search
Back to results

Immediate Weight-Bearing Ankle Study

Primary Purpose

Ankle Fractures, Surgery

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Late Rehabilitation
Early Rehabilitation
Sponsored by
Fraser Orthopaedic Research Society
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Ankle Fractures focused on measuring ankle, fracture, rehabilitation, weightbearing, early, late

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • lateral malleolus fracture with talar shaft
  • vertical shear medial malleolus fracture without superior articular involvement
  • bimalleolar fracture
  • any ankle fracture with posterior malleolus fragment involving 25% or less of the articular surface on the lateral ankle radiograph
  • 43.B1 (pure split of distal tibia - but only if does not involve any of tibial plafond, i.e., only the vertical split of medial malleolus)
  • 44.A1 (Weber A)
  • 44.A2 (Bimalleolar)
  • 44.A3 (posterior malleolus involvement - but only if < 25% articular involvement on lateral x-ray)
  • 44-B1 (Isolated)
  • 44.B2 (with medial lesion)
  • 44.B3 (with medial lesion & Volkmann's #)
  • closed, Gustilo-Anderson Grade I or Grade II open fractures are included
  • willing and able to sign the consent
  • willing and able to follow the protocol and attend follow-up visits
  • able to read and understand English or have an interpreter available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • skeletal immaturity demonstrated radiographically by open physes
  • previous ipsilateral ankle surgery
  • bilateral ankle fractures
  • non ambulatory prior to injury
  • inability to comply with postoperative protocol (i.e., cognitive impairment)
  • medical comorbidity precluding surgery
  • poorly controlled diabetes (i.e. dense neuropathy / hx of ulcers / sensory deficit)
  • polytrauma patients (other injuries involving the ipsi/contralateral lower limbs, including the hip, that would interfere with mobilization/rehabilitation)
  • surgical date > 14 days (time of injury to OR)
  • Gustilo-Anderson grade III open fractures
  • tibial plafond fractures
  • active infection at the surgical site diagnosed clinically by the attending surgeon
  • any ankle fracture with posterior malleolus fragment involving more than 25% of the articular surface on the lateral ankle radiograph
  • any medial malleolus fracture involving the superior articular surface
  • any ankle fracture requiring syndesmosis fixation
  • any ankle fracture-dislocation
  • incarceration
  • likely problems, in the judgment of the investigator, with maintaining follow-up

Sites / Locations

  • Royal Columbian Hospital / Fraser Health Authority

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Late WB

Immediate unprotected WB and ROM

Arm Description

Intervention: Patients receive a plaster splint in the operating room. They are not permitted to WB or ROM on the affected limb at this stage. At the first follow-up appointment (two weeks post-op), the splint is removed and a removable pre-fabricated walking boot applied. At this stage the patient is permitted to WB as tolerated while wearing the boot, and to perform ROM exercises with the boot removed. At six weeks post-op, the boot is discontinued and full unrestricted and unprotected weightbearing and ROM is permitted.

Patient do NOT receive a brace or splint of any kind. They are permitted to weightbear and range of motion as tolerated within the limitations of their own comfort. Use of ambulatory aids of any kind is permitted as needed without restrictions.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Olerud and Molander Score
An assessment of symptoms after ankle fracture.

Secondary Outcome Measures

EQ-5D
Health Related quality of life outcome measure using five dimensions: Mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
WPAI:SHP Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem
A questionnaire pertaining to the effect of the participant's ankle fracture on their ability to work and perform regular activities.
Range of Motion
Amount of ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion (measured in degrees) as determined by goniometer assessment, as well as total arc of ankle ROM (dorsiflexion+ plantarflexion). This will be measured on both ankles for comparison.
Wound Healing
Complications regarding the surgical wound, including but not limited to signs of infection or dehiscence.
Fracture Healing
Radiographic assessment to determine healing, loss of reduction, loss of hardware fixation, or ankle alignment.
Need for Re-operation
Any issue, whether it be a wound complication or fracture complication, requiring re-operation.
Time to Return to Work
The chronological time between the date of surgery to the first day the participant returned to occupational duties, if currently employed and returns to work within the 12 weeks postoperative follow-up period. For the purposes of this study, students enrolled in educational activities will have their schooling treated as their occupational duty.
Radiographic assessment
Assessment of alignment, hardware fixation, fracture reduction and loss of reduction (defined as any shft of 2mm or more in fracture position)

Full Information

First Posted
January 24, 2017
Last Updated
April 21, 2021
Sponsor
Fraser Orthopaedic Research Society
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03032653
Brief Title
Immediate Weight-Bearing Ankle Study
Official Title
Immediate Unprotected Weight-Bearing and Range of Motion After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Unstable Ankle Fractures. A Historical Control Group Comparative Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 9, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 18, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 18, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Fraser Orthopaedic Research Society

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This single-centre historical control group comparative study will compare outcomes of surgically-treated rotational ankle fractures and the current routine practice of early protected weightbearing and range of motion with immediate unprotected weightbearing as tolerated and range of motion after ankle open reduction and internal fixation.
Detailed Description
Ankle fractures are among the most common injuries, making up 9% of all fractures. Rotational ankle fractures are among the most common of all fractures, with an incidence averaging 4.2 per 1,000 individuals annually. These fractures range from minimal injuries amenable to non-surgical management to complex injuries with potential of long-term sequelae. Known risk factors for ankle fractures are age, body mass index and previous ankle fracture, with the highest incidence in elderly women. Most ankle fractures are low-energy injuries which occur when the body rotates about a planted foot, whether it be during sports, normal gait, or otherwise. Stable ankle fractures are generally treated non-surgically, while unstable fractures are usually treated with surgical reduction and fixation, with indications previously well-described and published. However, the post-operative management of such injuries is still controversial, with large variability between care providers. Protocols range from complete immobilization of the affected ankle and non-weightbearing to early range-of-motion (ROM) and weightbearing (WB). Studies have compared immobilization and non-WB to early ROM and WB but results have been mixed, with the most recent study demonstrating safety and advantages to protected WB and ROM at two weeks post-operatively versus non-WB and immobilization for six weeks. The Investigators intend to expand on the studies above and propose a single-centre historical control group comparative study to compare outcomes of surgically-treated rotational ankle fractures and the current routine practice of early protected weightbearing and range of motion with immediate unprotected weightbearing as tolerated and range of motion after ankle open reduction and internal fixation.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ankle Fractures, Surgery
Keywords
ankle, fracture, rehabilitation, weightbearing, early, late

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
80 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Late WB
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Intervention: Patients receive a plaster splint in the operating room. They are not permitted to WB or ROM on the affected limb at this stage. At the first follow-up appointment (two weeks post-op), the splint is removed and a removable pre-fabricated walking boot applied. At this stage the patient is permitted to WB as tolerated while wearing the boot, and to perform ROM exercises with the boot removed. At six weeks post-op, the boot is discontinued and full unrestricted and unprotected weightbearing and ROM is permitted.
Arm Title
Immediate unprotected WB and ROM
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient do NOT receive a brace or splint of any kind. They are permitted to weightbear and range of motion as tolerated within the limitations of their own comfort. Use of ambulatory aids of any kind is permitted as needed without restrictions.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Late Rehabilitation
Intervention Description
Post-0p: Non weight-bearing and no range of motion for 2 weeks post treatment. 2 weeks: Splint removed, removable pre-fabricated walking boot applied. WB as tolerated with boot, range of motion out of boot. 6 weeks: Boot discontinued and full unrestricted and unprotected WB and ROM permitted 6 weeks:
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Early Rehabilitation
Intervention Description
Weightbearing and range of motion as tolerated within the limitations of participant's own comfort. Use of ambulatory aides of any kind is permitted as needed without restriction. No brace or splint of any kind is permitted
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Olerud and Molander Score
Description
An assessment of symptoms after ankle fracture.
Time Frame
6 weeks post treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
EQ-5D
Description
Health Related quality of life outcome measure using five dimensions: Mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Time Frame
2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Title
WPAI:SHP Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem
Description
A questionnaire pertaining to the effect of the participant's ankle fracture on their ability to work and perform regular activities.
Time Frame
2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Title
Range of Motion
Description
Amount of ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion (measured in degrees) as determined by goniometer assessment, as well as total arc of ankle ROM (dorsiflexion+ plantarflexion). This will be measured on both ankles for comparison.
Time Frame
2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Title
Wound Healing
Description
Complications regarding the surgical wound, including but not limited to signs of infection or dehiscence.
Time Frame
2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Title
Fracture Healing
Description
Radiographic assessment to determine healing, loss of reduction, loss of hardware fixation, or ankle alignment.
Time Frame
2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Title
Need for Re-operation
Description
Any issue, whether it be a wound complication or fracture complication, requiring re-operation.
Time Frame
2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Title
Time to Return to Work
Description
The chronological time between the date of surgery to the first day the participant returned to occupational duties, if currently employed and returns to work within the 12 weeks postoperative follow-up period. For the purposes of this study, students enrolled in educational activities will have their schooling treated as their occupational duty.
Time Frame
2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment
Title
Radiographic assessment
Description
Assessment of alignment, hardware fixation, fracture reduction and loss of reduction (defined as any shft of 2mm or more in fracture position)
Time Frame
2, 6 and 12 weeks post treatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: lateral malleolus fracture with talar shaft vertical shear medial malleolus fracture without superior articular involvement bimalleolar fracture any ankle fracture with posterior malleolus fragment involving 25% or less of the articular surface on the lateral ankle radiograph 43.B1 (pure split of distal tibia - but only if does not involve any of tibial plafond, i.e., only the vertical split of medial malleolus) 44.A1 (Weber A) 44.A2 (Bimalleolar) 44.A3 (posterior malleolus involvement - but only if < 25% articular involvement on lateral x-ray) 44-B1 (Isolated) 44.B2 (with medial lesion) 44.B3 (with medial lesion & Volkmann's #) closed, Gustilo-Anderson Grade I or Grade II open fractures are included willing and able to sign the consent willing and able to follow the protocol and attend follow-up visits able to read and understand English or have an interpreter available Exclusion Criteria: skeletal immaturity demonstrated radiographically by open physes previous ipsilateral ankle surgery bilateral ankle fractures non ambulatory prior to injury inability to comply with postoperative protocol (i.e., cognitive impairment) medical comorbidity precluding surgery poorly controlled diabetes (i.e. dense neuropathy / hx of ulcers / sensory deficit) polytrauma patients (other injuries involving the ipsi/contralateral lower limbs, including the hip, that would interfere with mobilization/rehabilitation) surgical date > 14 days (time of injury to OR) Gustilo-Anderson grade III open fractures tibial plafond fractures active infection at the surgical site diagnosed clinically by the attending surgeon any ankle fracture with posterior malleolus fragment involving more than 25% of the articular surface on the lateral ankle radiograph any medial malleolus fracture involving the superior articular surface any ankle fracture requiring syndesmosis fixation any ankle fracture-dislocation incarceration likely problems, in the judgment of the investigator, with maintaining follow-up
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Darius G Viskontas, MD, FRCSC
Organizational Affiliation
Royal Columbian Hospital / Fraser Health Authority
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Vu (Brian) Le, MD, FRSCS
Organizational Affiliation
Royal Columbian Hospital / Fraser Health Authority
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kelly L Apostle, MD, FRCSC
Organizational Affiliation
Royal Columbian Hospital / Fraser Health Authority
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Royal Columbian Hospital / Fraser Health Authority
City
New Westminster
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V3L 3M2
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16814787
Citation
Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006 Aug;37(8):691-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23454858
Citation
Hoelsbrekken SE, Kaul-Jensen K, Morch T, Vika H, Clementsen T, Paulsrud O, Petursson G, Stiris M, Stromsoe K. Nonoperative treatment of the medial malleolus in bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Nov;27(11):633-7. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31828e1bb7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16891946
Citation
Petrisor BA, Poolman R, Koval K, Tornetta P 3rd, Bhandari M; Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. Management of displaced ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Jul;20(7):515-8. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200608000-00012.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17485995
Citation
Michelson JD, Magid D, McHale K. Clinical utility of a stability-based ankle fracture classification system. J Orthop Trauma. 2007 May;21(5):307-15. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318059aea3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27045369
Citation
Dehghan N, McKee MD, Jenkinson RJ, Schemitsch EH, Stas V, Nauth A, Hall JA, Stephen DJ, Kreder HJ. Early Weightbearing and Range of Motion Versus Non-Weightbearing and Immobilization After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Unstable Ankle Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Jul;30(7):345-52. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000572.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17715727
Citation
Gul A, Batra S, Mehmood S, Gillham N. Immediate unprotected weight-bearing of operatively treated ankle fractures. Acta Orthop Belg. 2007 Jun;73(3):360-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8168314
Citation
O'Sullivan ME, Bronk JT, Chao EY, Kelly PJ. Experimental study of the effect of weight bearing on fracture healing in the canine tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 May;(302):273-83.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12571295
Citation
Lehtonen H, Jarvinen TL, Honkonen S, Nyman M, Vihtonen K, Jarvinen M. Use of a cast compared with a functional ankle brace after operative treatment of an ankle fracture. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Feb;85(2):205-11. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200302000-00004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17195934
Citation
Honigmann P, Goldhahn S, Rosenkranz J, Audige L, Geissmann D, Babst R. Aftertreatment of malleolar fractures following ORIF -- functional compared to protected functional in a vacuum-stabilized orthesis: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007 Apr;127(3):195-203. doi: 10.1007/s00402-006-0255-x. Epub 2006 Dec 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8636173
Citation
van Laarhoven CJ, Meeuwis JD, van der WerkenC. Postoperative treatment of internally fixed ankle fractures: a prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 May;78(3):395-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8451961
Citation
Ahl T, Dalen N, Lundberg A, Bylund C. Early mobilization of operated on ankle fractures. Prospective, controlled study of 40 bimalleolar cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993 Feb;64(1):95-9. doi: 10.3109/17453679308994541.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2492286
Citation
Finsen V, Saetermo R, Kibsgaard L, Farran K, Engebretsen L, Bolz KD, Benum P. Early postoperative weight-bearing and muscle activity in patients who have a fracture of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989 Jan;71(1):23-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2044269
Citation
Cimino W, Ichtertz D, Slabaugh P. Early mobilization of ankle fractures after open reduction and internal fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Jun;(267):152-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8131334
Citation
Hedstrom M, Ahl T, Dalen N. Early postoperative ankle exercise. A study of postoperative lateral malleolar fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Mar;(300):193-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10755435
Citation
Egol KA, Dolan R, Koval KJ. Functional outcome of surgery for fractures of the ankle. A prospective, randomised comparison of management in a cast or a functional brace. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Mar;82(2):246-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25695796
Citation
Smeeing DP, Houwert RM, Briet JP, Kelder JC, Segers MJ, Verleisdonk EJ, Leenen LP, Hietbrink F. Weight-bearing and mobilization in the postoperative care of ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 19;10(2):e0118320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118320. eCollection 2015.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Immediate Weight-Bearing Ankle Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs