search
Back to results

Posterior Wall And Left Atrial Appendage Empiric Electrical Isolation for Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PLEA)

Primary Purpose

Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Catheter ablation
Sponsored by
Montefiore Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Atrial Fibrillation focused on measuring Catheter Ablation, Arrhythmia Recurrence, Embolic Stroke, Mortality

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 99 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  3. Male or female, aged 18 or greater
  4. In good general health as evidenced by medical history and diagnosed with symptomatic persistent AF or long-standing persistent AF.

    1. Persistent AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting > 7 days and less than 1 year.
    2. Long-standing persistent AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting more than 1 year and less than 10 years.
    3. Symptoms may include, but are not restricted to, palpitations, shortness of breath, chest pain, fatigue, left ventricular dysfunction, or other symptoms, or any combination of the above.
  5. At least one episode of persistent AF must have been documented by ECG, Holter, loop recorder, ziopatch, telemetry, trans telephonic monitoring (TTM), or implantable device within last 10 years of enrollment in this investigation.
  6. Patients undergoing first time procedure for AF.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with paroxysmal AF.

    • Paroxysmal AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting < 7 days (either terminated spontaneously or with pharmacological or electrical cardioversion.

  2. Reversible causes of AF.
  3. Patients with contraindications to systemic anticoagulation with heparin or coumadin, direct thrombin inhibitor or factor Xa inhibitors.
  4. Patients with left atrial size ≥ 75 mm (2D echocardiography, parasternal long axis view)
  5. Left atrial or LAA thrombus
  6. Patients with severe valvular heart disease or after mitral valve replacement (bioprosthetic or mechanical).
  7. Patients with a life expectancy ≤ 24 months
  8. CHA2DS2Vasc score of 0 for men and CHA2DS2Vasc score of 1 for women.
  9. Patients who are pregnant.

Sites / Locations

  • Grandview Medical Center
  • MarinHealth Medical Center
  • University of Colorado
  • Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute
  • Indiana University
  • Montefiore Medical Center
  • WakedMed Heart & Vascular
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute
  • Baylor Heart Clinic
  • Instituto Cardiovascular Adventista
  • Incor - HCFMUSP
  • University CES
  • Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien
  • Hospital Santa Cruz
  • Hacettepe University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

PVI

PVI + PWI

PVI + PWI + LAAEI

PVI + PWI + LAAEI + CSI

Arm Description

Pulmonary vein isolation alone will be performed using radiofrequency energy

Pulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall isolation will be performed using radiofrequency energy

Pulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall isolation plus left atrial appendage electrical isolation will be performed using radiofrequency energy

Pulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall isolation plus left atrial appendage electrical isolation plus coronary sinus isolation will be performed using radiofrequency energy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes and all-cause mortality after initial procedure
The primary effectiveness endpoint is defined as the freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (> 30 seconds) and all-cause mortality within 12 months after one ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic medications after blanking period (3 months after ablation) as adjudicated by the independent Core Laboratory. Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Atrial Tachycardia (AT) Atrial Flutter (AFL)
A composite of thromboembolic events, myocardial perforation, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrioesophageal fistula, left and right phrenic nerve paralysis, and other serious adverse events within 12 months post-procedure.
The primary safety endpoint is defined as a composite of thromboembolic events, myocardial perforation, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrioesophageal fistula, left and right phrenic nerve paralysis, and other serious adverse events within 12 months post-procedure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Incidence of peri-procedural and 12-month post procedural complications.
These complications include: ischemic stroke, pulmonary veins (PVs) stenosis, cardiac perforation, esophageal injury, phrenic nerve paralysis, rehospitalization, and death.
AF/AT/AFL Burden
Atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial tachycardia (AT) and/or atrial flutter (AFL) burden at 12 months after single and redo procedures
All-cause mortality
Death from all causes will be assessed
Atrial contractility
Myocardial strain will be used to assess atrial contractility after catheter ablation
Heart failure analysis
Primary outcome will be assessed base on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
Cardiovascular hospitalizations
Cardiovascular hospitalization was characterized by the site principal investigator (PI) and reported as part of the hospitalization case report form.
Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time
These times will be compared amongst groups
Number of repeat procedures
Number of repeat procedures within 12 months after the first ablation procedure
Cost-effectiveness analysis
The CEA will examine the cost of health care resources and health outcomes from the ablation procedure to 1-year postoperatively. The costs will include all health care utilization during this time. Health care utilization, and associated costs, related to the patients' condition, the procedure and adverse events will be the basis of a sensitivity analysis.
Long-term follow-up at 24 and 60 months to evaluate freedom of documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (>30 seconds) and all-cause mortality adjudicated by the Core Laboratory
Freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (> 30 seconds) and all-cause mortality within 24 and 60 months after one ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic medications after blanking period (3 months after ablation) as adjudicated by the independent Core Laboratory. Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Atrial Tachycardia (AT) Atrial Flutter (AFL)
Freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (>30 seconds) and all-cause mortality within 12 months after redo ablation procedure.
Freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias recurrence (AF/atrial flutter [AFL]/atrial tachycardia [AT]) (episodes >30 seconds on 12-lead ECG, event monitor, Zio patch, Holter or device interrogation) and all-cause mortality (patients who die before the 12-month assessment or who are too ill to undergo assessment of AF are considered not to have response to treatment) during the evaluation period at 12 months after redo-ablation procedures as adjudicated by the independent Core Laboratory.

Full Information

First Posted
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
August 29, 2023
Sponsor
Montefiore Medical Center
Collaborators
Biosense Webster, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04216667
Brief Title
Posterior Wall And Left Atrial Appendage Empiric Electrical Isolation for Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Acronym
PLEA
Official Title
Posterior Wall And Left Atrial Appendage Empiric Electrical Isolation for Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (The PLEA Trial)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Insufficient enrollment
Study Start Date
January 16, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Montefiore Medical Center
Collaborators
Biosense Webster, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of empirical posterior wall isolation (PWI), left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAEI) and coronary sinus isolation (CSI) when compared to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone: PVI alone, PVI + PWI, PVI + PWI + LAAEI, PVI + PWI + LAAEI + CSI.
Detailed Description
The Posterior Wall and/or Left Atrial Appendage Empiric Electrical Isolation for Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (The PLEA Trial) is a prospective multicenter randomized controlled study that has the overall goal of establishing the efficacy and safety of different ablation techniques for patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. The PLEA trial is designed to test the hypothesis whether posterior wall isolation (PWI) with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), PWI plus left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAEI) with PVI and PWI plus LAAEI plus coronary sinus isolation (CSI) with PVI is superior to the standard approach alone (i.e. PVI alone) in decreasing the incidence of the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and all-atrial arrhythmia recurrences.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Atrial Fibrillation
Keywords
Catheter Ablation, Arrhythmia Recurrence, Embolic Stroke, Mortality

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
A total of 932 patients will be randomized with equal allocation to one of four treatment groups. This sample size provides 90% power to detect pairwise differences in response rates between groups ranging from 0.12 to 0.15 based on two-tailed 0.05 level intention to treat chi-squared tests. Specifically, the response rates under the alternative upon which sample size is determined are 0.45, 0.60, 0.75, 0.87 for PVI alone, PVI + PWI, PVI + PWI + LAAEI and PVI + PWI + LAAEI + CSI respectively.
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The nature of the ablation procedures precludes blinding of physicians to patient treatment. However, patients will be blinded to their ablation strategy (single-blind design) and endpoint assessment will be made by blinded adjudicators from an independent core laboratory.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
124 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PVI
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Pulmonary vein isolation alone will be performed using radiofrequency energy
Arm Title
PVI + PWI
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Pulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall isolation will be performed using radiofrequency energy
Arm Title
PVI + PWI + LAAEI
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Pulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall isolation plus left atrial appendage electrical isolation will be performed using radiofrequency energy
Arm Title
PVI + PWI + LAAEI + CSI
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Pulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall isolation plus left atrial appendage electrical isolation plus coronary sinus isolation will be performed using radiofrequency energy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Catheter ablation
Intervention Description
Catheter ablation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes and all-cause mortality after initial procedure
Description
The primary effectiveness endpoint is defined as the freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (> 30 seconds) and all-cause mortality within 12 months after one ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic medications after blanking period (3 months after ablation) as adjudicated by the independent Core Laboratory. Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Atrial Tachycardia (AT) Atrial Flutter (AFL)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
A composite of thromboembolic events, myocardial perforation, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrioesophageal fistula, left and right phrenic nerve paralysis, and other serious adverse events within 12 months post-procedure.
Description
The primary safety endpoint is defined as a composite of thromboembolic events, myocardial perforation, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrioesophageal fistula, left and right phrenic nerve paralysis, and other serious adverse events within 12 months post-procedure.
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of peri-procedural and 12-month post procedural complications.
Description
These complications include: ischemic stroke, pulmonary veins (PVs) stenosis, cardiac perforation, esophageal injury, phrenic nerve paralysis, rehospitalization, and death.
Time Frame
12, 24 and 60 months
Title
AF/AT/AFL Burden
Description
Atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial tachycardia (AT) and/or atrial flutter (AFL) burden at 12 months after single and redo procedures
Time Frame
12, 24 and 60 months
Title
All-cause mortality
Description
Death from all causes will be assessed
Time Frame
12, 24 and 60 months
Title
Atrial contractility
Description
Myocardial strain will be used to assess atrial contractility after catheter ablation
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Heart failure analysis
Description
Primary outcome will be assessed base on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame
12, 24 and 60 months
Title
Cardiovascular hospitalizations
Description
Cardiovascular hospitalization was characterized by the site principal investigator (PI) and reported as part of the hospitalization case report form.
Time Frame
12, 24 and 60 months
Title
Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time
Description
These times will be compared amongst groups
Time Frame
Day of Procedure
Title
Number of repeat procedures
Description
Number of repeat procedures within 12 months after the first ablation procedure
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Description
The CEA will examine the cost of health care resources and health outcomes from the ablation procedure to 1-year postoperatively. The costs will include all health care utilization during this time. Health care utilization, and associated costs, related to the patients' condition, the procedure and adverse events will be the basis of a sensitivity analysis.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Long-term follow-up at 24 and 60 months to evaluate freedom of documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (>30 seconds) and all-cause mortality adjudicated by the Core Laboratory
Description
Freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (> 30 seconds) and all-cause mortality within 24 and 60 months after one ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic medications after blanking period (3 months after ablation) as adjudicated by the independent Core Laboratory. Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Atrial Tachycardia (AT) Atrial Flutter (AFL)
Time Frame
24 and 60 months
Title
Freedom from documented AF/AT/AFL episodes (>30 seconds) and all-cause mortality within 12 months after redo ablation procedure.
Description
Freedom from all-atrial arrhythmias recurrence (AF/atrial flutter [AFL]/atrial tachycardia [AT]) (episodes >30 seconds on 12-lead ECG, event monitor, Zio patch, Holter or device interrogation) and all-cause mortality (patients who die before the 12-month assessment or who are too ill to undergo assessment of AF are considered not to have response to treatment) during the evaluation period at 12 months after redo-ablation procedures as adjudicated by the independent Core Laboratory.
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
99 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Provision of signed and dated informed consent form Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study Male or female, aged 18 or greater In good general health as evidenced by medical history and diagnosed with symptomatic persistent AF or long-standing persistent AF. Persistent AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting > 7 days and less than 1 year. Long-standing persistent AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting more than 1 year and less than 10 years. Symptoms may include, but are not restricted to, palpitations, shortness of breath, chest pain, fatigue, left ventricular dysfunction, or other symptoms, or any combination of the above. At least one episode of persistent AF must have been documented by ECG, Holter, loop recorder, ziopatch, telemetry, trans telephonic monitoring (TTM), or implantable device within last 10 years of enrollment in this investigation. Patients undergoing first time procedure for AF. Exclusion Criteria: Patients with paroxysmal AF. • Paroxysmal AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting < 7 days (either terminated spontaneously or with pharmacological or electrical cardioversion. Reversible causes of AF. Patients with contraindications to systemic anticoagulation with heparin or coumadin, direct thrombin inhibitor or factor Xa inhibitors. Patients with left atrial size ≥ 75 mm (2D echocardiography, parasternal long axis view) Left atrial or LAA thrombus Patients with severe valvular heart disease or after mitral valve replacement (bioprosthetic or mechanical). Patients with a life expectancy ≤ 24 months CHA2DS2Vasc score of 0 for men and CHA2DS2Vasc score of 1 for women. Patients who are pregnant.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jorge E Romero, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luigi Di Biase, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andrea Natale, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute and St. David's Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Grandview Medical Center
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35243
Country
United States
Facility Name
MarinHealth Medical Center
City
Larkspur
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94904
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Colorado
City
Boulder
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80309
Country
United States
Facility Name
Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33176
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana University
City
Bloomington
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Montefiore Medical Center
City
Bronx
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10467
Country
United States
Facility Name
WakedMed Heart & Vascular
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27610
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor Heart Clinic
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Instituto Cardiovascular Adventista
City
Buenos Aires
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Incor - HCFMUSP
City
Sao Paulo
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
University CES
City
Medellín
State/Province
Antioquia
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien
City
Frankfurt
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Hospital Santa Cruz
City
Lisbon
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Hacettepe University
City
Ankara
Country
Turkey

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29342299
Citation
Romero J, Michaud GF, Avendano R, Briceno DF, Kumar S, Carlos Diaz J, Mohanty S, Trivedi C, Gianni C, Della Rocca D, Proietti R, Perrotta L, Bordignon S, Chun JKR, Schmidt B, Garcia M, Natale A, Di Biase L. Benefit of left atrial appendage electrical isolation for persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2018 Aug 1;20(8):1268-1278. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux372.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28122885
Citation
Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, de Ferranti SD, Floyd J, Fornage M, Gillespie C, Isasi CR, Jimenez MC, Jordan LC, Judd SE, Lackland D, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth L, Liu S, Longenecker CT, Mackey RH, Matsushita K, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nasir K, Neumar RW, Palaniappan L, Pandey DK, Thiagarajan RR, Reeves MJ, Ritchey M, Rodriguez CJ, Roth GA, Rosamond WD, Sasson C, Towfighi A, Tsao CW, Turner MB, Virani SS, Voeks JH, Willey JZ, Wilkins JT, Wu JH, Alger HM, Wong SS, Muntner P; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10):e146-e603. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485. Epub 2017 Jan 25. No abstract available. Erratum In: Circulation. 2017 Mar 7;135(10 ):e646. Circulation. 2017 Sep 5;136(10 ):e196.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24345399
Citation
Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, Gillum RF, Kim YH, McAnulty JH Jr, Zheng ZJ, Forouzanfar MH, Naghavi M, Mensah GA, Ezzati M, Murray CJ. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. 2014 Feb 25;129(8):837-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29016841
Citation
Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Nielsen JC, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d'Avila A, de Groot NMSN, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary. Europace. 2018 Jan 1;20(1):157-208. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux275. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27788847
Citation
Di Biase L, Burkhardt JD, Mohanty P, Mohanty S, Sanchez JE, Trivedi C, Gunes M, Gokoglan Y, Gianni C, Horton RP, Themistoclakis S, Gallinghouse GJ, Bailey S, Zagrodzky JD, Hongo RH, Beheiry S, Santangeli P, Casella M, Dello Russo A, Al-Ahmad A, Hranitzky P, Lakkireddy D, Tondo C, Natale A. Left Atrial Appendage Isolation in Patients With Longstanding Persistent AF Undergoing Catheter Ablation: BELIEF Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;68(18):1929-1940. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.770.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3210508
Citation
Ludka L. [Fasting during childbirth]. Katilolehti. 1988 Sep;93(6):25-8. No abstract available. Finnish.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20719881
Citation
Allessie MA, de Groot NM, Houben RP, Schotten U, Boersma E, Smeets JL, Crijns HJ. Electropathological substrate of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with structural heart disease: longitudinal dissociation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Dec;3(6):606-15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.910125. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20206320
Citation
Brooks AG, Stiles MK, Laborderie J, Lau DH, Kuklik P, Shipp NJ, Hsu LF, Sanders P. Outcomes of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Jun;7(6):835-46. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.01.017. Epub 2010 Jan 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27042964
Citation
Kuck KH, Brugada J, Furnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KR, Elvan A, Arentz T, Bestehorn K, Pocock SJ, Albenque JP, Tondo C; FIRE AND ICE Investigators. Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 9;374(23):2235-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602014. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25946280
Citation
Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, Macle L, Morillo CA, Haverkamp W, Weerasooriya R, Albenque JP, Nardi S, Menardi E, Novak P, Sanders P; STAR AF II Investigators. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 7;372(19):1812-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408288.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28279292
Citation
Lim HS, Hocini M, Dubois R, Denis A, Derval N, Zellerhoff S, Yamashita S, Berte B, Mahida S, Komatsu Y, Daly M, Jesel L, Pomier C, Meillet V, Amraoui S, Shah AJ, Cochet H, Sacher F, Jais P, Haissaguerre M. Complexity and Distribution of Drivers in Relation to Duration of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Mar 14;69(10):1257-1269. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26277862
Citation
Bai R, Di Biase L, Mohanty P, Trivedi C, Dello Russo A, Themistoclakis S, Casella M, Santarelli P, Fassini G, Santangeli P, Mohanty S, Rossillo A, Pelargonio G, Horton R, Sanchez J, Gallinghouse J, Burkhardt JD, Ma CS, Tondo C, Natale A. Proven isolation of the pulmonary vein antrum with or without left atrial posterior wall isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jan;13(1):132-40. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.08.019. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19808442
Citation
Tamborero D, Mont L, Berruezo A, Matiello M, Benito B, Sitges M, Vidal B, de Caralt TM, Perea RJ, Vatasescu R, Brugada J. Left atrial posterior wall isolation does not improve the outcome of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009 Feb;2(1):35-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.797944. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22972873
Citation
Lim TW, Koay CH, See VA, McCall R, Chik W, Zecchin R, Byth K, Seow SC, Thomas L, Ross DL, Thomas SP. Single-ring posterior left atrial (box) isolation results in a different mode of recurrence compared with wide antral pulmonary vein isolation on long-term follow-up: longer atrial fibrillation-free survival time but similar survival time free of any atrial arrhythmia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Oct;5(5):968-77. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.970293. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30060879
Citation
Aryana A, Baker JH, Espinosa Ginic MA, Pujara DK, Bowers MR, O'Neill PG, Ellenbogen KA, Di Biase L, d'Avila A, Natale A. Posterior wall isolation using the cryoballoon in conjunction with pulmonary vein ablation is superior to pulmonary vein isolation alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: A multicenter experience. Heart Rhythm. 2018 Aug;15(8):1121-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.05.014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20606120
Citation
Di Biase L, Burkhardt JD, Mohanty P, Sanchez J, Mohanty S, Horton R, Gallinghouse GJ, Bailey SM, Zagrodzky JD, Santangeli P, Hao S, Hongo R, Beheiry S, Themistoclakis S, Bonso A, Rossillo A, Corrado A, Raviele A, Al-Ahmad A, Wang P, Cummings JE, Schweikert RA, Pelargonio G, Dello Russo A, Casella M, Santarelli P, Lewis WR, Natale A. Left atrial appendage: an underrecognized trigger site of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2010 Jul 13;122(2):109-18. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.928903. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21762673
Citation
Hocini M, Shah AJ, Nault I, Sanders P, Wright M, Narayan SM, Takahashi Y, Jais P, Matsuo S, Knecht S, Sacher F, Lim KT, Clementy J, Haissaguerre M. Localized reentry within the left atrial appendage: arrhythmogenic role in patients undergoing ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2011 Dec;8(12):1853-61. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.07.013. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27406602
Citation
Panikker S, Jarman JW, Virmani R, Kutys R, Haldar S, Lim E, Butcher C, Khan H, Mantziari L, Nicol E, Foran JP, Markides V, Wong T. Left Atrial Appendage Electrical Isolation and Concomitant Device Occlusion to Treat Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A First-in-Human Safety, Feasibility, and Efficacy Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 Jul;9(7):e003710. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003710.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28340073
Citation
Yorgun H, Canpolat U, Kocyigit D, Coteli C, Evranos B, Aytemir K. Left atrial appendage isolation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation: one-year clinical outcome after cryoballoon-based ablation. Europace. 2017 May 1;19(5):758-768. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29759358
Citation
Lakkireddy D, Sridhar Mahankali A, Kanmanthareddy A, Lee R, Badhwar N, Bartus K, Atkins D, Bommana S, Cheng J, Rasekh A, Di Biase L, Natale A, Nath J, Ferrell R, Earnest M, Reddy YM. Left Atrial Appendage Ligation and Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The LAALA-AF Registry. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Jun;1(3):153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28402461
Citation
Romero J, Natale A, Di Biase L. Left atrial appendage empirical electrical isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation: time for a change in practice. Europace. 2017 May 1;19(5):699-702. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux050. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30689416
Citation
Heeger CH, Rillig A, Geisler D, Wohlmuth P, Fink T, Mathew S, Tilz RR, Reissmann B, Lemes C, Maurer T, Santoro F, Inaba O, Sohns C, Huang Y, Alessandrini H, Dotz I, Schluter M, Metzner A, Kuck KH, Ouyang F. Left Atrial Appendage Isolation in Patients Not Responding to Pulmonary Vein Isolation. Circulation. 2019 Jan 29;139(5):712-715. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037451. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35333095
Citation
Osorio J, Varley A, Kreidieh O, Godfrey B, Schrappe G, Rajendra A, Silverstein J, Romero J, Rodriguez D, Morales G, Zei P. High-Frequency, Low-Tidal-Volume Mechanical Ventilation Safely Improves Catheter Stability and Procedural Efficiency During Radiofrequency Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022 Apr;15(4):e010722. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010722. Epub 2022 Mar 25. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Posterior Wall And Left Atrial Appendage Empiric Electrical Isolation for Non-Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs