search
Back to results

Effects of Early Sensory Reeducation Programs Using Mirror Therapy for Patients With Peripheral Nerve Injuries

Primary Purpose

Sensation Disorders, Motor Deficit, Rehabilitation

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Taiwan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Sensorimotor reeducation programs
Sponsored by
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Sensation Disorders

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • median or ulnar nerve injury,
  • a combination of nerve and tendon or vascular injury,
  • injury sites between the level of mid-palm and elbow, and
  • the protective sensation of the hand is lacking or impaired.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with deficits in cognition or language comprehension, as well as severe limitations in the range of motion of the upper limbs.

Sites / Locations

  • National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Early sensorimotor reeducation intervention

Traditional sensorimotor reeducation intervention

Arm Description

The experimental group received 15 minutes of touch-observation and task-based mirror therapy program, followed by 20 minutes of regular hand therapy and 20 minutes of physiotherapy in each treatment session before the returning of the touch of a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament marked 4.31. Once the patients had regained the protective sense (SWM < 4.31), the mirror therapy program was replaced with a discriminative sensory reeducation program. Treatment duration was 12 weeks, at a frequency of three sessions per week.

The control group received received 15 minutes traditional sensory reeducation program, 20 minutes of regular hand therapy and 20 minutes of physiotherapy in each treatment session before the returning of the touch of a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament marked 4.31. Once the patients had regained the protective sense (SWM < 4.31), the protective sensory reeducation program was replaced with a discriminative sensory reeducation program. Treatment duration was 12 weeks, at a frequency of three sessions per week.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change from baseline result of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) test at 12 weeks and 24 weeks
Change from baseline result of Purdue pegboard test at 12 weeks and 24 weeks
Change from baseline result of Minnesota manual dexterity test at 12 weeks and 24 weeks
Change from baseline result of Pinch-holding-up-activity (PHUA) test at 12 weeks and 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change from baseline result of Static two-point discrimination (S2PD) test at 12 weeks and 24 weeks

Full Information

First Posted
May 5, 2016
Last Updated
May 12, 2016
Sponsor
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02768857
Brief Title
Effects of Early Sensory Reeducation Programs Using Mirror Therapy for Patients With Peripheral Nerve Injuries
Official Title
A Touch-Observation and Task-based Mirror Therapy Protocol (MTPTOT) to Improve Sensorimotor Control and Functional Capability of Hands for Patients With Peripheral Nerve Injury
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study evaluated the effects of an integrated program of touch-observation and task-based mirror therapy on sensorimotor function in nerve injury patients. Before the return of protective sense (Value of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test > 4.31), half of the participants received 15 minutes of mirror therapy program, followed by 20 minutes of regular hand therapy and 20 minutes of physiotherapy.While the other half received 15 minutes protective sensory reeducation programs, 20 minutes of regular hand therapy and 20 minutes of physiotherapy in each treatment session. Once the patients had regained the protective sense (Value of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test < 4.31), the discriminative sensory reeducation program was started for the participants in both groups. The hypothesis was that using the mirror therapy for sensorimotor reeducation in the early phase after nerve repair would yield better results with regard to the returning of sensation, sensorimotor control ability and hand function than using a classical reeducation program alone.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sensation Disorders, Motor Deficit, Rehabilitation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
12 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Early sensorimotor reeducation intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The experimental group received 15 minutes of touch-observation and task-based mirror therapy program, followed by 20 minutes of regular hand therapy and 20 minutes of physiotherapy in each treatment session before the returning of the touch of a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament marked 4.31. Once the patients had regained the protective sense (SWM < 4.31), the mirror therapy program was replaced with a discriminative sensory reeducation program. Treatment duration was 12 weeks, at a frequency of three sessions per week.
Arm Title
Traditional sensorimotor reeducation intervention
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The control group received received 15 minutes traditional sensory reeducation program, 20 minutes of regular hand therapy and 20 minutes of physiotherapy in each treatment session before the returning of the touch of a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament marked 4.31. Once the patients had regained the protective sense (SWM < 4.31), the protective sensory reeducation program was replaced with a discriminative sensory reeducation program. Treatment duration was 12 weeks, at a frequency of three sessions per week.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Sensorimotor reeducation programs
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from baseline result of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) test at 12 weeks and 24 weeks
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks
Title
Change from baseline result of Purdue pegboard test at 12 weeks and 24 weeks
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks
Title
Change from baseline result of Minnesota manual dexterity test at 12 weeks and 24 weeks
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks
Title
Change from baseline result of Pinch-holding-up-activity (PHUA) test at 12 weeks and 24 weeks
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from baseline result of Static two-point discrimination (S2PD) test at 12 weeks and 24 weeks
Time Frame
baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: median or ulnar nerve injury, a combination of nerve and tendon or vascular injury, injury sites between the level of mid-palm and elbow, and the protective sensation of the hand is lacking or impaired. Exclusion Criteria: patients with deficits in cognition or language comprehension, as well as severe limitations in the range of motion of the upper limbs.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
City
Tainan
ZIP/Postal Code
704
Country
Taiwan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Effects of Early Sensory Reeducation Programs Using Mirror Therapy for Patients With Peripheral Nerve Injuries

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs