy of the online cognitive training on subjective cognitive complaints (2)
Improvement on subjective cognitive complaints after eight weeks of cognitive training, measured by the Cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ).
Efficacy of the online cognitive training on executive cognitive functions (2)
Improvement on executive cognitive functions after eight weeks of cognitive training, measured by the Stroop color-word task. The color-word card (card III) will be corrected for color naming speed (measured by card II).
Efficacy of the online cognitive training on executive cognitive functions (3)
Improvement on executive cognitive functions after eight weeks of cognitive training, measured by the Letter fluency task.
Persistence of cognitive training effect on executive functions at six-month follow-up
Persistence of cognitive training effect on executive functions measured by the Tower of London task at six-month follow-up of no cognitive training.
Persistence of cognitive training effect on executive functions at one-year follow-up
Persistence of cognitive training effect on executive functions measured by the Tower of London task at one-year follow-up of no cognitive training.
Persistence of cognitive training effect on executive functions at two-year follow-up
Persistence of cognitive training effect on executive functions measured by the Tower of London task at one-year follow-up of no cognitive training.
Risk reduction of PD-MCI/PD-D development at follow-up
The reduction of the risk on developing PD-MCI or PD-D at six months and one year follow-up. Diagnostic criteria for Level II PD-MCI and probable PD-D will be used.
Online cognitive training effect on brain morphology measured by MRI
The effect of online cognitive training on brain morphology using MRI. Structural changes will be assessed after eight weeks of training (T1).
Online cognitive training effect on structural brain connectivity measured by DTI
The effect of online cognitive training on structural brain connectivity using DTI. Structural changes will be assessed after eight weeks of training (T1).
Online cognitive training effect on brain activity measured by resting state fMRI
The effect of online cognitive training on brain activity using resting state fMRI. Regional activity and functional connectivity changes will be assessed after eight weeks of training (T1).
Online cognitive training effect on brain network topology relative to healthy control group
The effect of online cognitive training on brain network topology using resting state fMRI compared with brain network topology of healthy subjects. Healthy subjects will undergo (functional) MRI scanning once.
Difference between Parkinson's disease patients' brain network topology with or without cognitive impairment, and healthy control subjects.
Participants will be classified to cognitive impairment or no cognitive impairment, and their brain network topology will be compared with healthy subjects.

Full Information

First Posted
August 30, 2016
Last Updated
October 13, 2020
Sponsor
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Collaborators
Dutch Parkinson Patient Association
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02920632
Brief Title
Cognitive Training in Parkinson Study
Acronym
cogtips
Official Title
COGTIPS (COGnitive Training In Parkinson Study): The Effect of Online Cognitive Training on Cognition and Brain Networks in Parkinson's Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
September 15, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 17, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2021 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Collaborators
Dutch Parkinson Patient Association

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study evaluates the efficacy of an eight-week online cognitive training program on objective and subjective cognitive functions in Parkinson's disease. Moreover, we intend to map the effect on brain network function, and if cognitive training can prevent the development of PD-MCI/PD-D after one- and two-year follow-up. In this study, two training groups will be compared (N: 70 vs 70). In a part of the participants MRI will be assessed (N: 40 vs. 40). We expect cognitive training to improve cognitive functions, and to improve the efficiency of brain network function. Moreover, we expect that cognitive training can decrease the risk of PD-MCI/PD-D at one- and two-year follow-up.
Detailed Description
BACKGROUND In Parkinson's disease (PD), cognitive dysfunction is frequently reported - approximately 50% of PD patients experience cognitive impairment (Litvan et al., 2011). Of these impairments, executive dysfunction is most frequently reported early in the disease trajectory (Bosboom, Stoffers, & Wolters, 2004; Muslimovic, Post, Speelman, & Schmand, 2005), while impairments in other cognitive domains (i.e. attention, episodic memory, visuospatial functions) are also highly prevalent (Bosboom et al., 2004). The majority of PD patients ultimately develops PD dementia (PD-D; Aarsland, Andersen, Larsen, Lolk, & Kragh-Sorensen, 2003; Hely, Reid, Adena, Halliday, & Morris, 2008). Moreover, about 10% of the PD patients develops PD-D every year (Aarsland & Kurz, 2010). Cognitive dysfunctions in PD have a significant negative influence on the quality of life (Klepac, Trkulja, Relja, & Babic, 2008), while treatment of these dysfunctions is in its infancy. Cognitive training may provide a new intervention for reducing cognitive complaints and delaying the onset of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or PD-D. This intervention has been widely studied in other diseases (Cicerone et al., 2011; Olazaran et al., 2010). Moreover, studies have provided evidence not only for behavioral influences, but also for brain connectivity and activity effects of cognitive training (Chapman et al., 2015; Castellanos et al., 2010; Subramaniam et al., 2012; Subramaniam et al., 2014; Belleville et al., 2011; Rosen, Sugiura, Kramer, Whitfield-Gabrieli, & Gabrieli, 2011). This suggests a restorative effect of cognitive training on disrupted brain networks. In PD, cognitive dysfunction - mainly executive dysfunction - is associated with disruption of the cortico-striato-thalamo-corticale circuits by depletion of dopamine. Dysfunction of these circuits seems to disrupt several cognitive networks, which leads to cognitive dysfunction (Baggio et al., 2014). Cognitive training could counteract these disruptions by normalising activity and connectivity, and ultimately lead to a reduction of impairment. Since earlier studies in different patient populations have shown that cognitive training has lasting effects (Petrelli et al., 2015), normalising disruptions underlying cognitive impairment could prevent cognitive deterioration and therefore prevent or delay the development of PD-D. Few studies in PD have focused on cognitive training and its neural correlates. A meta-analysis by Leung et al. (2015) showed positive effects of cognitive training on mainly 'frontal' cognitive functions (i.e. working memory, executive functions, processing speed). In addition, earlier research has described a neuroprotective effect of cognitive training on the development of MCI in PD (odds ratio: 3; Petrelli et al., 2015). Until now, however, studies have been relatively small and mainly without a controlled design - consequently, there is a need for large randomized controlled studies (Hindle, Petrelli, Clare, & Kalbe, 2013; Leung et al., 2015). Moreover, neural effects of cognitive training are largely unknown in PD. Furthermore, it is important to study the improvement of patients on daily functioning after cognitive training, rather than solely focusing on cognitive tasks and neural measures. Finally, cognitive training has been performed mainly in hospital settings, while PD patients have mobility problems - a training method suitable to perform from home is therefore needed for this population. OBJECTIVES The study objective is primarily to measure the effect of an online cognitive training in patients with mild cognitive complaints in PD. An online training, specifically altered for PD patients (BrainGymmer) will be compared with an active comparator. In both conditions, participants will train eight weeks, three times a week during 45 minutes. Primary objective: - To measure the effect of an online cognitive training (as compared to the active comparator), eight weeks, three times a week, on executive functions in patients with mild cognitive complaints in PD. Secondary objectives: To measure the effect of online cognitive training on daily functioning. To measure the endurance of the training effect after six months, one and two years. To assess the reduced risk of MCI and PD-D development by cognitive training. To assess the effect of cognitive training on brain network efficiency and connectivity. To assess the effect of cognitive training on brain network topology and connectivity, and cognition, relative to those of matched healthy control participants. To assess the difference in brain network topology and connectivity, and cognition, between Parkinson's disease patients with or without cognitive impairment and healthy control participants.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson Disease, Impaired Cognition, Alteration in Cognition
Keywords
Parkinson, Cognitive training, Cognitive rehabilitation, Brain networks

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
170 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Online cognitive training 1 (N=70)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Eight-week, three times a week during 45 minutes cognitive training
Arm Title
Online cognitive training 2 (N=70)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Eight-week, three times a week during 45 minutes cognitive activities
Arm Title
Healthy control subjects (N=30)
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Reference group to compare cognitive training effects to
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Online cognitive training 1
Intervention Description
Eight-week online cognitive training program, three times a week for 45 minutes. The training contains several games that are designed to train cognitive functions.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Online cognitive training 2
Intervention Description
Eight-week online active comparator program, three times a week for 45 minutes. The training contains several games.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Efficacy of the online cognitive training on executive function (1)
Description
Improvement in executive function after eight weeks of cognitive training as measured by the Tower of London
Time Frame
Eight weeks (T1)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Efficacy of the online cognitive training on subjective cognitive complaints (1)
Description
Improvement on subjective cognitive complaints after eight weeks of cognitive training, measured by the Parkinson's disease Cognitive Functional Rating Scale (PD-CFRS).
Time Frame
Eight weeks (T1)
Title
Efficacy of the online cognitive training on subjective cognitive complaints (2)
Description
Improvement on subjective cognitive complaints after eight weeks of cognitive training, measured by the Cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ).
Time Frame
Eight weeks (T1)
Title
Efficacy of the online cognitive training on executive cognitive functions (2)
Description
Improvement on executive cognitive functions after eight weeks of cognitive training, measured by the Stroop color-word task. The color-word card (card III) will be corrected for color naming speed (measured by card II).
Time Frame
Eight weeks (T1)
Title
Efficacy of the online cognitive training on executive cognitive functions (3)
Description
Improvement on executive cognitive functions after eight weeks of cognitive training, measured by the Letter fluency task.
Time Frame
Eight weeks (T1)
Title
Persistence of cognitive training effect on executive functions at six-month follow-up
Description
Persistence of cognitive training effect on executive functions measured by the Tower of London task at six-month follow-up of no cognitive training.
Time Frame
Six months (T2)
Title
Persistence of cognitive training effect on executive functions at one-year follow-up
Description
Persistence of cognitive training effect on executive functions measured by the Tower of London task at one-year follow-up of no cognitive training.
Time Frame
One year (T3)
Title
Persistence of cognitive training effect on executive functions at two-year follow-up
Description
Persistence of cognitive training effect on executive functions measured by the Tower of London task at one-year follow-up of no cognitive training.
Time Frame
Two years (T4)
Title
Risk reduction of PD-MCI/PD-D development at follow-up
Description
The reduction of the risk on developing PD-MCI or PD-D at six months and one year follow-up. Diagnostic criteria for Level II PD-MCI and probable PD-D will be used.
Time Frame
Six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Online cognitive training effect on brain morphology measured by MRI
Description
The effect of online cognitive training on brain morphology using MRI. Structural changes will be assessed after eight weeks of training (T1).
Time Frame
Eight weeks (T1)
Title
Online cognitive training effect on structural brain connectivity measured by DTI
Description
The effect of online cognitive training on structural brain connectivity using DTI. Structural changes will be assessed after eight weeks of training (T1).
Time Frame
Eight weeks (T1)
Title
Online cognitive training effect on brain activity measured by resting state fMRI
Description
The effect of online cognitive training on brain activity using resting state fMRI. Regional activity and functional connectivity changes will be assessed after eight weeks of training (T1).
Time Frame
Eight weeks (T1)
Title
Online cognitive training effect on brain network topology relative to healthy control group
Description
The effect of online cognitive training on brain network topology using resting state fMRI compared with brain network topology of healthy subjects. Healthy subjects will undergo (functional) MRI scanning once.
Time Frame
Eight weeks (T1)
Title
Difference between Parkinson's disease patients' brain network topology with or without cognitive impairment, and healthy control subjects.
Description
Participants will be classified to cognitive impairment or no cognitive impairment, and their brain network topology will be compared with healthy subjects.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Age
Description
Demographic characteristic: age at baseline.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0)
Title
Sex
Description
Demographic characteristic: sex.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0)
Title
Educational level
Description
Demographic characteristic: educational level.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0)
Title
Disease duration
Description
Disease characteristic: disease duration.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0)
Title
Disease stage
Description
Disease characteristic: disease stage (Hoehn and Yahr stage).
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Medication use
Description
Disease characteristic: medication use.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Motor symptoms
Description
Motor symptoms assessed by the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale - III
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Depressive symptom severity
Description
Psychiatric symptom severity, depression (Beck Depression Inventory).
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Anxiety symptom severity
Description
Psychiatric symptom severity, including anxiety (Parkinson Anxiety Scale).
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Impulse control disorder symptom severity
Description
Psychiatric symptom severity, including impulse control disorders (QUIP-RS).
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Psychotic symptom severity
Description
Psychiatric symptom severity, including psychotic symptoms (Questionnaire for psychotic events).
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Apathy symptom severity
Description
Psychiatric symptom severity, including apathy (Apathy Scale).
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Expectations of the intervention
Description
Participants' expectation prior the intervention, measured by the credibility/expectancy questionnaire.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0)
Title
Global cognitive functioning (1)
Description
Global cognitive functioning assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Global cognitive functioning (2)
Description
Global cognitive functioning assessed by the Pentagon copy test, which is predictive of cognitive detoriation.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Specific cognitive functioning: attention/working memory (1)
Description
Attention function, measured by the Stroop task part I: word naming.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Specific cognitive functioning: attention/working memory (2)
Description
Working memory function, measured by the backwards digit span test of the Wechsler adult intelligence test (WAIS)-III.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Specific cognitive functioning: episodic memory (1)
Description
Episodic memory function, measured by the Dutch version of the Auditory verbal learning test (RAVLT).
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Specific cognitive functioning: episodic memory (2)
Description
Episodic memory function, measured by the Location learning task.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Specific cognitive functioning: language (1)
Description
Language function, measured by the Boston naming task.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Specific cognitive functioning: language (2)
Description
Language function, measured by the category fluency task.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Specific cognitive functioning: visuospatial/visuoconstructive function (1)
Description
Visuospatial function, measured by the Benton visual form discrimination task.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Specific cognitive functioning: visuospatial/visuoconstructive function (2)
Description
Visuospatial function, measured by the Rey complex figure task.
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Physical activity
Description
Amount of estimated physical activity that a person performes, measured by the New Zealand Physical Activity Questionnaire
Time Frame
Pre-intervention (T0), eight weeks (T1), six months (T2), one year (T3), two years (T4)
Title
Cognitive reserve
Description
Estimation of cognitive reserve measured with the Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire
Time Frame
Two years (T4)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
--- Parkinson's disease patients --- Inclusion Criteria: Subjective cognitive complaints, measured by the Parkinson's Disease Cognitive Functional Rating Scale score > 3 (PD-CFRS). A score above 3 indicates significant cognitive complaints, that are milder than complaints associated with Parkinson's disease dementia. This questionnaire is filled in by the patient. Participants' Hoehn & Yahr stage is lower than 4. Patients are stable on dopaminergic medication at least a month before starting the intervention. During the intervention, patient and neurologist will be asked to keep the dopaminergic medication dosage as stable as possible. Participants have access to a computer or tablet, with access to the Internet. If the participant uses a computer, he or she is capable of using a keyboard and computer mouse. Participants are willing to sign informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: General criteria: Indications for a dementia syndrome, measured by the Self-administered Gerocognitive Examination score < 14 or the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score < 22. Current drug- or alcohol abuse, measured by a score > 1 on the four CAGE AID-questions (according to the Trimbos guidelines). The inability to undergo extensive neuropsychological assessment, or eight weeks of intervention. Moderate to severe depressive symptoms, as defined by the Beck Depression Inventory score > 18. An impulse control disorder, including internet addiction, screened by the impulse control disorder criteria interview. Psychotic symptoms, screened by the Questionnaire for Psychotic Experiences. Benign hallucinations with insight are not contraindicated. Traumatic brain injury, only in case of a contusio cerebri with 1) loss of consciousness for > 15 minutes and 2) posttraumatic amnesia > 1 hour. A space occupying lesion defined by a radiologist, or significant vascular abnormalities (Fazekas > 1). For participation in MRI research: Severe claustrophobia Metal in the body (for example, deep brain stimulator or pacemaker) Pregnancy Problems with or shortness of breath during 60 minutes of lying still. Healthy control subjects --- Inclusion criteria: - Participants are willing to sign informed consent. Exclusion criteria: Indications for a neurological disease, such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, multiple sclerosis or Huntington's disease; Indications for a dementia syndrome, measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score < 22. Indications for a current stroke or CVA, or in the past. Indications for the presence of a psychotic or depressive disorder, measured with a positive screening on the SAPS-PD (benign hallucinations with insight are not contraindicated) and a BDI > 18 respectively. Current drug- or alcohol abuse, measured by a score > 1 on the four CAGE AID-questions (according to the Trimbos guidelines). The inability to undergo extensive neuropsychological assessment, or eight weeks of intervention. Traumatic brain injury, only in case of a contusio cerebri with 1) loss of conciousness for > 15 minutes and 2) posttraumatic amnesia > 1 hour. A space occupying lesion defined by a radiologist, or significant vascular abnormalities (Fazekas > 1). Contra-indications for participation in MRI scanning (see above)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chris Vriend, PhD.
Organizational Affiliation
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Odile A Van den Heuvel, MD PhD.
Organizational Affiliation
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
VU University Medical Center
City
Amsterdam
State/Province
Noord-Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
1081HV
Country
Netherlands

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21661055
Citation
Litvan I, Aarsland D, Adler CH, Goldman JG, Kulisevsky J, Mollenhauer B, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Troster AI, Weintraub D. MDS Task Force on mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: critical review of PD-MCI. Mov Disord. 2011 Aug 15;26(10):1814-24. doi: 10.1002/mds.23823. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15480840
Citation
Bosboom JL, Stoffers D, Wolters ECh. Cognitive dysfunction and dementia in Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2004 Oct;111(10-11):1303-15. doi: 10.1007/s00702-004-0168-1. Epub 2004 Jun 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16247051
Citation
Muslimovic D, Post B, Speelman JD, Schmand B. Cognitive profile of patients with newly diagnosed Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2005 Oct 25;65(8):1239-45. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000180516.69442.95.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12633150
Citation
Aarsland D, Andersen K, Larsen JP, Lolk A, Kragh-Sorensen P. Prevalence and characteristics of dementia in Parkinson disease: an 8-year prospective study. Arch Neurol. 2003 Mar;60(3):387-92. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.3.387.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18307261
Citation
Hely MA, Reid WG, Adena MA, Halliday GM, Morris JG. The Sydney multicenter study of Parkinson's disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years. Mov Disord. 2008 Apr 30;23(6):837-44. doi: 10.1002/mds.21956.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19733364
Citation
Aarsland D, Kurz MW. The epidemiology of dementia associated with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Sci. 2010 Feb 15;289(1-2):18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.08.034. Epub 2009 Sep 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18217883
Citation
Klepac N, Trkulja V, Relja M, Babic T. Is quality of life in non-demented Parkinson's disease patients related to cognitive performance? A clinic-based cross-sectional study. Eur J Neurol. 2008 Feb;15(2):128-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.02011.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21440699
Citation
Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, Malec JF, Kalmar K, Fraas M, Felicetti T, Laatsch L, Harley JP, Bergquist T, Azulay J, Cantor J, Ashman T. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Apr;92(4):519-30. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20838046
Citation
Olazaran J, Reisberg B, Clare L, Cruz I, Pena-Casanova J, Del Ser T, Woods B, Beck C, Auer S, Lai C, Spector A, Fazio S, Bond J, Kivipelto M, Brodaty H, Rojo JM, Collins H, Teri L, Mittelman M, Orrell M, Feldman HH, Muniz R. Nonpharmacological therapies in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review of efficacy. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;30(2):161-78. doi: 10.1159/000316119. Epub 2010 Sep 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23985135
Citation
Chapman SB, Aslan S, Spence JS, Hart JJ Jr, Bartz EK, Didehbani N, Keebler MW, Gardner CM, Strain JF, DeFina LF, Lu H. Neural mechanisms of brain plasticity with complex cognitive training in healthy seniors. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Feb;25(2):396-405. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht234. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20826433
Citation
Castellanos NP, Paul N, Ordonez VE, Demuynck O, Bajo R, Campo P, Bilbao A, Ortiz T, del-Pozo F, Maestu F. Reorganization of functional connectivity as a correlate of cognitive recovery in acquired brain injury. Brain. 2010 Aug;133(Pt 8):2365-81. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq174.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22365555
Citation
Subramaniam K, Luks TL, Fisher M, Simpson GV, Nagarajan S, Vinogradov S. Computerized cognitive training restores neural activity within the reality monitoring network in schizophrenia. Neuron. 2012 Feb 23;73(4):842-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.024.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24867353
Citation
Subramaniam K, Luks TL, Garrett C, Chung C, Fisher M, Nagarajan S, Vinogradov S. Intensive cognitive training in schizophrenia enhances working memory and associated prefrontal cortical efficiency in a manner that drives long-term functional gains. Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 1;99:281-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.057. Epub 2014 May 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21427462
Citation
Belleville S, Clement F, Mellah S, Gilbert B, Fontaine F, Gauthier S. Training-related brain plasticity in subjects at risk of developing Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2011 Jun;134(Pt 6):1623-34. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr037. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21971474
Citation
Rosen AC, Sugiura L, Kramer JH, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Gabrieli JD. Cognitive training changes hippocampal function in mild cognitive impairment: a pilot study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):349-57. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-0009.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24639411
Citation
Baggio HC, Sala-Llonch R, Segura B, Marti MJ, Valldeoriola F, Compta Y, Tolosa E, Junque C. Functional brain networks and cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Sep;35(9):4620-34. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22499. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25534579
Citation
Petrelli A, Kaesberg S, Barbe MT, Timmermann L, Rosen JB, Fink GR, Kessler J, Kalbe E. Cognitive training in Parkinson's disease reduces cognitive decline in the long term. Eur J Neurol. 2015 Apr;22(4):640-7. doi: 10.1111/ene.12621. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26519540
Citation
Leung IH, Walton CC, Hallock H, Lewis SJ, Valenzuela M, Lampit A. Cognitive training in Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2015 Nov 24;85(21):1843-51. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002145. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23426759
Citation
Hindle JV, Petrelli A, Clare L, Kalbe E. Nonpharmacological enhancement of cognitive function in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. Mov Disord. 2013 Jul;28(8):1034-49. doi: 10.1002/mds.25377. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31366395
Citation
van Balkom TD, Berendse HW, van der Werf YD, Twisk JWR, Zijlstra I, Hagen RH, Berk T, Vriend C, van den Heuvel OA. COGTIPS: a double-blind randomized active controlled trial protocol to study the effect of home-based, online cognitive training on cognition and brain networks in Parkinson's disease. BMC Neurol. 2019 Jul 31;19(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1403-6.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.cogtips.nl
Description
Website of the trial

Learn more about this trial

Cognitive Training in Parkinson Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs