search
Back to results

First Line Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Treatment (RAAFT-3) (RAAFT-3)

Primary Purpose

Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Anti Arrhythmics
Pulmonary Vein Isolation performed by Radio Frequency Catheter Ablation
Sponsored by
University of Pennsylvania
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Atrial Fibrillation focused on measuring Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Eligible patients have a history of persistent AF with at least 2 episodes in the 9 months prior to enrollment. Persistent AF is defined according to 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines as continuous AF that is sustained for more than 7 days.Patients are enrolled if they are:

  1. Older than 18.
  2. Symptomatic with persistent AF.
  3. Experienced at least one AF episode that was documented by surface ECG, 6 months before randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Documented LVEF <40%.
  2. Documented left atrial diameter >/=6cm.
  3. Moderate to severe LVH (LV wall thickness >1.5cm).
  4. Documented severe valvular disease (aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation or presence of mechanical cardiac valves), active coronary artery disease (defined as the presence of >70% stenosis of coronary arteries or documentation of active myocardial ischemia), recent (within 6 months) CABG.
  5. Untreated hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism. Patients who are euthyroid on thyroid hormone replacement therapy are acceptable.
  6. Contraindication for the use of all antiarrhythmic drugs including sotalol, dofetilide, amiodarone and 1C antiarrhythmic drugs (liver enzymes and serum creatinine that are outside the upper normal lab values, e.g. > 3 times ULN with 2 abnormal lab values). [Note: Participants will not be excluded if they are able to take any single or combination of drugs without contraindications]
  7. Previous left heart ablation procedure, either by surgery or by percutaneous catheter, for atrial fibrillation.
  8. Current enrollment in another investigational drug or device study.
  9. Presence of any other condition that the investigator feels would be problematic or would restrict or limit the participation of the Patient for the entire study period.
  10. Absolute contra-indication to the use of heparin and or oral anticoagulation.
  11. Increase risk of bleeding, current peptic ulceration, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, history of severe systemic bleeding, or other history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.
  12. Severe pulmonary disease e.g. restrictive pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive disease (COPD).
  13. Documented intra-atrial thrombus, tumor, or another abnormality, which precludes left atrial catheter ablation.
  14. Previous use of an antiarrhythmic drug, including amiodarone, propafenone, flecainide, sotalol, quinidine, dofetilide, dronedarone (see below for specifications: Antiarrhythmic Drug Group).
  15. Women with a positive pregnancy test.
  16. Evidence of active cardiac or systemic infection.
  17. Medical condition limiting expected survival to less than one year.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Arizona
  • Montefiore Medical Center
  • MetroHealth
  • Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
  • University of Pennsylvania

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Antiarrhythmic Medications

Radio Frequency Catheter Ablation

Arm Description

Patients randomized to the antiarrhythmic drug group are administered medications approved for treatment of AF by the regulatory bodies of each participating country. The selection of antiarrhythmic drugs and dosages is left to the discretion of the investigator, and will follow the AHA/ACC/HRS general guidelines

Patients randomized to radiofrequency catheter ablation will undergo isolation of the pulmonary veins with confirmation of entrance block into each vein. The CARTO TM(Biosense Webster, CA) system will be used to reconstruct the atrial geometry and assist for mapping and ablation. Ablation will be performed using approved ablation devices (Biosense Webster, CA).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Recurrence of symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation
Recurrence (post 90- day blanking period) of symptomatic or asymptomatic AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting more than 30 seconds documented by the pre-defined ECG monitoring is the primary efficacy outcome. Any episodes occurring during the 90-day blanking period are not considered as recurrences

Secondary Outcome Measures

Time to AF recurrence
Time to first documented recurrence of AF, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia episodes
Repeat Episodes of AF
Repeated episodes (≥2) of symptomatic or asymptomatic AF, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia episodes
AF/AT Burden
Cumulative AF/AT burden (defined as percentage of time in AF/AT during follow-up)
CV Hospitalizations
Hospitalization for cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes during follow-up
Quality of Life Questionnaire
Quality of life at the 1-year follow-up by SF-36

Full Information

First Posted
July 25, 2019
Last Updated
October 17, 2023
Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Collaborators
Biosense Webster, Inc., Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04037397
Brief Title
First Line Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Treatment (RAAFT-3)
Acronym
RAAFT-3
Official Title
First Line Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Treatment
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
September 24, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 1, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Collaborators
Biosense Webster, Inc., Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if catheter-based atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is superior to treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs as a first-line therapy for symptomatic persistent AF.
Detailed Description
The burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) on Western countries healthcare systems is steadily increasing, with over 2 million Americans and 4 million Europeans affected by this condition. It is by far the most common sustained arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice, with a striking impact on morbidity and mortality. Achieving a definite cure is highly desirable, as this would have profound social and economic implication. In patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF, multiple clinical trials have established the superiority of catheter ablation over further antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy for the long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm, to improve quality of life, and reduce hospitalizations. Recent randomized controlled trials have also demonstrated a beneficial role of catheter ablation as a first-line therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF, with significantly better arrhythmia control and improved quality of life compared to AAD therapy. Patients with symptomatic persistent AF represent a more challenging group to treat, given the overall lower success rate of catheter ablation procedures in this group of patients. Pharmacologic rhythm-control strategies are also less effective in persistent AF, with a substantially increased economic burden given the repeat admissions for electrical cardioversions and AAD initiation/titration. In patients with symptomatic persistent AF who have already failed AADs, catheter ablation has been shown superior to further AAD therapy for sinus rhythm restoration in a recent randomized controlled trial. However, the value of an upstream adoption of catheter ablation for the treatment of symptomatic persistent AF (i.e., before a trial with AADs) is unknown. The purpose of the third Radiofrequency Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation Treatment (RAAFT-3) trial is to determine whether catheter ablation is superior to AAD as a first-line therapy in patients with persistent AF who had not been exposed to antiarrhythmic treatment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Atrial Fibrillation
Keywords
Pulmonary Vein Isolation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
120 patients will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion (80 in the RFCA arm; 40 in the AADs arm)
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
120 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Antiarrhythmic Medications
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients randomized to the antiarrhythmic drug group are administered medications approved for treatment of AF by the regulatory bodies of each participating country. The selection of antiarrhythmic drugs and dosages is left to the discretion of the investigator, and will follow the AHA/ACC/HRS general guidelines
Arm Title
Radio Frequency Catheter Ablation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients randomized to radiofrequency catheter ablation will undergo isolation of the pulmonary veins with confirmation of entrance block into each vein. The CARTO TM(Biosense Webster, CA) system will be used to reconstruct the atrial geometry and assist for mapping and ablation. Ablation will be performed using approved ablation devices (Biosense Webster, CA).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Anti Arrhythmics
Intervention Description
Propafenone or Flecanide or Sotalol or Dofetilide or Dronedarone or Amiodarone. The subject must first fail a Class 1C or III drug prior to starting Amiodarone
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Pulmonary Vein Isolation performed by Radio Frequency Catheter Ablation
Intervention Description
Approved Biosense Webster Inc. catheter devices should be used to perform RFCA. Ablation will be done to achieve entrance block into all pulmonary veins
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recurrence of symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation
Description
Recurrence (post 90- day blanking period) of symptomatic or asymptomatic AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting more than 30 seconds documented by the pre-defined ECG monitoring is the primary efficacy outcome. Any episodes occurring during the 90-day blanking period are not considered as recurrences
Time Frame
18 Months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to AF recurrence
Description
Time to first documented recurrence of AF, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia episodes
Time Frame
18 Months
Title
Repeat Episodes of AF
Description
Repeated episodes (≥2) of symptomatic or asymptomatic AF, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia episodes
Time Frame
18 Months
Title
AF/AT Burden
Description
Cumulative AF/AT burden (defined as percentage of time in AF/AT during follow-up)
Time Frame
18 Months
Title
CV Hospitalizations
Description
Hospitalization for cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes during follow-up
Time Frame
18 Months
Title
Quality of Life Questionnaire
Description
Quality of life at the 1-year follow-up by SF-36
Time Frame
18 Months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Eligible patients have a history of persistent AF with at least 2 episodes in the 9 months prior to enrollment. Persistent AF is defined according to 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines as continuous AF that is sustained for more than 7 days.Patients are enrolled if they are: Older than 18. Symptomatic with persistent AF. Experienced at least one AF episode that was documented by surface ECG, 6 months before randomization. Exclusion Criteria: Documented LVEF <40%. Documented left atrial diameter >/=6cm. Moderate to severe LVH (LV wall thickness >1.5cm). Documented severe valvular disease (aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation or presence of mechanical cardiac valves), active coronary artery disease (defined as the presence of >70% stenosis of coronary arteries or documentation of active myocardial ischemia), recent (within 6 months) CABG. Untreated hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism. Patients who are euthyroid on thyroid hormone replacement therapy are acceptable. Contraindication for the use of all antiarrhythmic drugs including sotalol, dofetilide, amiodarone and 1C antiarrhythmic drugs (liver enzymes and serum creatinine that are outside the upper normal lab values, e.g. > 3 times ULN with 2 abnormal lab values). [Note: Participants will not be excluded if they are able to take any single or combination of drugs without contraindications] Previous left heart ablation procedure, either by surgery or by percutaneous catheter, for atrial fibrillation. Current enrollment in another investigational drug or device study. Presence of any other condition that the investigator feels would be problematic or would restrict or limit the participation of the Patient for the entire study period. Absolute contra-indication to the use of heparin and or oral anticoagulation. Increase risk of bleeding, current peptic ulceration, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, history of severe systemic bleeding, or other history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy. Severe pulmonary disease e.g. restrictive pulmonary disease, chronic obstructive disease (COPD). Documented intra-atrial thrombus, tumor, or another abnormality, which precludes left atrial catheter ablation. Previous use of an antiarrhythmic drug, including amiodarone, propafenone, flecainide, sotalol, quinidine, dofetilide, dronedarone (see below for specifications: Antiarrhythmic Drug Group). Women with a positive pregnancy test. Evidence of active cardiac or systemic infection. Medical condition limiting expected survival to less than one year.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andrea Natale, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Arizona
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
84724
Country
United States
Facility Name
Montefiore Medical Center
City
Bronx
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10461
Country
United States
Facility Name
MetroHealth
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16818816
Citation
Miyasaka Y, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Cha SS, Bailey KR, Abhayaratna WP, Seward JB, Tsang TS. Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence. Circulation. 2006 Jul 11;114(2):119-25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595140. Epub 2006 Jul 3. Erratum In: Circulation. 2006 Sep 12;114(11):e498.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11343485
Citation
Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, Singer DE. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001 May 9;285(18):2370-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2370.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14569181
Citation
Friberg J, Buch P, Scharling H, Gadsbphioll N, Jensen GB. Rising rates of hospital admissions for atrial fibrillation. Epidemiology. 2003 Nov;14(6):666-72. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000091649.26364.c0.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Bialy D, Lehmann H, Schumacher DN, Steinman RT, Meissner MD. Hospitalization for arrhythmias in the United States: importance of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:41A
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20103757
Citation
Wilber DJ, Pappone C, Neuzil P, De Paola A, Marchlinski F, Natale A, Macle L, Daoud EG, Calkins H, Hall B, Reddy V, Augello G, Reynolds MR, Vinekar C, Liu CY, Berry SM, Berry DA; ThermoCool AF Trial Investigators. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 Jan 27;303(4):333-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.2029.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19029470
Citation
Jais P, Cauchemez B, Macle L, Daoud E, Khairy P, Subbiah R, Hocini M, Extramiana F, Sacher F, Bordachar P, Klein G, Weerasooriya R, Clementy J, Haissaguerre M. Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: the A4 study. Circulation. 2008 Dec 9;118(24):2498-505. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.772582. Epub 2008 Nov 24. Erratum In: Circulation. 2009 Sep 8;120(10):e83.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15928285
Citation
Wazni OM, Marrouche NF, Martin DO, Verma A, Bhargava M, Saliba W, Bash D, Schweikert R, Brachmann J, Gunther J, Gutleben K, Pisano E, Potenza D, Fanelli R, Raviele A, Themistoclakis S, Rossillo A, Bonso A, Natale A. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2634-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2634.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24549549
Citation
Morillo CA, Verma A, Connolly SJ, Kuck KH, Nair GM, Champagne J, Sterns LD, Beresh H, Healey JS, Natale A; RAAFT-2 Investigators. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (RAAFT-2): a randomized trial. JAMA. 2014 Feb 19;311(7):692-700. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.467. Erratum In: JAMA. 2014 Jun 11;311(22):2337. JAMA. 2021 Jul 27;326(4):360.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25140019
Citation
Santangeli P, Di Biase L, Natale A. Ablation versus drugs: what is the best first-line therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation? Antiarrhythmic drugs are outmoded and catheter ablation should be the first-line option for all patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: pro. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Aug;7(4):739-46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000629. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25946280
Citation
Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, Macle L, Morillo CA, Haverkamp W, Weerasooriya R, Albenque JP, Nardi S, Menardi E, Novak P, Sanders P; STAR AF II Investigators. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 7;372(19):1812-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408288.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19808490
Citation
Calkins H, Reynolds MR, Spector P, Sondhi M, Xu Y, Martin A, Williams CJ, Sledge I. Treatment of atrial fibrillation with antiarrhythmic drugs or radiofrequency ablation: two systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009 Aug;2(4):349-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.824789. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10215558
Citation
Catherwood E, Fitzpatrick WD, Greenberg ML, Holzberger PT, Malenka DJ, Gerling BR, Birkmeyer JD. Cost-effectiveness of cardioversion and antiarrhythmic therapy in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Apr 20;130(8):625-36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-8-199904200-00002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24135832
Citation
Mont L, Bisbal F, Hernandez-Madrid A, Perez-Castellano N, Vinolas X, Arenal A, Arribas F, Fernandez-Lozano I, Bodegas A, Cobos A, Matia R, Perez-Villacastin J, Guerra JM, Avila P, Lopez-Gil M, Castro V, Arana JI, Brugada J; SARA investigators. Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial (SARA study). Eur Heart J. 2014 Feb;35(8):501-7. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht457. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24685669
Citation
January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Murray KT, Sacco RL, Stevenson WG, Tchou PJ, Tracy CM, Yancy CW; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):e1-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Mar 28. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):2305-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22386883
Citation
Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, Brugada J, Camm AJ, Chen SA, Crijns HJ, Damiano RJ Jr, Davies DW, DiMarco J, Edgerton J, Ellenbogen K, Ezekowitz MD, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Hindricks G, Iesaka Y, Jackman W, Jalife J, Jais P, Kalman J, Keane D, Kim YH, Kirchhof P, Klein G, Kottkamp H, Kumagai K, Lindsay BD, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, McCarthy PM, Mont JL, Morady F, Nademanee K, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Packer DL, Pappone C, Prystowsky E, Raviele A, Reddy V, Ruskin JN, Shemin RJ, Tsao HM, Wilber D; Heart Rhythm Society Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Apr;9(4):632-696.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.12.016. Epub 2012 Mar 1. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26211828
Citation
Macle L, Khairy P, Weerasooriya R, Novak P, Verma A, Willems S, Arentz T, Deisenhofer I, Veenhuyzen G, Scavee C, Jais P, Puererfellner H, Levesque S, Andrade JG, Rivard L, Guerra PG, Dubuc M, Thibault B, Talajic M, Roy D, Nattel S; ADVICE trial investigators. Adenosine-guided pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an international, multicentre, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2015 Aug 15;386(9994):672-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60026-5. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23207492
Citation
Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Natale A. How to ablate long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2013 Jan;28(1):26-35. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32835b59bb.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

First Line Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Treatment (RAAFT-3)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs