Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Study (IMMI)
Primary Purpose
Sarcopenia
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation , no high protein ice cream supplementation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Sarcopenia focused on measuring Frailty,, Immobility, Electrical Stimulation, High protein
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- >/=65 years
- Hospitalised due to incident fragility fracture (hip, spine, pelvis, rib, upper limb, lower limb)
- Immobile 72 hours after admission or completion of surgery whichever is the later.
- Predicted date of discharge >/= 7 days after recruitment
Exclusion Criteria:
Unable to give valid informed consent
- Residence outside catchment area of hospital (likely to be moved during the study period)
- Unable to communicate in English sufficiently to participate in neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
- Implanted medical device (e.g. pacemaker)
- Any other contraindications to neuromuscular electrical stimulation (e.g. injury to the stimulation sites)
- Leg amputation or any pre-injury conditions affecting a leg unilaterally such as hemiparesis
- Dysphagia for liquids
- Protein supplementation clinically indicated and prescribed
- End stage renal failure
- Obesity (BMI>30)
- End of life, for any reason
- Any other clinical reason why rehabilitation is not clinically indicated
- Within 10 days of being symptom free having been COVID-19 positive (PCR testing or clinical criteria), or other barrier nursed patients
- Lactose intolerance
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Other
Other
Arm Label
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to one leg
High protein ice cream supplementation
Arm Description
NMES left leg, no high protein ice cream supplementation NMES right leg, no high protein ice cream supplementation
NMES left leg, high protein ice cream supplementation NMES right leg, high protein ice cream supplementation
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Lower limb muscle strength
using A hand-held dynamometer for both vastus lateralis and tibialis anterior muscles
Hand grip strength
using a standard device
Ultrasound
Ultrasound parameters of vastus lateralis and tibialis anterior muscles (thickness, pennation angle, echogenicity).
iEMG derived motor unit structure and function
intramuscular electromyography (iEMG) measures of muscle control
Elderly Mobility Scale
measuring 9 domains from very fit 1 to terminally ill 9
Nottingham Extended ADL
The Answers to the questions should be given whenever possible by the person who is the subject of the questionnaire Answers should be recorded by ticking one box for each question
Disability and functional independence using Barthel ADL score.
an ordinal scale used to measure performance in activities of daily living (ADL). variables describing ADL and mobility are scored, a higher number being a reflection of greater ability to function independently following hospital discharge.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Tolerability measurement
high number yes, low number no
Pain/Visual analogue scores
1 less pain, 10 severe pain
Mortality Rate
the number of participants who died within 6 months period after recruitment.
Number of protein supplementation doses consumed
How many cups participants consumed 1 cup lowest and 18 cups highest
Acceptability verbal questionnaire of Neuromuscular stimulation
yes / no answers, number of sessions participants say yes they accept or no not accept
Number of treatment sessions of Neuromuscular stimulation
number of treatment sessions 1 lowest and 18 highest
Duration of treatment sessions of Neuromuscular stimulation
number of weeks participants received Neuromuscular stimulation 1 week lowest, 6 weeks highest
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04792307
First Posted
February 9, 2021
Last Updated
March 9, 2021
Sponsor
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04792307
Brief Title
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Study
Acronym
IMMI
Official Title
Feasibility RCT of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation; an Intervention to Maintain and Improve neuroMuscular Function During Periods of Immobility
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
March 30, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2022 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators will use feasibility RCT design to determine whether it is justifiable to conduct a large-scale clinical trial of neuromuscular electrical stimulation with or without additional protein supplementation in hospitalised patients who are temporarily immobilised following a fragility fracture. Muscle thickness, muscle strength, patients' mobility and self-care will be assessed at baseline and after 6-wk trial duration or until patients discharged from hospital. Outcomes will include participants' recruitment rate, tolerability and accessibility and their characteristics.
Detailed Description
In frail elderly people with existing sarcopenia, muscle mass, muscle strength and muscle function during immobility after lower limb fractures are impaired and affect their functional abilities to achieve activities of daily living. To reverse these consequences, limited intervention studies show that resistance exercise training and protein supplement at least partly reverses sarcopenia. However, guidelines do not currently advise specific protein supplementation as a treatment to prevent or reverse sarcopenia. Additionally, these exercises are difficult to perform in adequate intensity when patients are ill, tired, or in pain and these same factors may reduce appetite. In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation with and without a high protein oral nutritional supplement.
Methods:
In this study, the investigators will use feasibility RCT design to determine whether it is justifiable to conduct a large-scale clinical trial of neuromuscular electrical stimulation with or without additional protein supplementation in hospitalised patients who are temporarily immobilised following a fragility fracture. Muscle thickness, muscle strength, patients' mobility and self-care will be assessed at baseline and after 6-wk trial duration or until patients discharged from hospital. Outcomes will include participants' recruitment rate, tolerability and accessibility and their characteristics.
Discussion This study addresses the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation with or without high protein supplements on mobility, self-care, muscle mass and strength in immobile older people with frailty after lower limb fracture. The information from this study may justify a large-scale clinical trial of using electrical stimulation with or without high protein supplement.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sarcopenia
Keywords
Frailty,, Immobility, Electrical Stimulation, High protein
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
will randomly allocate participants offering half of them additional protein supplementation over and above their ordinary diet
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
66 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to one leg
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
NMES left leg, no high protein ice cream supplementation
NMES right leg, no high protein ice cream supplementation
Arm Title
High protein ice cream supplementation
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
NMES left leg, high protein ice cream supplementation
NMES right leg, high protein ice cream supplementation
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation , no high protein ice cream supplementation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation with high protein ice cream supplementation
Intervention Description
A trained operator applies Neuromuscular electrical stimulation treatment to one leg, for approximately 30 minutes per session, three sessions per week with or without high protein ice cream. Treatment can stimulate the nerve controlling the vastus lateralis muscle in the thigh or the nerve controlling the tibialis anterior muscle in the lower leg, or both. In our study, we will aim to stimulate both nerves and muscle groups, on the basis that the maximal effect with result from the maximal amount of muscle stimulated.Treatment is adjusted to generate a specific force and maintained for up to 5 minutes, followed by a rest period and then repeated three times over the typical 30-minute session. The stimulation can vary according to the frequency (pulses per second, typically 10-50Hz).
Additional protein supplementation: high protein ice cream :a single doses of a high protein supplement after each bout of neuromuscular electrical stimulation,
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Lower limb muscle strength
Description
using A hand-held dynamometer for both vastus lateralis and tibialis anterior muscles
Time Frame
"Change from Baseline lower limb muscle strength at 6 weeks"
Title
Hand grip strength
Description
using a standard device
Time Frame
"Change from Baseline Hand grip strength at 6 weeks"
Title
Ultrasound
Description
Ultrasound parameters of vastus lateralis and tibialis anterior muscles (thickness, pennation angle, echogenicity).
Time Frame
"Change from Baseline lower limb muscle thickness at 6 weeks"
Title
iEMG derived motor unit structure and function
Description
intramuscular electromyography (iEMG) measures of muscle control
Time Frame
"Change from Baseline lower limb muscle control at 6 weeks"
Title
Elderly Mobility Scale
Description
measuring 9 domains from very fit 1 to terminally ill 9
Time Frame
"Change from Baseline functional independence at 6 weeks"and " 6 months"
Title
Nottingham Extended ADL
Description
The Answers to the questions should be given whenever possible by the person who is the subject of the questionnaire Answers should be recorded by ticking one box for each question
Time Frame
"Change from Baseline functional independence at 6 weeks"and " 6 months"
Title
Disability and functional independence using Barthel ADL score.
Description
an ordinal scale used to measure performance in activities of daily living (ADL). variables describing ADL and mobility are scored, a higher number being a reflection of greater ability to function independently following hospital discharge.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline functional independence at 6 weeks "and " 6 months"]
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Tolerability measurement
Description
high number yes, low number no
Time Frame
"up to 6 weeks"
Title
Pain/Visual analogue scores
Description
1 less pain, 10 severe pain
Time Frame
"Change from Baseline functional independence at 6 weeks "
Title
Mortality Rate
Description
the number of participants who died within 6 months period after recruitment.
Time Frame
At 6 months after recruitment
Title
Number of protein supplementation doses consumed
Description
How many cups participants consumed 1 cup lowest and 18 cups highest
Time Frame
"up to 6 weeks"
Title
Acceptability verbal questionnaire of Neuromuscular stimulation
Description
yes / no answers, number of sessions participants say yes they accept or no not accept
Time Frame
"up to 6 weeks"
Title
Number of treatment sessions of Neuromuscular stimulation
Description
number of treatment sessions 1 lowest and 18 highest
Time Frame
"up to 6 weeks"
Title
Duration of treatment sessions of Neuromuscular stimulation
Description
number of weeks participants received Neuromuscular stimulation 1 week lowest, 6 weeks highest
Time Frame
"up to 6 weeks"
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
>/=65 years
Hospitalised due to incident fragility fracture (hip, spine, pelvis, rib, upper limb, lower limb)
Immobile 72 hours after admission or completion of surgery whichever is the later.
Predicted date of discharge >/= 7 days after recruitment
Exclusion Criteria:
Unable to give valid informed consent
Residence outside catchment area of hospital (likely to be moved during the study period)
Unable to communicate in English sufficiently to participate in neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
Implanted medical device (e.g. pacemaker)
Any other contraindications to neuromuscular electrical stimulation (e.g. injury to the stimulation sites)
Leg amputation or any pre-injury conditions affecting a leg unilaterally such as hemiparesis
Dysphagia for liquids
Protein supplementation clinically indicated and prescribed
End stage renal failure
Obesity (BMI>30)
End of life, for any reason
Any other clinical reason why rehabilitation is not clinically indicated
Within 10 days of being symptom free having been COVID-19 positive (PCR testing or clinical criteria), or other barrier nursed patients
Lactose intolerance
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
John Gladman, Prof.
Phone
0441158230242
Email
John.Gladman@nottingham.ac.uk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
saleh aloraibi, PhD
Phone
00447459274400
Email
Saleh.Aloraibi@nottingham.ac.uk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maria Kofali
Organizational Affiliation
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Official's Role
Study Chair
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
individual participant data (IPD) available only to those involved in the research project
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30312372
Citation
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, Schneider SM, Sieber CC, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Visser M, Zamboni M; Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019 Jan 1;48(1):16-31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy169. Erratum In: Age Ageing. 2019 Jul 1;48(4):601.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30048806
Citation
Wilkinson DJ, Piasecki M, Atherton PJ. The age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and function: Measurement and physiology of muscle fibre atrophy and muscle fibre loss in humans. Ageing Res Rev. 2018 Nov;47:123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27610086
Citation
Rudrappa SS, Wilkinson DJ, Greenhaff PL, Smith K, Idris I, Atherton PJ. Human Skeletal Muscle Disuse Atrophy: Effects on Muscle Protein Synthesis, Breakdown, and Insulin Resistance-A Qualitative Review. Front Physiol. 2016 Aug 25;7:361. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00361. eCollection 2016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24089670
Citation
Anthony K, Robinson K, Logan P, Gordon AL, Harwood RH, Masud T. Chair-based exercises for frail older people: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:309506. doi: 10.1155/2013/309506. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33098419
Citation
Welch C, Majid Z, Greig C, Gladman J, Masud T, Jackson T. Interventions to ameliorate reductions in muscle quantity and function in hospitalised older adults: a systematic review towards acute sarcopenia treatment. Age Ageing. 2021 Feb 26;50(2):394-404. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa209.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Dacombe PJ, Clement RGE, Woodard J, Sahota O. Poor nutritional intake in acute fractured neck of femur admission - is this well described clinical problem still under-managed? International Journal of Surgery (Abtracts) 2010 : 8 ; 501-578
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27748503
Citation
Jones S, Man WD, Gao W, Higginson IJ, Wilcock A, Maddocks M. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle weakness in adults with advanced disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 17;10(10):CD009419. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009419.pub3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19699838
Citation
Symons TB, Sheffield-Moore M, Wolfe RR, Paddon-Jones D. A moderate serving of high-quality protein maximally stimulates skeletal muscle protein synthesis in young and elderly subjects. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Sep;109(9):1582-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.06.369.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16645295
Citation
Martin HJ, Yule V, Syddall HE, Dennison EM, Cooper C, Aihie Sayer A. Is hand-held dynamometry useful for the measurement of quadriceps strength in older people? A comparison with the gold standard Bodex dynamometry. Gerontology. 2006;52(3):154-9. doi: 10.1159/000091824.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32706848
Citation
Lunt E, Ong T, Gordon AL, Greenhaff PL, Gladman JRF. The clinical usefulness of muscle mass and strength measures in older people: a systematic review. Age Ageing. 2021 Jan 8;50(1):88-95. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa123.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25140439
Citation
Tarquinio C, Kivits J, Minary L, Coste J, Alla F. Evaluating complex interventions: perspectives and issues for health behaviour change interventions. Psychol Health. 2015 Jan;30(1):35-51. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.953530. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3403500
Citation
Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61-3. doi: 10.3109/09638288809164103.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8310887
Citation
Gladman JR, Lincoln NB, Adams SA. Use of the extended ADL scale with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1993 Nov;22(6):419-24. doi: 10.1093/ageing/22.6.419.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16129869
Citation
Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15817019
Citation
Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. Erratum In: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Sep;67(9):1991.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Elia M RC, Stratton R, Todorovic V, Evans L, Farrer K. Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) for adults www.bapen.org.uk 2004
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25083133
Citation
Laufer Y, Shtraker H, Elboim Gabyzon M. The effects of exercise and neuromuscular electrical stimulation in subjects with knee osteoarthritis: a 3-month follow-up study. Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Jul 17;9:1153-61. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S64104. eCollection 2014.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Asakawa Y, Jung JH, Koh SE. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves strength, pain and weight distribution on patients with knee instability post surgery. Physical therapy rehabilitation science. 2014;3(2):112-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27932876
Citation
Chen RC, Li XY, Guan LL, Guo BP, Wu WL, Zhou ZQ, Huo YT, Chen X, Zhou LQ. Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for the rehabilitation of moderate-to-severe COPD: a meta-analysis. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Nov 28;11:2965-2975. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S120555. eCollection 2016.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Study
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs