search
Back to results

Effects of Catheter Ablation on Burden of Atrial Fibrillation (MRICEMAN) (MRICEMAN)

Primary Purpose

Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Finland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
catheter ablation
Sponsored by
Heikki Huikuri
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Atrial Fibrillation focused on measuring arrhythmias, quality of life

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation fulfilling the contemporary guideline criteria for AF ablation

Exclusion Criteria:

- Any contraindication to catheter ablation

Sites / Locations

  • UOulu
  • Heikki Huikuri

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

manual radiofrequency ablation

magnet navigation ablation

cryoablation

Arm Description

Radiofrequency catheter ablation using manual catheter manipulation will be used as an ablation technique.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation using remote magnet navigation will be used as an ablation technique.

Catheter ablation using cryoablation technique will be used as an ablation technique of atrial fibrillation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Free of atrial fibrillation
the proportion of patients remaining free from AF, atrial flutter (AFL) or atrial tachycardia (AT) (> 2 minutes) recorded by the implantable cardiac monitor (ICM, Reveal, Medtronic Co.) at 24 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Total AF burden
total AF burden recorded by the implantable loop recorder during the 24 month follow-up.
Incidence of adverse events
Safety is one of the secondary endpoints. The following potential adverse events will be monitored: Any previous left atrial ablation or surgery Any cardiac surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention within three months prior to enrolment. Secondary AF Stroke or transient ischemic attack within six months prior to enrolment Myocardial infarction within three months prior to enrolment Left ventricular ejection fraction < 40 % Anteroposterior left atrial diameter >55 mm by transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography Implanted prosthetic valve

Full Information

First Posted
December 9, 2015
Last Updated
December 24, 2015
Sponsor
Heikki Huikuri
Collaborators
University of Helsinki
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02639793
Brief Title
Effects of Catheter Ablation on Burden of Atrial Fibrillation (MRICEMAN)
Acronym
MRICEMAN
Official Title
A Nationwide Multicenter Trial Assessing the Effects of Catheter Ablation on Burden of Atrial Fibrillation Recorded by Implantable Cardiac Monitor
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
January 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Heikki Huikuri
Collaborators
University of Helsinki

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study will assess the atrial fibrillation burden recorded By implantable loop recorder at 12 and 24 months compared to baseline. The patients with clinical indication fo catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation will be randomized to three techniques: manual radiofrequency ablation, radiofrequency ablation using remote magnet monitoring, and cryoablation.
Detailed Description
A total of 300 patients will be randomized to three different catheter ablation techniques (100 patients/group); radiofrequency ablation using remote magnet navigation, radiofrequency ablation using manual method, and cryoablation. A loop recorder (REVEAL) is implanted one month before the catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and the effects of atrial fibrillation burden will be compared between the three methods at 12 and 24 months after ablation excluding the first three months´ blanking period. The primary endpoints are: the proportion of patients remaining free from atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia (> 2 minutes) recorded by the implantable cardiac monitor (Medtronic) at 24 months follow-up and total atrial fibrillation burden recorded by the loop recorder. Other endpoints: Atrial fibrillation burden in 7 days Holter recording at 12 and 24 months compared to baseline, the time to first documented symptomatic and asymptomatic recurrence of atrial fibrillation prescription of antiarrhythmic drugs after the 3 months blanking period following the ablation re-ablation after the index ablation procedure, total procedural duration; total time of fluoroscopy and radiation dose; number and duration of cardiovascular hospitalization; quality of life questionnaires at 12 months and 24 month compared with baseline, cognitive function at 12 and 24 month compared with baseline, cost-efficacy of the different ablation techniques.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Atrial Fibrillation
Keywords
arrhythmias, quality of life

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
300 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
manual radiofrequency ablation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Radiofrequency catheter ablation using manual catheter manipulation will be used as an ablation technique.
Arm Title
magnet navigation ablation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Radiofrequency catheter ablation using remote magnet navigation will be used as an ablation technique.
Arm Title
cryoablation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Catheter ablation using cryoablation technique will be used as an ablation technique of atrial fibrillation.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
catheter ablation
Intervention Description
Three different catheter ablation techniques will be used aimed at isolating the pulmonary veins from left atrium.The endpoint is defined as absence or dissociation of all pulmonary vein potentials as confirmed by the circular mapping catheter after a waiting period of 30 minutes after the last ablation. The use of adenosine or isoproterenol to detect concealed pulmonary vein conduction is voluntary.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Free of atrial fibrillation
Description
the proportion of patients remaining free from AF, atrial flutter (AFL) or atrial tachycardia (AT) (> 2 minutes) recorded by the implantable cardiac monitor (ICM, Reveal, Medtronic Co.) at 24 months.
Time Frame
24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Total AF burden
Description
total AF burden recorded by the implantable loop recorder during the 24 month follow-up.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Incidence of adverse events
Description
Safety is one of the secondary endpoints. The following potential adverse events will be monitored: Any previous left atrial ablation or surgery Any cardiac surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention within three months prior to enrolment. Secondary AF Stroke or transient ischemic attack within six months prior to enrolment Myocardial infarction within three months prior to enrolment Left ventricular ejection fraction < 40 % Anteroposterior left atrial diameter >55 mm by transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography Implanted prosthetic valve
Time Frame
24 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation fulfilling the contemporary guideline criteria for AF ablation Exclusion Criteria: - Any contraindication to catheter ablation
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Heikki Huikuri, Prof
Phone
+358400892330
Email
heikki.huikuri@oulu.fi
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Pekka Raatikainen, Prof
Phone
+35883154108
Email
pekka-raatikainen@hus.fi
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Heikki Huikuri, Prof
Organizational Affiliation
University of Oulu
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UOulu
City
Oulu
ZIP/Postal Code
90014
Country
Finland
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Heikki Huikuri, Prof
Phone
+35883155599
Email
heikki.huikuri@oulu.fi
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pekka Raatikainen, prof
Phone
+3588400892330
Email
pekka.raatikainen@hus.fi
Facility Name
Heikki Huikuri
City
Oulu
Country
Finland
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Heikki Huikuri, Prof
Phone
+35883154108
Email
heikki.huikuri@oiulu.fi

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Links:
URL
http://www.oulu.fi/yliopisto
Description
wep-page

Learn more about this trial

Effects of Catheter Ablation on Burden of Atrial Fibrillation (MRICEMAN)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs