Robot-assisted Rehabilitation of Ankle Fractures: Efficacy and Comparison With Traditional Methods
Primary Purpose
Ankle Fractures
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Specific ankle rehabilitation by ARBOT device
General Rehabilitation
Specific ankle rehabilitation performed by physiotherapist
Specific ankle rehabilitation by Biodex System 3 dynamometer
Specific ankle rehabilitation by ProKin PK254 platform
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Ankle Fractures focused on measuring Rehabilitation, Robotics
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Functional limitation following work-related ankle injuries, including:
- Malleolar and/or tibial shaft fractures, both surgically and conservatively treated;
- Distal tibia and fibula fractures, both surgically and conservatively treated;
- Hindfoot (Calcaneus and Talus) fractures, both surgically and conservatively treated.
- Post-immobilization phase;
- Time interval since fracture event of less than 12 months;
- Signed informed consent acquisition.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-compliance with study requirements;
- Pregnancy or breast feeding;
- Current or prior history of malignancy;
- Open skin at the level of the patient-device interface;
- Sensory deficit at the level of the patient-device interface;
- Ankle motor deficit secondary to peroneal or tibial neuropathy;
- Acute inflammatory arthritis of the ankle;
- Other pathological conditions inducing lower limb pain or disfunction.
Sites / Locations
- INAIL - Centro di Riabilitazione Motoria di Volterra
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Other
Arm Label
Experimental: ARBOT Group
Control Group
Arm Description
The patients in the "ARBOT Group" underwent to following interventions: General Rehabilitation Specific ankle rehabilitation by ARBOT device
The patients in the Control Group underwent to following interventions: General Rehabilitation Specific ankle rehabilitation performed by physiotherapist Specific ankle rehabilitation by Biodex System 3 dynamometer Specific ankle rehabilitation by ProKin PK254 platform.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change of Dorsiflexion Range of Motion
Change of Isometric peak torque at 0° and 10° of plantar flexion
Change of Isokinetic plantar-flexion torque at speed of 30°, 60°, 120°/sec
Change of 2 Minute Walk Test (2MWT)
Side Effects using ARBOT
Secondary Outcome Measures
Timed Stair Climbing Test (10 steps)
Proprioceptive tests (time taking and accuracy)
Pain (VAS 0-10)
LEFS - The Lower Extremity Functional Scale
AOFAS - Ankle-Hindfoot Scale
Patient Satisfaction (VAS 0-10)
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02923479
First Posted
September 28, 2016
Last Updated
October 1, 2016
Sponsor
Istituto Nazionale Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro
Collaborators
Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02923479
Brief Title
Robot-assisted Rehabilitation of Ankle Fractures: Efficacy and Comparison With Traditional Methods
Official Title
Robot-assisted Ankle Rehabilitation Using the High-performance Robotic Device IIT-ARBOT: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2015 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Istituto Nazionale Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro
Collaborators
Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to determine the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of robot-assisted rehabilitation using ARBOT in patients with ankle dysfunction resulting from work related ankle fractures, compared with conventional rehabilitation programs.
Detailed Description
INTRODUCTION:
Robotic devices for lower-limb rehabilitation have been mainly tested in neurologically injured patients. Up to now, clinical studies using robotic training in orthopedic conditions are few. A pilot study was carried out at INAIL Physical Rehabilitation Center of Volterra using ARBOT, a prototypal robotic system for ankle rehabilitation. This device has been developed by IIT - Italian Institute of Technology and it consists of a two-degree-of-freedom electromechanical platform which is able to perform most of the exercises foreseen by the standard rehabilitation programs. By virtue of its innovative motion system and control architecture, ARBOT integrates multiple rehabilitation equipment functions, performing also special exercise programs such as elastic and fluid-dynamic resistance.
ARBOT allows training according to programmed sequences, in order to promote range of movement, muscular function and proprioceptive recovery. Exercises can be performed with or without bearing weight. Moreover, ARBOT is a powerful evaluation instrument for physiotherapists in order to verify and record the results of rehabilitative intervention.
The primary aim of this trial was to determine the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of robot-assisted rehabilitation using ARBOT in patients with ankle dysfunction resulting from work related ankle fractures, compared with conventional rehabilitation programs. Secondary objectives was to investigate correlations among physical and disability parameters, to collect data in order to define further study protocols and improve ARBOT's performance and ergonomics, and ultimately to evaluate patient satisfaction with respect to robot assisted rehabilitation programs.
METHODS:
Thirty-two patients with work related injuries resulting in ankle and/or hindfoot fractures and subsequent to the immobilization phase was enrolled in an open randomized controlled trial over a 30 month period. Each participant was randomly allocated to experimental or control group and received a 4-week rehabilitation program (20 sessions, for 5 days/week from admission to discharge in the Rehabilitation Centre) and weekly robotic and clinical assessments.
Subjects in the experimental group were treated using ARBOT with passive, active and active assisted range-of-motion exercises, resistive exercises in isometric, isotonic, isokinetic, elastic and fluid-dynamic conditions, and proprioceptive training. Control subjects were assisted by a physiotherapist during range of motion recovery exercises and performed resistive and proprioceptive training using Biodex System 3 dynamometer and ProKin PK254 mobile electronic platform.
The assessment sessions included measurements of dorsiflexion ROM, isometric and isokinetic plantar-flexion torque and proprioceptive performance with ARBOT and 2 minutes walking and timed stair climbing test, LEFS-Lower Extremity Functional Scale and AOFAS-Ankle-Hindfoot Scale.
Site monitoring of the study has been conducted according to the standard ISO 14155.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ankle Fractures
Keywords
Rehabilitation, Robotics
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
32 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Experimental: ARBOT Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The patients in the "ARBOT Group" underwent to following interventions:
General Rehabilitation
Specific ankle rehabilitation by ARBOT device
Arm Title
Control Group
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
The patients in the Control Group underwent to following interventions:
General Rehabilitation
Specific ankle rehabilitation performed by physiotherapist
Specific ankle rehabilitation by Biodex System 3 dynamometer
Specific ankle rehabilitation by ProKin PK254 platform.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Specific ankle rehabilitation by ARBOT device
Intervention Description
ARBOT is a programmable robotic device consisting in a two-degree-of-freedom electromechanical platform developed by Italian Institute of Technology - Advanced Robotics and Rehab Technologies. It is composed of a fixed base, a central strut, a moving platform supporting patient's foot and three actuated limbs with a universal-prismatic-spherical kinematic chain. A six-axis force/torque sensor mounted between the moving platform and the footplate senses the human-robot interaction force and torque. The device is interfaced to a standard all-in-one touch screen Personal Computer with graphic applications to give patients visual feedback in real time.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
General Rehabilitation
Intervention Description
All patients underwent general rehabilitation (gait training, aerobic conditioning), including - if necessary - an initial weight training phase before the functional full weight-bearing program.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Specific ankle rehabilitation performed by physiotherapist
Intervention Description
Subjects in the control group underwent manually assisted range of motion exercises.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Specific ankle rehabilitation by Biodex System 3 dynamometer
Intervention Description
Subjects in the control group performed non-robotic resistive training using a Biodex System 3 dynamometer
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Specific ankle rehabilitation by ProKin PK254 platform
Intervention Description
Subjects in the control group performed non-robotic proprioceptive training using a ProKin PK254 mobile electronic platform.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change of Dorsiflexion Range of Motion
Time Frame
At baseline and after 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks intervention
Title
Change of Isometric peak torque at 0° and 10° of plantar flexion
Time Frame
At baseline and after 2 and 4 weeks intervention
Title
Change of Isokinetic plantar-flexion torque at speed of 30°, 60°, 120°/sec
Time Frame
At baseline and after 2 and 4 weeks intervention
Title
Change of 2 Minute Walk Test (2MWT)
Time Frame
At baseline and after 2 and 4 weeks intervention
Title
Side Effects using ARBOT
Time Frame
Through study completion, up to 4 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Timed Stair Climbing Test (10 steps)
Time Frame
At baseline and after 2 and 4 weeks intervention
Title
Proprioceptive tests (time taking and accuracy)
Time Frame
At baseline and after after 2 and 4 weeks intervention
Title
Pain (VAS 0-10)
Time Frame
At baseline and after 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks intervention
Title
LEFS - The Lower Extremity Functional Scale
Time Frame
At baseline and after after 4 weeks intervention
Title
AOFAS - Ankle-Hindfoot Scale
Time Frame
At baseline and after 4 weeks intervention
Title
Patient Satisfaction (VAS 0-10)
Time Frame
After 4 weeks intervention
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Functional limitation following work-related ankle injuries, including:
Malleolar and/or tibial shaft fractures, both surgically and conservatively treated;
Distal tibia and fibula fractures, both surgically and conservatively treated;
Hindfoot (Calcaneus and Talus) fractures, both surgically and conservatively treated.
Post-immobilization phase;
Time interval since fracture event of less than 12 months;
Signed informed consent acquisition.
Exclusion Criteria:
Non-compliance with study requirements;
Pregnancy or breast feeding;
Current or prior history of malignancy;
Open skin at the level of the patient-device interface;
Sensory deficit at the level of the patient-device interface;
Ankle motor deficit secondary to peroneal or tibial neuropathy;
Acute inflammatory arthritis of the ankle;
Other pathological conditions inducing lower limb pain or disfunction.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paolo Catitti, MD
Organizational Affiliation
INAIL - Centro di Riabilitazione Motoria di Volterra
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
INAIL - Centro di Riabilitazione Motoria di Volterra
City
Volterra
State/Province
Pisa
ZIP/Postal Code
56048
Country
Italy
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
Citation
Saglia JA, Tsagarakis NG, Dai JS, Caldwell DG. Control Strategies for Patient-Assisted Training Using the Ankle Rehabilitation Robot (ARBOT). IEEE ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS 2013; PP (99): 1-10.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Saglia JA, Tsagarakis NG, Dai JS, Caldwell DG. A high-performance redundantly actuated parallel mechanism for ankle rehabilitation. International Journal of Robotics Research 2009; 28 (9): 1216-1227.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Saglia JA, Tsagarakis NG, Dai JS, Caldwell DG. Inverse-Kinematics-Based Control of a Redundantly Actuated Platform for Rehabilitation. Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, IMechE Proceedings 2009; 223 (1): 53-70.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Robot-assisted Rehabilitation of Ankle Fractures: Efficacy and Comparison With Traditional Methods
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs