search
Back to results

S.T.O.P.® Technology Contact Lenses Versus Dual-focus Contact Lenses for Slowing Down Myopia Progression in Children

Primary Purpose

Myopia

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
S.T.O.P® F2
S.T.O.P® DT
MiSight®
Sponsored by
nthalmic Pty Ltd
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Myopia

Eligibility Criteria

8 Years - 14 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be between 8-14
  • Have

    • read the Informed Assent
    • been explained the Informed Assent
    • indicated an understanding of the Informed Assent
    • signed the Informed Assent
  • Have their parent / legal guardian

    • read the Informed Consent
    • been explained the Informed Consent
    • indicated an understanding of the Informed Consent
    • signed the Informed Consent
  • Along with their parent / legal guardian, be capable of comprehending the nature of the study, and be willing and able to adhere to study requirements
  • Along with their parent / legal guardian, agree to maintain the visit schedule
  • Agree to wear allocated contact lenses for a minimum of 5 days per week, at least 6 hours per day on days lenses are worn but not > 16 hours per day, and to remove lenses at night (i.e., daily wear only with no contact lens wear during sleep), for their duration of the study and to inform the investigator if their schedule is interrupted. Wearing time can be modified by the investigator for health reasons
  • Possess wearable and visually functioning spectacles
  • Be in good general health, based on the parent's / legal guardian's knowledge
  • Have best-corrected high contrast visual acuity based on manifest refraction of 0.10 logMAR (20/25, 6/7.6) or better in each eye.
  • Meet the following criteria determined by cycloplegic autorefraction:

    • spherical equivalent between -0.75 to -4.00 D inclusive
    • astigmatism ≥ -1.00 D

      *participants who fail astigmatism criterion with autorefraction pass astigmatism criterion if ≥ -0.75 D is measured with subjective refraction

    • anisometropia ≤ 1.00 D

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is currently, or within 30 days prior to this study, has been an active participant in another study
  • Current or prior use of ANY form of myopia control, including but not limited to:

    • Optical devices

      • bifocal / multifocal spectacles of any type
      • bifocal / multifocal contact lenses of any type
      • orthokeratology of any type
    • Pharmacological agents

      • atropine
      • pirenzepine
  • Participant born earlier than 30 weeks or weighed < 1500 g at birth
  • Habitual use of a systemic or topical medication that may alter normal ocular findings / is known to affect a participant's ocular health / physiology or contact lens performance either in an adverse or beneficial manner at enrolment and / or during the clinical trial.
  • A known allergy to sodium fluorescein, benoxinate, proparacaine, or tropicamide
  • A known corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity), corneal ulcer, corneal infiltrates, ocular viral or fungal infections, or any other recurrent ocular infections
  • Strabismus by cover test at distance (3 m) or near (40 cm) while wearing distance correction under non-cycloplegic conditions
  • Known ocular or systemic disease, such as but not limited to:

    • Diabetes
    • Graves' disease
    • glaucoma
    • uveitis
    • scleritis
    • auto immune diseases such as ankylosing spondylitis, multiple sclerosis, Sjogrens syndrome, and systemic lupus erythematosus
  • Any ocular, systemic, or neuro-developmental conditions that could influence refractive development, such as but not limited to:

    • persistent pupillary membrane
    • vitreous haemorrhage
    • cataract
    • central corneal scarring
    • eyelid haemangiomas
    • Marfan's syndrome
    • Down's syndrome
    • Ehler's-Danlos syndrome
    • Stickler's syndrome
    • ocular albinism
    • retinopathy of prematurity
  • Keratoconus or irregular cornea
  • Biomicroscopic that contraindicate contact lens, such as but limited to:

    • neovascularisation or ghost vessels ≥ 1.5 mm in from limbus
    • any active anterior segment disease that contraindicates safe contact lens wear
    • clinically significant giant papillary conjunctivitis
    • clinically significant abnormalities of the anterior segment, lids, conjunctiva, sclera, or associated structures
    • allergic or seasonal conjunctivitis if the investigator believes it could significantly interfere with maintaining a specified wearing schedule
  • The investigator may, at their discretion, exclude anyone who they believe may not be able to fulfil the clinical trial requirements or it is believed to be in the participant's best interests

Sites / Locations

  • Wenzhou Medical University Eye Hospital
  • Tianjin Medical University
  • Shanghai Fudan University Eye and ENT Hospital
  • LV Prasad Eye InstituteRecruiting
  • The University of Hyderabad
  • Centre Universitari de la Visió
  • Lab. de Superficie Ocular y Lentes de Contacto (SOYLC)
  • Ocupharm Research Group (Clinica Universitaria de Optometría), Universidad Complutense Madrid

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

MiSight®

S.T.O.P® F2

S.T.O.P® DT

Arm Description

MiSight® Contact Lens (Omafilcon A, 60% water)

S.T.O.P® F2 Contact Lens (Ocufilcon D, 55% water)

S.T.O.P® DT Contact Lens (Ocufilcon D, 55% water)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Axial Length
Difference in change from baseline in axial length between test and control contact lenses.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Cycloplegic spherical equivalent autorefraction
Difference in change from baseline in spherical equivalent autorefraction between test and control contact lenses.
Visual performance as measured by high contrast visual acuity at 6 m
Differences in visual performance between test and control contact lenses
Visual performance as measured by a non validated questionnaire based on a 1-10 numeric rating scale where a higher score indicates a better outcome
Differences in visual performance between test and control contact lenses
Bulbar hyperemia graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased hyperemia
Differences in bulbar hyperemia grading between test and control contact lenses.
Limbal hyperemia graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased hyperemia
Differences in limbal hyperemia grading between test and control contact lenses.
Palpebral roughness graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased roughness
Differences in palpebral roughness grading between test and control contact lenses.
Corneal staining graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased staining
Differences in corneal staining grading between test and control contact lenses.
Conjunctival staining graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased staining
Differences in conjunctival staining grading between test and control contact lenses.
Binocular vision as measured by heterophoria in prism diopters at 3 m
Differences in heterophoria at 3 m between test and control contact lenses.
Binocular vision as measured by heterophoria in prism diopters at 40 cm
Differences in heterophoria at 40 cm between test and control contact lenses.
Binocular vision as measured by monocular accommodative facility (+/-2.00 D flipper) in cycles per minute at 40 cm
Differences in monocular accommodative facility at 40 cm between test and control contact lenses.
Binocular vision as measured by monocular accommodative response in diopters at 40 cm
Differences in monocular accommodative response at 40 cm between test and control contact lenses.
Corneal topography as measured by flat keratometry measurement in diopters
Differences in flat keratometry measurements between test and control contact lenses.
Corneal topography as measured by steep keratometry measurement in diopters
Differences in steep keratometry measurements between test and control contact lenses.

Full Information

First Posted
January 17, 2022
Last Updated
August 17, 2023
Sponsor
nthalmic Pty Ltd
Collaborators
Brighten Optix Corporation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05243836
Brief Title
S.T.O.P.® Technology Contact Lenses Versus Dual-focus Contact Lenses for Slowing Down Myopia Progression in Children
Official Title
Contact Lenses Utilising S.T.O.P.® Technology Versus Dual-focus Contact Lenses for Slowing Down Myopia Progression in Children: A Three-year Prospective, Multi-centre, Controlled, Double-masked, Randomised, Non Inferiority Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
August 4, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 2028 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 2028 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
nthalmic Pty Ltd
Collaborators
Brighten Optix Corporation

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To compare the rate of myopia progression of contact lenses utilising S.T.O.P.® technology against MiSight® contact lenses.
Detailed Description
Myopic children (8-14 years of age) will be randomly allocated to wear one of 3 contact lens options (MiSight®, S.T.O.P.®- F2 or S.T.O.P.®- DT) bilaterally on a daily wear basis. The overall trial duration, including follow-up period, is expected to be approximately 48 months. Each participant's duration is expected to be approximately 36 months. The visits are Baseline / Fit, Dispensing, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months then visits every 6 months after. All procedures performed at these visits are standard, non invasive clinical tests.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Myopia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
441 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
MiSight®
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
MiSight® Contact Lens (Omafilcon A, 60% water)
Arm Title
S.T.O.P® F2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
S.T.O.P® F2 Contact Lens (Ocufilcon D, 55% water)
Arm Title
S.T.O.P® DT
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
S.T.O.P® DT Contact Lens (Ocufilcon D, 55% water)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
S.T.O.P® F2
Intervention Description
Ocufilcon D, 55% water
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
S.T.O.P® DT
Intervention Description
Ocufilcon D, 55% water
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
MiSight®
Intervention Description
Omafilcon A (60% water)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Axial Length
Description
Difference in change from baseline in axial length between test and control contact lenses.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cycloplegic spherical equivalent autorefraction
Description
Difference in change from baseline in spherical equivalent autorefraction between test and control contact lenses.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months, 36 months
Title
Visual performance as measured by high contrast visual acuity at 6 m
Description
Differences in visual performance between test and control contact lenses
Time Frame
1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Title
Visual performance as measured by a non validated questionnaire based on a 1-10 numeric rating scale where a higher score indicates a better outcome
Description
Differences in visual performance between test and control contact lenses
Time Frame
1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Title
Bulbar hyperemia graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased hyperemia
Description
Differences in bulbar hyperemia grading between test and control contact lenses.
Time Frame
1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Title
Limbal hyperemia graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased hyperemia
Description
Differences in limbal hyperemia grading between test and control contact lenses.
Time Frame
1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Title
Palpebral roughness graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased roughness
Description
Differences in palpebral roughness grading between test and control contact lenses.
Time Frame
1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Title
Corneal staining graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased staining
Description
Differences in corneal staining grading between test and control contact lenses.
Time Frame
1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Title
Conjunctival staining graded on a 0-4 scale in 0.5- steps where a higher grading indicates increased staining
Description
Differences in conjunctival staining grading between test and control contact lenses.
Time Frame
1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months , 24 months, 30 months, 36 months
Title
Binocular vision as measured by heterophoria in prism diopters at 3 m
Description
Differences in heterophoria at 3 m between test and control contact lenses.
Time Frame
1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months
Title
Binocular vision as measured by heterophoria in prism diopters at 40 cm
Description
Differences in heterophoria at 40 cm between test and control contact lenses.
Time Frame
1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months
Title
Binocular vision as measured by monocular accommodative facility (+/-2.00 D flipper) in cycles per minute at 40 cm
Description
Differences in monocular accommodative facility at 40 cm between test and control contact lenses.
Time Frame
1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months
Title
Binocular vision as measured by monocular accommodative response in diopters at 40 cm
Description
Differences in monocular accommodative response at 40 cm between test and control contact lenses.
Time Frame
1 week, 6 months, 18 months, 30 months
Title
Corneal topography as measured by flat keratometry measurement in diopters
Description
Differences in flat keratometry measurements between test and control contact lenses.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 months, 36 months
Title
Corneal topography as measured by steep keratometry measurement in diopters
Description
Differences in steep keratometry measurements between test and control contact lenses.
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 months, 36 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
8 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
14 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Be between 8-14. Have: Read the Informed Assent. Been explained the Informed Assent. Indicated an understanding of the Informed Assent. Signed the Informed Assent. Have their parent / legal guardian: Read the Informed Consent. Been explained the Informed Consent. Indicated an understanding of the Informed Consent. Signed the Informed Consent. Along with their parent / legal guardian, be capable of comprehending the nature of the study, and be willing and able to adhere to study requirements. Along with their parent / legal guardian, agree to maintain the visit schedule . Agree to wear allocated contact lenses for a minimum of 5 days per week, at least 6 hours per day on days lenses are worn but not > 16 hours per day, and to remove lenses at night (i.e., daily wear only with no contact lens wear during sleep), for their duration of the study and to inform the investigator if their schedule is interrupted. Wearing time can be modified by the investigator for health reasons. Possess wearable and visually functioning spectacles. Be in good general health, based on the parent's / legal guardian's knowledge. Have best-corrected high contrast visual acuity based on manifest refraction of 0.10 logMAR (20/25, 6/7.6) or better in each eye. Meet the following criteria determined by cycloplegic autorefraction: Spherical equivalent between -0.75 to -4.00 D inclusive. Astigmatism ≥ -1.00 D. *participants who fail astigmatism criterion with autorefraction pass astigmatism criterion if ≥ -0.75 D is measured with subjective refraction. anisometropia ≤ 1.00 D. Exclusion Criteria: Participant is currently, or within 30 days prior to this study, has been an active participant in another study. Current or prior use of ANY form of myopia control, including but not limited to: Optical devices. Bifocal / multifocal spectacles of any type. Bifocal / multifocal contact lenses of any type. Orthokeratology of any type. Pharmacological agents. European and Indian sites: Atropine. Chinese sites: Atropine with a concentration > 0.01%. Participants who have previously used 0.01% atropine are eligible for this study provided they agree not to use 0.01% atropine for at least 30 days before baseline and at any time during the study. Pirenzepine. Participant born earlier than 30 weeks or weighed < 1500 g at birth. Habitual use of a systemic or topical medication that may alter normal ocular findings / is known to affect a participant's ocular health / physiology or contact lens performance either in an adverse or beneficial manner at enrolment and / or during the clinical trial. A known allergy to sodium fluorescein, benoxinate, proparacaine, or tropicamide. Chinese sites: A known allergy to cyclopentolate. A known corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity), corneal ulcer, corneal infiltrates, ocular viral or fungal infections, or any other recurrent ocular infections. Strabismus by cover test at distance (3 m) or near (40 cm) while wearing distance correction under non-cycloplegic conditions. Known ocular or systemic disease, such as but not limited to: Diabetes. Graves' disease. Glaucoma. Uveitis. Scleritis. Auto-immune diseases such as ankylosing spondylitis, multiple sclerosis, Sjogrens syndrome, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Any ocular, systemic, or neuro-developmental conditions that could influence refractive development, such as but not limited to: Persistent pupillary membrane. Vitreous haemorrhage. Cataract. Central corneal scarring. Eyelid haemangiomas. Marfan's syndrome. Down's syndrome. Ehler's-Danlos syndrome. Stickler's syndrome. Ocular albinism. Retinopathy of prematurity. Keratoconus or irregular cornea. Biomicroscopic that contraindicate contact lens, such as but limited to: Neovascularisation or ghost vessels ≥ 1.5 mm in from limbus. Any active anterior segment disease that contraindicates safe contact lens wear. Clinically significant giant papillary conjunctivitis. Clinically significant abnormalities of the anterior segment, lids, conjunctiva, sclera, or associated structures. Allergic or seasonal conjunctivitis if the investigator believes it could significantly interfere with maintaining a specified wearing schedule. The investigator may, at their discretion, exclude anyone who they believe may not be able to fulfil the clinical trial requirements or it is believed to be in the participant's best interests.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Daniel Tilia, MOptom, PhD
Phone
+61290377700
Email
d.tilia@nthalmic.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniel Tilia, MOptom, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
nthalmic Pty Ltd
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Wenzhou Medical University Eye Hospital
City
Wenzhou
State/Province
Lucheng District
ZIP/Postal Code
325027
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jiang Jun
Email
jjhsj@hotmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jiang Jun
Facility Name
Tianjin Medical University
City
Tianjin
State/Province
Wuqing District
ZIP/Postal Code
300384
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lin Liu
Email
liulin_117@126.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lin Liu
Facility Name
Shanghai Fudan University Eye and ENT Hospital
City
Shanghai
State/Province
Xuhui District
ZIP/Postal Code
200031
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zhi Chen, MD, PhD
Phone
+86-13761681740
Email
peter459@aliyun.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jia Qi Zhou, MD, PhD
Phone
+86-13917873415
Email
qiqi_zjq@163.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xing Tao Zhou, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zhi Chen, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jia Qi Zhou, MD, PhD
Facility Name
LV Prasad Eye Institute
City
Hyderabad
State/Province
Telangana
ZIP/Postal Code
500034
Country
India
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pavan Verkicharla
Email
pavanverkicharla@lvpei.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pavan K Verkicharla
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Swati Panigrahi
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Megha Anthony
Facility Name
The University of Hyderabad
City
Hyderabad
State/Province
Telangana
ZIP/Postal Code
500046
Country
India
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nagaraju Konda
Phone
91 40 2313 5482
Email
knr@uohyd.ac.in
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nagaraju Konda
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
M Radhika
Facility Name
Centre Universitari de la Visió
City
Terrassa
State/Province
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08222
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nuria E Tomas Corominas
Phone
+34 937 39 83 49
Email
nuria.tomas@upc.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Juan Perez Corral
Email
juan.enrique.perez@upc.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nuria Tomas Corominas
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Juan Perez Corral
Facility Name
Lab. de Superficie Ocular y Lentes de Contacto (SOYLC)
City
Santiago De Compostela
State/Province
Galicia
ZIP/Postal Code
15899
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Javier Gonzalez Perez
Phone
+34 696809706
Email
javier.gonzalez@usc.es
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Javier Gonzalez Perez
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ángel Sánchez García
Facility Name
Ocupharm Research Group (Clinica Universitaria de Optometría), Universidad Complutense Madrid
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28037
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gonzalo Carracedo Rodríguez, PhD
Phone
+34616513539
Email
jgcarrac@ucm.es
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laura Batres, PhD
Phone
+34913946883
Email
lbatres@ucm.es
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gonzalo Carracedo Rodríguez, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Laura Batres, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
There is no plan to make IPD available to other researchers.

Learn more about this trial

S.T.O.P.® Technology Contact Lenses Versus Dual-focus Contact Lenses for Slowing Down Myopia Progression in Children

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs