Is Family Screening Improved by Genetic Testing of Familial Hypercholesterolemia (IFIGhTFH)
Primary Purpose
Hypercholesterolemia, Familial
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Standard of Care
Genetic Testing
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Hypercholesterolemia, Familial focused on measuring Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Genetics, Cascade screening
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
For probands, inclusion criteria are as follows:
- LDL cholesterol > 220 mg/dL or a previous clinical diagnosis of FH
- Aged 18 years or older
- Ability to provide informed consent
- Willingness/ability to contact a minimum of 2 biological relatives about the study
Exclusion Criteria:
For family members of probands, inclusion criteria are as follows:
- Willingness to participate in the study
- Age 10 or older
- Ability to give informed consent/assent
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Other
Other
Arm Label
Standard of Care
Genetic Testing
Arm Description
Participants with suspected FH (LDL-C greater than 220 mg/dL) or a previous clinical diagnosis of FH and randomized to standard of care with lipid testing only.
Participants with suspected FH (LDL-C greater than 220 mg/dL) or a previous clinical diagnosis of FH randomized to genetic testing
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of probands with relatives enrolled
The primary outcome of this study was the number of probands with family members enrolled in the study within 52 weeks of results being returned to probands. Investigators compared the proportion of probands with a relative enrolled in the genetic testing group with the proportion of probands with a relative enrolled in the usual care group (lipid testing only). Relative enrolment was defined as the return of a test kit within the study time frame.
Secondary Outcome Measures
The number of relatives enrolled in the study 52 weeks after results were returned to probands
The number of relatives enrolled in the study within 52 weeks of results being returned to probands. Investigators compared the number of relatives enrolled in the genetic testing group with the number of relatives enrolled in the usual care group (lipid testing only). Relative enrolment was defined as the return of a test kit within the study time frame.
The number of family members diagnosed with FH 52 weeks after results were returned to probands
The number of family members diagnosed with FH within 52 weeks of results being returned to probands. Investigators compared the number of enrolled relatives diagnosed with FH in the genetic testing group with the number of enrolled relatives diagnosed with FH in the usual care group (lipid testing only). This diagnosis had to be made through the study. The number of enrolled relatives diagnosed with FH in each group was expressed as the new case per index case ratio (relatives diagnosed with FH/total number of index case). Relative enrolment was defined as the return of a test kit within the study time frame. The diagnosis of FH was based on meeting either genetic or the Make Early Diagnosis To Prevent Early Deaths (MEDPED) clinical criteria
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04526457
First Posted
August 19, 2020
Last Updated
December 9, 2020
Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04526457
Brief Title
Is Family Screening Improved by Genetic Testing of Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Acronym
IFIGhTFH
Official Title
Is Family Screening Improved by Genetic Testing of Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 1, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 1, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 1, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
To test the hypothesis that in patients with a clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), genetic testing and identification of a causative mutation might enhance the success of family-based cascade screening.
Detailed Description
To examine the impact of genetic testing on the efficiency of cascade screening for FH, patients with suspected FH or a clinical diagnosis of FH have been randomized to genetic testing or standard of care with lipid testing alone. After systematic encouragement of family enrollment, as a primary endpoint, the compared the number of probands with relatives enrolled in each group one year after results were returned to probands. The secondary endpoints examined include the number of relatives enrolled within 52 weeks of the genetic counseling call and the number of relatives diagnosed with FH through the study. Exploratory subgroup analyses were conducted stratifying the cohort by randomization/genetic test result. Further exploratory analyses compared probands' perceptions about high cholesterol diagnosis at baseline and at 20 weeks from enrollment
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hypercholesterolemia, Familial
Keywords
Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Genetics, Cascade screening
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Probands were randomized 2:1 to genetic testing for FH plus lipid testing or lipid testing alone
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
240 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Standard of Care
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Participants with suspected FH (LDL-C greater than 220 mg/dL) or a previous clinical diagnosis of FH and randomized to standard of care with lipid testing only.
Arm Title
Genetic Testing
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Participants with suspected FH (LDL-C greater than 220 mg/dL) or a previous clinical diagnosis of FH randomized to genetic testing
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Standard of Care
Intervention Description
Randomized to standard of care with lipid testing only.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Genetic Testing
Intervention Description
Randomized to genetic testing.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of probands with relatives enrolled
Description
The primary outcome of this study was the number of probands with family members enrolled in the study within 52 weeks of results being returned to probands. Investigators compared the proportion of probands with a relative enrolled in the genetic testing group with the proportion of probands with a relative enrolled in the usual care group (lipid testing only). Relative enrolment was defined as the return of a test kit within the study time frame.
Time Frame
52 weeks after genetic/lipid testing results are returned to probands
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The number of relatives enrolled in the study 52 weeks after results were returned to probands
Description
The number of relatives enrolled in the study within 52 weeks of results being returned to probands. Investigators compared the number of relatives enrolled in the genetic testing group with the number of relatives enrolled in the usual care group (lipid testing only). Relative enrolment was defined as the return of a test kit within the study time frame.
Time Frame
52 weeks after results are returned to probands
Title
The number of family members diagnosed with FH 52 weeks after results were returned to probands
Description
The number of family members diagnosed with FH within 52 weeks of results being returned to probands. Investigators compared the number of enrolled relatives diagnosed with FH in the genetic testing group with the number of enrolled relatives diagnosed with FH in the usual care group (lipid testing only). This diagnosis had to be made through the study. The number of enrolled relatives diagnosed with FH in each group was expressed as the new case per index case ratio (relatives diagnosed with FH/total number of index case). Relative enrolment was defined as the return of a test kit within the study time frame. The diagnosis of FH was based on meeting either genetic or the Make Early Diagnosis To Prevent Early Deaths (MEDPED) clinical criteria
Time Frame
52 weeks after results are returned to probands
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Proband perceptions about their high cholesterol including its etiology, management and heritability at 20 weeks after enrollment compared to baseline
Description
Proband perceptions about their high cholesterol including its etiology, management and heritability were examined at baseline and 20 weeks after enrollment, using a questionnaire administered at these time points. Investigators examined proband agreement/disagreement with statements about the etiology of their high cholesterol, its management and heritability in these questionnaires. Using this approach, investigators were able to determine the proportion of probands that agreed/disagreed with these statements, and could compare how these proportions differed between the groups of interest at baseline/follow-up and how these changed from baseline to follow-up.
Time Frame
20 weeks after enrollment
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
10 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
For probands, inclusion criteria are as follows:
LDL cholesterol > 220 mg/dL or a previous clinical diagnosis of FH
Aged 18 years or older
Ability to provide informed consent
Willingness/ability to contact a minimum of 2 biological relatives about the study
Exclusion Criteria:
For family members of probands, inclusion criteria are as follows:
Willingness to participate in the study
Age 10 or older
Ability to give informed consent/assent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniel J Rader, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pennsylvania
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IRB approval to share IPD was not obtained for this protocol at the time of the initial protocol submission. If this should be required as part of the peer review process, or after publication of the study results and application will be submitted for a protocol amendment to fulfill this request
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28008010
Citation
Abul-Husn NS, Manickam K, Jones LK, Wright EA, Hartzel DN, Gonzaga-Jauregui C, O'Dushlaine C, Leader JB, Lester Kirchner H, Lindbuchler DM, Barr ML, Giovanni MA, Ritchie MD, Overton JD, Reid JG, Metpally RP, Wardeh AH, Borecki IB, Yancopoulos GD, Baras A, Shuldiner AR, Gottesman O, Ledbetter DH, Carey DJ, Dewey FE, Murray MF. Genetic identification of familial hypercholesterolemia within a single U.S. health care system. Science. 2016 Dec 23;354(6319):aaf7000. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7000.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22893714
Citation
Benn M, Watts GF, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Familial hypercholesterolemia in the danish general population: prevalence, coronary artery disease, and cholesterol-lowering medication. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Nov;97(11):3956-64. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1563. Epub 2012 Aug 14. Erratum In: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Dec;99(12):4758-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27678431
Citation
Mortensen MB, Kulenovic I, Klausen IC, Falk E. Familial hypercholesterolemia among unselected contemporary patients presenting with first myocardial infarction: Prevalence, risk factor burden, and impact on age at presentation. J Clin Lipidol. 2016 Sep-Oct;10(5):1145-1152.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25997074
Citation
De Backer G, Besseling J, Chapman J, Hovingh GK, Kastelein JJ, Kotseva K, Ray K, Reiner Z, Wood D, De Bacquer D; EUROASPIRE Investigators. Prevalence and management of familial hypercholesterolaemia in coronary patients: An analysis of EUROASPIRE IV, a study of the European Society of Cardiology. Atherosclerosis. 2015 Jul;241(1):169-75. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.04.809. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25682442
Citation
Wald DS, Bangash FA, Bestwick JP. Prevalence of DNA-confirmed familial hypercholesterolaemia in young patients with myocardial infarction. Eur J Intern Med. 2015 Mar;26(2):127-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26350818
Citation
Pang J, Poulter EB, Bell DA, Bates TR, Jefferson VL, Hillis GS, Schultz CJ, Watts GF. Frequency of familial hypercholesterolemia in patients with early-onset coronary artery disease admitted to a coronary care unit. J Clin Lipidol. 2015 Sep-Oct;9(5):703-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2015.07.005. Epub 2015 Jul 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23956253
Citation
Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Humphries SE, Ginsberg HN, Masana L, Descamps OS, Wiklund O, Hegele RA, Raal FJ, Defesche JC, Wiegman A, Santos RD, Watts GF, Parhofer KG, Hovingh GK, Kovanen PT, Boileau C, Averna M, Boren J, Bruckert E, Catapano AL, Kuivenhoven JA, Pajukanta P, Ray K, Stalenhoef AF, Stroes E, Taskinen MR, Tybjaerg-Hansen A; European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2013 Dec;34(45):3478-90a. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht273. Epub 2013 Aug 15. Erratum In: Eur Heart J. 2020 Dec 14;41(47):4517.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Programme WHOHG. Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) : report of a second WHO consultation, Geneva, 4 September 1998. 1999:This report is dedicated to the memory of Professo.
Results Reference
background
Citation
CDC. Genomic tests by levels of evidence. Centers for Disease Control Office of Public Health Genomics. http://www.cdc.gov/genomics/gtesting/file/print/tier.pdf. Published 2013. Accessed August 23, 2016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28742895
Citation
Knowles JW, Rader DJ, Khoury MJ. Cascade Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia and the Use of Genetic Testing. JAMA. 2017 Jul 25;318(4):381-382. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.8543. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30071997
Citation
Sturm AC, Knowles JW, Gidding SS, Ahmad ZS, Ahmed CD, Ballantyne CM, Baum SJ, Bourbon M, Carrie A, Cuchel M, de Ferranti SD, Defesche JC, Freiberger T, Hershberger RE, Hovingh GK, Karayan L, Kastelein JJP, Kindt I, Lane SR, Leigh SE, Linton MF, Mata P, Neal WA, Nordestgaard BG, Santos RD, Harada-Shiba M, Sijbrands EJ, Stitziel NO, Yamashita S, Wilemon KA, Ledbetter DH, Rader DJ; Convened by the Familial Hypercholesterolemia Foundation. Clinical Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: JACC Scientific Expert Panel. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Aug 7;72(6):662-680. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.044.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11213091
Citation
Umans-Eckenhausen MA, Defesche JC, Sijbrands EJ, Scheerder RL, Kastelein JJ. Review of first 5 years of screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia in the Netherlands. Lancet. 2001 Jan 20;357(9251):165-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03587-X.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18196915
Citation
Leren TP, Finborud TH, Manshaus TE, Ose L, Berge KE. Diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia in general practice using clinical diagnostic criteria or genetic testing as part of cascade genetic screening. Community Genet. 2008;11(1):26-35. doi: 10.1159/000111637. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21685482
Citation
Nherera L, Marks D, Minhas R, Thorogood M, Humphries SE. Probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis of cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia using alternative diagnostic and identification strategies. Heart. 2011 Jul;97(14):1175-81. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.213975.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27013694
Citation
deGoma EM, Ahmad ZS, O'Brien EC, Kindt I, Shrader P, Newman CB, Pokharel Y, Baum SJ, Hemphill LC, Hudgins LC, Ahmed CD, Gidding SS, Duffy D, Neal W, Wilemon K, Roe MT, Rader DJ, Ballantyne CM, Linton MF, Duell PB, Shapiro MD, Moriarty PM, Knowles JW. Treatment Gaps in Adults With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the United States: Data From the CASCADE-FH Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2016 Jun;9(3):240-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001381. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24239923
Citation
Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, Goldberg AC, Gordon D, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones DM, McBride P, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC Jr, Watson K, Wilson PW; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):2889-934. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 12. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt B):3024-3025. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 22;66(24):2812.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34040191
Citation
Ajufo E, deGoma EM, Raper A, Yu KD, Cuchel M, Rader DJ. A randomized controlled trial of genetic testing and cascade screening in familial hypercholesterolemia. Genet Med. 2021 Sep;23(9):1697-1704. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01192-z. Epub 2021 May 26.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Is Family Screening Improved by Genetic Testing of Familial Hypercholesterolemia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs