search
Back to results

In-Home Technology for Caregivers of People With Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Primary Purpose

Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
In-Home Technology System and Questionnaires
Waiting Control In-Home Technology System and Questionnaires
Sponsored by
University of California, Berkeley
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Dementia focused on measuring Caregivers, Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment, In-Home Technology, Alzheimer Disease

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Caregivers are fluent/literate in English
  • Caregivers currently reside with spouse/family member who has received a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, other dementias, or mild cognitive impairment
  • Caregivers primarily use a smartphone (e.g., iPhone, Android)
  • Caregiver has wireless internet in home

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Caregivers providing care for individuals with known non-neurodegenerative conditions affecting behavior and cognition
  • Caregivers providing care for individuals with longstanding Axis I psychiatric disorder
  • Caregivers providing care for individuals with metabolic disorder or major organ dysfunction
  • Caregivers providing care for individuals with alcohol abuse or dependence (within 5 years of dementia onset)
  • Caregivers providing care for individuals with head trauma with loss of consciousness greater than 30 minutes
  • Caregivers providing care for individuals with contraindications to MRI imaging
  • Caregivers providing care for individuals with large confluent white matter lesions
  • Caregivers providing care for individuals with significant systemic medical illness
  • Caregivers providing care for individuals who use a medication likely to affect central nervous system functions adversely

Sites / Locations

  • University of California, Berkeley

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Arm Label

In-Home Technology System

Waiting Control

Arm Description

Participants will receive and install the full system (sensors for entry, activity, temperature, water leak; voice control; digital display; local router) in their homes. Remote assistance will be provided to help with the installation. Sensors, warnings, messaging, and social networking features will be activated remotely. Participation will extend over a six month period with questionnaires (e.g., health and well-being) administered 3 times (at the time of installation and every 3 months thereafter).

Participants will be assigned a date for receiving and installing the full system (sensors for entry, activity, temperature, water leak; voice control; digital display; local router) six months after they enter the study. During that six-month period, questionnaires (e.g., health and well-being) will be administered 3 times (at the start of the study and every 3 months thereafter). At the end of the six-month period, participants will receive and install the full system (sensors for entry, activity, temperature, water leak; voice control; digital display; local router) in their homes. Remote assistance will be provided to help with the installation. Sensors, warnings, messaging, and social networking features will be activated remotely. Participation will extend over an additional six-month period with questionnaires (e.g., health and well-being) administered 2 times (every 3 months following installation).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

3 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Questionnaire to measure depression (Radloff, 1977). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range = 0-60). There are no subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. The clinical cut-off is usually set at a score of 16.
6 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Questionnaire to measure depression (Radloff, 1977). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range = 0-60). There are no subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. The clinical cut-off is usually set at a score of 16.
3 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form
Questionnaire to measure caregiver burden (Zarit, Reever, & Bach-Peterson, 1980). 12 items are rated on 0-4 scale. Range: 0-48. No subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
6 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form
Questionnaire to measure caregiver burden (Zarit, Reever, & Bach-Peterson, 1980). 12 items are rated on 0-4 scale. Range: 0-48. No subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
3 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Questionnaire to measure anxiety (Beck, Epstein, Brown, & Steer, 1988). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range= 0-60). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. There are no subscales. A score greater than 36 is considered to be clinically significant.
6 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Questionnaire to measure anxiety (Beck, Epstein, Brown, & Steer, 1988). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range= 0-60). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. There are no subscales. A score greater than 36 is considered to be clinically significant.
3 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale
Questionnaire measuring overall life satisfaction and well-being (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985). 5 items scored on a 1-7 scale and summed (Range = 5-35). Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. A score of 20 is considered neutral with higher scores considered increasingly more satisfied and lower scores considered increasingly more dissatisfied.
6 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale
Questionnaire measuring overall life satisfaction and well-being (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985). 5 items scored on a 1-7 scale and summed (Range = 5-35). Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. A score of 20 is considered neutral with higher scores considered increasingly more satisfied and lower scores considered increasingly more dissatisfied.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
December 10, 2019
Last Updated
April 14, 2022
Sponsor
University of California, Berkeley
Collaborators
People Power Company, National Institute on Aging (NIA), University of California, San Francisco
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04206670
Brief Title
In-Home Technology for Caregivers of People With Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment
Official Title
Developing and Evaluating In-Home Supportive Technology for Caregivers of People With Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 10, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 8, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 8, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, Berkeley
Collaborators
People Power Company, National Institute on Aging (NIA), University of California, San Francisco

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study aims to develop and evaluate new in-home supportive technology that is designed to alleviate anxiety, burden, and loneliness in spousal and familial caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer's disease, other dementias, or mild cognitive impairment.
Detailed Description
This study aims to develop, refine, and evaluate a new hardware/software system designed to integrate in-home sensors and devices, Internet-of-Things technologies (i.e., devices that can be controlled and communicated with via the internet), and social networking to create a more safe and supportive home environment for caregivers and people who have Alzheimer's disease, other dementias, or mild cognitive impairment. The system monitors troublesome behaviors in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (e.g., wandering), and targets mechanisms (e.g., worry, social isolation) thought to link behavioral symptoms in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment with adverse caregiver outcomes (declines in health and well-being). The system is designed to minimize demands on caregivers' limited time and energy and to provide a platform for data collection that can be used by researchers and care professionals. Hypotheses: Caregivers in the full operation condition will have fewer negative effects of caregiving (lower burden, better mental and physical health, higher well-being) than those in the control condition. Greater use of the social networking features of the system will be associated with fewer caregiver depressive symptoms. Greater utilization of the home safety features of the system will be associated with fewer caregiver anxiety symptoms.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer Disease
Keywords
Caregivers, Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment, In-Home Technology, Alzheimer Disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Masking Description
Participants are randomly assigned to treatment arms by People Power. All participants complete the same questionnaires at the same intervals. University of California, Berkeley investigators are blind as to participants' treatment arm assignment.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
216 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
In-Home Technology System
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive and install the full system (sensors for entry, activity, temperature, water leak; voice control; digital display; local router) in their homes. Remote assistance will be provided to help with the installation. Sensors, warnings, messaging, and social networking features will be activated remotely. Participation will extend over a six month period with questionnaires (e.g., health and well-being) administered 3 times (at the time of installation and every 3 months thereafter).
Arm Title
Waiting Control
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Participants will be assigned a date for receiving and installing the full system (sensors for entry, activity, temperature, water leak; voice control; digital display; local router) six months after they enter the study. During that six-month period, questionnaires (e.g., health and well-being) will be administered 3 times (at the start of the study and every 3 months thereafter). At the end of the six-month period, participants will receive and install the full system (sensors for entry, activity, temperature, water leak; voice control; digital display; local router) in their homes. Remote assistance will be provided to help with the installation. Sensors, warnings, messaging, and social networking features will be activated remotely. Participation will extend over an additional six-month period with questionnaires (e.g., health and well-being) administered 2 times (every 3 months following installation).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
In-Home Technology System and Questionnaires
Intervention Description
Participants self-install the in-home technology system in their homes after enrollment in the study (i.e., consent procedures and initial questionnaire). Intelligent bots monitor the in-home sensors, learn typical patterns, and provide caregivers with text messages via cell phone and alerts via the tablet when worrisome behaviors occur. Social contact is encouraged using caregiver resources and a trusted circle of friends and family who are encouraged to stay in contact with the caregiver and person with dementia or mild cognitive impairment.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Waiting Control In-Home Technology System and Questionnaires
Intervention Description
Participants self-install the in-home technology system in their homes six months after their enrollment in the study (i.e., consent procedures and initial questionnaire). Intelligent bots monitor the in-home sensors, learn typical patterns, and provide caregivers with text messages via cell phone and alerts via the tablet when worrisome behaviors occur. Social contact is encouraged using caregiver resources and a trusted circle of friends and family who are encouraged to stay in contact with the caregiver and person with dementia or mild cognitive impairment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
3 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Description
Questionnaire to measure depression (Radloff, 1977). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range = 0-60). There are no subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. The clinical cut-off is usually set at a score of 16.
Time Frame
3 months after baseline
Title
6 Months Assessment for Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Description
Questionnaire to measure depression (Radloff, 1977). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range = 0-60). There are no subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes. The clinical cut-off is usually set at a score of 16.
Time Frame
6 months after baseline
Title
3 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form
Description
Questionnaire to measure caregiver burden (Zarit, Reever, & Bach-Peterson, 1980). 12 items are rated on 0-4 scale. Range: 0-48. No subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Time Frame
3 months after baseline
Title
6 Months Assessment for Zarit Burden Interview-Short Form
Description
Questionnaire to measure caregiver burden (Zarit, Reever, & Bach-Peterson, 1980). 12 items are rated on 0-4 scale. Range: 0-48. No subscales. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Time Frame
6 months after baseline
Title
3 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Description
Questionnaire to measure anxiety (Beck, Epstein, Brown, & Steer, 1988). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range= 0-60). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. There are no subscales. A score greater than 36 is considered to be clinically significant.
Time Frame
3 months after baseline
Title
6 Months Assessment for Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Description
Questionnaire to measure anxiety (Beck, Epstein, Brown, & Steer, 1988). 20 items are rated on a 0-3 scale and summed (range= 0-60). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. There are no subscales. A score greater than 36 is considered to be clinically significant.
Time Frame
6 months after baseline
Title
3 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale
Description
Questionnaire measuring overall life satisfaction and well-being (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985). 5 items scored on a 1-7 scale and summed (Range = 5-35). Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. A score of 20 is considered neutral with higher scores considered increasingly more satisfied and lower scores considered increasingly more dissatisfied.
Time Frame
3 months after baseline
Title
6 Months Assessment for Satisfaction With Life Scale
Description
Questionnaire measuring overall life satisfaction and well-being (Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin, 1985). 5 items scored on a 1-7 scale and summed (Range = 5-35). Lower scores indicate worse outcomes. A score of 20 is considered neutral with higher scores considered increasingly more satisfied and lower scores considered increasingly more dissatisfied.
Time Frame
6 months after baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Caregivers are fluent/literate in English Caregivers currently reside with spouse/family member who has received a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, other dementias, or mild cognitive impairment Caregivers primarily use a smartphone (e.g., iPhone, Android) Caregiver has wireless internet in home Exclusion Criteria: Caregivers providing care for individuals with known non-neurodegenerative conditions affecting behavior and cognition Caregivers providing care for individuals with longstanding Axis I psychiatric disorder Caregivers providing care for individuals with metabolic disorder or major organ dysfunction Caregivers providing care for individuals with alcohol abuse or dependence (within 5 years of dementia onset) Caregivers providing care for individuals with head trauma with loss of consciousness greater than 30 minutes Caregivers providing care for individuals with contraindications to MRI imaging Caregivers providing care for individuals with large confluent white matter lesions Caregivers providing care for individuals with significant systemic medical illness Caregivers providing care for individuals who use a medication likely to affect central nervous system functions adversely
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert W Levenson, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, Berkeley
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of California, Berkeley
City
Berkeley
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94720
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Because health and other protected data are involved, we need to consult with our institutional review board and other collaborators concerning which data can be shared.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29216633
Citation
Chen KH, Wells JL, Otero MC, Lwi SJ, Haase CM, Levenson RW. Greater Experience of Negative Non-Target Emotions by Patients with Neurodegenerative Diseases Is Related to Lower Emotional Well-Being in Caregivers. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;44(5-6):245-255. doi: 10.1159/000481132. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28655841
Citation
Lwi SJ, Ford BQ, Casey JJ, Miller BL, Levenson RW. Poor caregiver mental health predicts mortality of patients with neurodegenerative disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 11;114(28):7319-7324. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701597114. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28395276
Citation
Otero MC, Levenson RW. Lower Visual Avoidance in Dementia Patients Is Associated with Greater Psychological Distress in Caregivers. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;43(5-6):247-258. doi: 10.1159/000468146. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29289452
Citation
Brown CL, Lwi SJ, Goodkind MS, Rankin KP, Merrilees J, Miller BL, Levenson RW. Empathic Accuracy Deficits in Patients with Neurodegenerative Disease: Association with Caregiver Depression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;26(4):484-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
https://research.presencefamily.com/
Description
Presence Caregiver Research Website

Learn more about this trial

In-Home Technology for Caregivers of People With Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs