Evaluation of the Nonmotor Symptomatology of Parkinsonian Patients Treated With Two Strategies Related to Apomorphine Pump Therapy in French Hospitals (AGAPO)
Primary Purpose
Parkinson Disease
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Apomorphine
Dopaminergic Agonist + Apomorphine
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Parkinson Disease focused on measuring Parkinson, Nonmotor symptomatology
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged = or > 18 years,
- Idiopathic PD (According to British Brain Bank Criteria) without any other known or suspected cause of symptoms,
- Indicated for apomorphine pump therapy and according to the centers' practice, treatment with apomorphine pump association with dopamine agonists or apomorphine pump therapy alone
- Presence of fluctuations for > 3 years,
- Patients covered with social insurance.
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Neurological (other than Parkinson's disease) or severe psychiatric history (depression, schizophrenia, addiction, bipolar disorder, anxiety and depressive disorders);
- Severe neurocognitive disorders (DSM-V)
- History of use of apomorphine pump treatment or deep brain stimulation or lesional surgery for PD or intrajejunal L-Dopa;
- History or current drug or alcohol abuse or dependencies;
- History of impulse control disorders;
- Adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship or supervision), persons deprived of their liberty;
- Inability to understand the information given on the study, to express informed consent.
Sites / Locations
- CHU La Timone
- Hôpital Gui de ChauliacRecruiting
- CH CaremeauRecruiting
- CHU La Pitié SalpêtrièreRecruiting
- CHU de Reims- hôpital Maison BlancheRecruiting
- CHU de RennesRecruiting
- CHU Charles NicolleRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Other
Other
Arm Label
Apomorphine
Dopaminergic Agonist + Apomorphine
Arm Description
Withdrawal of dopaminergic agonists at pump initiation
Continuation of dopaminergic agonists at pump initiation
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Difference in the Non Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
The Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease, through 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular, sleep/fatigue, mood/cognition, perceptual problems/hallucinations, attention/memory, gastro-intestinal tract, urinary, sexual function, and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). Item scores are calculated as the product of severity and frequency; the total score is obtained by summing the item scores. The NMSS total score ranges from 0 to 360 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms (reduced score).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ39) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ-39): the 39-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) is a commonly used measure of self-appraisal in PD. It is a measure of health status and quality of life, by assessing difficulties in 8 dimensions of daily living: mobility (10 items), activities of daily living (6 items), emotional well-being (6 items), stigma (4 items), social support (3 items), cognition (4 items), communication (3 items) and bodily discomfort (3 items). The frequency of each event is determined by selecting one of 5 options: never (scored 0) / occasionally (scored 1) / sometimes (2) / often (3) / always (4). Each dimension total score range from 0 to 100, with lower scores reflecting better quality of life.
Change in the Neurologist Global Impression of change (CGI) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
The Change in the Neurologist (clinician) Global Impression of change (CGI) provides a brief, stand-alone assessment of the clinician's view of the patient's global functioning prior to and after initiating a study medication. It ranges from severely impaired to dramatically improved.
Change in non-motor aspects of experiences of daily living (MDS-UPDRS I) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part I include 13 items (6 semistructured interview items and 7 self-reported items) scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.
Change in apathy assessed on the long version of Lille Apathy Rating Scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up (LARS)
The Lille apathy rating scale (LARS) is a measure of apathy through nine domains (each corresponding to a clinical manifestation of apathy: everyday productivity, interests, taking the initiative, novelty seeking, motivation - Voluntary actions, emotional responses, concern, social life & self-awareness) and 33 queries. The interview is structured, with a precise scoring mode for each reply (-2 to 2); when an item does not apply to the patient or the reply cannot be classified, it is scored "0" (for non-applicable and/or non-classifiable) The scale's overall score ranges from -36 to +36, with highest scores reflecting apathy severity. 4 factorial sub-scores (intellectual curiosity, emotion, action initiation and self-awareness) are calculated from sub-scale scores.
Change in occurrence of anxiety (STAI-YA) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Present feelings
Change in occurrence of anxiety (STAI-YB) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
General feelings
Change in behavioral symptoms assessed by Ardouin Scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Changes from baseline in hyper and hypo dopaminergic symptoms scores will be assessed through the Ardouin Scale of Behavior in Parkinson's Disease (ASBPD). It is designed for assessing mood and behavior with a view to quantifying changes related to Parkinson's disease, to dopaminergic medication, and to non-motor fluctuations. Its 21 items address nonmotor symptoms and are grouped into four dimensions: general psychological assessment, apathy, nonmotor fluctuations and hyperdopaminergic behaviors, with a 5-point rating scale ranging from 0 (Absent) to 4 (Severe). A score ≥ 2 is considered as a warning sign.
Change in emotional function assessed by the short form of the TEIQue between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow upscale
The Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form (TEIQue-SF) aims at evaluating emotional intelligence through a self-report inventory that measure global trait emotional intelligence (trait EI) through a 30-item questionnaire. The trait EI is about perceptions and not about abilities, competencies or skills ; high scores are not necessarily adaptive (good) and low scores are not necessarily maladaptive (bad).
Change in emotional function assessed by the short form of the BEQ scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
The Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire (BEQ) is a self-report measure of three emotional expressivity facets related to emotional expressivity: expressivity of negative and positive emotions, and strength of expression impulse. Each of the 16 items is answered on a 7-point Likert-type ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The 3 facets can be kept as separate scores or combined to form an overall Emotional Expressivity score.
Change in motor aspects of experiences of daily in "on" and "off" medication (MDS-UPDRS II) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part II include 13 self-reported items) scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.
Change in motor examination during "on" periods (MDS-UPDRS III) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part III include 18 items scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.
Change in motor complications with MDS-UPDRS IV between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part IV include 6 items assessed in a semistructured interview, scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.
Change in motor examination with the Schwab and England scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
The Schwab & England activities of daily living evaluates patients' autonomy through a percentage ranging from 0% (=Vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowel functions are not functioning. Bedridden.) to 100% ( = Completely independent. Able to do all chores without slowness, difficulty or impairment. Essentially normal).
Unaware of any difficulty.
Change in motor examination with the Hoehn & Yarr scale
The severity of PD is assessed through the Modified Hoehn & Yahr rating scale, consisting of 10levels comprised between 0 (best), 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5 (worst).
Change in cognitive function assessed by the MoCA scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a short tool (one-page 30-point test administered in approximately 10 minutes) to evaluate a multitude of cognitive domains (visuospatial / executive functioning, object naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, orientation). MoCA scores range between 0 and 30; a score ≥ 26 is considered to be normal.
Change of dose for treatments assessed by levodopa (L-DOPA) équivalents between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Frequency, type and severity of therapy-related adverse events
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03693872
First Posted
October 1, 2018
Last Updated
July 2, 2021
Sponsor
Rennes University Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03693872
Brief Title
Evaluation of the Nonmotor Symptomatology of Parkinsonian Patients Treated With Two Strategies Related to Apomorphine Pump Therapy in French Hospitals
Acronym
AGAPO
Official Title
Evaluation of the Nonmotor Symptomatology of Parkinsonian Patients Treated With Two Strategies Related to Apomorphine Pump Therapy in French Hospitals
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
May 15, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 15, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 15, 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Rennes University Hospital
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
There is currently no consensus on the adequate concomitant treatment to apomorphine pump in Parkinson's disease (PD). In practice, some centers withdraw all dopaminergic agonists when initiating apomorphine pump therapy, whereas others combine the two. To date, there has been no study led to determine the best strategy for efficiently treating motor and nonmotor symptoms, as well as improving patients' quality of life (QoL). This preliminary study, entitled AGAPO, aims at identifying significant differences in patients' evolution (nonmotor symptoms and quality of life), over a course of 6 months, depending on the two strategies adopted in French centers (apomorphine pump with or without dopaminergic agonists), through the Non Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS, Chaudhuri et al, 2017).
Detailed Description
The recruitment period will be 24 months. The duration of the study will be 6 months for each patient due to adjustments of apomorphine pump parameters and oral medication as well time needed for motor and nonmotor changes to develop and influence QoL.
This study will be done without any modification of the planned treatment plan for each patient included. The treatments are administered in accordance with their marketing authorization and according to the usual practices of each center. No additional visits are expected.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson Disease
Keywords
Parkinson, Nonmotor symptomatology
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Interventional to minimal risks and constraints, non randomized, open
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
open
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
42 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Apomorphine
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Withdrawal of dopaminergic agonists at pump initiation
Arm Title
Dopaminergic Agonist + Apomorphine
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Continuation of dopaminergic agonists at pump initiation
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Apomorphine
Other Intervention Name(s)
APO
Intervention Description
Apomorphine (5 mg/ml), supplied as solution for infusion in a 10 ml glass ampoule Hourly flow rate adjusted during the whole duration of the study to obtain the best effect in each patient
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dopaminergic Agonist + Apomorphine
Other Intervention Name(s)
AGAPO
Intervention Description
Apomorphine (5 mg/ml), supplied as solution for infusion in a 10 ml glass ampoule Hourly flow rate adjusted during the whole duration of the study to obtain the best effect in each patient and associated with dopaminergic agonists
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference in the Non Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Description
The Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) measures the frequency and severity of a range of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's Disease, through 30 questions grouped into 9 domains: cardiovascular, sleep/fatigue, mood/cognition, perceptual problems/hallucinations, attention/memory, gastro-intestinal tract, urinary, sexual function, and miscellaneous (pain, taste/smell, weight change, excessive sweating). Severity is rated on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Frequency is rated on a scale from 1 (rarely) to 4 (very frequent). Item scores are calculated as the product of severity and frequency; the total score is obtained by summing the item scores. The NMSS total score ranges from 0 to 360 with a lower score indicating fewer symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in symptoms (reduced score).
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ39) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Description
Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ-39): the 39-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) is a commonly used measure of self-appraisal in PD. It is a measure of health status and quality of life, by assessing difficulties in 8 dimensions of daily living: mobility (10 items), activities of daily living (6 items), emotional well-being (6 items), stigma (4 items), social support (3 items), cognition (4 items), communication (3 items) and bodily discomfort (3 items). The frequency of each event is determined by selecting one of 5 options: never (scored 0) / occasionally (scored 1) / sometimes (2) / often (3) / always (4). Each dimension total score range from 0 to 100, with lower scores reflecting better quality of life.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in the Neurologist Global Impression of change (CGI) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Description
The Change in the Neurologist (clinician) Global Impression of change (CGI) provides a brief, stand-alone assessment of the clinician's view of the patient's global functioning prior to and after initiating a study medication. It ranges from severely impaired to dramatically improved.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in non-motor aspects of experiences of daily living (MDS-UPDRS I) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Description
The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part I include 13 items (6 semistructured interview items and 7 self-reported items) scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in apathy assessed on the long version of Lille Apathy Rating Scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up (LARS)
Description
The Lille apathy rating scale (LARS) is a measure of apathy through nine domains (each corresponding to a clinical manifestation of apathy: everyday productivity, interests, taking the initiative, novelty seeking, motivation - Voluntary actions, emotional responses, concern, social life & self-awareness) and 33 queries. The interview is structured, with a precise scoring mode for each reply (-2 to 2); when an item does not apply to the patient or the reply cannot be classified, it is scored "0" (for non-applicable and/or non-classifiable) The scale's overall score ranges from -36 to +36, with highest scores reflecting apathy severity. 4 factorial sub-scores (intellectual curiosity, emotion, action initiation and self-awareness) are calculated from sub-scale scores.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in occurrence of anxiety (STAI-YA) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Description
Present feelings
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in occurrence of anxiety (STAI-YB) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Description
General feelings
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in behavioral symptoms assessed by Ardouin Scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Description
Changes from baseline in hyper and hypo dopaminergic symptoms scores will be assessed through the Ardouin Scale of Behavior in Parkinson's Disease (ASBPD). It is designed for assessing mood and behavior with a view to quantifying changes related to Parkinson's disease, to dopaminergic medication, and to non-motor fluctuations. Its 21 items address nonmotor symptoms and are grouped into four dimensions: general psychological assessment, apathy, nonmotor fluctuations and hyperdopaminergic behaviors, with a 5-point rating scale ranging from 0 (Absent) to 4 (Severe). A score ≥ 2 is considered as a warning sign.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in emotional function assessed by the short form of the TEIQue between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow upscale
Description
The Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form (TEIQue-SF) aims at evaluating emotional intelligence through a self-report inventory that measure global trait emotional intelligence (trait EI) through a 30-item questionnaire. The trait EI is about perceptions and not about abilities, competencies or skills ; high scores are not necessarily adaptive (good) and low scores are not necessarily maladaptive (bad).
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in emotional function assessed by the short form of the BEQ scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Description
The Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire (BEQ) is a self-report measure of three emotional expressivity facets related to emotional expressivity: expressivity of negative and positive emotions, and strength of expression impulse. Each of the 16 items is answered on a 7-point Likert-type ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The 3 facets can be kept as separate scores or combined to form an overall Emotional Expressivity score.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in motor aspects of experiences of daily in "on" and "off" medication (MDS-UPDRS II) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Description
The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part II include 13 self-reported items) scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in motor examination during "on" periods (MDS-UPDRS III) between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Description
The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part III include 18 items scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in motor complications with MDS-UPDRS IV between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Description
The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is the standard validated tool for the assessment of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). This combined scale includes subsections collecting data regarding: nonmotor experiences of daily living (part I), their motor experiences of daily living (part II) an examination of the motor features of PD (part III), and motor complications arising from the use of dopamine replacement (part IV). The Part IV include 6 items assessed in a semistructured interview, scored on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Higher scores reflect worse condition.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in motor examination with the Schwab and England scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Description
The Schwab & England activities of daily living evaluates patients' autonomy through a percentage ranging from 0% (=Vegetative functions such as swallowing, bladder and bowel functions are not functioning. Bedridden.) to 100% ( = Completely independent. Able to do all chores without slowness, difficulty or impairment. Essentially normal).
Unaware of any difficulty.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in motor examination with the Hoehn & Yarr scale
Description
The severity of PD is assessed through the Modified Hoehn & Yahr rating scale, consisting of 10levels comprised between 0 (best), 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5 (worst).
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in cognitive function assessed by the MoCA scale between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Description
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a short tool (one-page 30-point test administered in approximately 10 minutes) to evaluate a multitude of cognitive domains (visuospatial / executive functioning, object naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, orientation). MoCA scores range between 0 and 30; a score ≥ 26 is considered to be normal.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change of dose for treatments assessed by levodopa (L-DOPA) équivalents between the Baseline assessment and the assessment at 6 months' follow up
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Frequency, type and severity of therapy-related adverse events
Time Frame
6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults aged = or > 18 years,
Idiopathic PD (According to British Brain Bank Criteria) without any other known or suspected cause of symptoms,
Indicated for apomorphine pump therapy and according to the centers' practice, treatment with apomorphine pump association with dopamine agonists or apomorphine pump therapy alone
Presence of fluctuations for > 3 years,
Patients covered with social insurance.
Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Neurological (other than Parkinson's disease) or severe psychiatric history (depression, schizophrenia, addiction, bipolar disorder, anxiety and depressive disorders);
Severe neurocognitive disorders (DSM-V)
History of use of apomorphine pump treatment or deep brain stimulation or lesional surgery for PD or intrajejunal L-Dopa;
History or current drug or alcohol abuse or dependencies;
History of impulse control disorders;
Adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship or supervision), persons deprived of their liberty;
Inability to understand the information given on the study, to express informed consent.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Marc VERIN, PH
Phone
299289842
Ext
+33
Email
marc.verin@chu-rennes.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Manon Auffret
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marc VERIN, PH
Organizational Affiliation
Rennes University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CHU La Timone
City
Marseille
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alexandre EUSEBIO, PH
Email
alexandre.eusebio@ap-hm.fr
Facility Name
Hôpital Gui de Chauliac
City
Montpellier
ZIP/Postal Code
34295
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christian GENY, MD
Email
c-geny@chu-montpellier.fr
Facility Name
CH Caremeau
City
Nîmes
ZIP/Postal Code
30029
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Giovanni CASTELNOVO, MD
Email
giovanni.castelnovo@chu-nimes.fr
Facility Name
CHU La Pitié Salpêtrière
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75013
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emmanuel FLAMAND ROZE, PH
Email
emmanuel.flamand-roze@aphp.fr
Facility Name
CHU de Reims- hôpital Maison Blanche
City
Reims
ZIP/Postal Code
51100
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne DOE DE MAINDREVILLE, MD
Email
adoedemaindreville@chu-reims.fr
Facility Name
CHU de Rennes
City
Rennes
ZIP/Postal Code
35033
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marc VERIN, PH
Email
marc.verin@chu-rennes.fr
Facility Name
CHU Charles Nicolle
City
Rouen
ZIP/Postal Code
76000
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David MALTETE, PH
Email
david.maltete@chu-rouen.fr
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Evaluation of the Nonmotor Symptomatology of Parkinsonian Patients Treated With Two Strategies Related to Apomorphine Pump Therapy in French Hospitals
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs