search
Back to results

Lay Health Worker Engage, Educate, and Encourage Patients to Share (LEAPS)

Primary Purpose

End of Life, Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lay Health Worker Intervention
Usual Care
Sponsored by
Stanford University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for End of Life focused on measuring cancer, end of life, patient-centered

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Newly diagnosed patients with a cancer diagnosis.
  2. Patients with any relapse or progressive disease (any cancer diagnosis) as identified by imaging or biopsy and confirmed by physician.
  3. The patients must be 18 years or older.
  4. Patients must have the capacity to verbally consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to consent to the study due to lack of capacity as documented by the referring physician.
  2. Patients without a newly diagnosed malignancy or patients without relapse of disease.
  3. Patients not eligible for Fund benefits.

Patients without a newly diagnosed malignancy or patients without relapse of disease.

Sites / Locations

  • Stanford University School of Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Intervention Group Arm

Control Group Arm

Arm Description

Patients randomized into the intervention will be assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention. The intervention includes: education on early advance care planning, documenting goals of care, assessing symptoms, and coordinating community services (such as home health, home visits, and home hospice). The intervention arm will also receive usual care as provided by Unite Here Health and their local oncologists.

The control group arm will receive usual care as provided by Unite Here Health and their local oncologists.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Patient Quality of Life Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey
Each patient will receive a quality of life survey (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey) at baseline and 4 months. We will measure the change in quality of life at baseline to 4 months. Scores for quality of life will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of HRQOL in cancer patients: Physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Each question is a 5-point likert scale item. Scores range from 0-108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Patient Satisfaction With Decision-Making Using the Satisfaction With Decision (SWD) Survey
The validated Satisfaction with Decision (SWD) Survey was administered to all participants at 4 months after study enrollment. The SWD is a 6-item questionnaire, where respondents rate their agreement with 6 statements (e.g. "I am satisfied that I am adequately informed about the issues important to my decision") on a likert-type scale. Answer options were (1) Strongly Disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither Agree nor Disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly Agree. Responses to each item were averaged to give a score of 0 to 5 where 0 indicated lowest satisfaction and 5 indicated most satisfied with decision making. Scores for each group were averaged at 4 months after study enrollment. Results are expressed as a proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree" at 4 months post-enrollment on the SWD scale, which measured ratings of decision-making. Changes in the proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree" are reflected from baseline to 4 months post-enrollment.
Patient Satisfaction With Decision-Making Using the Satisfaction With Decision Survey
The validated Satisfaction with Decision (SWD) Survey was administered to all participants at 12 months after study enrollment. The SWD is a 6-item questionnaire, where respondents rate their agreement with 6 statements (e.g. "I am satisfied that I am adequately informed about the issues important to my decision") on a likert-type scale. Answer options were (1) Strongly Disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither Agree nor Disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly Agree. Responses to each item were averaged to give a score of 0 to 5 where 0 indicated lowest satisfaction and 5 indicated most satisfied with decision making. Scores for each group are averaged at 12 months after study enrollment. Results are expressed as a proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree" at 12 months post-enrollment on the SWD scale, which measured ratings of decision-making. Changes in the proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree" are reflected from baseline to 12 months.
Patient Activation Using the Patient Activation Measure Survey
Each patient will receive the 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) at 4 months after study enrollment. This is a validated measure from Insignia Health. Each item is rated on 4-point scale (1 strongly disagree to 4 strongly agree, with additional "not applicable" option). Higher scores indicate greater patient activation. For the PAM-13, minimum score is 0 and maximum is 100. Raw scores are converted into activation levels per the scoring guidelines by Insignia Health for: level 1 Disengaged and Overwhelmed, level 2 Becoming Aware but Still Struggling, level 3 Taking Action and Gaining Control, level 4 Maintaining Behaviors and Pushing Further. Scores for each group will be averaged at 4 months after study enrollment.
Patient Activation Using the Patient Activation Measure Survey
Each patient will receive the 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) at 12 months after study enrollment. This is a validated measure from Insignia Health. Each item is rated on 4-point scale (1 strongly disagree to 4 strongly agree, with additional "not applicable" option). Higher scores indicate greater patient activation. For the PAM-13, minimum score is 0 and maximum is 100 (highest level of activation). Raw scores are converted into activation levels per the scoring guidelines by Insignia Health for: level 1 Disengaged and Overwhelmed, level 2 Becoming Aware but Still Struggling, level 3 Taking Action and Gaining Control, level 4 Maintaining Behaviors and Pushing Further. Scores for each group will be averaged 12 months after study enrollment.
Patient Quality of Life Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey
Each patient will receive a quality of life survey (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey) at 12 months. Scores for quality of life will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey-General survey. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of HRQOL in cancer patients: Physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Each question is a 5-point likert scale item. Scores range from 0-108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Emergency Department Visit (Chart Review)
Emergency Department Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Emergency Department Visit (Chart Review)
Emergency Department Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Emergency Department Visit (Chart Review)
Emergency Department Use will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who is deceased within 12 months of enrollment, looking at their ER visits during the last 30 days of life.
Hospitalization Visit (Chart Review)
Hospitalization use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Hospitalization Visits (Chart Review)
Hospitalization use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Hospitalization Visits (Chart Review)
Hospitalization use will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who is deceased within12 months of enrollment, looking at their hospital visits during the last 30 days of life.
Advance Directive Documentation (Chart Review)
Advance Directive documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Advance Directive Documentation (Chart Review)
Advance Directive documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (Chart Review)
Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (Chart Review)
Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Goals of Care Documentation (Chart Review)
Goals of Care documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Goals of Care Documentation (Chart Review)
Goals of Care documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Total Costs of Care
Total Costs of Care will be evaluated by review of claims data from time of enrollment until 12 months post-enrollment
Total Costs of Care End of Life
Total Costs of Care during the last 30 days of life will be evaluated by review of claims data from the 30 days preceding death for those patients who become deceased within 12 months of study enrollment.
Palliative Care Use (Chart Review)
Palliative Care Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Palliative Care Use (Chart Review)
Palliative Care Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Palliative Care Use (Chart Review)
Palliative Care Use will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who is deceased within12 months of enrollment, looking at their palliative care usage during the last 30 days of life.
Hospice Use (Chart Review)
Hospice Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Hospice Use (Chart Review)
Hospice Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Hospice Use (Chart Review)
Hospice Use will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who is deceased within12 months of enrollment, looking at their hospice use during the last 30 days of life.
Survival (Chart Review)
Survival rate for patients will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review at 4 months after enrollment.
Survival (Chart Review)
Survival rate for patients will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review at 12 months after enrollment.
Patient Satisfaction With Decision-Making Using the Satisfaction With Decision Survey
The validated Satisfaction with Decision (SWD) Survey was administered to all participants at baseline. The SWD is a 6-item questionnaire, where respondents rate their agreement with 6 statements (e.g. "I am satisfied that I am adequately informed about the issues important to my decision") on a likert-type scale. Answer options were (1) Strongly Disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither Agree nor Disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly Agree. Responses to each item were averaged to give a score of 0 to 5 where 0 indicated lowest satisfaction and 5 indicated most satisfied with decision making. Results are expressed as a proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree" at Baseline on the Satisfaction with Decision scale, which measured ratings of decision-making.

Full Information

First Posted
October 5, 2018
Last Updated
July 6, 2023
Sponsor
Stanford University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03699748
Brief Title
Lay Health Worker Engage, Educate, and Encourage Patients to Share
Acronym
LEAPS
Official Title
Lay Health Worker Engage, Educate, and Encourage Patients to Share
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 30, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Stanford University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the LEAPS program is to understand how a trained lay health worker who engages with newly diagnosed patients after a diagnosis of an advanced stage of cancer can help to engage patients in advance care planning, improve patient satisfaction with their decision-making, activation, quality of life, and healthcare resource utilization.
Detailed Description
Unite Here Health proposes to implement and evaluate several critical elements to be in alignment with the mission of the organization to provide high value care to their members. The Lay Health Worker Engages, Educates, and Encourages Patients to Share intervention is an innovative program that will strengthen provider-patient relationship and facilitate whole person care about matters important to Unite Here Health members who are diagnosed with cancer and important to support network and family. The project is intended to help establish Goals of Care Plan with appropriate documentation, develop, deploy, and evaluate a model of care for persons with cancer that is intended to improve clinical outcomes and experience of care for individuals. The intervention provides patients with lay health coaches who assist patients and their families in discussing goals of care and engage in shared-decision making. The goal of the project is to demonstrate that there is improved documentation of goals of care, patient experiences, patient activation and quality of life outcomes, and that the program helps to reduce utilization of health care resources at the end of life.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
End of Life, Cancer
Keywords
cancer, end of life, patient-centered

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Care ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
160 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention Group Arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients randomized into the intervention will be assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention. The intervention includes: education on early advance care planning, documenting goals of care, assessing symptoms, and coordinating community services (such as home health, home visits, and home hospice). The intervention arm will also receive usual care as provided by Unite Here Health and their local oncologists.
Arm Title
Control Group Arm
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The control group arm will receive usual care as provided by Unite Here Health and their local oncologists.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Lay Health Worker Intervention
Intervention Description
Patients randomized into the intervention will be assigned a lay health worker who will contact the patient to begin the intervention. The intervention includes: education on early advance care planning, documenting goals of care, assessing symptoms, and coordinating community services (such as home health, home visits, and home hospice). The intervention is provided along with usual care as provided by Unite Here Health and local oncologists.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Usual Care
Intervention Description
Usual care as provided by Unite Here Health and local oncologists
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient Quality of Life Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey
Description
Each patient will receive a quality of life survey (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey) at baseline and 4 months. We will measure the change in quality of life at baseline to 4 months. Scores for quality of life will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of HRQOL in cancer patients: Physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Each question is a 5-point likert scale item. Scores range from 0-108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time Frame
Change in Quality of Life from Baseline to 4 Months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient Satisfaction With Decision-Making Using the Satisfaction With Decision (SWD) Survey
Description
The validated Satisfaction with Decision (SWD) Survey was administered to all participants at 4 months after study enrollment. The SWD is a 6-item questionnaire, where respondents rate their agreement with 6 statements (e.g. "I am satisfied that I am adequately informed about the issues important to my decision") on a likert-type scale. Answer options were (1) Strongly Disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither Agree nor Disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly Agree. Responses to each item were averaged to give a score of 0 to 5 where 0 indicated lowest satisfaction and 5 indicated most satisfied with decision making. Scores for each group were averaged at 4 months after study enrollment. Results are expressed as a proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree" at 4 months post-enrollment on the SWD scale, which measured ratings of decision-making. Changes in the proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree" are reflected from baseline to 4 months post-enrollment.
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who strongly agree that decisions about their health care were theirs to make at 4 months post study enrollment.
Title
Patient Satisfaction With Decision-Making Using the Satisfaction With Decision Survey
Description
The validated Satisfaction with Decision (SWD) Survey was administered to all participants at 12 months after study enrollment. The SWD is a 6-item questionnaire, where respondents rate their agreement with 6 statements (e.g. "I am satisfied that I am adequately informed about the issues important to my decision") on a likert-type scale. Answer options were (1) Strongly Disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither Agree nor Disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly Agree. Responses to each item were averaged to give a score of 0 to 5 where 0 indicated lowest satisfaction and 5 indicated most satisfied with decision making. Scores for each group are averaged at 12 months after study enrollment. Results are expressed as a proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree" at 12 months post-enrollment on the SWD scale, which measured ratings of decision-making. Changes in the proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree" are reflected from baseline to 12 months.
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who strongly agree that decisions about their health care were theirs to make at 12 months post study enrollment.
Title
Patient Activation Using the Patient Activation Measure Survey
Description
Each patient will receive the 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) at 4 months after study enrollment. This is a validated measure from Insignia Health. Each item is rated on 4-point scale (1 strongly disagree to 4 strongly agree, with additional "not applicable" option). Higher scores indicate greater patient activation. For the PAM-13, minimum score is 0 and maximum is 100. Raw scores are converted into activation levels per the scoring guidelines by Insignia Health for: level 1 Disengaged and Overwhelmed, level 2 Becoming Aware but Still Struggling, level 3 Taking Action and Gaining Control, level 4 Maintaining Behaviors and Pushing Further. Scores for each group will be averaged at 4 months after study enrollment.
Time Frame
Change in Patient Activation Measure from baseline to 4 months post enrollment.
Title
Patient Activation Using the Patient Activation Measure Survey
Description
Each patient will receive the 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) at 12 months after study enrollment. This is a validated measure from Insignia Health. Each item is rated on 4-point scale (1 strongly disagree to 4 strongly agree, with additional "not applicable" option). Higher scores indicate greater patient activation. For the PAM-13, minimum score is 0 and maximum is 100 (highest level of activation). Raw scores are converted into activation levels per the scoring guidelines by Insignia Health for: level 1 Disengaged and Overwhelmed, level 2 Becoming Aware but Still Struggling, level 3 Taking Action and Gaining Control, level 4 Maintaining Behaviors and Pushing Further. Scores for each group will be averaged 12 months after study enrollment.
Time Frame
Change in Patient Activation Measure from baseline to 12 months post-enrollment.
Title
Patient Quality of Life Using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey
Description
Each patient will receive a quality of life survey (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey) at 12 months. Scores for quality of life will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Survey-General survey. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of HRQOL in cancer patients: Physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Each question is a 5-point likert scale item. Scores range from 0-108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life at 12 months
Title
Emergency Department Visit (Chart Review)
Description
Emergency Department Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
4 months after patient enrollment
Title
Emergency Department Visit (Chart Review)
Description
Emergency Department Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
12 months after patient enrollment
Title
Emergency Department Visit (Chart Review)
Description
Emergency Department Use will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who is deceased within 12 months of enrollment, looking at their ER visits during the last 30 days of life.
Time Frame
Last 30 days of life up to 12 months from patient enrollment
Title
Hospitalization Visit (Chart Review)
Description
Hospitalization use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
4 months after patient enrollment
Title
Hospitalization Visits (Chart Review)
Description
Hospitalization use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
12 months after study enrollment
Title
Hospitalization Visits (Chart Review)
Description
Hospitalization use will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who is deceased within12 months of enrollment, looking at their hospital visits during the last 30 days of life.
Time Frame
last 30 days of life
Title
Advance Directive Documentation (Chart Review)
Description
Advance Directive documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
4 months after patient enrollment
Title
Advance Directive Documentation (Chart Review)
Description
Advance Directive documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
12 months after patient enrollment
Title
Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (Chart Review)
Description
Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
4 months after patient enrollment
Title
Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (Chart Review)
Description
Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
12 months after patient enrollment
Title
Goals of Care Documentation (Chart Review)
Description
Goals of Care documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
4 months after patient enrollment
Title
Goals of Care Documentation (Chart Review)
Description
Goals of Care documentation for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
12 months after patient enrollment
Title
Total Costs of Care
Description
Total Costs of Care will be evaluated by review of claims data from time of enrollment until 12 months post-enrollment
Time Frame
12 months after patient enrollment
Title
Total Costs of Care End of Life
Description
Total Costs of Care during the last 30 days of life will be evaluated by review of claims data from the 30 days preceding death for those patients who become deceased within 12 months of study enrollment.
Time Frame
Last 30 days of life up to 12 months from patient enrollment
Title
Palliative Care Use (Chart Review)
Description
Palliative Care Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
4 months after patient enrollment
Title
Palliative Care Use (Chart Review)
Description
Palliative Care Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
12 months after patient enrollment
Title
Palliative Care Use (Chart Review)
Description
Palliative Care Use will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who is deceased within12 months of enrollment, looking at their palliative care usage during the last 30 days of life.
Time Frame
last 30 days of life
Title
Hospice Use (Chart Review)
Description
Hospice Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 4 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
4 months after patient enrollment
Title
Hospice Use (Chart Review)
Description
Hospice Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 12 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
12 months after patient enrollment
Title
Hospice Use (Chart Review)
Description
Hospice Use will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient who is deceased within12 months of enrollment, looking at their hospice use during the last 30 days of life.
Time Frame
last 30 days of life
Title
Survival (Chart Review)
Description
Survival rate for patients will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review at 4 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
4 months after patient enrollment
Title
Survival (Chart Review)
Description
Survival rate for patients will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review at 12 months after enrollment.
Time Frame
12 months after patient enrollment
Title
Patient Satisfaction With Decision-Making Using the Satisfaction With Decision Survey
Description
The validated Satisfaction with Decision (SWD) Survey was administered to all participants at baseline. The SWD is a 6-item questionnaire, where respondents rate their agreement with 6 statements (e.g. "I am satisfied that I am adequately informed about the issues important to my decision") on a likert-type scale. Answer options were (1) Strongly Disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither Agree nor Disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly Agree. Responses to each item were averaged to give a score of 0 to 5 where 0 indicated lowest satisfaction and 5 indicated most satisfied with decision making. Results are expressed as a proportion of participants who responded "strongly agree" at Baseline on the Satisfaction with Decision scale, which measured ratings of decision-making.
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who strongly agreed the decisions about their health care were theirs to make at baseline (study enrollment).

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Newly diagnosed patients with a cancer diagnosis. Patients with any relapse or progressive disease (any cancer diagnosis) as identified by imaging or biopsy and confirmed by physician. The patients must be 18 years or older. Patients must have the capacity to verbally consent. Exclusion Criteria: Inability to consent to the study due to lack of capacity as documented by the referring physician. Patients without a newly diagnosed malignancy or patients without relapse of disease. Patients not eligible for Fund benefits. Patients without a newly diagnosed malignancy or patients without relapse of disease.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Manali I Patel, MD MPH MS
Organizational Affiliation
Stanford University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Stanford University School of Medicine
City
Stanford
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32145441
Citation
Patel MI, Khateeb S, Coker T. A randomized trial of a multi-level intervention to improve advance care planning and symptom management among low-income and minority employees diagnosed with cancer in outpatient community settings. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;91:105971. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105971. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Lay Health Worker Engage, Educate, and Encourage Patients to Share

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs