search
Back to results

Is Family Screening Improved by Genetic Testing of Familial Hypercholesterolemia (IFIGhTFH)

Primary Purpose

Hypercholesterolemia, Familial

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Standard of Care
Genetic Testing
Sponsored by
University of Pennsylvania
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Hypercholesterolemia, Familial focused on measuring Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Genetics, Cascade screening

Eligibility Criteria

10 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • For probands, inclusion criteria are as follows:

    1. LDL cholesterol > 220 mg/dL or a previous clinical diagnosis of FH
    2. Aged 18 years or older
    3. Ability to provide informed consent
    4. Willingness/ability to contact a minimum of 2 biological relatives about the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • For family members of probands, inclusion criteria are as follows:

    1. Willingness to participate in the study
    2. Age 10 or older
    3. Ability to give informed consent/assent

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Other

    Other

    Arm Label

    Standard of Care

    Genetic Testing

    Arm Description

    Participants with suspected FH (LDL-C greater than 220 mg/dL) or a previous clinical diagnosis of FH and randomized to standard of care with lipid testing only.

    Participants with suspected FH (LDL-C greater than 220 mg/dL) or a previous clinical diagnosis of FH randomized to genetic testing

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Number of probands with relatives enrolled
    The primary outcome of this study was the number of probands with family members enrolled in the study within 52 weeks of results being returned to probands. Investigators compared the proportion of probands with a relative enrolled in the genetic testing group with the proportion of probands with a relative enrolled in the usual care group (lipid testing only). Relative enrolment was defined as the return of a test kit within the study time frame.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    The number of relatives enrolled in the study 52 weeks after results were returned to probands
    The number of relatives enrolled in the study within 52 weeks of results being returned to probands. Investigators compared the number of relatives enrolled in the genetic testing group with the number of relatives enrolled in the usual care group (lipid testing only). Relative enrolment was defined as the return of a test kit within the study time frame.
    The number of family members diagnosed with FH 52 weeks after results were returned to probands
    The number of family members diagnosed with FH within 52 weeks of results being returned to probands. Investigators compared the number of enrolled relatives diagnosed with FH in the genetic testing group with the number of enrolled relatives diagnosed with FH in the usual care group (lipid testing only). This diagnosis had to be made through the study. The number of enrolled relatives diagnosed with FH in each group was expressed as the new case per index case ratio (relatives diagnosed with FH/total number of index case). Relative enrolment was defined as the return of a test kit within the study time frame. The diagnosis of FH was based on meeting either genetic or the Make Early Diagnosis To Prevent Early Deaths (MEDPED) clinical criteria

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 19, 2020
    Last Updated
    December 9, 2020
    Sponsor
    University of Pennsylvania
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04526457
    Brief Title
    Is Family Screening Improved by Genetic Testing of Familial Hypercholesterolemia
    Acronym
    IFIGhTFH
    Official Title
    Is Family Screening Improved by Genetic Testing of Familial Hypercholesterolemia
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    December 2020
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    November 1, 2014 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 1, 2016 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    April 1, 2017 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Pennsylvania

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    To test the hypothesis that in patients with a clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), genetic testing and identification of a causative mutation might enhance the success of family-based cascade screening.
    Detailed Description
    To examine the impact of genetic testing on the efficiency of cascade screening for FH, patients with suspected FH or a clinical diagnosis of FH have been randomized to genetic testing or standard of care with lipid testing alone. After systematic encouragement of family enrollment, as a primary endpoint, the compared the number of probands with relatives enrolled in each group one year after results were returned to probands. The secondary endpoints examined include the number of relatives enrolled within 52 weeks of the genetic counseling call and the number of relatives diagnosed with FH through the study. Exploratory subgroup analyses were conducted stratifying the cohort by randomization/genetic test result. Further exploratory analyses compared probands' perceptions about high cholesterol diagnosis at baseline and at 20 weeks from enrollment

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Hypercholesterolemia, Familial
    Keywords
    Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Genetics, Cascade screening

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Other
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    Probands were randomized 2:1 to genetic testing for FH plus lipid testing or lipid testing alone
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    240 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Standard of Care
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    Participants with suspected FH (LDL-C greater than 220 mg/dL) or a previous clinical diagnosis of FH and randomized to standard of care with lipid testing only.
    Arm Title
    Genetic Testing
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    Participants with suspected FH (LDL-C greater than 220 mg/dL) or a previous clinical diagnosis of FH randomized to genetic testing
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Standard of Care
    Intervention Description
    Randomized to standard of care with lipid testing only.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Genetic Testing
    Intervention Description
    Randomized to genetic testing.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of probands with relatives enrolled
    Description
    The primary outcome of this study was the number of probands with family members enrolled in the study within 52 weeks of results being returned to probands. Investigators compared the proportion of probands with a relative enrolled in the genetic testing group with the proportion of probands with a relative enrolled in the usual care group (lipid testing only). Relative enrolment was defined as the return of a test kit within the study time frame.
    Time Frame
    52 weeks after genetic/lipid testing results are returned to probands
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    The number of relatives enrolled in the study 52 weeks after results were returned to probands
    Description
    The number of relatives enrolled in the study within 52 weeks of results being returned to probands. Investigators compared the number of relatives enrolled in the genetic testing group with the number of relatives enrolled in the usual care group (lipid testing only). Relative enrolment was defined as the return of a test kit within the study time frame.
    Time Frame
    52 weeks after results are returned to probands
    Title
    The number of family members diagnosed with FH 52 weeks after results were returned to probands
    Description
    The number of family members diagnosed with FH within 52 weeks of results being returned to probands. Investigators compared the number of enrolled relatives diagnosed with FH in the genetic testing group with the number of enrolled relatives diagnosed with FH in the usual care group (lipid testing only). This diagnosis had to be made through the study. The number of enrolled relatives diagnosed with FH in each group was expressed as the new case per index case ratio (relatives diagnosed with FH/total number of index case). Relative enrolment was defined as the return of a test kit within the study time frame. The diagnosis of FH was based on meeting either genetic or the Make Early Diagnosis To Prevent Early Deaths (MEDPED) clinical criteria
    Time Frame
    52 weeks after results are returned to probands
    Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
    Title
    Proband perceptions about their high cholesterol including its etiology, management and heritability at 20 weeks after enrollment compared to baseline
    Description
    Proband perceptions about their high cholesterol including its etiology, management and heritability were examined at baseline and 20 weeks after enrollment, using a questionnaire administered at these time points. Investigators examined proband agreement/disagreement with statements about the etiology of their high cholesterol, its management and heritability in these questionnaires. Using this approach, investigators were able to determine the proportion of probands that agreed/disagreed with these statements, and could compare how these proportions differed between the groups of interest at baseline/follow-up and how these changed from baseline to follow-up.
    Time Frame
    20 weeks after enrollment

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    10 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: For probands, inclusion criteria are as follows: LDL cholesterol > 220 mg/dL or a previous clinical diagnosis of FH Aged 18 years or older Ability to provide informed consent Willingness/ability to contact a minimum of 2 biological relatives about the study Exclusion Criteria: For family members of probands, inclusion criteria are as follows: Willingness to participate in the study Age 10 or older Ability to give informed consent/assent
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Daniel J Rader, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Pennsylvania
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    IRB approval to share IPD was not obtained for this protocol at the time of the initial protocol submission. If this should be required as part of the peer review process, or after publication of the study results and application will be submitted for a protocol amendment to fulfill this request
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    28008010
    Citation
    Abul-Husn NS, Manickam K, Jones LK, Wright EA, Hartzel DN, Gonzaga-Jauregui C, O'Dushlaine C, Leader JB, Lester Kirchner H, Lindbuchler DM, Barr ML, Giovanni MA, Ritchie MD, Overton JD, Reid JG, Metpally RP, Wardeh AH, Borecki IB, Yancopoulos GD, Baras A, Shuldiner AR, Gottesman O, Ledbetter DH, Carey DJ, Dewey FE, Murray MF. Genetic identification of familial hypercholesterolemia within a single U.S. health care system. Science. 2016 Dec 23;354(6319):aaf7000. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7000.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22893714
    Citation
    Benn M, Watts GF, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Familial hypercholesterolemia in the danish general population: prevalence, coronary artery disease, and cholesterol-lowering medication. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Nov;97(11):3956-64. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1563. Epub 2012 Aug 14. Erratum In: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Dec;99(12):4758-9.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27678431
    Citation
    Mortensen MB, Kulenovic I, Klausen IC, Falk E. Familial hypercholesterolemia among unselected contemporary patients presenting with first myocardial infarction: Prevalence, risk factor burden, and impact on age at presentation. J Clin Lipidol. 2016 Sep-Oct;10(5):1145-1152.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25997074
    Citation
    De Backer G, Besseling J, Chapman J, Hovingh GK, Kastelein JJ, Kotseva K, Ray K, Reiner Z, Wood D, De Bacquer D; EUROASPIRE Investigators. Prevalence and management of familial hypercholesterolaemia in coronary patients: An analysis of EUROASPIRE IV, a study of the European Society of Cardiology. Atherosclerosis. 2015 Jul;241(1):169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.04.809. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25682442
    Citation
    Wald DS, Bangash FA, Bestwick JP. Prevalence of DNA-confirmed familial hypercholesterolaemia in young patients with myocardial infarction. Eur J Intern Med. 2015 Mar;26(2):127-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26350818
    Citation
    Pang J, Poulter EB, Bell DA, Bates TR, Jefferson VL, Hillis GS, Schultz CJ, Watts GF. Frequency of familial hypercholesterolemia in patients with early-onset coronary artery disease admitted to a coronary care unit. J Clin Lipidol. 2015 Sep-Oct;9(5):703-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23956253
    Citation
    Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Humphries SE, Ginsberg HN, Masana L, Descamps OS, Wiklund O, Hegele RA, Raal FJ, Defesche JC, Wiegman A, Santos RD, Watts GF, Parhofer KG, Hovingh GK, Kovanen PT, Boileau C, Averna M, Boren J, Bruckert E, Catapano AL, Kuivenhoven JA, Pajukanta P, Ray K, Stalenhoef AF, Stroes E, Taskinen MR, Tybjaerg-Hansen A; European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2013 Dec;34(45):3478-90a. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht273. Epub 2013 Aug 15. Erratum In: Eur Heart J. 2020 Dec 14;41(47):4517.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Programme WHOHG. Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) : report of a second WHO consultation, Geneva, 4 September 1998. 1999:This report is dedicated to the memory of Professo.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    CDC. Genomic tests by levels of evidence. Centers for Disease Control Office of Public Health Genomics. http://www.cdc.gov/genomics/gtesting/file/print/tier.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed August 23, 2016.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28742895
    Citation
    Knowles JW, Rader DJ, Khoury MJ. Cascade Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia and the Use of Genetic Testing. JAMA. 2017 Jul 25;318(4):381-382. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.8543. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30071997
    Citation
    Sturm AC, Knowles JW, Gidding SS, Ahmad ZS, Ahmed CD, Ballantyne CM, Baum SJ, Bourbon M, Carrie A, Cuchel M, de Ferranti SD, Defesche JC, Freiberger T, Hershberger RE, Hovingh GK, Karayan L, Kastelein JJP, Kindt I, Lane SR, Leigh SE, Linton MF, Mata P, Neal WA, Nordestgaard BG, Santos RD, Harada-Shiba M, Sijbrands EJ, Stitziel NO, Yamashita S, Wilemon KA, Ledbetter DH, Rader DJ; Convened by the Familial Hypercholesterolemia Foundation. Clinical Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: JACC Scientific Expert Panel. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Aug 7;72(6):662-680. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.044.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    11213091
    Citation
    Umans-Eckenhausen MA, Defesche JC, Sijbrands EJ, Scheerder RL, Kastelein JJ. Review of first 5 years of screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia in the Netherlands. Lancet. 2001 Jan 20;357(9251):165-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03587-X.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18196915
    Citation
    Leren TP, Finborud TH, Manshaus TE, Ose L, Berge KE. Diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia in general practice using clinical diagnostic criteria or genetic testing as part of cascade genetic screening. Community Genet. 2008;11(1):26-35. doi: 10.1159/000111637. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21685482
    Citation
    Nherera L, Marks D, Minhas R, Thorogood M, Humphries SE. Probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia using alternative diagnostic and identification strategies. Heart. 2011 Jul;97(14):1175-81. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.213975.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27013694
    Citation
    deGoma EM, Ahmad ZS, O'Brien EC, Kindt I, Shrader P, Newman CB, Pokharel Y, Baum SJ, Hemphill LC, Hudgins LC, Ahmed CD, Gidding SS, Duffy D, Neal W, Wilemon K, Roe MT, Rader DJ, Ballantyne CM, Linton MF, Duell PB, Shapiro MD, Moriarty PM, Knowles JW. Treatment Gaps in Adults With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the United States: Data From the CASCADE-FH Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016 Jun;9(3):240-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001381. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24239923
    Citation
    Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, Goldberg AC, Gordon D, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones DM, McBride P, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC Jr, Watson K, Wilson PW; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2889-934. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 12. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):3024-3025. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 22;66(24):2812.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    34040191
    Citation
    Ajufo E, deGoma EM, Raper A, Yu KD, Cuchel M, Rader DJ. A randomized controlled trial of genetic testing and cascade screening in familial hypercholesterolemia. Genet Med. 2021 Sep;23(9):1697-1704. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01192-z. Epub 2021 May 26.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    Is Family Screening Improved by Genetic Testing of Familial Hypercholesterolemia

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs