search
Back to results

Fluid Resuscitation Optimization in Surgical Trauma Patients (FROST) (FROST)

Primary Purpose

Critical Illness, Trauma

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
FloTrac™ and EV1000™
Sponsored by
CAMC Health System
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Critical Illness focused on measuring Trauma, Minimally Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring, Perioperative, Complications, Hemodynamics, Operative procedures

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18 years of age or older
  2. Injury Severity Score > 15 (indicator of anticipated trauma mortality)
  3. Admission to Surgical-Trauma ICU (STICU)
  4. Anticipated surgery within 72 hours of admission
  5. American Society of Anesthesiology patient classification status (ASA) 2-5
  6. Lactic acid > 2.5 within 24 hours of surgical procedure or Base deficit ≥ - 5 mmol/L, or persistent requirement for vasopressor support within 24 hours of surgical procedure
  7. Patient requires mechanical ventilation prior to consenting surgery
  8. Vascular devices that include a minimum of an arterial line
  9. Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring initiated prior to first surgical procedure unless patient is taken emergently, e.g. OR from trauma bay
  10. Patients requiring emergent initial operative procedures will be eligible for consenting if above criteria are met prior to their second surgical procedure
  11. Anticipated operative procedure precipitating evaluation and/or consenting for study must be > 30 minutes in duration

    • Procedures < 30 minutes would not result in significant metabolic stress necessitating a continuation of MIHM

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy
  2. Exclusions due to limitations with respect to accuracy of MIHM:

    • Patients not intubated prior to surgical procedure
    • Patients requiring an open thoracotomy
    • Patients with known history of surgical intervention for peripheral vascular disease
    • Patients with pre-existing atrial arrhythmias
    • Patients who are on cardiopulmonary bypass
  3. Isolated acute cerebral injury and/or traumatic cerebral injury

    • Hemodynamic management in this patient population does not always follow typical/standard endpoints due to nuances of managing intracranial pressures
  4. Cardiac arrest prior to enrollment
  5. Patients with pre-existing, dialysis dependent, renal failure upon admission

    • Hemodynamic management in this patient population does not always follow typical/standard endpoints due to nuances of managing renal failure
  6. Patients with pre-existing cirrhosis

    • Hepatic failure results in abnormal clearance of lactic acid
  7. Patients with no survival injuries, e.g. gunshot wound to the head

Sites / Locations

  • Charleston Area Medical Center, General HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

FloTrac™ and EV1000™ pre and post-operatively

FloTrac™ and EV1000™ peri-operatively

Arm Description

Cardiovascular management guided by minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring via FloTrac™ and EV1000™ will be utilized in the pre and post-operative period in the control arm.

Cardiovascular management guided by minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring via FloTrac™ and EV1000™ will be utilized in the perioperative period for the intervention arm

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Complications
The aim of this study is to determine if the incidence of post-operative complications will decreased with the implementation of intra-operative, minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring via FloTrac™ and EV1000™ in trauma patients.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Impact of Intervention
To evaluate the impact of continuing intra-operative minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring via FloTrac™ and EV1000™ : Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay in days Duration of post-operative vasopressor requirements in days
Impact of Intervention
To evaluate the impact of continuing intra-operative minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring via FloTrac™ and EV1000™ : -ICU and hospital mortality rate
Lactic acid and Base deficit changes
To compare the change in lactic acid and base deficit from the pre to post-operative period (most recent value within 24 hours pre and post-surgery). Both lactic acid and base deficit values will be recorded in mmoL/L.
APACHE II
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score between study cohorts. These scores will be recorded in whole numbers.
SOFA scores
Sepsis-related Organ Failure (SOFA) score between study cohorts. These scores will be recorded in whole numbers.
Changes in pre and post-operative lactic acid and base deficit
To compare changes in pre and post-operative lactic acid and based deficit between cohorts based on duration of surgical interventions. Both lactic acid and base deficit values will be recorded in mmoL/L.
Changes in pre and post-operative APACHE II score
To compare changes in pre and post-operative APACHE II scores between cohorts based on duration of surgical interventions. This score will be recorded in whole numbers.

Full Information

First Posted
February 10, 2016
Last Updated
April 14, 2016
Sponsor
CAMC Health System
Collaborators
Edwards Lifesciences
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02742974
Brief Title
Fluid Resuscitation Optimization in Surgical Trauma Patients (FROST)
Acronym
FROST
Official Title
Fluid Resuscitation Optimization in Surgical Trauma Patients (FROST)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
December 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2019 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
CAMC Health System
Collaborators
Edwards Lifesciences

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to determine if the incidence of post-operative complications can be decreased by the implementation of intra-operative, minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring (MIHM) via FloTrac™ and EV1000™ in trauma patients.
Detailed Description
Numerous factors are known to contribute to post-traumatic morbidity and mortality. Acute blood loss, hypovolemia, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome can often develop following severe traumatic injury and are, frequently, further exacerbated by the presence of pre-existing health conditions. The culmination of these insults and/or pre-existing conditions can precipitate an imbalance in oxygen delivery and consumption leading to tissue ischemia and resultant organ dysfunction. Tissue ischemia precipitates a disruption in the balance of oxygen delivery and consumption often yielding a conversion from aerobic to anaerobic processes in order to maintain metabolic functionality. The conversion to anaerobic processes leads to the production of lactic acid and a resulting consumption of the body's basic buffers. Clinically, the consumption of the body's basic buffers is frequently referred to as the development of a base deficit. Both the production of lactic acid and the development of a base deficit have been positively linked to the increased morbidity and mortality in multiple critically ill patient populations, including those with traumatic injuries. Multiple studies have linked the rate at which base deficit corrects or lactic acid clears to the likelihood of survival. Accordingly, hemodynamic monitoring can provide vital information concerning cardiovascular function including vascular volume, vascular capacitance, and cardiac performance. Obtaining this information enables clinicians to tailor interventions to target specific components of the cardiovascular system in order to most effectively reverse the cause of tissue hypoxia, elevation in lactic acid, and base deficit, while simultaneously decreasing the likelihood of causing harm through unnecessary or unwarranted changes in management. Advancements in hemodynamic monitoring technology now allow clinicians to obtain data by using minimally invasive techniques. Devices utilizing this technology can be connected to vascular access routinely utilized in the intensive care setting such as arterial lines. These devices provide parameters such as systolic pressure variation (SPV), pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) to predict fluid responsiveness of critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. Studies evaluating these parameters have shown them to have a 84-94% positive predictive value for fluid responsiveness. In addition, higher variability in studied parameters were indicative of patients who were more likely to be responsive to fluid challenges. Modern clinical management in critically ill patients with cardiovascular dysfunction hinges on reversal of the underlying cause of cardiovascular dysfunction. Recent management strategies have used a multi-faceted approach in which multiple processes of potential dysfunction can be monitored and managed simultaneously. Management is goal directed with clearly defined endpoints for the management of vascular volume, cardiac performance as well as maintenance of vascular capacitance. Hemodynamic monitoring technology is essential in providing data that will allow clinical interventions to be tailored to patient-specific physiology and provide goals for titration of therapy. In recent years, data has emerged using goal directed therapy in the surgical patient population with favorable outcomes suggesting a decrease in post-operative organ dysfunction, ICU and hospital length of stay, however, there is limited data in the trauma patient population. This study endeavors to determine if the implementation of intra-operative monitoring will decrease the incidence of post-operative complications such as acute lung injury, infections, thromboembolism, cerebral vascular accident, acute kidney injury, myocardial infarction; in addition to the traditional outcome measures of mortality and length of stay.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Critical Illness, Trauma
Keywords
Trauma, Minimally Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring, Perioperative, Complications, Hemodynamics, Operative procedures

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
196 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
FloTrac™ and EV1000™ pre and post-operatively
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Cardiovascular management guided by minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring via FloTrac™ and EV1000™ will be utilized in the pre and post-operative period in the control arm.
Arm Title
FloTrac™ and EV1000™ peri-operatively
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Cardiovascular management guided by minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring via FloTrac™ and EV1000™ will be utilized in the perioperative period for the intervention arm
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
FloTrac™ and EV1000™
Intervention Description
Interventions to improve cardiovascular performance will be made in all patients whose cardiovascular function is sub-optimal in accordance with routine clinical management during trauma resuscitation. Patients who meet inclusion criteria will be assigned to the intervention or control arm of the study based on the process outlined in the protocol. Patients assigned to the intervention arm will have intra-operative hemodynamic monitoring performed by the anesthesia staff and cardiovascular interventions will be based off of the algorithm described in the protocol. Members of anesthesia or the surgical team can initiate interventions as indicated during routine ICU care or intra-operatively.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complications
Description
The aim of this study is to determine if the incidence of post-operative complications will decreased with the implementation of intra-operative, minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring via FloTrac™ and EV1000™ in trauma patients.
Time Frame
Post-operative complications during patient hospital stay up to 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Impact of Intervention
Description
To evaluate the impact of continuing intra-operative minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring via FloTrac™ and EV1000™ : Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay in days Duration of post-operative vasopressor requirements in days
Time Frame
During patient hospital stay up to 6 months
Title
Impact of Intervention
Description
To evaluate the impact of continuing intra-operative minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring via FloTrac™ and EV1000™ : -ICU and hospital mortality rate
Time Frame
During patient hospital stay up to 6 months
Title
Lactic acid and Base deficit changes
Description
To compare the change in lactic acid and base deficit from the pre to post-operative period (most recent value within 24 hours pre and post-surgery). Both lactic acid and base deficit values will be recorded in mmoL/L.
Time Frame
Within 24 hours pre and post-surgery
Title
APACHE II
Description
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score between study cohorts. These scores will be recorded in whole numbers.
Time Frame
Within 24 hours pre and post-surgery
Title
SOFA scores
Description
Sepsis-related Organ Failure (SOFA) score between study cohorts. These scores will be recorded in whole numbers.
Time Frame
Within 24 hours pre and post-surgery
Title
Changes in pre and post-operative lactic acid and base deficit
Description
To compare changes in pre and post-operative lactic acid and based deficit between cohorts based on duration of surgical interventions. Both lactic acid and base deficit values will be recorded in mmoL/L.
Time Frame
Within 24 hours pre and post-surgery
Title
Changes in pre and post-operative APACHE II score
Description
To compare changes in pre and post-operative APACHE II scores between cohorts based on duration of surgical interventions. This score will be recorded in whole numbers.
Time Frame
Within 24 hours pre and post-surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 18 years of age or older Injury Severity Score > 15 (indicator of anticipated trauma mortality) Admission to Surgical-Trauma ICU (STICU) Anticipated surgery within 72 hours of admission American Society of Anesthesiology patient classification status (ASA) 2-5 Lactic acid > 2.5 within 24 hours of surgical procedure or Base deficit ≥ - 5 mmol/L, or persistent requirement for vasopressor support within 24 hours of surgical procedure Patient requires mechanical ventilation prior to consenting surgery Vascular devices that include a minimum of an arterial line Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring initiated prior to first surgical procedure unless patient is taken emergently, e.g. OR from trauma bay Patients requiring emergent initial operative procedures will be eligible for consenting if above criteria are met prior to their second surgical procedure Anticipated operative procedure precipitating evaluation and/or consenting for study must be > 30 minutes in duration Procedures < 30 minutes would not result in significant metabolic stress necessitating a continuation of MIHM Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy Exclusions due to limitations with respect to accuracy of MIHM: Patients not intubated prior to surgical procedure Patients requiring an open thoracotomy Patients with known history of surgical intervention for peripheral vascular disease Patients with pre-existing atrial arrhythmias Patients who are on cardiopulmonary bypass Isolated acute cerebral injury and/or traumatic cerebral injury Hemodynamic management in this patient population does not always follow typical/standard endpoints due to nuances of managing intracranial pressures Cardiac arrest prior to enrollment Patients with pre-existing, dialysis dependent, renal failure upon admission Hemodynamic management in this patient population does not always follow typical/standard endpoints due to nuances of managing renal failure Patients with pre-existing cirrhosis Hepatic failure results in abnormal clearance of lactic acid Patients with no survival injuries, e.g. gunshot wound to the head
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Audis Bethea, PharmD, BCPS
Phone
304-388-3653
Email
audis.bethea@camc.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Joy S Hogan, LPNph, CCRC
Phone
304-388-9957
Email
joy.hogan@camc.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Audis Bethea, PharmD, BCPS
Organizational Affiliation
CAMC Health System
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Charleston Area Medical Center, General Hospital
City
Charleston
State/Province
West Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
25301
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Audis Bethea, PharmD, BCPS
Phone
304-388-6260
Email
audis.bethea@camc.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Audis Bethea, PharmD, BCPS

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12727572
Citation
Husain FA, Martin MJ, Mullenix PS, Steele SR, Elliott DC. Serum lactate and base deficit as predictors of mortality and morbidity. Am J Surg. 2003 May;185(5):485-91. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00044-8.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
8411283
Citation
Abramson D, Scalea TM, Hitchcock R, Trooskin SZ, Henry SM, Greenspan J. Lactate clearance and survival following injury. J Trauma. 1993 Oct;35(4):584-8; discussion 588-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199310000-00014.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12904861
Citation
Cerovic O, Golubovic V, Spec-Marn A, Kremzar B, Vidmar G. Relationship between injury severity and lactate levels in severely injured patients. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Aug;29(8):1300-5. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1753-8. Epub 2003 Jul 9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19533847
Citation
Arnold RC, Shapiro NI, Jones AE, Schorr C, Pope J, Casner E, Parrillo JE, Dellinger RP, Trzeciak S; Emergency Medicine Shock Research Network (EMShockNet) Investigators. Multicenter study of early lactate clearance as a determinant of survival in patients with presumed sepsis. Shock. 2009 Jul;32(1):35-9. doi: 10.1097/shk.0b013e3181971d47.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15286537
Citation
Nguyen HB, Rivers EP, Knoblich BP, Jacobsen G, Muzzin A, Ressler JA, Tomlanovich MC. Early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2004 Aug;32(8):1637-42. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000132904.35713.a7.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19359912
Citation
Callaway DW, Shapiro NI, Donnino MW, Baker C, Rosen CL. Serum lactate and base deficit as predictors of mortality in normotensive elderly blunt trauma patients. J Trauma. 2009 Apr;66(4):1040-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181895e9e.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15920409
Citation
Dunne JR, Tracy JK, Scalea TM, Napolitano LM. Lactate and base deficit in trauma: does alcohol or drug use impair their predictive accuracy? J Trauma. 2005 May;58(5):959-66. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000158508.84009.49.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22695417
Citation
Ouellet JF, Roberts DJ, Tiruta C, Kirkpatrick AW, Mercado M, Trottier V, Dixon E, Feliciano DV, Ball CG. Admission base deficit and lactate levels in Canadian patients with blunt trauma: are they useful markers of mortality? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jun;72(6):1532-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318256dd5a.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
9308617
Citation
Ziegler DW, Wright JG, Choban PS, Flancbaum L. A prospective randomized trial of preoperative "optimization" of cardiac function in patients undergoing elective peripheral vascular surgery. Surgery. 1997 Sep;122(3):584-92. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(97)90132-x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
11529214
Citation
Landry DW, Oliver JA. The pathogenesis of vasodilatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 23;345(8):588-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra002709. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17099041
Citation
Otero RM, Nguyen HB, Huang DT, Gaieski DF, Goyal M, Gunnerson KJ, Trzeciak S, Sherwin R, Holthaus CV, Osborn T, Rivers EP. Early goal-directed therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock revisited: concepts, controversies, and contemporary findings. Chest. 2006 Nov;130(5):1579-95. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.5.1579.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22735299
Citation
Monnet X, Dres M, Ferre A, Le Teuff G, Jozwiak M, Bleibtreu A, Le Deley MC, Chemla D, Richard C, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness by a continuous non-invasive assessment of arterial pressure in critically ill patients: comparison with four other dynamic indices. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Sep;109(3):330-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes182. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19602972
Citation
Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009 Sep;37(9):2642-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a590da.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16557164
Citation
Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1333-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000214677.76535.A5.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17080001
Citation
Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, Monnet X, Anguel N, Richard C, Teboul JL. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):64-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000249851.94101.4F.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
7535996
Citation
Mythen MG, Webb AR. Perioperative plasma volume expansion reduces the incidence of gut mucosal hypoperfusion during cardiac surgery. Arch Surg. 1995 Apr;130(4):423-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430040085019.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
7760409
Citation
Bishop MH, Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Meade P, Ordog GJ, Wasserberger J, Wo CJ, Rimle DA, Kram HB, Umali R, et al. Prospective, randomized trial of survivor values of cardiac index, oxygen delivery, and oxygen consumption as resuscitation endpoints in severe trauma. J Trauma. 1995 May;38(5):780-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199505000-00018.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18511439
Citation
Buettner M, Schummer W, Huettemann E, Schenke S, van Hout N, Sakka SG. Influence of systolic-pressure-variation-guided intraoperative fluid management on organ function and oxygen transport. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Aug;101(2):194-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen126. Epub 2008 May 28.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20553586
Citation
Benes J, Chytra I, Altmann P, Hluchy M, Kasal E, Svitak R, Pradl R, Stepan M. Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study. Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R118. doi: 10.1186/cc9070. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16696864
Citation
Lobo SM, Lobo FR, Polachini CA, Patini DS, Yamamoto AE, de Oliveira NE, Serrano P, Sanches HS, Spegiorin MA, Queiroz MM, Christiano AC Jr, Savieiro EF, Alvarez PA, Teixeira SP, Cunrath GS. Prospective, randomized trial comparing fluids and dobutamine optimization of oxygen delivery in high-risk surgical patients [ISRCTN42445141]. Crit Care. 2006;10(3):R72. doi: 10.1186/cc4913. Epub 2006 May 12.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17313691
Citation
Chytra I, Pradl R, Bosman R, Pelnar P, Kasal E, Zidkova A. Esophageal Doppler-guided fluid management decreases blood lactate levels in multiple-trauma patients: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2007;11(1):R24. doi: 10.1186/cc5703.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15242867
Citation
McKendry M, McGloin H, Saberi D, Caudwell L, Brady AR, Singer M. Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse delivered, flow monitored protocol for optimisation of circulatory status after cardiac surgery. BMJ. 2004 Jul 31;329(7460):258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38156.767118.7C. Epub 2004 Jul 8. Erratum In: BMJ. 2004 Aug 21;329(7463):438.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
21943111
Citation
Lobo SM, Ronchi LS, Oliveira NE, Brandao PG, Froes A, Cunrath GS, Nishiyama KG, Netinho JG, Lobo FR. Restrictive strategy of intraoperative fluid maintenance during optimization of oxygen delivery decreases major complications after high-risk surgery. Crit Care. 2011;15(5):R226. doi: 10.1186/cc10466. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17925428
Citation
Donati A, Loggi S, Preiser JC, Orsetti G, Munch C, Gabbanelli V, Pelaia P, Pietropaoli P. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy reduces morbidity and length of hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients. Chest. 2007 Dec;132(6):1817-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0621. Epub 2007 Oct 9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12563237
Citation
Arkilic CF, Taguchi A, Sharma N, Ratnaraj J, Sessler DI, Read TE, Fleshman JW, Kurz A. Supplemental perioperative fluid administration increases tissue oxygen pressure. Surgery. 2003 Jan;133(1):49-55. doi: 10.1067/msy.2003.80.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
10781452
Citation
Polonen P, Ruokonen E, Hippelainen M, Poyhonen M, Takala J. A prospective, randomized study of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2000 May;90(5):1052-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200005000-00010.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18086070
Citation
Abbas SM, Hill AG. Systematic review of the literature for the use of oesophageal Doppler monitor for fluid replacement in major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2008 Jan;63(1):44-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05233.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16155038
Citation
Wakeling HG, McFall MR, Jenkins CS, Woods WG, Miles WF, Barclay GR, Fleming SC. Intraoperative oesophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):634-42. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei223. Epub 2005 Sep 9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
16888706
Citation
Noblett SE, Snowden CP, Shenton BK, Horgan AF. Randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg. 2006 Sep;93(9):1069-76. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5454.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
9361539
Citation
Sinclair S, James S, Singer M. Intraoperative intravascular volume optimisation and length of hospital stay after repair of proximal femoral fracture: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1997 Oct 11;315(7113):909-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7113.909.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
11881887
Citation
Venn R, Steele A, Richardson P, Poloniecki J, Grounds M, Newman P. Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Jan;88(1):65-71. doi: 10.1093/bja/88.1.65.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
11594901
Citation
Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Melot C, Vincent JL. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2001 Oct 10;286(14):1754-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.14.1754.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
9824069
Citation
Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Moreno R, Takala J, Suter PM, Sprung CL, Colardyn F, Blecher S. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on "sepsis-related problems" of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;26(11):1793-800. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199811000-00016.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
3928249
Citation
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29.
Results Reference
result
Links:
URL
http://clincalc.com/IcuMortality/SOFA.aspx
Description
SOFA Calculator
URL
http://clincalc.com/IcuMortality/APACHEII.aspx
Description
APACHE II Calculator

Learn more about this trial

Fluid Resuscitation Optimization in Surgical Trauma Patients (FROST)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs