search
Back to results

Home Alone: An Intervention for People With Cognitive Impairment Who Live Alone

Primary Purpose

Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, Memory Loss

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Home Alone
Sponsored by
University of Minnesota
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Cognitive Impairment

Eligibility Criteria

55 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: 55 years of age or older Lives alone in a non-residential setting Either a provider diagnosis of MCI or presence of cognitive impairment is suggested via administration of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment by telephone (T-MoCA; a score between 13 and 18) Resides in the US Demonstrates capacity to consent Exclusion Criteria: Those who do not meet the inclusion criteria above are not eligible. Additionally, researchers would exclude those who: Live in assisted living, a group care home, or similar residential setting that provides care and services Are not English speaking Are currently participating in any other type of service that provides one-to-one psychosocial consultation or independent living coaching Have a new or worsening mental health condition and are not receiving ongoing treatment Have not remained on a stable psychotropic medications dosage, such as antidepressants, anxiolytics, or anti-psychotics, for the prior three months Are not willing/interested in participating or cannot actively participate in the intervention, per researcher discretion

Sites / Locations

  • University of MinnesotaRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Home Alone Intervention

Arm Description

Home Alone is a semi-structured intervention, tailored to address the individual needs and concerns of the older adult. The participant will engage in about seven psychoeducational coaching sessions, each lasting approximately one hour. The intervention has two key foci: increasing or maintaining home safety and comfort increasing scheduled social engagements and activities. Sessions are also designed to identify formal and informal services and supports to improve to increase assistance and ability to live independently for as long as safely possible. The sessions take place either in-person or remotely (via secure video conferencing or telephone). Ad hoc/ongoing sessions may be provided as needed.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Acceptability of Intervention
Acceptability of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program acceptability. The measure evaluates the likeability of the intervention (e.g. I like the intervention; I welcome the intervention; the intervention meets my approval; the intervention is appealing to me). Items are rated on a scale of agreement (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of acceptability.
Acceptability of Intervention
Acceptability of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program acceptability. The measure evaluates the likeability of the intervention (e.g. I like the intervention; I welcome the intervention; the intervention meets my approval; the intervention is appealing to me). Items are rated on a scale of agreement (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of acceptability.
Acceptability of Intervention
Acceptability of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program acceptability. The measure evaluates the likeability of the intervention (e.g. I like the intervention; I welcome the intervention; the intervention meets my approval; the intervention is appealing to me). Items are rated on a scale of agreement (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of acceptability.
Acceptability of Intervention
Acceptability of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program acceptability. The measure evaluates the likeability of the intervention (e.g. I like the intervention; I welcome the intervention; the intervention meets my approval; the intervention is appealing to me). Items are rated on a scale of agreement (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of acceptability.
Feasibility of Intervention
Feasibility of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program feasibility; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems implementable; the intervention seems doable; the intervention seems possible; the intervention seems easy to use). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Feasibility of Intervention
Feasibility of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program feasibility; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems implementable; the intervention seems doable; the intervention seems possible; the intervention seems easy to use). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Feasibility of Intervention
Feasibility of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program feasibility; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems implementable; the intervention seems doable; the intervention seems possible; the intervention seems easy to use). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Feasibility of Intervention
Feasibility of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program feasibility; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems implementable; the intervention seems doable; the intervention seems possible; the intervention seems easy to use). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Intervention Appropriateness
Intervention Appropriateness Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program appropriateness; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems fitting; the intervention seems suitable; the intervention seems applicable; the intervention seems liked a good match). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Intervention Appropriateness
Intervention Appropriateness Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program appropriateness; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems fitting; the intervention seems suitable; the intervention seems applicable; the intervention seems liked a good match). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Intervention Appropriateness
Intervention Appropriateness Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program appropriateness; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems fitting; the intervention seems suitable; the intervention seems applicable; the intervention seems liked a good match). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Intervention Appropriateness
Intervention Appropriateness Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program appropriateness; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems fitting; the intervention seems suitable; the intervention seems applicable; the intervention seems liked a good match). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Intervention Treatment Receipt
Intervention Treatment Receipt Checklist Measure - Eleven item checklist designed for study, measuring whether the coach delivered key aspects of the intervention. The measure includes 10 Likert scale items and one open-ended question on the appropriateness and acceptability of Home Alone and the extent to which Home Alone helps participants with CI modify their environment, engage in pleasant activities, and access social and other resources. The 10 items are scored on a 5 point Likert scale with a total score ranging from 0-50, where higher scores indicate greater treatment fidelity and acceptability of the intervention.
Intervention Treatment Receipt
Intervention Treatment Receipt Checklist Measure - Eleven item checklist designed for study, measuring whether the coach delivered key aspects of the intervention. The measure includes 10 Likert scale items and one open-ended question on the appropriateness and acceptability of Home Alone and the extent to which Home Alone helps participants with CI modify their environment, engage in pleasant activities, and access social and other resources. The 10 items are scored on a 5 point Likert scale with a total score ranging from 0-50, where higher scores indicate greater treatment fidelity and acceptability of the intervention.
Intervention Treatment Receipt
Intervention Treatment Receipt Checklist Measure - Eleven item checklist designed for study, measuring whether the coach delivered key aspects of the intervention. The measure includes 10 Likert scale items and one open-ended question on the appropriateness and acceptability of Home Alone and the extent to which Home Alone helps participants with CI modify their environment, engage in pleasant activities, and access social and other resources. The 10 items are scored on a 5 point Likert scale with a total score ranging from 0-50, where higher scores indicate greater treatment fidelity and acceptability of the intervention.
Intervention Treatment Receipt
Intervention Treatment Receipt Checklist Measure - Eleven item checklist designed for study, measuring whether the coach delivered key aspects of the intervention. The measure includes 10 Likert scale items and one open-ended question on the appropriateness and acceptability of Home Alone and the extent to which Home Alone helps participants with CI modify their environment, engage in pleasant activities, and access social and other resources. The 10 items are scored on a 5 point Likert scale with a total score ranging from 0-50, where higher scores indicate greater treatment fidelity and acceptability of the intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Social Well-being/Loneliness (Social contact and Support)
Lubben Social Network Scale-6 6 item scale evaluating social engagement; Items assess social contact and support including family and friends; Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores representing more social engagement.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Social contact and Support)
Lubben Social Network Scale-6 6 item scale evaluating social engagement; Items assess social contact and support including family and friends; Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores representing more social engagement.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Social contact and Support)
Lubben Social Network Scale-6 6 item scale evaluating social engagement; Items assess social contact and support including family and friends; Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores representing more social engagement.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Social contact and Support)
Lubben Social Network Scale-6 6 item scale evaluating social engagement; Items assess social contact and support including family and friends; Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores representing more social engagement.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Social contact and Support)
Lubben Social Network Scale-6 6 item scale evaluating social engagement; Items assess social contact and support including family and friends; Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores representing more social engagement.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Social contact and Support)
Lubben Social Network Scale-6 6 item scale evaluating social engagement; Items assess social contact and support including family and friends; Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores representing more social engagement.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Loneliness)
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (Short - 6 items) will measure emotional and social loneliness; Scores range from 1-6. Higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Loneliness)
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (Short - 6 items) will measure emotional and social loneliness; Scores range from 1-6. Higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Loneliness)
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (Short - 6 items) will measure emotional and social loneliness; Scores range from 1-6. Higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Loneliness)
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (Short - 6 items) will measure emotional and social loneliness; Scores range from 1-6. Higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Loneliness)
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (Short - 6 items) will measure emotional and social loneliness; Scores range from 1-6. Higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Loneliness)
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (Short - 6 items) will measure emotional and social loneliness; Scores range from 1-6. Higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Well-being)
Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form -15 items measuring emotional well-being; scores range from 0-15; Scores under 5 indicate that depression is unlikely, scores of 5 or more suggest depression.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Well-being)
Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form -15 items measuring emotional well-being; scores range from 0-15; Scores under 5 indicate that depression is unlikely, scores of 5 or more suggest depression.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Well-being)
Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form -15 items measuring emotional well-being; scores range from 0-15; Scores under 5 indicate that depression is unlikely, scores of 5 or more suggest depression.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Well-being)
Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form -15 items measuring emotional well-being; scores range from 0-15; Scores under 5 indicate that depression is unlikely, scores of 5 or more suggest depression.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Well-being)
Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form -15 items measuring emotional well-being; scores range from 0-15; Scores under 5 indicate that depression is unlikely, scores of 5 or more suggest depression.
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Well-being)
Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form -15 items measuring emotional well-being; scores range from 0-15; Scores under 5 indicate that depression is unlikely, scores of 5 or more suggest depression.
Activity/Engagement
Pleasant Events Schedule: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) short form - 20 activity items measured on a scale divided into two parts. The first part of the scale measures frequency of participation and availability of the event (ltems are rated from 0 to 2; total scores can range from 0 to 40). The second part of the scale assesses current and/or past enjoyment of those activities (ltems are rated from 0 to 1; total scores can range from 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate higher levels of activity on both subscales.
Activity/Engagement
Pleasant Events Schedule: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) short form - 20 activity items measured on a scale divided into two parts. The first part of the scale measures frequency of participation and availability of the event (ltems are rated from 0 to 2; total scores can range from 0 to 40). The second part of the scale assesses current and/or past enjoyment of those activities (ltems are rated from 0 to 1; total scores can range from 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate higher levels of activity on both subscales.
Activity/Engagement
Pleasant Events Schedule: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) short form - 20 activity items measured on a scale divided into two parts. The first part of the scale measures frequency of participation and availability of the event (ltems are rated from 0 to 2; total scores can range from 0 to 40). The second part of the scale assesses current and/or past enjoyment of those activities (ltems are rated from 0 to 1; total scores can range from 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate higher levels of activity on both subscales.
Activity/Engagement
Pleasant Events Schedule: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) short form - 20 activity items measured on a scale divided into two parts. The first part of the scale measures frequency of participation and availability of the event (ltems are rated from 0 to 2; total scores can range from 0 to 40). The second part of the scale assesses current and/or past enjoyment of those activities (ltems are rated from 0 to 1; total scores can range from 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate higher levels of activity on both subscales.
Activity/Engagement
Pleasant Events Schedule: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) short form - 20 activity items measured on a scale divided into two parts. The first part of the scale measures frequency of participation and availability of the event (ltems are rated from 0 to 2; total scores can range from 0 to 40). The second part of the scale assesses current and/or past enjoyment of those activities (ltems are rated from 0 to 1; total scores can range from 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate higher levels of activity on both subscales.
Activity/Engagement
Pleasant Events Schedule: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) short form - 20 activity items measured on a scale divided into two parts. The first part of the scale measures frequency of participation and availability of the event (ltems are rated from 0 to 2; total scores can range from 0 to 40). The second part of the scale assesses current and/or past enjoyment of those activities (ltems are rated from 0 to 1; total scores can range from 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate higher levels of activity on both subscales.
Cognition
Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) - measure assessing 8 areas of cognition used over the phone to screen for Mild Cognitive Impairment; scores range from 0-22; with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. Scores 18 or below suggest mild cognitive dysfunction.
Cognition
Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) - measure assessing 8 areas of cognition used over the phone to screen for Mild Cognitive Impairment; scores range from 0-22; with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. Scores 18 or below suggest mild cognitive dysfunction.
Cognition
Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) - measure assessing 8 areas of cognition used over the phone to screen for Mild Cognitive Impairment; scores range from 0-22; with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. Scores 18 or below suggest mild cognitive dysfunction.
Cognition
Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) - measure assessing 8 areas of cognition used over the phone to screen for Mild Cognitive Impairment; scores range from 0-22; with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. Scores 18 or below suggest mild cognitive dysfunction.
Cognition
Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) - measure assessing 8 areas of cognition used over the phone to screen for Mild Cognitive Impairment; scores range from 0-22; with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. Scores 18 or below suggest mild cognitive dysfunction.
Cognition
Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) - measure assessing 8 areas of cognition used over the phone to screen for Mild Cognitive Impairment; scores range from 0-22; with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. Scores 18 or below suggest mild cognitive dysfunction.
Functional Dependence - Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Independent Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Fifteen item scale created from Katz Activities of Daily Living- 6 item scale measuring ability to perform activities of daily living, 8 items from the Lawton Independent Activities of Daily Living scale assessing 8 domains of independent living skills (including shopping and taking medications) and 1 item on hygiene from the Routine Task Inventory; Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores needing more help with ADL/IADLs.
Functional Dependence - Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Independent Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Fifteen item scale created from Katz Activities of Daily Living- 6 item scale measuring ability to perform activities of daily living, 8 items from the Lawton Independent Activities of Daily Living scale assessing 8 domains of independent living skills (including shopping and taking medications) and 1 item on hygiene from the Routine Task Inventory; Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores needing more help with ADL/IADLs.
Functional Dependence - Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Independent Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Fifteen item scale created from Katz Activities of Daily Living- 6 item scale measuring ability to perform activities of daily living, 8 items from the Lawton Independent Activities of Daily Living scale assessing 8 domains of independent living skills (including shopping and taking medications) and 1 item on hygiene from the Routine Task Inventory; Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores needing more help with ADL/IADLs.
Functional Dependence - Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Independent Activities of Daily Living
Fifteen item scale created from Katz Activities of Daily Living- 6 item scale measuring ability to perform activities of daily living, 8 items from the Lawton Independent Activities of Daily Living scale assessing 8 domains of independent living skills (including shopping and taking medications) and 1 item on hygiene from the Routine Task Inventory; Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores needing more help with ADL/IADLs.
Functional Dependence - Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Independent Activities of Daily Living
Fifteen item scale created from Katz Activities of Daily Living- 6 item scale measuring ability to perform activities of daily living, 8 items from the Lawton Independent Activities of Daily Living scale assessing 8 domains of independent living skills (including shopping and taking medications) and 1 item on hygiene from the Routine Task Inventory; Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores needing more help with ADL/IADLs.
Functional Dependence - Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Independent Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Fifteen item scale created from Katz Activities of Daily Living- 6 item scale measuring ability to perform activities of daily living, 8 items from the Lawton Independent Activities of Daily Living scale assessing 8 domains of independent living skills (including shopping and taking medications) and 1 item on hygiene from the Routine Task Inventory; Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores needing more help with ADL/IADLs.
Functional Dependence (Physical functioning)
US Health Interview Survey - assesses engagement in physical activities in the prior two weeks. A composite index of physical activity is computed by summing the products of the number of minutes in each activity (9 are listed and there is an open response "other" option) and how many times in the past two weeks the engaged in the activity for the 9 activities and any open response activities, this is divided by 60 minutes, and then by 2, to determine the number of hours of physical activity per week. The minimum composite index is 0. A higher composite index indicates more physical activity.
Functional Dependence (Physical functioning)
US Health Interview Survey - assesses engagement in physical activities in the prior two weeks. A composite index of physical activity is computed by summing the products of the number of minutes in each activity (9 are listed and there is an open response "other" option) and how many times in the past two weeks the engaged in the activity for the 9 activities and any open response activities, this is divided by 60 minutes, and then by 2, to determine the number of hours of physical activity per week. The minimum composite index is 0. A higher composite index indicates more physical activity.
Functional Dependence (Physical functioning)
US Health Interview Survey - assesses engagement in physical activities in the prior two weeks. A composite index of physical activity is computed by summing the products of the number of minutes in each activity (9 are listed and there is an open response "other" option) and how many times in the past two weeks the engaged in the activity for the 9 activities and any open response activities, this is divided by 60 minutes, and then by 2, to determine the number of hours of physical activity per week. The minimum composite index is 0. A higher composite index indicates more physical activity.
Functional Dependence (Physical functioning)
US Health Interview Survey - assesses engagement in physical activities in the prior two weeks. A composite index of physical activity is computed by summing the products of the number of minutes in each activity (9 are listed and there is an open response "other" option) and how many times in the past two weeks the engaged in the activity for the 9 activities and any open response activities, this is divided by 60 minutes, and then by 2, to determine the number of hours of physical activity per week. The minimum composite index is 0. A higher composite index indicates more physical activity.
Functional Dependence (Physical functioning)
US Health Interview Survey - assesses engagement in physical activities in the prior two weeks. A composite index of physical activity is computed by summing the products of the number of minutes in each activity (9 are listed and there is an open response "other" option) and how many times in the past two weeks the engaged in the activity for the 9 activities and any open response activities, this is divided by 60 minutes, and then by 2, to determine the number of hours of physical activity per week. The minimum composite index is 0. A higher composite index indicates more physical activity.
Functional Dependence (Physical functioning)
US Health Interview Survey - assesses engagement in physical activities in the prior two weeks. A composite index of physical activity is computed by summing the products of the number of minutes in each activity (9 are listed and there is an open response "other" option) and how many times in the past two weeks the engaged in the activity for the 9 activities and any open response activities, this is divided by 60 minutes, and then by 2, to determine the number of hours of physical activity per week. The minimum composite index is 0. A higher composite index indicates more physical activity.

Full Information

First Posted
February 10, 2023
Last Updated
May 24, 2023
Sponsor
University of Minnesota
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05746390
Brief Title
Home Alone: An Intervention for People With Cognitive Impairment Who Live Alone
Official Title
Home Alone: Developing a Home-Based Intervention for People With Cognitive Impairment Who Live Alone
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
April 15, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 15, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 15, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Minnesota

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate a program for adults who live alone and have some cognitive impairment (CI) to see if it is useful and acceptable. This program aims to help older adults with cognitive impairment who live alone to be engaged and active, as well as safe at home. The investigators want to see how useful this program is and how it can be improved. The specific aims are: Specific Aim 1: Develop and Adapt Home Alone to Prepare for Pilot Testing. Specific Aim 2: Pilot Test a Revised Version of Home Alone. Phase I participants will be asked to: Participate for 3 months Complete 3 surveys Complete 7 1-hour meetings on a weekly basis with a coach Complete a final interview Phase II participants will be asked to: Participate for 6 months Complete 3 surveys Complete 7 1-hour meetings on a weekly basis with a coach A sub-sample will be asked to complete a final interview
Detailed Description
The primary goal of this proposal is to establish the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of a novel intervention, "Home Alone." Home Alone will be targeted to older persons with CI or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) who live alone in the community. This National Institute on Aging (NIA) Stage I effort will adapt and tailor established, evidence-based mental health and dementia care intervention models (behavioral activation, Skills2Care®, Tailored Activity Program) to reduce environmental stress and enhance engagement in desired activities to improve social well-being and maintain cognition and function for those who live alone with CI. Relying on a robust, mixed methods strategy and an implementation science lens at the outset of intervention development, the investigators seek to position Home Alone as a scalable program that, as its efficacy and effectiveness is determined in subsequent trials, is primed for widespread dissemination and adoption in home-based and community contexts. The Specific Aims are as follows: Specific Aim 1 (Phase I): Develop and Adapt Home Alone to Prepare for Pilot Testing. The investigators will identify treatment components and examine feasibility and relevance by obtaining insights from 15 persons with CI who live alone and participate in the Home Alone intervention over a 3-month period. The investigators will utilize the Phase I period to determine whether various elements of Home Alone (e.g., delivery mode, length, and other intervention characteristics) require adaptation. The investigators will use a convergent parallel mixed methods design (i.e., the collection and analysis of quantitative and qualitative data concurrently) when doing so. Through analysis of the various quantitative and qualitative data elements to inform adaptation, the investigators will finalize and refine Home Alone prior to project Phase II (Specific Aim 2). Specific Aim 2 (Phase II): Pilot Test a Revised Version of Home Alone. This R21 project will evaluate the following indices of implementation potential over a 6-month period: whether Home Alone is carried out as intended and is feasible (the degree to which Home Alone can be successfully delivered); acceptable (Home Alone is agreeable and satisfactory among users), and useful (participants perceive benefit from the Home Alone intervention). A sequential explanatory mixed methods design (a quantitative component followed by a qualitative component) will be utilized to pilot test Home Alone. The investigators will enroll 50 persons living alone with CI over a 6-month period. The investigators will also examine whether key empirical outcomes (perceived loneliness; activity engagement; measures of cognition and functional dependence) change over a 6-month period. Available qualitative data will provide information on how and why Home Alone was beneficial or not for persons with CI and allow for greater understanding of the intervention's mechanisms of benefit. Home Alone combines Behavioral Activation (BA) with other evidence-based intervention approaches (i.e., Tailored Activity Program (TAP); Skills2Care®) that target the environment in order to tailor activity that is fulfilling and meaningful to persons with CI. An additional intervention component that will be incorporated in Home Alone includes environmental assessments that help the person with CI by removing objects and improving lighting and safety in areas of the home where a desired and meaningful activity will be conducted.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cognitive Impairment, Dementia, Memory Loss

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
65 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Home Alone Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Home Alone is a semi-structured intervention, tailored to address the individual needs and concerns of the older adult. The participant will engage in about seven psychoeducational coaching sessions, each lasting approximately one hour. The intervention has two key foci: increasing or maintaining home safety and comfort increasing scheduled social engagements and activities. Sessions are also designed to identify formal and informal services and supports to improve to increase assistance and ability to live independently for as long as safely possible. The sessions take place either in-person or remotely (via secure video conferencing or telephone). Ad hoc/ongoing sessions may be provided as needed.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Home Alone
Intervention Description
See Home Alone description.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Acceptability of Intervention
Description
Acceptability of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program acceptability. The measure evaluates the likeability of the intervention (e.g. I like the intervention; I welcome the intervention; the intervention meets my approval; the intervention is appealing to me). Items are rated on a scale of agreement (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of acceptability.
Time Frame
Phase I at 1 month
Title
Acceptability of Intervention
Description
Acceptability of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program acceptability. The measure evaluates the likeability of the intervention (e.g. I like the intervention; I welcome the intervention; the intervention meets my approval; the intervention is appealing to me). Items are rated on a scale of agreement (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of acceptability.
Time Frame
Phase I at 3 months
Title
Acceptability of Intervention
Description
Acceptability of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program acceptability. The measure evaluates the likeability of the intervention (e.g. I like the intervention; I welcome the intervention; the intervention meets my approval; the intervention is appealing to me). Items are rated on a scale of agreement (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of acceptability.
Time Frame
Phase II at 3 months
Title
Acceptability of Intervention
Description
Acceptability of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program acceptability. The measure evaluates the likeability of the intervention (e.g. I like the intervention; I welcome the intervention; the intervention meets my approval; the intervention is appealing to me). Items are rated on a scale of agreement (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20, with higher scores indicating higher levels of acceptability.
Time Frame
Phase II at 6 months
Title
Feasibility of Intervention
Description
Feasibility of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program feasibility; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems implementable; the intervention seems doable; the intervention seems possible; the intervention seems easy to use). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Time Frame
Phase I at 1 month
Title
Feasibility of Intervention
Description
Feasibility of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program feasibility; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems implementable; the intervention seems doable; the intervention seems possible; the intervention seems easy to use). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Time Frame
Phase I at 3 months
Title
Feasibility of Intervention
Description
Feasibility of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program feasibility; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems implementable; the intervention seems doable; the intervention seems possible; the intervention seems easy to use). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Time Frame
Phase II at 3 months
Title
Feasibility of Intervention
Description
Feasibility of Intervention Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program feasibility; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems implementable; the intervention seems doable; the intervention seems possible; the intervention seems easy to use). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Time Frame
Phase II at 6 months
Title
Intervention Appropriateness
Description
Intervention Appropriateness Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program appropriateness; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems fitting; the intervention seems suitable; the intervention seems applicable; the intervention seems liked a good match). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Time Frame
Phase I at 1 month
Title
Intervention Appropriateness
Description
Intervention Appropriateness Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program appropriateness; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems fitting; the intervention seems suitable; the intervention seems applicable; the intervention seems liked a good match). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Time Frame
Phase I at 3 months
Title
Intervention Appropriateness
Description
Intervention Appropriateness Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program appropriateness; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems fitting; the intervention seems suitable; the intervention seems applicable; the intervention seems liked a good match). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Time Frame
Phase II at 3 months
Title
Intervention Appropriateness
Description
Intervention Appropriateness Measure - 4 item scale evaluating program appropriateness; The measure includes four statements about the feasibility of intervention implementation (ex. the intervention seems fitting; the intervention seems suitable; the intervention seems applicable; the intervention seems liked a good match). Items are rated on a five-point scale (completely disagree, disagree, neither agree or disagree, agree, completely agree). Scores range from 4-20. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Time Frame
Phase II at 6 months
Title
Intervention Treatment Receipt
Description
Intervention Treatment Receipt Checklist Measure - Eleven item checklist designed for study, measuring whether the coach delivered key aspects of the intervention. The measure includes 10 Likert scale items and one open-ended question on the appropriateness and acceptability of Home Alone and the extent to which Home Alone helps participants with CI modify their environment, engage in pleasant activities, and access social and other resources. The 10 items are scored on a 5 point Likert scale with a total score ranging from 0-50, where higher scores indicate greater treatment fidelity and acceptability of the intervention.
Time Frame
Phase I at 1 month
Title
Intervention Treatment Receipt
Description
Intervention Treatment Receipt Checklist Measure - Eleven item checklist designed for study, measuring whether the coach delivered key aspects of the intervention. The measure includes 10 Likert scale items and one open-ended question on the appropriateness and acceptability of Home Alone and the extent to which Home Alone helps participants with CI modify their environment, engage in pleasant activities, and access social and other resources. The 10 items are scored on a 5 point Likert scale with a total score ranging from 0-50, where higher scores indicate greater treatment fidelity and acceptability of the intervention.
Time Frame
Phase I at 3 months
Title
Intervention Treatment Receipt
Description
Intervention Treatment Receipt Checklist Measure - Eleven item checklist designed for study, measuring whether the coach delivered key aspects of the intervention. The measure includes 10 Likert scale items and one open-ended question on the appropriateness and acceptability of Home Alone and the extent to which Home Alone helps participants with CI modify their environment, engage in pleasant activities, and access social and other resources. The 10 items are scored on a 5 point Likert scale with a total score ranging from 0-50, where higher scores indicate greater treatment fidelity and acceptability of the intervention.
Time Frame
Phase II at 3 months
Title
Intervention Treatment Receipt
Description
Intervention Treatment Receipt Checklist Measure - Eleven item checklist designed for study, measuring whether the coach delivered key aspects of the intervention. The measure includes 10 Likert scale items and one open-ended question on the appropriateness and acceptability of Home Alone and the extent to which Home Alone helps participants with CI modify their environment, engage in pleasant activities, and access social and other resources. The 10 items are scored on a 5 point Likert scale with a total score ranging from 0-50, where higher scores indicate greater treatment fidelity and acceptability of the intervention.
Time Frame
Phase II at 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Social contact and Support)
Description
Lubben Social Network Scale-6 6 item scale evaluating social engagement; Items assess social contact and support including family and friends; Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores representing more social engagement.
Time Frame
Phase I at baseline
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Social contact and Support)
Description
Lubben Social Network Scale-6 6 item scale evaluating social engagement; Items assess social contact and support including family and friends; Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores representing more social engagement.
Time Frame
Phase I at 1 month
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Social contact and Support)
Description
Lubben Social Network Scale-6 6 item scale evaluating social engagement; Items assess social contact and support including family and friends; Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores representing more social engagement.
Time Frame
Phase I at 3 months
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Social contact and Support)
Description
Lubben Social Network Scale-6 6 item scale evaluating social engagement; Items assess social contact and support including family and friends; Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores representing more social engagement.
Time Frame
Phase II at baseline
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Social contact and Support)
Description
Lubben Social Network Scale-6 6 item scale evaluating social engagement; Items assess social contact and support including family and friends; Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores representing more social engagement.
Time Frame
Phase II at 3 months
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Social contact and Support)
Description
Lubben Social Network Scale-6 6 item scale evaluating social engagement; Items assess social contact and support including family and friends; Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores representing more social engagement.
Time Frame
Phase II at 6 months
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Loneliness)
Description
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (Short - 6 items) will measure emotional and social loneliness; Scores range from 1-6. Higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.
Time Frame
Phase I at baseline
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Loneliness)
Description
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (Short - 6 items) will measure emotional and social loneliness; Scores range from 1-6. Higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.
Time Frame
Phase I at 1 month
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Loneliness)
Description
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (Short - 6 items) will measure emotional and social loneliness; Scores range from 1-6. Higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.
Time Frame
Phase I at 3 months
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Loneliness)
Description
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (Short - 6 items) will measure emotional and social loneliness; Scores range from 1-6. Higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.
Time Frame
Phase II at baseline
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Loneliness)
Description
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (Short - 6 items) will measure emotional and social loneliness; Scores range from 1-6. Higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.
Time Frame
Phase II at 3 months
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Loneliness)
Description
De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (Short - 6 items) will measure emotional and social loneliness; Scores range from 1-6. Higher scores indicate greater levels of loneliness.
Time Frame
Phase II at 6 months
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Well-being)
Description
Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form -15 items measuring emotional well-being; scores range from 0-15; Scores under 5 indicate that depression is unlikely, scores of 5 or more suggest depression.
Time Frame
Phase I at baseline
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Well-being)
Description
Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form -15 items measuring emotional well-being; scores range from 0-15; Scores under 5 indicate that depression is unlikely, scores of 5 or more suggest depression.
Time Frame
Phase I at 1 month
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Well-being)
Description
Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form -15 items measuring emotional well-being; scores range from 0-15; Scores under 5 indicate that depression is unlikely, scores of 5 or more suggest depression.
Time Frame
Phase I at 3 months
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Well-being)
Description
Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form -15 items measuring emotional well-being; scores range from 0-15; Scores under 5 indicate that depression is unlikely, scores of 5 or more suggest depression.
Time Frame
Phase II at baseline
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Well-being)
Description
Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form -15 items measuring emotional well-being; scores range from 0-15; Scores under 5 indicate that depression is unlikely, scores of 5 or more suggest depression.
Time Frame
Phase II at 3 months
Title
Social Well-being/Loneliness (Well-being)
Description
Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form -15 items measuring emotional well-being; scores range from 0-15; Scores under 5 indicate that depression is unlikely, scores of 5 or more suggest depression.
Time Frame
Phase II at 6 months
Title
Activity/Engagement
Description
Pleasant Events Schedule: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) short form - 20 activity items measured on a scale divided into two parts. The first part of the scale measures frequency of participation and availability of the event (ltems are rated from 0 to 2; total scores can range from 0 to 40). The second part of the scale assesses current and/or past enjoyment of those activities (ltems are rated from 0 to 1; total scores can range from 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate higher levels of activity on both subscales.
Time Frame
Phase I at baseline
Title
Activity/Engagement
Description
Pleasant Events Schedule: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) short form - 20 activity items measured on a scale divided into two parts. The first part of the scale measures frequency of participation and availability of the event (ltems are rated from 0 to 2; total scores can range from 0 to 40). The second part of the scale assesses current and/or past enjoyment of those activities (ltems are rated from 0 to 1; total scores can range from 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate higher levels of activity on both subscales.
Time Frame
Phase I at 1 month
Title
Activity/Engagement
Description
Pleasant Events Schedule: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) short form - 20 activity items measured on a scale divided into two parts. The first part of the scale measures frequency of participation and availability of the event (ltems are rated from 0 to 2; total scores can range from 0 to 40). The second part of the scale assesses current and/or past enjoyment of those activities (ltems are rated from 0 to 1; total scores can range from 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate higher levels of activity on both subscales.
Time Frame
Phase I at 3 months
Title
Activity/Engagement
Description
Pleasant Events Schedule: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) short form - 20 activity items measured on a scale divided into two parts. The first part of the scale measures frequency of participation and availability of the event (ltems are rated from 0 to 2; total scores can range from 0 to 40). The second part of the scale assesses current and/or past enjoyment of those activities (ltems are rated from 0 to 1; total scores can range from 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate higher levels of activity on both subscales.
Time Frame
Phase II at baseline
Title
Activity/Engagement
Description
Pleasant Events Schedule: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) short form - 20 activity items measured on a scale divided into two parts. The first part of the scale measures frequency of participation and availability of the event (ltems are rated from 0 to 2; total scores can range from 0 to 40). The second part of the scale assesses current and/or past enjoyment of those activities (ltems are rated from 0 to 1; total scores can range from 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate higher levels of activity on both subscales.
Time Frame
Phase II at 3 months
Title
Activity/Engagement
Description
Pleasant Events Schedule: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) short form - 20 activity items measured on a scale divided into two parts. The first part of the scale measures frequency of participation and availability of the event (ltems are rated from 0 to 2; total scores can range from 0 to 40). The second part of the scale assesses current and/or past enjoyment of those activities (ltems are rated from 0 to 1; total scores can range from 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate higher levels of activity on both subscales.
Time Frame
Phase II at 6 months
Title
Cognition
Description
Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) - measure assessing 8 areas of cognition used over the phone to screen for Mild Cognitive Impairment; scores range from 0-22; with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. Scores 18 or below suggest mild cognitive dysfunction.
Time Frame
Phase I at screening
Title
Cognition
Description
Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) - measure assessing 8 areas of cognition used over the phone to screen for Mild Cognitive Impairment; scores range from 0-22; with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. Scores 18 or below suggest mild cognitive dysfunction.
Time Frame
Phase I at 1 month
Title
Cognition
Description
Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) - measure assessing 8 areas of cognition used over the phone to screen for Mild Cognitive Impairment; scores range from 0-22; with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. Scores 18 or below suggest mild cognitive dysfunction.
Time Frame
Phase I at 3 months
Title
Cognition
Description
Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) - measure assessing 8 areas of cognition used over the phone to screen for Mild Cognitive Impairment; scores range from 0-22; with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. Scores 18 or below suggest mild cognitive dysfunction.
Time Frame
Phase II at screening
Title
Cognition
Description
Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) - measure assessing 8 areas of cognition used over the phone to screen for Mild Cognitive Impairment; scores range from 0-22; with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. Scores 18 or below suggest mild cognitive dysfunction.
Time Frame
Phase II at 3 months
Title
Cognition
Description
Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) - measure assessing 8 areas of cognition used over the phone to screen for Mild Cognitive Impairment; scores range from 0-22; with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning. Scores 18 or below suggest mild cognitive dysfunction.
Time Frame
Phase II at 6 months
Title
Functional Dependence - Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Independent Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Description
Fifteen item scale created from Katz Activities of Daily Living- 6 item scale measuring ability to perform activities of daily living, 8 items from the Lawton Independent Activities of Daily Living scale assessing 8 domains of independent living skills (including shopping and taking medications) and 1 item on hygiene from the Routine Task Inventory; Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores needing more help with ADL/IADLs.
Time Frame
Phase I at baseline
Title
Functional Dependence - Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Independent Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Description
Fifteen item scale created from Katz Activities of Daily Living- 6 item scale measuring ability to perform activities of daily living, 8 items from the Lawton Independent Activities of Daily Living scale assessing 8 domains of independent living skills (including shopping and taking medications) and 1 item on hygiene from the Routine Task Inventory; Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores needing more help with ADL/IADLs.
Time Frame
Phase I at 1 month
Title
Functional Dependence - Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Independent Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Description
Fifteen item scale created from Katz Activities of Daily Living- 6 item scale measuring ability to perform activities of daily living, 8 items from the Lawton Independent Activities of Daily Living scale assessing 8 domains of independent living skills (including shopping and taking medications) and 1 item on hygiene from the Routine Task Inventory; Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores needing more help with ADL/IADLs.
Time Frame
Phase I at 3 months
Title
Functional Dependence - Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Independent Activities of Daily Living
Description
Fifteen item scale created from Katz Activities of Daily Living- 6 item scale measuring ability to perform activities of daily living, 8 items from the Lawton Independent Activities of Daily Living scale assessing 8 domains of independent living skills (including shopping and taking medications) and 1 item on hygiene from the Routine Task Inventory; Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores needing more help with ADL/IADLs.
Time Frame
Phase II at baseline
Title
Functional Dependence - Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Independent Activities of Daily Living
Description
Fifteen item scale created from Katz Activities of Daily Living- 6 item scale measuring ability to perform activities of daily living, 8 items from the Lawton Independent Activities of Daily Living scale assessing 8 domains of independent living skills (including shopping and taking medications) and 1 item on hygiene from the Routine Task Inventory; Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores needing more help with ADL/IADLs.
Time Frame
Phase II at 3 months
Title
Functional Dependence - Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Independent Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Description
Fifteen item scale created from Katz Activities of Daily Living- 6 item scale measuring ability to perform activities of daily living, 8 items from the Lawton Independent Activities of Daily Living scale assessing 8 domains of independent living skills (including shopping and taking medications) and 1 item on hygiene from the Routine Task Inventory; Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores needing more help with ADL/IADLs.
Time Frame
Phase II at 6 months
Title
Functional Dependence (Physical functioning)
Description
US Health Interview Survey - assesses engagement in physical activities in the prior two weeks. A composite index of physical activity is computed by summing the products of the number of minutes in each activity (9 are listed and there is an open response "other" option) and how many times in the past two weeks the engaged in the activity for the 9 activities and any open response activities, this is divided by 60 minutes, and then by 2, to determine the number of hours of physical activity per week. The minimum composite index is 0. A higher composite index indicates more physical activity.
Time Frame
Phase I at baseline.
Title
Functional Dependence (Physical functioning)
Description
US Health Interview Survey - assesses engagement in physical activities in the prior two weeks. A composite index of physical activity is computed by summing the products of the number of minutes in each activity (9 are listed and there is an open response "other" option) and how many times in the past two weeks the engaged in the activity for the 9 activities and any open response activities, this is divided by 60 minutes, and then by 2, to determine the number of hours of physical activity per week. The minimum composite index is 0. A higher composite index indicates more physical activity.
Time Frame
Phase I at 1 month
Title
Functional Dependence (Physical functioning)
Description
US Health Interview Survey - assesses engagement in physical activities in the prior two weeks. A composite index of physical activity is computed by summing the products of the number of minutes in each activity (9 are listed and there is an open response "other" option) and how many times in the past two weeks the engaged in the activity for the 9 activities and any open response activities, this is divided by 60 minutes, and then by 2, to determine the number of hours of physical activity per week. The minimum composite index is 0. A higher composite index indicates more physical activity.
Time Frame
Phase I at 3 months
Title
Functional Dependence (Physical functioning)
Description
US Health Interview Survey - assesses engagement in physical activities in the prior two weeks. A composite index of physical activity is computed by summing the products of the number of minutes in each activity (9 are listed and there is an open response "other" option) and how many times in the past two weeks the engaged in the activity for the 9 activities and any open response activities, this is divided by 60 minutes, and then by 2, to determine the number of hours of physical activity per week. The minimum composite index is 0. A higher composite index indicates more physical activity.
Time Frame
Phase II at baseline
Title
Functional Dependence (Physical functioning)
Description
US Health Interview Survey - assesses engagement in physical activities in the prior two weeks. A composite index of physical activity is computed by summing the products of the number of minutes in each activity (9 are listed and there is an open response "other" option) and how many times in the past two weeks the engaged in the activity for the 9 activities and any open response activities, this is divided by 60 minutes, and then by 2, to determine the number of hours of physical activity per week. The minimum composite index is 0. A higher composite index indicates more physical activity.
Time Frame
Phase II at 3 months
Title
Functional Dependence (Physical functioning)
Description
US Health Interview Survey - assesses engagement in physical activities in the prior two weeks. A composite index of physical activity is computed by summing the products of the number of minutes in each activity (9 are listed and there is an open response "other" option) and how many times in the past two weeks the engaged in the activity for the 9 activities and any open response activities, this is divided by 60 minutes, and then by 2, to determine the number of hours of physical activity per week. The minimum composite index is 0. A higher composite index indicates more physical activity.
Time Frame
Phase II at 6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 55 years of age or older Lives alone in a non-residential setting Either a provider diagnosis of MCI or presence of cognitive impairment is suggested via administration of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment by telephone (T-MoCA; a score between 13 and 18) Resides in the US Demonstrates capacity to consent Exclusion Criteria: Those who do not meet the inclusion criteria above are not eligible. Additionally, researchers would exclude those who: Live in assisted living, a group care home, or similar residential setting that provides care and services Are not English speaking Are currently participating in any other type of service that provides one-to-one psychosocial consultation or independent living coaching Have a new or worsening mental health condition and are not receiving ongoing treatment Have not remained on a stable psychotropic medications dosage, such as antidepressants, anxiolytics, or anti-psychotics, for the prior three months Are not willing/interested in participating or cannot actively participate in the intervention, per researcher discretion
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Joseph Gaugler, PhD
Phone
612-626-2485
Email
gaug0015@umn.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joseph Gaugler, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Minnesota
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Minnesota
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55455
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joseph Gaugler, PhD
Phone
612-626-2485
Email
gaug0015@umn.edu

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Study data and appropriate study materials/documentation will be deposited and made available through the National Archive of Computerized Data on Aging (NACDA), a NIA/NIH funded repository.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Data and supporting documents/materials will be deposited in the NACDA repository.

Learn more about this trial

Home Alone: An Intervention for People With Cognitive Impairment Who Live Alone

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs