High-dose vs. Standard-dose Cephalexin for Cellulitis
Primary Purpose
Cellulitis
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cephalexin
Cephalexin
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Cellulitis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults (age >=18 years) with non-purulent cellulitis determined by the treating emergency physician to be eligible for outpatient care with oral antibiotics.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age <18 years
- Patient already taking oral antibiotics
- Treating physician decides that intravenous therapy is required
- Abscess requiring an incision and drainage or needle aspiration procedure
- Known prior cellulitis secondary to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
- Cellulitis secondary to a human or animal bite wound
- Surgical site infection
- Malignancy and currently being treated with chemotherapy
- Febrile neutropenia (temperature >=38C plus absolute neutrophil count <500 cells/uL)
- Solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipient
- Renal impairment with creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Allergy to cephalosporins or history of anaphylaxis to penicillin
- Inability to provide consent
Sites / Locations
- The Ottawa Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
High Dose Cephalexin
Standard Dose Cephalexin
Arm Description
The intervention is high-dose cephalexin (1000mg PO QID) for seven days
The comparator is standard-dose cephalexin (500mg PO QID) plus oral placebo for seven days
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Patient recruitment rate
% of patients recruited into the trial
Oral antibiotic treatment failure
% of patients with oral antibiotic treatment failure
Secondary Outcome Measures
Ability to approach eligible patients
% of eligible patients that are approached for consent to enter into the trial
Assessment of blinding
Assessment of blinding via a patient questionnaire (participant will be asked to indicate which treatment they believe they received) at end of therapy (7 days)
Protocol adherence
% of patients that are adherent to allocated treatment for 7 days
Loss to follow up
% of patients lost to follow up at 14 days
Clinical cure
% of patients with clinical cure (no erythema, pain and fever) at days 3 and 7
Adverse events
% of patients with adverse events (e.g. vomiting, diarrhea, rash) at 14-days measured via telephone follow-up
Unplanned ED Visits or Hospitalization
% of patients with unplanned i) return ED visits; and ii) hospitalization, measured via 14-day telephone follow-up
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04471246
First Posted
June 30, 2020
Last Updated
April 26, 2022
Sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Collaborators
The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Association, Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04471246
Brief Title
High-dose vs. Standard-dose Cephalexin for Cellulitis
Official Title
High-dose Cephalexin for Cellulitis: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 16, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 23, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 23, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Collaborators
The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Association, Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Cellulitis is a painful bacterial infection of the skin and underlying tissue that needs antibiotic treatment. There are approximately 193,000 visits to Canadian emergency departments (EDs) each year for cellulitis. Emergency doctors who treat patients with cellulitis must decide on the correct antibiotic agent, dose, duration and frequency. Cellulitis is most commonly treated with the oral antibiotic cephalexin. However, there has been little research to guide doctors with respect to cellulitis treatment, which has led to an overuse of intravenous antibiotics. In addition, the current treatment failure rate of 20% is unacceptably high. When compared to standard-dose oral cephalexin, high-dose oral cephalexin may reduce treatment failure, which would help decrease the need for intravenous antibiotics and subsequent hospitalization. A well-designed clinical trial is necessary to determine if high-dose oral cephalexin reduces treatment failure for cellulitis patients. This pilot trial will determine the feasibility and design of such a clinical trial.
Detailed Description
Background: Cellulitis is a common clinical condition that represents up to 3% of all emergency department (ED) visits. The current treatment failure rate is approximately 20%. This high treatment failure rate may be due to suboptimal dosing of cephalexin. The Investigators hypothesize that high-dose cephalexin may lead to lower rates of treatment failure and subsequently improved patient outcomes (less hospitalizations and avoidance of intravenous antibiotics)
Rationale: Before embarking on a large, multicenter trial, it is essential to conduct a smaller pilot to test and refine study procedures and to demonstrate feasibility.
Methods:
Design: The investigators will conduct a parallel arm double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial at the Civic and General campus ED of The Ottawa Hospital (TOH). The study will operate seven days a week from 0800 to 2000 over a 6-month timeframe. TOH Pharmacy will follow a randomization sequence and prepare study medication packages. Study medication packages will be dispensed to the patient by a registered nurse (RN).
Patients: Adult (age >=18 years) ED patient with non-purulent cellulitis determined by the treating emergency physician to be eligible for outpatient care with oral antibiotics.
Intervention: High-dose cephalexin (1000 mg PO QID) for seven days.
Comparator: Standard-dose cephalexin (500 mg PO QID) plus placebo for seven days.
Primary Feasibility Outcome: Patient recruitment rate (percentage of approached eligible patients who are successfully recruited). The goal is to recruit at least 29% of eligible patients.
Primary Effectiveness Outcome: 1. Oral antibiotic treatment failure, defined as a change in antibiotic (change in class of oral antibiotic or step up to intravenous therapy) within 7 days due to worsening infection, which is defined as:
New fever (temperature ≥ 38.0C) or persistent fever at Day 3 follow up; or
Increasing area of erythema ≥20% from baseline; or
Increasing pain ≥2 points from baseline (numeric rating scale)
The secondary effectiveness outcomes are:
Clinical cure (no erythema, pain and fever) at day 7
Clinical response (≥20% reduction in area of erythema compared to baseline) at day 3
Adverse events (e.g. vomiting, diarrhea, rash) at 14-day telephone follow-up
Unplanned i) return ED visits; and ii) hospitalization at 14-day telephone follow-up
Importance: This pilot trial will be the first to compare high-dose cephalexin to standard-dose cephalexin for ED patients with cellulitis. The results of this pilot randomized trial will help inform the design and implementation of a larger, multicenter randomized controlled trial to answer this important clinical question.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cellulitis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The Investigators will conduct a parallel arm double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial.
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Masking Description
Eligible patients will be randomized (1:1) to high-dose versus standard-dose arms. The randomization sequence will be computer-generated by a statistician
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
66 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
High Dose Cephalexin
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The intervention is high-dose cephalexin (1000mg PO QID) for seven days
Arm Title
Standard Dose Cephalexin
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The comparator is standard-dose cephalexin (500mg PO QID) plus oral placebo for seven days
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cephalexin
Intervention Description
1000 mg PO QID for 7 days
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cephalexin
Intervention Description
500 mg PO QID plus oral placebo for 7 days
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient recruitment rate
Description
% of patients recruited into the trial
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Oral antibiotic treatment failure
Description
% of patients with oral antibiotic treatment failure
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ability to approach eligible patients
Description
% of eligible patients that are approached for consent to enter into the trial
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Assessment of blinding
Description
Assessment of blinding via a patient questionnaire (participant will be asked to indicate which treatment they believe they received) at end of therapy (7 days)
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Protocol adherence
Description
% of patients that are adherent to allocated treatment for 7 days
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Loss to follow up
Description
% of patients lost to follow up at 14 days
Time Frame
14 days
Title
Clinical cure
Description
% of patients with clinical cure (no erythema, pain and fever) at days 3 and 7
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Adverse events
Description
% of patients with adverse events (e.g. vomiting, diarrhea, rash) at 14-days measured via telephone follow-up
Time Frame
14 days
Title
Unplanned ED Visits or Hospitalization
Description
% of patients with unplanned i) return ED visits; and ii) hospitalization, measured via 14-day telephone follow-up
Time Frame
14 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults (age >=18 years) with non-purulent cellulitis determined by the treating emergency physician to be eligible for outpatient care with oral antibiotics.
Exclusion Criteria:
Age <18 years
Patient already taking oral antibiotics
Treating physician decides that intravenous therapy is required
Abscess requiring an incision and drainage or needle aspiration procedure
Known prior cellulitis secondary to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Cellulitis secondary to a human or animal bite wound
Surgical site infection
Malignancy and currently being treated with chemotherapy
Febrile neutropenia (temperature >=38C plus absolute neutrophil count <500 cells/uL)
Solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipient
Renal impairment with creatinine clearance <30 mL/min
Pregnant or breastfeeding
Allergy to cephalosporins or history of anaphylaxis to penicillin
Inability to provide consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Krishan Yadav, MD, MSc
Organizational Affiliation
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The Ottawa Hospital
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1y 4E9
Country
Canada
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19124814
Citation
Stevens DL, Eron LL. In the clinic. Cellulitis and soft-tissue infections. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jan 6;150(1):ITC11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-1-200901060-01001.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19788787
Citation
Stenstrom R, Grafstein E, Romney M, Fahimi J, Harris D, Hunte G, Innes G, Christenson J. Prevalence of and risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infection in a Canadian emergency department. CJEM. 2009 Sep;11(5):430-8. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500011623. Erratum In: CJEM. 2009 Nov;11(6):570.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29869364
Citation
Yadav K, Suh KN, Eagles D, MacIsaac J, Ritchie D, Bernick J, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Wells G, Stiell IG. Predictors of Oral Antibiotic Treatment Failure for Nonpurulent Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;26(1):51-59. doi: 10.1111/acem.13492. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25605319
Citation
Pollack CV Jr, Amin A, Ford WT Jr, Finley R, Kaye KS, Nguyen HH, Rybak MJ, Talan D. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI): practice guidelines for management and care transitions in the emergency department and hospital. J Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;48(4):508-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24973422
Citation
Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein EJ, Gorbach SL, Hirschmann JV, Kaplan SL, Montoya JG, Wade JC; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 15;59(2):e10-52. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu444. Erratum In: Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 1;60(9):1448. Dosage error in article text.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29299899
Citation
Kwak YG, Choi SH, Kim T, Park SY, Seo SH, Kim MB, Choi SH. Clinical Guidelines for the Antibiotic Treatment for Community-Acquired Skin and Soft Tissue Infection. Infect Chemother. 2017 Dec;49(4):301-325. doi: 10.3947/ic.2017.49.4.301.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25992781
Citation
Li HK, Agweyu A, English M, Bejon P. An unsupported preference for intravenous antibiotics. PLoS Med. 2015 May 19;12(5):e1001825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001825. eCollection 2015 May.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24799810
Citation
Cyriac JM, James E. Switch over from intravenous to oral therapy: A concise overview. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2014 Apr;5(2):83-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.130042.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27531595
Citation
Yadav K, Gatien M, Corrales-Medina V, Stiell I. Antimicrobial treatment decision for non-purulent skin and soft tissue infections in the emergency department. CJEM. 2017 May;19(3):175-180. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.347. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
438352
Citation
Chow M, Quintiliani R, Cunha BA, Thompson M, Finkelstein E, Nightingale CH. Pharmacokinetics of high-dose oral cephalosporins. J Clin Pharmacol. 1979 Apr;19(4):185-94. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1979.tb01650.x. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
2292525
Citation
Wise R. The pharmacokinetics of the oral cephalosporins--a review. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Dec;26 Suppl E:13-20. doi: 10.1093/jac/26.suppl_e.13.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17355677
Citation
Murray H, Stiell I, Wells G. Treatment failure in emergency department patients with cellulitis. CJEM. 2005 Jul;7(4):228-34. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500014342.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24842503
Citation
Peterson D, McLeod S, Woolfrey K, McRae A. Predictors of failure of empiric outpatient antibiotic therapy in emergency department patients with uncomplicated cellulitis. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 May;21(5):526-31. doi: 10.1111/acem.12371.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
31378847
Citation
Yadav K, Nath A, Suh KN, Sikora L, Eagles D. Treatment failure definitions for non-purulent skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review. Infection. 2020 Feb;48(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s15010-019-01347-w. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
High-dose vs. Standard-dose Cephalexin for Cellulitis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs