search
Back to results

Effect of Cognitive Training on Gait in Parkinson's Disease

Primary Purpose

Parkinson Disease

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Czechia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
cognitive training
Sponsored by
General University Hospital, Prague
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Parkinson Disease focused on measuring Parkinson Disease, Cognitive training, Gait

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of Parkinson´s disease (PD)
  • PD duration ≥8 years
  • mild cognitive impairment
  • stable medication
  • presence of freezing of gait according to the FoG-Q AND/OR Rapid Turns Test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • dementia
  • deep brain stimulation, pump therapy with Duodopa or Apomorphine
  • severe fluctuations with ON state duration for less than 2 hours
  • dopa dysregulation syndrome
  • impulse control disorder
  • untreated depression
  • benzodiazepines except for single dose at night
  • non-compliance
  • inability to walk without support
  • significant co-morbidities likely to affect gait, e.g., acute illness, orthopedic disease, significant visual problems, or a clinical history of stroke
  • involvement in other treatment trials
  • not meeting inclusion criteria

Sites / Locations

  • General University Hospital in Prague

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Group cognitive training

Home-based cognitive training

Arm Description

The experimental group will undergo 60 minutes long cognitive training group sessions twice a week for 12 weeks focused on executive function, attention and working memory.

The control group will perform executive function, attention and working memory training similar to the experimental group but at home as instructed by their therapist using specialized software for cognitive training (Rehacom). This training will be dose matched to the experimental group, i.e. it will be performed four times a week for 30 minutes for 12 weeks. In this group, therapists will only provide coaching once a month.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change from Baseline instrumental assessment of turn fluency during rapid turns at 12 weeks
see Bertoli et al. 2019 for a detailed description; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
Change from Baseline Timed Up and Go Test: dual-task performance at 12 weeks
Patient is asked to perform TUG while subtracting 3 from a random number between 51-100; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used

Secondary Outcome Measures

Timed Up and Go Test: single-task performance
G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
10-meter walking test: single-task performance
G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
10-meter walking test: dual-task performance
Patient is asked to perform 10MWT while subtracting 3 from a random number between 51-100; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
Number of steps/day
Assessed using Fitbit activity trackers
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Total score
Global cognition screening
Trail Making Test A (TMT A), Total score (in seconds)
Assessing of attention distribution.
The Victoria Version of Stroop Test (VST): Dot Time Score (in seconds) Neutral Word Time Score (in seconds) The Victoria Version of Stroop Test (VST): Dot Time Score (in seconds) Neutral Word Time Score (in seconds)
Assessing of focused visual attention
The Victoria Version of Stroop Test (VST): Color Word Time Score (in seconds) Error score on VST Color Word Task, Total score
Assessing of executive functions - inhibition
Tower of London, Total score
Assessing of executive functions - problem solving
Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS 21)
Self-assessment scale of depression, anxiety and stress. Patient fills it at home.
Falls Efficacy Scale-International
Fear of falls assessment
Number of falls
Diary based quantification of the number of falls
Change from post-intervention instrumental assessment of turn fluency during rapid turns at 1 month follow-up
see Bertoli et al. 2019 for a detailed description; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
Change from post-intervention instrumental assessment of turn fluency during rapid turns at 3 months follow-up
see Bertoli et al. 2019 for a detailed description; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
Change from post-intervention Timed Up and Go Test: dual-task performance at 1 month follow-up
Patient is asked to perform TUG while subtracting 3 from a random number between 51-100; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
Change from post-intervention Timed Up and Go Test: dual-task performance at 3 months follow-up
Patient is asked to perform TUG while subtracting 3 from a random number between 51-100; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used

Full Information

First Posted
August 15, 2022
Last Updated
September 13, 2023
Sponsor
General University Hospital, Prague
Collaborators
Charles University, Czech Republic
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05514379
Brief Title
Effect of Cognitive Training on Gait in Parkinson's Disease
Official Title
Disorders of Gait, Postural Stability and Cognition in Parkinson's Disease: Presymptomatic Detection and Targeted Rehabilitation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Enrolling by invitation
Study Start Date
October 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
General University Hospital, Prague
Collaborators
Charles University, Czech Republic

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Physiotherapy and targeted rehabilitation are routinely performed in order to influence disorders of posture, gait and stability in Parkinson´s disease (PD), but their effects have been controversial (Keus et al. 2014; Walton wt al. 2014). Recently, several studies suggested that cognitive training can improve gait in patients with PD (Peterson et al. 2016, Heremans et al. 2013), similar to the effects seen in the elderly (Yogev-Seligmann et al. 2008; Amboni et al. 2013). Specific training programs including dual tasking with automatic verbal series, counting etc. have led to increased walking speed and improved stepping cadence, length, and duration in patients with dementia (Schwenk et al. 2010). However, since in advanced PD patients dual-task gait training has to be supervised by therapists, it is not a suitable type of therapy to be performed at home. Therefore, this study aims to verify and extend the encouraging results of the single study which showed a positive effect of cognitive function training on gait in PD (Milman et al. 2014) by exploring this effect in advanced PD patients, by assessing the effect on gait using more targeted clinical and instrumental evaluation, and by comparing two modes of therapy delivery, group and computer-based.
Detailed Description
Background: In a pilot study, Milman et al. 2014 showed that computer-based cognitive training focusing on executive function and attention performed at home might improve selected gait parameters in early patients with Parkinson´s disease (PD). Goal 1: To explore this effect in advanced PD patients Hypothesis 1: Effect of cognitive training focusing on executive function and attention will be detected also in advanced PD patients and this effect will be larger as compared to the results published by Milman et al. 2014. Goal 2: To verify the results published by Milman et al. 2014 using more targeted clinical and instrumental gait assessment, including dual-task gait evaluation as well as instrumental testing of turn fluency (Bertoli et al. 2019). Hypothesis 2: The results published by Milman et al. 2014 will be confirmed and an effect on dual-task gait and turn fluency will be shown. Goal 3: To explore the role of the form of therapy setting, i.e. whether group setting might increase the effect of cognitive training on gait as compared to individual cognitive training at home. Such results have been shown in the case of a physiotherapy intervention by King et al. 2015. Hypothesis 3: The effect of group cognitive training on gait will be larger as compared to individual dose-matched, computer-based cognitive training performed at home. However, it remains to be determined whether the effect size difference between the two groups will outweigh the advantages of tele-rehabilitation. Design: Randomised-controlled trial Interventions: experimental group: group cognitive training focusing on executive function and attention; control group: computer-based cognitive training focusing on executive function and attention performed at home. Intervention in both groups will be dose-matched (experimental: 60 mins, 2x/week, 12 weeks; control: 30 mins, 4x/week, 12 weeks) Follow-up: at 1 and 3 months time points. Power analysis results: at least 38 patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson Disease
Keywords
Parkinson Disease, Cognitive training, Gait

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Prticipants are randomly assigned to either the experimental or the control group.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Masking Description
Participants are blinded to study hypothesis. Investigators are blinded to treatment group.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group cognitive training
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The experimental group will undergo 60 minutes long cognitive training group sessions twice a week for 12 weeks focused on executive function, attention and working memory.
Arm Title
Home-based cognitive training
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The control group will perform executive function, attention and working memory training similar to the experimental group but at home as instructed by their therapist using specialized software for cognitive training (Rehacom). This training will be dose matched to the experimental group, i.e. it will be performed four times a week for 30 minutes for 12 weeks. In this group, therapists will only provide coaching once a month.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
cognitive training
Intervention Description
Cognitive training focused on executive function, attention and working memory delivered either by the therapist in a group setting (experimental group) or by a specialized software for cognitive training (Rehacom) at home.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from Baseline instrumental assessment of turn fluency during rapid turns at 12 weeks
Description
see Bertoli et al. 2019 for a detailed description; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 weeks
Title
Change from Baseline Timed Up and Go Test: dual-task performance at 12 weeks
Description
Patient is asked to perform TUG while subtracting 3 from a random number between 51-100; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Timed Up and Go Test: single-task performance
Description
G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
10-meter walking test: single-task performance
Description
G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
10-meter walking test: dual-task performance
Description
Patient is asked to perform 10MWT while subtracting 3 from a random number between 51-100; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Number of steps/day
Description
Assessed using Fitbit activity trackers
Time Frame
5 days monitoring at baseline and 12 weeks
Title
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Total score
Description
Global cognition screening
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 3 months follow-up
Title
Trail Making Test A (TMT A), Total score (in seconds)
Description
Assessing of attention distribution.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
The Victoria Version of Stroop Test (VST): Dot Time Score (in seconds) Neutral Word Time Score (in seconds) The Victoria Version of Stroop Test (VST): Dot Time Score (in seconds) Neutral Word Time Score (in seconds)
Description
Assessing of focused visual attention
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
The Victoria Version of Stroop Test (VST): Color Word Time Score (in seconds) Error score on VST Color Word Task, Total score
Description
Assessing of executive functions - inhibition
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Tower of London, Total score
Description
Assessing of executive functions - problem solving
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS 21)
Description
Self-assessment scale of depression, anxiety and stress. Patient fills it at home.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Falls Efficacy Scale-International
Description
Fear of falls assessment
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Number of falls
Description
Diary based quantification of the number of falls
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Change from post-intervention instrumental assessment of turn fluency during rapid turns at 1 month follow-up
Description
see Bertoli et al. 2019 for a detailed description; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
Time Frame
12 weeks and 1 month follow-up
Title
Change from post-intervention instrumental assessment of turn fluency during rapid turns at 3 months follow-up
Description
see Bertoli et al. 2019 for a detailed description; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
Time Frame
12 weeks and 3 months follow-up
Title
Change from post-intervention Timed Up and Go Test: dual-task performance at 1 month follow-up
Description
Patient is asked to perform TUG while subtracting 3 from a random number between 51-100; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
Time Frame
12 weeks and 1 month follow-up
Title
Change from post-intervention Timed Up and Go Test: dual-task performance at 3 months follow-up
Description
Patient is asked to perform TUG while subtracting 3 from a random number between 51-100; G-Walk instrumental gait assessment will be used
Time Frame
12 weeks and 3 months follow-up
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Counting: number of (correct) answers per second
Description
Patient is asked to subtract 3 from a random number between 51-100 while seated. This assessment is used as a reference value for TUG-DT and 10MWT-DT
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
Description
Scale evaluating various aspects of Parkinson's disease including non-motor and motor experiences of daily living and motor complications.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Freezing of Gait Questionnaire
Description
Subjective evaluation of freezing of gait
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Quantitative MRI metrics
Description
Volumetric parameters
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Quantitative MRI metrics
Description
Vascular white matter lesional volume
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Quantitative MRI metrics
Description
Resting functional connectivity
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT): T1 (Try) T2 T3 T4 T5 T1-5 Total score Interfence, Total score T6, Total score Delayed recall, Total score Recognition, Correct answers total score, False answers total score
Description
Assessing of auditory memory, memory capacity, ability to learn, delayed recall, recognition
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Phonemic Verbal Fluency FAS, letters: K, P, S Letter K, Total score Letter P, Total Score Letter S, Total score Letters K, P, S, Total score
Description
Assessing of executive functions - initation, maintenance, stop and end the activity
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Semantic Fluency, category: Animals, Total score
Description
Assessing of phatic functions.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Trail Making Test B (TMT B): Total score (in seconds), Number of errors
Description
Assessing of executive functions - cognitive flexibility.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Digit Span Forward, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, Total score Digit Span Forward, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, Total score
Description
Assessing of focused auditory attention.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Digit Span Backward, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, Total score
Description
Working memory capacity measurement.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Digit Symbol, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised, Total score
Description
Assessing of divided attention and working memory.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Grooved Pegboard, Left.
Description
Assessing of visual-motor coordination. The Grooved Pegboard is a manipulative dexterity test consisting of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
The Parkinson´s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)
Description
Self-assessment quality of life scale for patients with Parkinson's disease. Patient fills it at home.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Grooved Pegboard, Right.
Description
Assessing of visual-motor coordination. The Grooved Pegboard is a manipulative dexterity test consisting of 25 holes with randomly positioned slots. Pegs with a key along one side must be rotated to match the hole before they can be inserted.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up, 3 months follow-up
Title
Exploratory assessment of relationship between clinical effects of cognitive training and blood signature of polymorphisms in PD-related genes
Description
Custom genetic panel (SureSelect, Agilent) for mutational analysis of 177 genes (including APOE, MAPT, GBA LRRK2, etc.)
Time Frame
Baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: diagnosis of Parkinson´s disease (PD) PD duration ≥8 years mild cognitive impairment stable medication presence of freezing of gait according to the FoG-Q AND/OR Rapid Turns Test Exclusion Criteria: dementia deep brain stimulation, pump therapy with Duodopa or Apomorphine severe fluctuations with ON state duration for less than 2 hours dopa dysregulation syndrome impulse control disorder untreated depression benzodiazepines except for single dose at night non-compliance inability to walk without support significant co-morbidities likely to affect gait, e.g., acute illness, orthopedic disease, significant visual problems, or a clinical history of stroke involvement in other treatment trials not meeting inclusion criteria
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Evzen Ruzicka, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
General University Hospital, Prague
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
General University Hospital in Prague
City
Prague
ZIP/Postal Code
12821
Country
Czechia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24322063
Citation
Milman U, Atias H, Weiss A, Mirelman A, Hausdorff JM. Can cognitive remediation improve mobility in patients with Parkinson's disease? Findings from a 12 week pilot study. J Parkinsons Dis. 2014;4(1):37-44. doi: 10.3233/JPD-130321.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18058946
Citation
Yogev-Seligmann G, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. The role of executive function and attention in gait. Mov Disord. 2008 Feb 15;23(3):329-42; quiz 472. doi: 10.1002/mds.21720.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24132840
Citation
Amboni M, Barone P, Hausdorff JM. Cognitive contributions to gait and falls: evidence and implications. Mov Disord. 2013 Sep 15;28(11):1520-33. doi: 10.1002/mds.25674.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Keus SHJ MM, Graziano M, et al. European Physiotherapy Guideline for Parkinson´s Disease. the Netherlands: KNGF/ParkinsonNet,2014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24531294
Citation
Walton CC, Shine JM, Mowszowski L, Naismith SL, Lewis SJ. Freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: current treatments and the potential role for cognitive training. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32(3):411-22. doi: 10.3233/RNN-130370.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26381808
Citation
Peterson DS, King LA, Cohen RG, Horak FB. Cognitive Contributions to Freezing of Gait in Parkinson Disease: Implications for Physical Rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2016 May;96(5):659-70. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140603. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23328947
Citation
Heremans E, Nieuwboer A, Spildooren J, Vandenbossche J, Deroost N, Soetens E, Kerckhofs E, Vercruysse S. Cognitive aspects of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: a challenge for rehabilitation. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2013 Apr;120(4):543-57. doi: 10.1007/s00702-012-0964-y. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20445152
Citation
Schwenk M, Zieschang T, Oster P, Hauer K. Dual-task performances can be improved in patients with dementia: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2010 Jun 15;74(24):1961-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e39696. Epub 2010 May 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31539800
Citation
Bertoli M, Croce UD, Cereatti A, Mancini M. Objective measures to investigate turning impairments and freezing of gait in people with Parkinson's disease. Gait Posture. 2019 Oct;74:187-193. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26308937
Citation
King LA, Wilhelm J, Chen Y, Blehm R, Nutt J, Chen Z, Serdar A, Horak FB. Effects of Group, Individual, and Home Exercise in Persons With Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2015 Oct;39(4):204-12. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000101.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Effect of Cognitive Training on Gait in Parkinson's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs