search
Back to results

Neurofeedback Using Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes

Primary Purpose

Parkinson Disease, Epilepsy, Essential Tremor

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Neurofeedback
Sponsored by
ETH Zurich
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Parkinson Disease

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

patients undergoing clinically indicated implantation of a Percept™ PC neurostimulator, age ≥ 18 years as well as planned hospitalisation of ≥ 3 days after operation

Exclusion Criteria:

minimal prognosticated survival of less than 1 year, reduced state of consciousness (i. e. Glasgow Coma Scale < 15), inability to communicate (in terms of hearing, seeing, speaking and understanding), other significant concomitant diseases (e. g. cardiovascular disease, infectious disease, isolation), inability to follow procedures, insufficient knowledge of project language, inability to give consent and unlikeliness to follow protocol.

Sites / Locations

  • ETH ZurichRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Bidirectional Neurofeedback

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Amount of endogenous neuromodulation (difference in oscillatory power)
The investigators will assess the amount of endogenous modulation of the neurofeedback parameter as compared to a baseline state ('rest') as well as in a bidirectional neurofeedback design (upregulation vs. downregulation). Local field potentials are measured (LFP-recording; physiological parameter; for Parkinson patients the beta-frequencies will be assessed during the study period) using already implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes (Medtronic DBS electrodes) and used to compute the neurofeedback parameter. The amount of endogenous neuromodulation is determined as the difference of power of neuronal oscillations between two conditions [unit of measure: %-difference in power of deep brain neuronal oscillations].

Secondary Outcome Measures

performance in motor activity tasks
The investigators will assess the 'performance in motor activity tasks' (= name of the measurement) using the measurement tools of wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) and motion detectors. The following units of measure (physiological parameters) could be extracted from the recorded data: speed of movement, smoothness of movement, extent of movement.
transfer of neurofeedback-learnt strategies
The investigators will assess the amount of endogenous modulation of the neurofeedback parameter as compared to a baseline state ('rest') as well as in a bidirectional neurofeedback design (upregulation vs. downregulation) in the ABSENCE of active neurofeedback. Local field potentials are measured (LFP-recording; physiological parameter; for Parkinson patients the beta-frequencies will be assessed during the study period) using already implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes (Medtronic DBS electrodes) and used to compute the neurofeedback parameter. The amount of endogenous neuromodulation is determined as the difference of power of neuronal oscillations between two conditions [unit of measure: %-difference in power of deep brain neuronal oscillations].
agency as measured on a visual scale (1-10)
the subjectively perceived ability to control deep brain oscillatory activity. Patients will be asked to indicate the perceived ability (agency) to control the neurofeedback parameter on a visual scale from 0 (no control) to 10 (perfect control).

Full Information

First Posted
September 23, 2021
Last Updated
September 20, 2022
Sponsor
ETH Zurich
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05101161
Brief Title
Neurofeedback Using Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes
Official Title
Neurofeedback Using Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
September 23, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 23, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 23, 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
ETH Zurich

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a gold-standard symptomatic treatment option for Parkinson's disease (PD) and is also explored for a variety of other neurological disorders. The implantation of electrodes into deep brain areas has not only enabled the application of electrical stimuli, but has also provided researchers and clinicians with an unprecedented window to investigate aberrant neuronal activity right at the core of pathological brain circuits. Local field potentials (LFP) have already been readily investigated through externalised DBS electrode wires prior to internalisation and connection to an implantable neurostimulator. In the case of PD, motor symptoms have been evidenced to correlate with exaggerated beta oscillatory activity (13-35 Hz) in the LFP recorded from the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Firstly, beta activity recorded in the STN at rest in patients withdrawn from their medication has been correlated with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) across patients. Secondly, a reduction of signal power in the beta-band was correlated with clinical improvements of motor symptoms. Thirdly, the two main therapeutic strategies, the administration of L-Dopa, and high-frequency DBS both lead to a suppression of beta-synchronicity in the STN. Furthermore, beta-oscillations show fast and movement-dependent modulation over time and can serve as a biomarker and feedback signal to control the delivery of DBS. The investigators recently implemented deep brain electrical neurofeedback to provide real-time visual neurofeedback of pathological STN oscillations through externalised DBS electrodes and showed that PD patients were able to volitionally control and reduce subthalamic activity within a single 1 hour session. Moreover, neurofeedback-learnt strategies accelerated movements and could be retained in the short- and mid-term. Only recently, a newly developed neurostimulator, the Percept™ PC (Medtronic Neurological Division, Minneapolis, MN, USA), has been clinically approved, which can not only apply electrical impulses, but also enable the measurement and transmission of brain activity. This neurostimulator is now the first choice for implantations at the University Hospital Zurich and is used for a variety of neurological disorders. The investigators' goal is to investigate whether neurofeedback through a fully implanted deep brain stimulation device is possible and can lead to a better control of pathological oscillations as well as symptom mitigation. Having shown that endogenous control over deep brain oscillations is possible, the investigators will also test this novel therapeutic approach for pathologies other than PD that are also treated with DBS. Neurofeedback using implanted DBS electrodes will have the advantage of enabling longer and multiple-day training sessions, which the investigators hypothesise to have a larger impact on control over pathological deep brain oscillations and neurological symptoms, as such a fully implanted neurofeedback system no longer requires the externalisation of DBS wires and is as such no longer limited to the first two days after electrode implantation. All in all, the investigators will not exceed a total streaming time of 7 hours per patients (7 d of battery time), which the investigators deem justifiable with respect to a battery life of > 5 years. This proposed research is highly significant as it will help our understanding of various neurological diseases that are highly prevalent in society (PD being, for instance, the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer's disease) and might culminate in novel, endogenous treatment strategies. The overall risk for patients is minimal to non-existent, as stimulation parameters are unaffected and the intended changes in brain activity are self-induced while DBS stimulation is off.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson Disease, Epilepsy, Essential Tremor

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Bidirectional Neurofeedback
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Neurofeedback
Intervention Description
Modulating brain oscillations based on visual neurofeedback
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Amount of endogenous neuromodulation (difference in oscillatory power)
Description
The investigators will assess the amount of endogenous modulation of the neurofeedback parameter as compared to a baseline state ('rest') as well as in a bidirectional neurofeedback design (upregulation vs. downregulation). Local field potentials are measured (LFP-recording; physiological parameter; for Parkinson patients the beta-frequencies will be assessed during the study period) using already implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes (Medtronic DBS electrodes) and used to compute the neurofeedback parameter. The amount of endogenous neuromodulation is determined as the difference of power of neuronal oscillations between two conditions [unit of measure: %-difference in power of deep brain neuronal oscillations].
Time Frame
60 Minutes
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
performance in motor activity tasks
Description
The investigators will assess the 'performance in motor activity tasks' (= name of the measurement) using the measurement tools of wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) and motion detectors. The following units of measure (physiological parameters) could be extracted from the recorded data: speed of movement, smoothness of movement, extent of movement.
Time Frame
60 min
Title
transfer of neurofeedback-learnt strategies
Description
The investigators will assess the amount of endogenous modulation of the neurofeedback parameter as compared to a baseline state ('rest') as well as in a bidirectional neurofeedback design (upregulation vs. downregulation) in the ABSENCE of active neurofeedback. Local field potentials are measured (LFP-recording; physiological parameter; for Parkinson patients the beta-frequencies will be assessed during the study period) using already implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes (Medtronic DBS electrodes) and used to compute the neurofeedback parameter. The amount of endogenous neuromodulation is determined as the difference of power of neuronal oscillations between two conditions [unit of measure: %-difference in power of deep brain neuronal oscillations].
Time Frame
60 min
Title
agency as measured on a visual scale (1-10)
Description
the subjectively perceived ability to control deep brain oscillatory activity. Patients will be asked to indicate the perceived ability (agency) to control the neurofeedback parameter on a visual scale from 0 (no control) to 10 (perfect control).
Time Frame
60 min

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: patients undergoing clinically indicated implantation of a Percept™ PC neurostimulator, age ≥ 18 years as well as planned hospitalisation of ≥ 3 days after operation Exclusion Criteria: minimal prognosticated survival of less than 1 year, reduced state of consciousness (i. e. Glasgow Coma Scale < 15), inability to communicate (in terms of hearing, seeing, speaking and understanding), other significant concomitant diseases (e. g. cardiovascular disease, infectious disease, isolation), inability to follow procedures, insufficient knowledge of project language, inability to give consent and unlikeliness to follow protocol.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Oliver Bichsel, MD, MSc ETH
Phone
+41 44 510 72 34
Email
oliver.bichsel@hest.ethz.ch
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Oliver Bichsel, MD, MSc ETH
Organizational Affiliation
ETH Zurich
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
ETH Zurich
City
Zürich
State/Province
Zurich
ZIP/Postal Code
8092
Country
Switzerland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Oliver Bichsel, MD, MSc ETH
Phone
+41 44 510 72 34
Email
oliver.bichsel@hest.ethz.ch

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

Neurofeedback Using Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs