search
Back to results

Safety and Efficacy of Motor Cortex Stimulation in the Treatment of Advanced Parkinson Disease

Primary Purpose

Parkinson Disease

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Motor cortex stimulation
Sponsored by
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional educational/counseling/training trial for Parkinson Disease focused on measuring Advanced parkinson disease, Stimulation, Motor Cortex, Parkinson disease C10.574.812, Electric Stimulation Therapy E02.831.580.438, Neuronavigation E05.873.249

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Age between 18 and 70 years Idiopathic Parkinson disease, for at least 5 years of evolution Asymmetric akinetic-rigid form, with symptoms predominant in the right side of the body (stimulator will be implanted on the left side). Functional impairment score in off stage (no drug treatment) of 3-4 according to the Hoehn and Yahr scale UPDRS III score > 40 in off-drug stage. UPDRS III score with L-dopa treatment improved by at least 50% compared to UPDRS III score in off-drug stage Exclusion Criteria: Age superior to 70 years Adult patients under guardianship Previous neurosurgical operation(s) Previous partial or generalised seizures Mini Mental Status (MMS) score  24 or Mattis score < 130 or Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) depression score > 20. Presence of signal abnormalities on T1- and T2- MRI sequences Abnormalities in general exam or biological constants (hemogram, ionogram, hepatic or kidney dysfunction) with a higher surgical risk

Sites / Locations

  • Neurosurgical Department Henri Mondor HospitalRecruiting

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Safety of the treatment and Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III 1 month following constant stimulation with and without motor cortex stimulation when the patient has no anti-parkinsonian drug for 12 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Quality of life: Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ39) scores
Anti-parkinsonian drug doses (equivalent L-dopa)
Results of motor activation study in positron emission tomography (PET) scan
Results of the different neuropsychological tests
Video movement analysis

Full Information

First Posted
September 7, 2005
Last Updated
March 5, 2007
Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00159172
Brief Title
Safety and Efficacy of Motor Cortex Stimulation in the Treatment of Advanced Parkinson Disease
Official Title
Phase 1 Study of Motor Cortex Stimulation in the Treatment of Advanced Parkinson Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2005
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
September 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
May 2008 (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether motor cortex stimulation, a mildly invasive surgical procedure, is safe and effective in advanced stage Parkinsonian patients who display side effects with dopaminergic treatment.
Detailed Description
Advanced stage of Parkinson disease (PD) is a difficult condition to treat, especially after several years of dopaminergic drugs. Recent development of neurosurgical techniques using deep brain stimulation leads has shown good behavioral results in these advanced PD patients. However, the placement of a stimulation lead in the subthalamic nucleus is a complex, invasive, and long surgical procedure. Such intervention requires a sophisticated technical environment, including a stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exam, associated with per-operative electrophysiological exploration of deep brain structures. This surgical treatment can therefore be indicated only for a few selected patients, and cannot be offered to a large proportion of patients among the potential candidates (estimation of 5000 patients in France). Thus, there is a need to develop therapeutic alternatives that would be technically and practically more convenient, less invasive, and that could be offered to a larger number of patients. Several clinical studies, including one led by our group, have already demonstrated that transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation could improve bradykinesia and shorten motor reaction time in patients with Parkinson disease. The clinical benefit was however moderate, and transient, probably because the stimulating sessions were too short in duration. A prolonged effect could be obtained with continuous cortical stimulation. Such cortical stimulation has already been developed with good clinical tolerance in our hospital since 1991 for chronic neuropathic pain syndromes. In a non-human primate model of late stage Parkinson disease, we have recently demonstrated that prolonged primary motor cortex stimulation significantly improved both akinesia and bradykinesia. The primary objective of this pilot study will be to evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of chronic stimulation of the primary motor cortex in 10 patients suffering from advanced stage Parkinson disease, despite the optimisation of dopaminergic treatment. The expected benefit for the patient will be gait improvement, increased movement velocities, and finally a better quality of life associated with reduction in dopaminergic medication and low per-operative morbidity risk.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson Disease
Keywords
Advanced parkinson disease, Stimulation, Motor Cortex, Parkinson disease C10.574.812, Electric Stimulation Therapy E02.831.580.438, Neuronavigation E05.873.249

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Educational/Counseling/Training
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Double
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
10 (false)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Motor cortex stimulation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety of the treatment and Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III 1 month following constant stimulation with and without motor cortex stimulation when the patient has no anti-parkinsonian drug for 12 hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quality of life: Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ39) scores
Title
Anti-parkinsonian drug doses (equivalent L-dopa)
Title
Results of motor activation study in positron emission tomography (PET) scan
Title
Results of the different neuropsychological tests
Title
Video movement analysis

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age between 18 and 70 years Idiopathic Parkinson disease, for at least 5 years of evolution Asymmetric akinetic-rigid form, with symptoms predominant in the right side of the body (stimulator will be implanted on the left side). Functional impairment score in off stage (no drug treatment) of 3-4 according to the Hoehn and Yahr scale UPDRS III score > 40 in off-drug stage. UPDRS III score with L-dopa treatment improved by at least 50% compared to UPDRS III score in off-drug stage Exclusion Criteria: Age superior to 70 years Adult patients under guardianship Previous neurosurgical operation(s) Previous partial or generalised seizures Mini Mental Status (MMS) score  24 or Mattis score < 130 or Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) depression score > 20. Presence of signal abnormalities on T1- and T2- MRI sequences Abnormalities in general exam or biological constants (hemogram, ionogram, hepatic or kidney dysfunction) with a higher surgical risk
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Stephane Palfi, MD, PhD
Phone
33149812203
Email
stephane.palfi@hmn.aphp.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephane Palfi, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Paris 12 University- APHP
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Neurosurgical Department Henri Mondor Hospital
City
Creteil
ZIP/Postal Code
94100
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yves Kéravel, MD
Phone
33149812201
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Philippe Remy, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean Marc Gurruchaga, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean Paul N'Guyen, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean Pascal Lefaucheur, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pierre Brugière, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne Catherine Bachoud-Levy, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yves Kéravel, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Patrick Maison, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marc Peschanski, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gilles Fenelon, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephane Palfi, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pierre Albaladejo, MD, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
15572109
Citation
Drouot X, Oshino S, Jarraya B, Besret L, Kishima H, Remy P, Dauguet J, Lefaucheur JP, Dolle F, Conde F, Bottlaender M, Peschanski M, Keravel Y, Hantraye P, Palfi S. Functional recovery in a primate model of Parkinson's disease following motor cortex stimulation. Neuron. 2004 Dec 2;44(5):769-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.11.023.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Safety and Efficacy of Motor Cortex Stimulation in the Treatment of Advanced Parkinson Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs