Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Parkinson´s Disease-related Pain
Primary Purpose
Parkinson Disease, Pain
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Parkinson Disease focused on measuring Parkinson Disease, Pain, tDCS
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Neuroimaging study without previous pathologies.
- Score > 5 in transfers (bed to chair and back) item in Barthel Index.
- Score = or > 24 in Mini-Mental State Examination.
- Tolerability for the application of electrotherapy.
- Able to provide informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Neurologic disease different from PD.
- Pain non-related to PD.
- Dermatologic problems, wounds, or ulcers in the electrode's application area.
- Presence of implants or metal pieces in the head.
- Presence of cardiac pacemaker, vagal, brain or transcutaneous stimulators, medication pumps, ventriculoperitoneal shunts or aneurysm clips.
- Significative difficulties in language.
- History of alcohol or drugs abuse.
- Non-controlled medical problems.
- Pregnancy.
- Epilepsy.
Sites / Locations
- Hospital Beata Maria Ana
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Arm Description
Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (a-tDCS) will be applied over the Primary Motor Cortex during 10 sessions of 20 minutes at 2 milli amps.
Sham Transcranial Direct Current (s-tDCS) will be applied over the Primary Motor Cortex during 10 sessions of 20 minutes.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in King´s Parkinson´s Disease Pain Scale score
Parkinson´s Disease specific scale that evaluates the localization, frequency, and intensity of pain. It has 14 items distributed in 7 domains: 1. Musculoskeletal Pain; 2. Chronic Pain; 3. Fluctuation-related Pain; 4. Nocturnal Pain; 5. Oro-facial Pain; 6. Discoloration, Oedema/Swelling Pain; 7. Radicular Pain. Each item is scored by severity (0, none to 3, very severe) multiplied by frequency (0, never to 4, all the time) resulting in a subscore of 0 to 12, the sum of which gives the total score with a theoretical range from 0 to 168, with higher scores indicating more severity and frequency of pain.
Change in King´s Parkinson´s Disease Pain Scale score
Parkinson´s Disease specific scale that evaluates the localization, frequency, and intensity of pain. It has 14 items distributed in 7 domains: 1. Musculoskeletal Pain; 2. Chronic Pain; 3. Fluctuation-related Pain; 4. Nocturnal Pain; 5. Oro-facial Pain; 6. Discoloration, Oedema/Swelling Pain; 7. Radicular Pain. Each item is scored by severity (0, none to 3, very severe) multiplied by frequency (0, never to 4, all the time) resulting in a subscore of 0 to 12, the sum of which gives the total score with a theoretical range from 0 to 168, with higher scores indicating more severity and frequency of pain.
Change in Brief Pain Inventory score
It contains 15 items, including 2 multi-item scales to measure the intensity of pain and its impact on the function and welfare of patients. It also presents open questions to assess the localization of pain and the treatment used for its management, just as its effectiveness. Scores oscillate from 0 to 110, with higher scores indicating more pain and more impact on function and welfare of patients.
Change in Brief Pain Inventory score
It contains 15 items, including 2 multi-item scales to measure the intensity of pain and its impact on the function and welfare of patients. It also presents open questions to assess the localization of pain and the treatment used for its management, just as its effectiveness. Scores oscillate from 0 to 110, with higher scores indicating more pain and more impact on function and welfare of patients.
Change in Conditioned Pain Modulation
Assesses the descending pain modulatory system. The Pain Pressure Threshold will be assessed in the middle of the distal phalanx of the thumb with ta handheld algometer, corresponding to the first test stimulus. Afterward, the patient will immerse the contrary hand up to the wrist into stirred ice-cold water (0-4º) maintaining it for 3 minutes, corresponding to the conditioning stimulus. If the pain is unbearable before the 3 minutes, the patient will be able to remove his/her hand. Immediately after removing the hand, a second Pain Pressure Threshold measure will be performed in the same place as the first one, corresponding to the second test stimulus. After 1-minute rest, a third Pain Pressure Threshold will be measured to assess the Conditioned Pain Modulation residual functioning.
Change in Conditioned Pain Modulation
Assesses the descending pain modulatory system. The Pain Pressure Threshold will be assessed in the middle of the distal phalanx of the thumb with ta handheld algometer, corresponding to the first test stimulus. Afterward, the patient will immerse the contrary hand up to the wrist into stirred ice-cold water (0-4º) maintaining it for 3 minutes, corresponding to the conditioning stimulus. If the pain is unbearable before the 3 minutes, the patient will be able to remove his/her hand. Immediately after removing the hand, a second Pain Pressure Threshold measure will be performed in the same place as the first one, corresponding to the second test stimulus. After 1-minute rest, a third Pain Pressure Threshold will be measured to assess the Conditioned Pain Modulation residual functioning.
Change in Temporal Summation
Represents excitatory modulation processes. It will be generated through the application of 10 pulses of the handheld pressure algometer over the middle of the distal phalanx of the thumb with the intensity of the Pain Pressure Threshold, previously calculated. In each pulse, pressure intensity will be increasing at a rate of 2 kg/s over the previously determined Pain Pressure Threshold intensity, leaving an interstimulus interval of one second according to the optimal method reported for inducing Temporal Summation with pressure pain. Before the first pressure pulse, subjects were taught to use a verbal numeric pain rating scale to rate the pain intensity of the first, fifth, and 10th pressure pulses. The verbal numeric pain rating scale ranged from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("the worst possible pain").
Change in Temporal Summation
Represents excitatory modulation processes. It will be generated through the application of 10 pulses of the handheld pressure algometer over the middle of the distal phalanx of the thumb with the intensity of the Pain Pressure Threshold, previously calculated. In each pulse, pressure intensity will be increasing at a rate of 2 kg/s over the previously determined Pain Pressure Threshold intensity, leaving an interstimulus interval of one second according to the optimal method reported for inducing Temporal Summation with pressure pain. Before the first pressure pulse, subjects were taught to use a verbal numeric pain rating scale to rate the pain intensity of the first, fifth, and 10th pressure pulses. The verbal numeric pain rating scale ranged from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("the worst possible pain").
Changes in Pain Pressure Threshold
Two Pain Pressure Thresholds will be measured by a handheld algometer, one over the most painful area (peripheric hyperalgesia) and the other one over the middle of the distal phalanx of the thumb (central hyperalgesia). The Pain Pressure Threshold will be applied with the algometer perpendicular to the skin increasing at a rate of 1 kg/s until the first sensation of pain. 3 measures with 30-seconds rest between them will be performed, taking the average as Pain Pressure Threshold.
Changes in Pain Pressure Threshold
Two Pain Pressure Thresholds will be measured by a handheld algometer, one over the most painful area (peripheric hyperalgesia) and the other one over the middle of the distal phalanx of the thumb (central hyperalgesia). The Pain Pressure Threshold will be applied with the algometer perpendicular to the skin increasing at a rate of 1 kg/s until the first sensation of pain. 3 measures with 30-seconds rest between them will be performed, taking the average as Pain Pressure Threshold.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Beck Depression Inventory
Measures depressive symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 63 leading to 6 groups: 0-10, normal; 11-16, mild mood disturbance; 17-20, borderline clinical depression; 21-30, moderate depression; 31-40, severe depression; and over 40, extreme depression.
Beck Depression Inventory
Measures depressive symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 63 leading to 6 groups: 0-10, normal; 11-16, mild mood disturbance; 17-20, borderline clinical depression; 21-30, moderate depression; 31-40, severe depression; and over 40, extreme depression.
Beck Depression Inventory
Measures depressive symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 63 leading to 6 groups: 0-10, normal; 11-16, mild mood disturbance; 17-20, borderline clinical depression; 21-30, moderate depression; 31-40, severe depression; and over 40, extreme depression.
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Measures anxious states and anxious traits. It has 20 items for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety. All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "Almost Never" to "Almost Always"). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Measures anxious states and anxious traits. It has 20 items for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety. All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "Almost Never" to "Almost Always"). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Measures anxious states and anxious traits. It has 20 items for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety. All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "Almost Never" to "Almost Always"). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Measures fear of movement-related pain. Its scores range from 11-44 points with higher scores indicating greater fear of pain, movement, and injury.
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Measures fear of movement-related pain. Its scores range from 11-44 points with higher scores indicating greater fear of pain, movement, and injury.
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Measures fear of movement-related pain. Its scores range from 11-44 points with higher scores indicating greater fear of pain, movement, and injury.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Measures catastrophizing thinking. Its total score range from 0-52, along with three subscale scores assessing rumination, magnification and helplessness, with higher scores indicating higher level of catastrophizing.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Measures catastrophizing thinking. Its total score range from 0-52, along with three subscale scores assessing rumination, magnification and helplessness, with higher scores indicating higher level of catastrophizing.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Measures catastrophizing thinking. Its total score range from 0-52, along with three subscale scores assessing rumination, magnification and helplessness, with higher scores indicating higher level of catastrophizing.
Unified Parkinson´s Disease Rating Scale
Measures disability in Parkinson´s Disease patients. The scale itself has four components: Part I, Mentation, Behavior and Mood; Part II, Activities of Daily Living; Part III, Motor aspects; Part IV, Associated Complications. Scores range from 0 to 159 with higher scores indicating more severity.
Unified Parkinson´s Disease Rating Scale
Measures disability in Parkinson´s Disease patients. The scale itself has four components: Part I, Mentation, Behavior and Mood; Part II, Activities of Daily Living; Part III, Motor aspects; Part IV, Associated Complications. Scores range from 0 to 159 with higher scores indicating more severity.
Unified Parkinson´s Disease Rating Scale
Measures disability in Parkinson´s Disease patients. The scale itself has four components: Part I, Mentation, Behavior and Mood; Part II, Activities of Daily Living; Part III, Motor aspects; Part IV, Associated Complications. Scores range from 0 to 159 with higher scores indicating more severity.
Reaction Times
Performed through 2 related subtasks. Finger Taping task, where the participants will be instructed to press the space bar on the keyboard as fast as possible and repeatedly with the index finger, to measure motor function. And Simple Reaction Time task, where participants will be instructed to press the left mouse button as fast as possible when the stimulus "+" appears in the center of the screen at a size of 2 cm x 2 cm, to measure simple perception and sustained alertness.
Reaction Times
Performed through 2 related subtasks. Finger Taping task, where the participants will be instructed to press the space bar on the keyboard as fast as possible and repeatedly with the index finger, to measure motor function. And Simple Reaction Time task, where participants will be instructed to press the left mouse button as fast as possible when the stimulus "+" appears in the center of the screen at a size of 2 cm x 2 cm, to measure simple perception and sustained alertness.
Reaction Times
Performed through 2 related subtasks. Finger Taping task, where the participants will be instructed to press the space bar on the keyboard as fast as possible and repeatedly with the index finger, to measure motor function. And Simple Reaction Time task, where participants will be instructed to press the left mouse button as fast as possible when the stimulus "+" appears in the center of the screen at a size of 2 cm x 2 cm, to measure simple perception and sustained alertness.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Action Motor Threshold in millivolts
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Action Motor Threshold in millivolts
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Action Motor Threshold in millivolts
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04651699
First Posted
November 19, 2020
Last Updated
January 25, 2023
Sponsor
Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
Collaborators
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Hospital Beata María Ana
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04651699
Brief Title
Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Parkinson´s Disease-related Pain
Official Title
Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Targeting Pain in Parkinson´s Disease Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 3, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 23, 2023 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
Collaborators
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Hospital Beata María Ana
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Pain is an under-reported but prevalent symptom in Parkinson´s Disease (PD), impacting patients' quality of life. Both pain and PD conditions cause cortical excitability reduction, but non-invasive brain stimulation is thought to be able to counteract it, resulting also effective in chronic pain conditions. The investigators in the present project aim to evaluate the efficacy of a novel brain stimulation protocol in the management of pain in PD patients during the ON state. The investigators hypothesize that active transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) over the Primary Motor Cortex (M1) can improve clinical pain and its central processing features.
Detailed Description
Parkinson´s Disease (PD) affects between 4.1 and 4.6 million people in the world. Diagnosis of PD is currently clinical and based on its motor manifestations (bradykinesia, rest tremor, and rigidity). However, non-motor symptoms such as pain, fatigue and neuropsychiatric manifestations are present in more than 70% of subjects. Pain affects about 85% of patients but is paradoxically under-reported and consequently under-treated in PD patients with a great impact on their quality of life. Levodopa, which is the election treatment in PD, has shown controversial results regarding pain sensitivity and has been shown ineffective for enhancing the endogenous pain modulation system. Furthermore, there is a lack of management protocols and nonpharmacologic treatments for pain in PD. Several syndromes are hypothesized to be involved in PD pain generation. Generally, PD patients suffer from alterations in peripheral transmission, sensitive-discriminative processing, pain perception, and pain interpretation in multiple levels, due to neurodegenerative changes in dopaminergic pathways and non-dopaminergic pain-related structures. Therefore, central mechanisms are proposed to be crucial for the development and establishment of pain in PD patients. Regarding pain processing features, PD patients have reduced pain thresholds, an augmented Temporal Summation (TS) after repetitive nociceptive stimulus, and the impairment of their Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) is correlated with greater severity and premature onset of the disease. Cortical excitability reduction is common in patients with pain. Therefore, diverse therapies are being developed to counteract this cortical excitability reduction and obtaining, consequently, effective pain relief. In consonance with these findings, in PD condition, especially in off state, there is also evidence of cortical excitability decrease but, to the best of the investigators´ knowledge, there are no studies targeting cortical excitability to treat pain in PD. Thus, the present study proposes non-invasive brain stimulation therapy for the treatment of PD-related pain. The non-invasive brain stimulation therapy will be transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the Primary Motor Cortex (M1). tDCS over M1 is capable of increase corticospinal excitability in both M1 and other pain processing-related areas such as the thalamus, Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC), cingulate cortex, and insula, also involved in PD pain processing. These increments of cortical excitability have been correlated with pain relief in chronic pain such as fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, migraine, and spinal cord injury. It is also hypothesized that tDCS would be an effective strategy to treat central sensitivity-related pain, a process whose features are common with PD condition. Moreover, specifically in PD, tDCS over M1 has shown to increase cortical excitability, augmenting the Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) amplitude by 78.5%, correlating with motor improvements. The main aim of this study is to conduct an independent parallel randomized controlled trial based on tDCS targeting changes in 1. validated general and specific PD related pain scales and 2. psychophysical measurements of pain modulation mechanisms. The investigators´ main hypothesis is that active tDCS will be superior to its respective control placebo intervention.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson Disease, Pain
Keywords
Parkinson Disease, Pain, tDCS
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This study will be a triple-blinded experimental longitudinal prospective randomized controlled trial with a parallel design. The randomization will be realized through the "GraphPad" software by an independent investigator. All the participants who fulfill the inclusion criteria and have none of the exclusion ones will be randomly allocated into two groups: active-tDCS (a-tDCS) or sham-tDCS (s-tDCS). Allocation concealment will be ensured by the inclusion of the assigned group in closed opaque envelopes that will be opened at the time of the intervention.
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Triple-blind criteria will be achieved by identic collocation of the electrodes in both groups and by activating the "double-blind" option in the Starstim tDCS® Software (Neuroelectrics Inc, Barcelona, Spain) that allows concealing the protocol by writing a neutral number. The evaluator, not allowed to stay in the same room while interventions, will conceal the protocols with the neutral number and the therapist will read it in the envelope, ignoring which number coincides with each intervention. At the end of the full treatment, patients will be asked whether they received active or sham stimulation, to assess the blinding success. Patients recruited will not meet in waiting rooms to avoid them to comment on their experience during the protocol. The statistician will be also blinded through the mentioned neutral numbers. Unblinding will be permissible when any event could suppose a risk for the patient's health.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
22 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (a-tDCS) will be applied over the Primary Motor Cortex during 10 sessions of 20 minutes at 2 milli amps.
Arm Title
Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Sham Transcranial Direct Current (s-tDCS) will be applied over the Primary Motor Cortex during 10 sessions of 20 minutes.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Intervention Description
The Starstim tDCS® stimulator will be used by an experienced physical therapist to transfer direct current by a saline-soak pair of surface sponge electrodes (35cm2). The anode electrode will be placed over C3 (EEG 10/20 system) and the cathode electrode over the contralateral supraorbital area (Fp2), in order to enhance the excitability of M1 (32). Regarding the stimulated hemisphere, contralateral M1 will be stimulated in patients with asymmetric pain and the dominant (contrary to the dominant hand determined by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory) in patients with symmetric pain, due to the widespread changes induced by tDCS in other cortical areas, including contralateral M1. A constant current of 2 milli amps intensity (subthreshold intensity) will be applied for 20 min, with 30 seconds of ramp-up and 30 seconds of ramp-down.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Intervention Description
The electrodes will be placed in the same positions as for M1 stimulation, but only applying ramping active current for 30 seconds in the beginning and at the end of the procedure for a reliable blinding.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in King´s Parkinson´s Disease Pain Scale score
Description
Parkinson´s Disease specific scale that evaluates the localization, frequency, and intensity of pain. It has 14 items distributed in 7 domains: 1. Musculoskeletal Pain; 2. Chronic Pain; 3. Fluctuation-related Pain; 4. Nocturnal Pain; 5. Oro-facial Pain; 6. Discoloration, Oedema/Swelling Pain; 7. Radicular Pain. Each item is scored by severity (0, none to 3, very severe) multiplied by frequency (0, never to 4, all the time) resulting in a subscore of 0 to 12, the sum of which gives the total score with a theoretical range from 0 to 168, with higher scores indicating more severity and frequency of pain.
Time Frame
From Baseline at 2 weeks
Title
Change in King´s Parkinson´s Disease Pain Scale score
Description
Parkinson´s Disease specific scale that evaluates the localization, frequency, and intensity of pain. It has 14 items distributed in 7 domains: 1. Musculoskeletal Pain; 2. Chronic Pain; 3. Fluctuation-related Pain; 4. Nocturnal Pain; 5. Oro-facial Pain; 6. Discoloration, Oedema/Swelling Pain; 7. Radicular Pain. Each item is scored by severity (0, none to 3, very severe) multiplied by frequency (0, never to 4, all the time) resulting in a subscore of 0 to 12, the sum of which gives the total score with a theoretical range from 0 to 168, with higher scores indicating more severity and frequency of pain.
Time Frame
From Baseline at 1 month
Title
Change in Brief Pain Inventory score
Description
It contains 15 items, including 2 multi-item scales to measure the intensity of pain and its impact on the function and welfare of patients. It also presents open questions to assess the localization of pain and the treatment used for its management, just as its effectiveness. Scores oscillate from 0 to 110, with higher scores indicating more pain and more impact on function and welfare of patients.
Time Frame
From Baseline at 2 weeks
Title
Change in Brief Pain Inventory score
Description
It contains 15 items, including 2 multi-item scales to measure the intensity of pain and its impact on the function and welfare of patients. It also presents open questions to assess the localization of pain and the treatment used for its management, just as its effectiveness. Scores oscillate from 0 to 110, with higher scores indicating more pain and more impact on function and welfare of patients.
Time Frame
From Baseline at 1 month
Title
Change in Conditioned Pain Modulation
Description
Assesses the descending pain modulatory system. The Pain Pressure Threshold will be assessed in the middle of the distal phalanx of the thumb with ta handheld algometer, corresponding to the first test stimulus. Afterward, the patient will immerse the contrary hand up to the wrist into stirred ice-cold water (0-4º) maintaining it for 3 minutes, corresponding to the conditioning stimulus. If the pain is unbearable before the 3 minutes, the patient will be able to remove his/her hand. Immediately after removing the hand, a second Pain Pressure Threshold measure will be performed in the same place as the first one, corresponding to the second test stimulus. After 1-minute rest, a third Pain Pressure Threshold will be measured to assess the Conditioned Pain Modulation residual functioning.
Time Frame
From Baseline at 2 weeks
Title
Change in Conditioned Pain Modulation
Description
Assesses the descending pain modulatory system. The Pain Pressure Threshold will be assessed in the middle of the distal phalanx of the thumb with ta handheld algometer, corresponding to the first test stimulus. Afterward, the patient will immerse the contrary hand up to the wrist into stirred ice-cold water (0-4º) maintaining it for 3 minutes, corresponding to the conditioning stimulus. If the pain is unbearable before the 3 minutes, the patient will be able to remove his/her hand. Immediately after removing the hand, a second Pain Pressure Threshold measure will be performed in the same place as the first one, corresponding to the second test stimulus. After 1-minute rest, a third Pain Pressure Threshold will be measured to assess the Conditioned Pain Modulation residual functioning.
Time Frame
From Baseline at 1 month
Title
Change in Temporal Summation
Description
Represents excitatory modulation processes. It will be generated through the application of 10 pulses of the handheld pressure algometer over the middle of the distal phalanx of the thumb with the intensity of the Pain Pressure Threshold, previously calculated. In each pulse, pressure intensity will be increasing at a rate of 2 kg/s over the previously determined Pain Pressure Threshold intensity, leaving an interstimulus interval of one second according to the optimal method reported for inducing Temporal Summation with pressure pain. Before the first pressure pulse, subjects were taught to use a verbal numeric pain rating scale to rate the pain intensity of the first, fifth, and 10th pressure pulses. The verbal numeric pain rating scale ranged from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("the worst possible pain").
Time Frame
From Baseline at 2 weeks
Title
Change in Temporal Summation
Description
Represents excitatory modulation processes. It will be generated through the application of 10 pulses of the handheld pressure algometer over the middle of the distal phalanx of the thumb with the intensity of the Pain Pressure Threshold, previously calculated. In each pulse, pressure intensity will be increasing at a rate of 2 kg/s over the previously determined Pain Pressure Threshold intensity, leaving an interstimulus interval of one second according to the optimal method reported for inducing Temporal Summation with pressure pain. Before the first pressure pulse, subjects were taught to use a verbal numeric pain rating scale to rate the pain intensity of the first, fifth, and 10th pressure pulses. The verbal numeric pain rating scale ranged from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("the worst possible pain").
Time Frame
From Baseline at 1 month
Title
Changes in Pain Pressure Threshold
Description
Two Pain Pressure Thresholds will be measured by a handheld algometer, one over the most painful area (peripheric hyperalgesia) and the other one over the middle of the distal phalanx of the thumb (central hyperalgesia). The Pain Pressure Threshold will be applied with the algometer perpendicular to the skin increasing at a rate of 1 kg/s until the first sensation of pain. 3 measures with 30-seconds rest between them will be performed, taking the average as Pain Pressure Threshold.
Time Frame
From Baseline at 2 weeks
Title
Changes in Pain Pressure Threshold
Description
Two Pain Pressure Thresholds will be measured by a handheld algometer, one over the most painful area (peripheric hyperalgesia) and the other one over the middle of the distal phalanx of the thumb (central hyperalgesia). The Pain Pressure Threshold will be applied with the algometer perpendicular to the skin increasing at a rate of 1 kg/s until the first sensation of pain. 3 measures with 30-seconds rest between them will be performed, taking the average as Pain Pressure Threshold.
Time Frame
From Baseline at 1 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Beck Depression Inventory
Description
Measures depressive symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 63 leading to 6 groups: 0-10, normal; 11-16, mild mood disturbance; 17-20, borderline clinical depression; 21-30, moderate depression; 31-40, severe depression; and over 40, extreme depression.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Beck Depression Inventory
Description
Measures depressive symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 63 leading to 6 groups: 0-10, normal; 11-16, mild mood disturbance; 17-20, borderline clinical depression; 21-30, moderate depression; 31-40, severe depression; and over 40, extreme depression.
Time Frame
At 2 weeks from Baseline
Title
Beck Depression Inventory
Description
Measures depressive symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 63 leading to 6 groups: 0-10, normal; 11-16, mild mood disturbance; 17-20, borderline clinical depression; 21-30, moderate depression; 31-40, severe depression; and over 40, extreme depression.
Time Frame
At 1 month from Baseline
Title
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Description
Measures anxious states and anxious traits. It has 20 items for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety. All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "Almost Never" to "Almost Always"). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Description
Measures anxious states and anxious traits. It has 20 items for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety. All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "Almost Never" to "Almost Always"). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
Time Frame
At 2 weeks from Baseline
Title
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
Description
Measures anxious states and anxious traits. It has 20 items for assessing trait anxiety and 20 for state anxiety. All items are rated on a 4-point scale (e.g., from "Almost Never" to "Almost Always"). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety.
Time Frame
At 1 month from Baseline
Title
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Description
Measures fear of movement-related pain. Its scores range from 11-44 points with higher scores indicating greater fear of pain, movement, and injury.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Description
Measures fear of movement-related pain. Its scores range from 11-44 points with higher scores indicating greater fear of pain, movement, and injury.
Time Frame
At 2 weeks from Baseline
Title
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Description
Measures fear of movement-related pain. Its scores range from 11-44 points with higher scores indicating greater fear of pain, movement, and injury.
Time Frame
At 1 month from Baseline
Title
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Description
Measures catastrophizing thinking. Its total score range from 0-52, along with three subscale scores assessing rumination, magnification and helplessness, with higher scores indicating higher level of catastrophizing.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Description
Measures catastrophizing thinking. Its total score range from 0-52, along with three subscale scores assessing rumination, magnification and helplessness, with higher scores indicating higher level of catastrophizing.
Time Frame
At 2 weeks from Baseline
Title
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Description
Measures catastrophizing thinking. Its total score range from 0-52, along with three subscale scores assessing rumination, magnification and helplessness, with higher scores indicating higher level of catastrophizing.
Time Frame
At 1 month from Baseline
Title
Unified Parkinson´s Disease Rating Scale
Description
Measures disability in Parkinson´s Disease patients. The scale itself has four components: Part I, Mentation, Behavior and Mood; Part II, Activities of Daily Living; Part III, Motor aspects; Part IV, Associated Complications. Scores range from 0 to 159 with higher scores indicating more severity.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Unified Parkinson´s Disease Rating Scale
Description
Measures disability in Parkinson´s Disease patients. The scale itself has four components: Part I, Mentation, Behavior and Mood; Part II, Activities of Daily Living; Part III, Motor aspects; Part IV, Associated Complications. Scores range from 0 to 159 with higher scores indicating more severity.
Time Frame
At 2 weeks from Baseline
Title
Unified Parkinson´s Disease Rating Scale
Description
Measures disability in Parkinson´s Disease patients. The scale itself has four components: Part I, Mentation, Behavior and Mood; Part II, Activities of Daily Living; Part III, Motor aspects; Part IV, Associated Complications. Scores range from 0 to 159 with higher scores indicating more severity.
Time Frame
At 1 month from Baseline
Title
Reaction Times
Description
Performed through 2 related subtasks. Finger Taping task, where the participants will be instructed to press the space bar on the keyboard as fast as possible and repeatedly with the index finger, to measure motor function. And Simple Reaction Time task, where participants will be instructed to press the left mouse button as fast as possible when the stimulus "+" appears in the center of the screen at a size of 2 cm x 2 cm, to measure simple perception and sustained alertness.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Reaction Times
Description
Performed through 2 related subtasks. Finger Taping task, where the participants will be instructed to press the space bar on the keyboard as fast as possible and repeatedly with the index finger, to measure motor function. And Simple Reaction Time task, where participants will be instructed to press the left mouse button as fast as possible when the stimulus "+" appears in the center of the screen at a size of 2 cm x 2 cm, to measure simple perception and sustained alertness.
Time Frame
At 2 weeks from Baseline
Title
Reaction Times
Description
Performed through 2 related subtasks. Finger Taping task, where the participants will be instructed to press the space bar on the keyboard as fast as possible and repeatedly with the index finger, to measure motor function. And Simple Reaction Time task, where participants will be instructed to press the left mouse button as fast as possible when the stimulus "+" appears in the center of the screen at a size of 2 cm x 2 cm, to measure simple perception and sustained alertness.
Time Frame
At 1 month from Baseline
Title
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Description
Action Motor Threshold in millivolts
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Description
Action Motor Threshold in millivolts
Time Frame
At 2 weeks from Baseline
Title
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Description
Action Motor Threshold in millivolts
Time Frame
At 1 month from Baseline
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Neuroimaging study without previous pathologies.
Score > 5 in transfers (bed to chair and back) item in Barthel Index.
Score = or > 24 in Mini-Mental State Examination.
Tolerability for the application of electrotherapy.
Able to provide informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
Neurologic disease different from PD.
Pain non-related to PD.
Dermatologic problems, wounds, or ulcers in the electrode's application area.
Presence of implants or metal pieces in the head.
Presence of cardiac pacemaker, vagal, brain or transcutaneous stimulators, medication pumps, ventriculoperitoneal shunts or aneurysm clips.
Significative difficulties in language.
History of alcohol or drugs abuse.
Non-controlled medical problems.
Pregnancy.
Epilepsy.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Juan Pablo Romero Muñoz, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Josué Fernandez Carnero, PT PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Beata Maria Ana
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28007
Country
Spain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Individual anonymized participant data will be available to other researchers under request.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Six months at the end of the study.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Individual anonymized participant data will be available to other researchers under request.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25904081
Citation
Kalia LV, Lang AE. Parkinson's disease. Lancet. 2015 Aug 29;386(9996):896-912. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61393-3. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29903584
Citation
Silverdale MA, Kobylecki C, Kass-Iliyya L, Martinez-Martin P, Lawton M, Cotterill S, Chaudhuri KR, Morris H, Baig F, Williams N, Hubbard L, Hu MT, Grosset DG; UK Parkinson's Pain Study Collaboration. A detailed clinical study of pain in 1957 participants with early/moderate Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018 Nov;56:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29520899
Citation
Antonini A, Tinazzi M, Abbruzzese G, Berardelli A, Chaudhuri KR, Defazio G, Ferreira J, Martinez-Martin P, Trenkwalder C, Rascol O. Pain in Parkinson's disease: facts and uncertainties. Eur J Neurol. 2018 Jul;25(7):917-e69. doi: 10.1111/ene.13624. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27866120
Citation
Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ayache SS, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Cogiamanian F, Cotelli M, De Ridder D, Ferrucci R, Langguth B, Marangolo P, Mylius V, Nitsche MA, Padberg F, Palm U, Poulet E, Priori A, Rossi S, Schecklmann M, Vanneste S, Ziemann U, Garcia-Larrea L, Paulus W. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan;128(1):56-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16817194
Citation
Fregni F, Boggio PS, Santos MC, Lima M, Vieira AL, Rigonatti SP, Silva MT, Barbosa ER, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A. Noninvasive cortical stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2006 Oct;21(10):1693-702. doi: 10.1002/mds.21012.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16564618
Citation
Fregni F, Boggio PS, Lima MC, Ferreira MJ, Wagner T, Rigonatti SP, Castro AW, Souza DR, Riberto M, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A. A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain. 2006 May;122(1-2):197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.023. Epub 2006 Mar 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26096067
Citation
Chaudhuri KR, Rizos A, Trenkwalder C, Rascol O, Pal S, Martino D, Carroll C, Paviour D, Falup-Pecurariu C, Kessel B, Silverdale M, Todorova A, Sauerbier A, Odin P, Antonini A, Martinez-Martin P; EUROPAR and the IPMDS Non Motor PD Study Group. King's Parkinson's disease pain scale, the first scale for pain in PD: An international validation. Mov Disord. 2015 Oct;30(12):1623-31. doi: 10.1002/mds.26270. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30363588
Citation
Perez-Lloret S, Ciampi de Andrade D, Lyons KE, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Chaudhuri KR, Deuschl G, Cruccu G, Sampaio C, Goetz CG, Schrag A, Martinez-Martin P, Stebbins G; Members of the MDS Committee on Rating Scales Development. Rating Scales for Pain in Parkinson's Disease: Critique and Recommendations. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2016 Jun 24;3(6):527-537. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12384. eCollection 2016 Nov-Dec.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27650216
Citation
Imai Y, Petersen KK, Morch CD, Arendt Nielsen L. Comparing test-retest reliability and magnitude of conditioned pain modulation using different combinations of test and conditioning stimuli. Somatosens Mot Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;33(3-4):169-177. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2016.1229178. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32776601
Citation
Santos-Garcia D, Oreiro M, Perez P, Fanjul G, Paz Gonzalez JM, Feal Painceiras MJ, Cores Bartolome C, Valdes Aymerich L, Garcia Sancho C, Castellanos Rodrigo MDM. Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Parkinson's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Survey of 568 Spanish Patients. Mov Disord. 2020 Oct;35(10):1712-1716. doi: 10.1002/mds.28261. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Parkinson´s Disease-related Pain
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs