search
Back to results

REmote Assessment and Dynamic Response Intervention (READyR)

Primary Purpose

Dementia, Alzheimer Disease, Relationship, Marital

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
READyR A
READyR B
Sponsored by
Oregon Health and Science University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Dementia focused on measuring Needs Assessment, Family Caregiver, Technology, Remote Monitoring, Care Values, Aging-in-place

Eligibility Criteria

62 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Persons with Dementia

Inclusion:

  1. 62 years or older;
  2. Able to identify a family care partner over age 20 who is living with you and will also consent to fully participate in the study;
  3. Probable or confirmed diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or early-stage dementia
  4. Age and education adjusted MOCA score > 15 (at most recent measurement by parent study) corresponding to early to moderate stage dementia

Exclusion:

  1. Inability to speak English or read printed materials in English
  2. Conditions that would limit participation at entry to study (e.g. visual or hearing impairments prohibiting reading and discussing the intervention materials);
  3. Any uncontrolled medical condition that is expected to preclude completion of the study, such as late stage cancers.

Family Care Partners

Inclusion:

  1. 21 years or older;
  2. Self-identifying as a family member and care partner residing with the PwD participant;

Exclusion:

  1. Inability to speak English or read printed materials in English
  2. Conditions that would limit participation at entry to study (e.g. visual or hearing impairments prohibiting reading and discussing the intervention materials);
  3. Any uncontrolled medical condition that is expected to preclude completion of the study, such as late stage cancers.

Sites / Locations

  • Oregon Health & Science University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

READyR A

READyR B (wait list comparison)

Arm Description

Group A will start the READyR intervention immediately after the baseline Session 1. The READyR program consists of a 3-session, values-based needs assessment intervention designed to match objectively-assessed in-home activity patterns with subjective reports of participants' care values. The goal of the intervention is to address unmet dementia-related care needs and help couples prepare for the future, and reduce strain on their relationship, and help maintain their health and well-being. Session 2 will occur approximately 3 weeks after Session 1, and Session 3 will occur approximately 3 weeks after Session 2. Session 3 also includes follow-up assessments.

Group B - the wait list comparison group - will have a 60-minute support session (comparator intervention) about 3 weeks after the baseline Session 1. The support session will include general information about dementia-related care needs that does not take into account the individual participant's care values or objective in-home activity patterns. They will also receive a check-in call approximately 3 weeks later, with follow-up assessments. Group B will begin the READyR intervention sessions following completion of follow-up assessments.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean difference effect sizes for pre-post change the care dyad's preparation for future care needs
The Preparation for Future Care Needs Scale (Short Form) assesses the degree to which an individual has engaged in planning for future care needs in late life using 15 items and 5 subscales representing distinct planning processes (awareness, gathering information, decision making, concrete planning, avoidance). Items are scored on a 5 point Likert scale with higher scores indicating greater preparation for future care needs. Sorensen, S., Chapman, B. P., Duberstein, P. R., Pinquart, M., & Lyness, J. M. (2017). Assessing future care preparation in late life: Two short measures. Psychol Assess, 29(12), 1480-1495.
Mean difference effect sizes for pre-post change in the care dyad's relationship quality
The Dyadic Relationship Scale assesses the positive dyadic interactions and negative dyadic strain experienced by caregivers (11 items) and care recipients (10 items). Items are averaged for a summary score that ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more positive interactions in the relationship, or more relationship strain, respectively. Sebern, M.D. & Whitlatch, C.J. (2007). Dyadic Relationship Scale: A measure of the impact of the provision and receipt of family care. The Gerontologist, 47(6), 741-751.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mean difference effect sizes for pre-post change in care-related strain
Subjective strain from caregiving will be assessed among family care partners at baseline and follow-up assessments using the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), short-form (12 items). Scores range from 0-48 with higher scores indicating a greater degree of strain from providing care.
Mean difference effect sizes for pre-post change in quality of life
The Quality of Life: Alzheimer's Disease Scale assesses individual perceptions of quality of life (from poor to excellent) across 13 items. Items are averaged for a summary score of 1 to 4, higher scores indicating greater degree of quality of life. Logsdon, R. G., Gibbons, L. E., McCurry, S. M., & Teri, L. (1999). Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease: Patient and Caregiver Reports. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 5(1), 21-32.
Mean difference effect sizes for pre-post change in concealment of emotions.
The Emotional Intimacy Disruptive Behavior Scale (8 items) assesses the frequency of engagement in behaviors to conceal emotions about an illness from one's partner. Druley, J. A., Stephens, M. A. P., & Coyne, J. C. (1997). Emotional and physical intimacy in coping with Lupus: Women's dilemmas of disclosure and approach. . Health Psychology, 16, 506-514.

Full Information

First Posted
August 27, 2020
Last Updated
June 27, 2022
Sponsor
Oregon Health and Science University
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04542109
Brief Title
REmote Assessment and Dynamic Response Intervention
Acronym
READyR
Official Title
READyR: A Remote Assessment and Dynamic Response Intervention to Support Couples in Planning for Changing Dementia Care Needs
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 27, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 17, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 17, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Oregon Health and Science University
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the READyR study (originally called SHARE-sense) is to redevelop and test an intervention program to remotely assess for changing dementia-related care needs.
Detailed Description
Unmet dementia-related care needs are highly prevalent, and are detrimental to the care dyad's (person with dementia and their family care partner) health, safety, mortality, and likelihood of nursing home placement. The first phase of this study involves redevelopment of the intervention program into a 3-session values-based needs assessment intervention (delivered over 6 weeks) designed for early-stage persons with dementia and their primary family caregiver (i.e. spouse or partner). A secondary data analysis and focus groups will be conducted in order to complete the redevelopment phase. Objective digital data on behavioral patterns (from sensors and wearables) will be incorporated into a needs assessment that will allow for dynamic tailoring of the READyR program to new and unforeseen care needs. People who voluntarily decide to participate in this study will be asked to participate in three sessions: Session 1 for baseline assessments gathered from all participants (including remote in-home monitoring), Session 2 for discussing the participant's care values and their alignment with current patterns of activities (assessed by remote monitoring) in the home, and Session 3 for addressing current dementia related care needs and setting goals for the future. Participants who complete this study will be offered participation in a follow-up monitoring period to further study the possibilities for dynamic tailoring of their dementia-related needs assessment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dementia, Alzheimer Disease, Relationship, Marital, Caregiver Stress Syndrome
Keywords
Needs Assessment, Family Caregiver, Technology, Remote Monitoring, Care Values, Aging-in-place

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Dyads will be randomized (assigned by chance) to one of two groups: 1) READyR A or 2) READyR B (Wait List Control).
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
READyR A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Group A will start the READyR intervention immediately after the baseline Session 1. The READyR program consists of a 3-session, values-based needs assessment intervention designed to match objectively-assessed in-home activity patterns with subjective reports of participants' care values. The goal of the intervention is to address unmet dementia-related care needs and help couples prepare for the future, and reduce strain on their relationship, and help maintain their health and well-being. Session 2 will occur approximately 3 weeks after Session 1, and Session 3 will occur approximately 3 weeks after Session 2. Session 3 also includes follow-up assessments.
Arm Title
READyR B (wait list comparison)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Group B - the wait list comparison group - will have a 60-minute support session (comparator intervention) about 3 weeks after the baseline Session 1. The support session will include general information about dementia-related care needs that does not take into account the individual participant's care values or objective in-home activity patterns. They will also receive a check-in call approximately 3 weeks later, with follow-up assessments. Group B will begin the READyR intervention sessions following completion of follow-up assessments.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
READyR A
Other Intervention Name(s)
SHARE-sense
Intervention Description
Two active sessions to conduct an individually-tailored dementia-related needs assessment, incorporating the participant's care values and objective data from remote in-home monitoring.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
READyR B
Intervention Description
Active comparator. Two sessions to deliver general information about dementia-related care needs.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean difference effect sizes for pre-post change the care dyad's preparation for future care needs
Description
The Preparation for Future Care Needs Scale (Short Form) assesses the degree to which an individual has engaged in planning for future care needs in late life using 15 items and 5 subscales representing distinct planning processes (awareness, gathering information, decision making, concrete planning, avoidance). Items are scored on a 5 point Likert scale with higher scores indicating greater preparation for future care needs. Sorensen, S., Chapman, B. P., Duberstein, P. R., Pinquart, M., & Lyness, J. M. (2017). Assessing future care preparation in late life: Two short measures. Psychol Assess, 29(12), 1480-1495.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Title
Mean difference effect sizes for pre-post change in the care dyad's relationship quality
Description
The Dyadic Relationship Scale assesses the positive dyadic interactions and negative dyadic strain experienced by caregivers (11 items) and care recipients (10 items). Items are averaged for a summary score that ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more positive interactions in the relationship, or more relationship strain, respectively. Sebern, M.D. & Whitlatch, C.J. (2007). Dyadic Relationship Scale: A measure of the impact of the provision and receipt of family care. The Gerontologist, 47(6), 741-751.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean difference effect sizes for pre-post change in care-related strain
Description
Subjective strain from caregiving will be assessed among family care partners at baseline and follow-up assessments using the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI), short-form (12 items). Scores range from 0-48 with higher scores indicating a greater degree of strain from providing care.
Time Frame
Baseline and weekly for 12 weeks
Title
Mean difference effect sizes for pre-post change in quality of life
Description
The Quality of Life: Alzheimer's Disease Scale assesses individual perceptions of quality of life (from poor to excellent) across 13 items. Items are averaged for a summary score of 1 to 4, higher scores indicating greater degree of quality of life. Logsdon, R. G., Gibbons, L. E., McCurry, S. M., & Teri, L. (1999). Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease: Patient and Caregiver Reports. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 5(1), 21-32.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks
Title
Mean difference effect sizes for pre-post change in concealment of emotions.
Description
The Emotional Intimacy Disruptive Behavior Scale (8 items) assesses the frequency of engagement in behaviors to conceal emotions about an illness from one's partner. Druley, J. A., Stephens, M. A. P., & Coyne, J. C. (1997). Emotional and physical intimacy in coping with Lupus: Women's dilemmas of disclosure and approach. . Health Psychology, 16, 506-514.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
62 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Persons with Dementia Inclusion: 62 years or older; Able to identify a family care partner over age 20 who is living with you and will also consent to fully participate in the study; Probable or confirmed diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or early-stage dementia Age and education adjusted MOCA score > 15 (at most recent measurement by parent study) corresponding to early to moderate stage dementia Exclusion: Inability to speak English or read printed materials in English Conditions that would limit participation at entry to study (e.g. visual or hearing impairments prohibiting reading and discussing the intervention materials); Any uncontrolled medical condition that is expected to preclude completion of the study, such as late stage cancers. Family Care Partners Inclusion: 21 years or older; Self-identifying as a family member and care partner residing with the PwD participant; Exclusion: Inability to speak English or read printed materials in English Conditions that would limit participation at entry to study (e.g. visual or hearing impairments prohibiting reading and discussing the intervention materials); Any uncontrolled medical condition that is expected to preclude completion of the study, such as late stage cancers.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lyndsey M Miller, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Oregon Health and Science University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Oregon Health & Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
De-identified IPD will be available upon request to our Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will become available after completion of study and after publication of primary study aims.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Requests need to made to the PI at the Oregon Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (OARDC). A short data request form will need to be submitted to the OADRC
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35402736
Citation
Miller LM, Solomon DN, Whitlatch CJ, Hiatt SO, Wu CY, Reynolds C, Au-Yeung WM, Kaye J, Steele JS. The Remote Assessment and Dynamic Response Program: Development of an In-Home Dementia-Related Care Needs Assessment to Improve Well-Being. Innov Aging. 2022 Feb 7;6(2):igac006. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igac006. eCollection 2022.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

REmote Assessment and Dynamic Response Intervention

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs