search
Back to results

Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial Comparing SMILE and LASIK

Primary Purpose

Myopia, Astigmatism, Hypermetropia

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Singapore
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Femtosecond LASIK
Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)
Sponsored by
Singapore National Eye Centre
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Myopia

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 21 years of age or older.
  2. Cycloplegic spherical equivalent of >-2.00D
  3. Refractive cylinder -4.00 D or less, Anisometropia of >1D
  4. Best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 6/12 or better in BOTH eyes.
  5. Spherical or cylindrical error has progressed at -0.50D or less per year from date of baseline measurement.
  6. Contact lens wearers must have removed contact lenses at least two (2) weeks before the baseline measurement.
  7. No evidence of irregular astigmatism on corneal topography.
  8. Available to attend post-operative examinations for a 3 month period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Progressive or unstable myopia and/or astigmatism.
  2. Clinical or corneal topographic evidence of keratoconus.
  3. Residual, recurrent or active ocular disease such as uveitis, severe dry eyes, severe allergic eye disease, glaucoma, visually significant cataract and retinal disease.
  4. Previous corneal surgery or trauma within the corneal flap zone.
  5. Patent corneal vascularization within 1mm of the corneal flap zone.
  6. Taking systemic medications likely to affect wound healing, such as corticosteroids and antimetabolites.
  7. Systemically immunocompromised.
  8. Systemic disease likely to affect wound healing, such as diabetes, connective tissue disease and severe atopy.
  9. Pregnant or nursing.

Sites / Locations

  • Singapore National Eye CentreRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Femtosecond LASIK

SMILE

Arm Description

2 lasers refractive procedure

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Refractive predictability
Defined as the proportion number of eyes achieving a postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) within ±0.50 diopter (D) of the intended target.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Efficacy
Defined as the proportion number of eyes achieving a unaided visual acuity (UAVA) of 20/20 or better postoperatively
Safety
Defined as the proportion number of eyes that lost or gained 1 or more lines of postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) relative to the preoperative BCVA
Contrast sensitivity
Tested using the Vision Contrast Test System (VCTS) chart (VCTS 6500 contrast sensitivity Chart) in 6 spatial frequencies

Full Information

First Posted
September 8, 2010
Last Updated
July 19, 2016
Sponsor
Singapore National Eye Centre
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01216475
Brief Title
Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial Comparing SMILE and LASIK
Official Title
Comparison of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and VisuMax Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (FemtoLASIK): A Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
February 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2016 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2017 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Singapore National Eye Centre

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Background: Small Incision Lenticule Extraction or SMILE is a novel form of 'flapless' corneal refractive surgery that was adapted from Refractive Lenticule Extraction (ReLEx). SMILE uses only one femtosecond laser to complete the refractive surgery, potentially reducing surgical time, side effects and cost. If successful, SMILE could potentially replace the current, widely practiced Laser In-situ Keratomileusis or LASIK. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether SMILE is non-inferior to LASIK in terms of refractive outcomes at 3-months post-operatively. Methods/ Design: Single tertiary center, parallel group, single-blinded, paired-eye design, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. Participants who are eligible for LASIK will be enrolled for study after informed consent. Each participant will be randomized to receive SMILE and LASIK in each eye. Our primary hypothesis (stated as null) in this non-inferiority trial would be that SMILE differs from LASIK in adults (>21 years old) with myopia (> -3.00D) at a tertiary eye center in terms of refractive predictability at 3 months post-operatively. Our secondary hypothesis (stated as null) in this non-inferiority trial would be that SMILE differs from LASIK in adults (>21 years old) with myopia (> -3.00D) at a tertiary eye center in terms of other refractive outcomes (efficacy, safety, higher-order aberrations) at 3 months post-operatively. Our primary outcome is refractive predictability, which is one of several standard refractive outcomes, defined as the proportion of eyes achieving a postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) within ±0.50 diopter (D) of the intended target. Randomization will be performed using random allocation sequence generated by a computer with no blocks or restrictions, and implemented by concealing the number-coded surgery within sealed envelopes until just before the procedure. In this single-blinded trial, subjects and their caregivers will be blinded to the assigned treatment in each eye. Discussion: This novel trial will provide information on whether SMILE has comparable, if not superior, refractive outcomes compared to the established LASIK for myopia, thus providing evidence for translation into clinical practice.
Detailed Description
Surgical correction for refractive errors may be performed by a number of procedures. Laser correction involves procedures such as EpiLASIK, LASIK or conductive keratoplasty, while lens based corrections involve the use of phakic intra-ocular lenses. Despite the emergence of other procedures, due to its fast visual rehabilitation and painless postoperative course, LASIK is still the procedure of choice for both patients and refractive surgeons. LASIK consists of two steps: the first step involves the formation of a corneal flap and the second one is when the excimer ablation is performed in the corneal stromal bed. Femtosecond lasers (FL) have been widely used in LASIK surgery to fashion the corneal flap. The laser will cut a lamellar followed by a vertical corneal incision. We are able to produce a vertical cut since the Femtosecond laser can deliver laser pulses of 1 micron diameter at a preselected depth in the cornea, which then expands to 2 to 3 microns with the formation of a cavitation bubble. These pulses create micro-photodisruption of the corneal tissue by the formation of an expanding bubble of carbon dioxide and water, which in turn cleaves the tissue and creates a plane of separation. The flap is then removed to expose the stroma and the refractive treatment is done by the excimer laser over the denuded stroma. The advantages of femtosecond laser over microkeratome LASIK flaps have been reduced postoperative dry eye symptoms, less chance of dislocation from trauma and reduced incidence of button holes or free caps. Even though femto-LASIK has demonstrated good efficacy, it can still be asssociated with side effects found in standard LASIK e.g. glare, haloes, dry eye and still requires the use of two laser machines, one for the flap the other for the excimer ablation. This increases the length of time of the overall procedure and the costs. Recently, a new "one laser" refractive surgery has been proposed: Femtosecond Lenticule Ex-traction (FLEx). It consists of performing the entire refractive procedure without an excimer laser. The Femtosecond laser creates four stromal incisions to create a corneal lenticule and a corneal flap. The size and shape of the lenticule is calculated based on the patient refractive error. The lenticule is separated from the flap above and the rest of the cornea below using a small spatula. Following this, the lenticule is grasped with a forceps and extracted from the eye. Finally, the flap is repositioned and the interface washed. At this time the refractive error is already corrected without the use of a second laser. The advantages of FLEx treatment are shortened length of the refractive procedure, reduced patient inconvenience from moving from one laser to another, reduced risk of intraoperative infections and more accurate ablation since the patient need to fixate only once. Currently there are no publications comparing FLEx to LASIK, hence this study will be unique in the fact that the paired eye approach will act as an internal patient control to assess the objective and subjective outcomes in patients following both these procedures. The study will be a prospective randomized trial of patients comparing SMILE (a variation of FLEx) with LASIK to treat their myopic refractive error. One eye will be randomized for SMILE and other eye for LASIK. Each procedure will be performed sequentially. Randomization will be performed by a random number generator, and assignment concealed in envelopes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Myopia, Astigmatism, Hypermetropia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
70 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Femtosecond LASIK
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
2 lasers refractive procedure
Arm Title
SMILE
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Femtosecond LASIK
Other Intervention Name(s)
Blade-less LASIK
Intervention Description
LASIK consists of two steps: the first step involves the formation of a corneal flap and the second one is when the excimer ablation is performed in the corneal stromal bed. Femtosecond lasers (FL) have been widely used in LASIK surgery to fashion the corneal flap. The laser will cut a lamellar followed by a vertical corneal incision. We are able to produce a vertical cut since the Femtosecond laser can deliver laser pulses of 1 micron diameter at a preselected depth in the cornea, which then expands to 2 to 3 microns with the formation of a cavitation bubble. These pulses create micro-photodisruption of the corneal tissue by the formation of an expanding bubble of carbon dioxide and water, which in turn cleaves the tissue and creates a plane of separation. The flap is then removed to expose the stroma and the refractive treatment is done by the excimer laser over the denuded stroma.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)
Intervention Description
Patient's eye will be centered and docked with the curved interface cone before application of suction fixation. First, the posterior surface of the refractive lenticule (spiral in), then the lenticule border is created. The anterior surface of the refractive lenticule (spiral out) is then formed which extended beyond the posterior lenticule diameter by 0.5mm to form the anterior flap and is followed by a rim cut. After the suction is released, a Siebel spatula is inserted under the flap near the hinge before the flap is seperated and reflected. The edge of the refractive lenticule is separated from the stromal bed with a sinsky hook and the posterior border of the lenticule gently separated with the Siebel spatula and removed through small incision.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Refractive predictability
Description
Defined as the proportion number of eyes achieving a postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) within ±0.50 diopter (D) of the intended target.
Time Frame
3 months Post-operative
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Efficacy
Description
Defined as the proportion number of eyes achieving a unaided visual acuity (UAVA) of 20/20 or better postoperatively
Time Frame
3 months Post-operative
Title
Safety
Description
Defined as the proportion number of eyes that lost or gained 1 or more lines of postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) relative to the preoperative BCVA
Time Frame
3 months Post-operative
Title
Contrast sensitivity
Description
Tested using the Vision Contrast Test System (VCTS) chart (VCTS 6500 contrast sensitivity Chart) in 6 spatial frequencies
Time Frame
3 months Post-operative

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 21 years of age or older. Cycloplegic spherical equivalent of >-2.00D Refractive cylinder -4.00 D or less, Anisometropia of >1D Best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 6/12 or better in BOTH eyes. Spherical or cylindrical error has progressed at -0.50D or less per year from date of baseline measurement. Contact lens wearers must have removed contact lenses at least two (2) weeks before the baseline measurement. No evidence of irregular astigmatism on corneal topography. Available to attend post-operative examinations for a 3 month period. Exclusion Criteria: Progressive or unstable myopia and/or astigmatism. Clinical or corneal topographic evidence of keratoconus. Residual, recurrent or active ocular disease such as uveitis, severe dry eyes, severe allergic eye disease, glaucoma, visually significant cataract and retinal disease. Previous corneal surgery or trauma within the corneal flap zone. Patent corneal vascularization within 1mm of the corneal flap zone. Taking systemic medications likely to affect wound healing, such as corticosteroids and antimetabolites. Systemically immunocompromised. Systemic disease likely to affect wound healing, such as diabetes, connective tissue disease and severe atopy. Pregnant or nursing.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Donald T Tan, FRCS(Ed),
Phone
6562263395
Email
snecdt@pacific.net.sg
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jodhbir S Mehta, FRCS(Ed)
Phone
65622772565
Email
jodmehta@gmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Donald T Tan, FRCS(Ed),
Organizational Affiliation
Singapore National Eye Centre
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jodhbir S Mehta, FRCS (ed)
Organizational Affiliation
SNEC
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Singapore National Eye Centre
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
168751
Country
Singapore
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jod Mehta, FRCOph
Phone
62277255
Email
jodmehta@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Donald T Tan, FRCS (Ed)
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jodhbir S Mehta, FRCS (Ed)
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Federico Luengo Gimeno, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cordelia Chan, FRCS (Ed)
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marcus Ang, FRCS

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18721712
Citation
Sekundo W, Kunert K, Russmann C, Gille A, Bissmann W, Stobrawa G, Sticker M, Bischoff M, Blum M. First efficacy and safety study of femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Sep;34(9):1513-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.05.033. Erratum In: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Nov;34(11):1819.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22647480
Citation
Ang M, Tan D, Mehta JS. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial. Trials. 2012 May 31;13:75. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-75.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial Comparing SMILE and LASIK

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs