search
Back to results

Telehealth Weight Loss Program for Breast Cancer Survivors (TWL)

Primary Purpose

Cancer Survivors, Cancer of Breast, Body Weight

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Behavioral Weight-loss Program Via Telehealth
Behavioral Weight-Loss Program Via Telehealth - Weight Measures
Validated Surveys of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Sponsored by
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cancer Survivors focused on measuring Breast Cancer, Cancer Survivor, Body Mass Index, Telehealth, Breast Carcinoma, Overweight, Obese

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of in situ or invasive breast cancer
  • Have completed breast cancer surgery, adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy (as indicated) and adjuvant radiation therapy (as indicated) at least 6-months prior to enrollment
  • Not on active treatment for other cancer for at least 6-months prior to enrollment
  • Currently cancer free
  • Overweight or obese (BMI of 25 kg/m^2 or greater)
  • Have internet access and videoconferencing capability

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current use of weight loss medication (OTC or prescription) or participation in behavioral weight loss program
  • Currently participating in a behavioral weight loss program
  • Self-report of alcohol or substance abuse within the past 12-months, including at-risk drinking (current consumption of more than 14 drinks per week)
  • Undergone bilateral mastectomy
  • History of Bulimia nervosa
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Sites / Locations

  • University of Pennsylvania (Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania)

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Single-Arms Longitudinal Group

Arm Description

Behavioral weight-loss program via telehealth (video conferencing). Participants will receive weekly group sessions of lifestyle counseling for the first 20-weeks, followed by every other week sessions in weeks 22 and 24, for a total of 6-months of intervention.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Determine feasibility and Acceptability Using the City of Hope Quality of Life Instrument - Breast Cancer Patient to Assess Changes in Quality of Life
To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a weight loss program via telehealth for breast cancer survivors. The participants will be asked to complete the City of Hope Quality of Life Instrument (COH-QOL) - Breast Cancer Patient (QOL-BC) at two time points: baseline (pre-) and treatment end (at week 24). COH-QOL Instrument - Breast Cancer Patient (QOL-BC) - 46 items The scoring is based on a scale of 0 = worst outcome to 10 = best outcome. Some items have reverse anchors and the value should be scored as the reverse of the item circled, e.g., if a patient selected "4" then their score on a reverse anchor would be 10 - 4 = 6.
Determine feasibility and Acceptability Using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire to Assess Changes in Physical Activity
To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a weight loss program via telehealth for breast cancer survivors. The participants will be asked to complete the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) at two time points: baseline (pre-) and treatment end (at week 24). The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Short Form This is an open-ended questionnaire surrounding individuals' last 7-day recall of physical activity.
Determine feasibility and Acceptability Using the Patient Health Questionnaire to Assess Changes in Measures of Depression
To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a weight loss program via telehealth for breast cancer survivors. The participants will be asked to complete the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (Depression) at two time points: baseline (pre-) and treatment end (at week 24). - The PHQ-9 is a nine item questionnaire and the scoring is based on a scale of 0= best outcome to 3 = worst outcome. Total scores range from 0 to 27 and higher scores are associated with higher severities of depression, ranging from minimal to severe.
Using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure to Assess Acceptability and Feasibility
To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a weight loss program via telehealth for breast cancer survivors. The participants will be asked to complete the Acceptability of Intervention Measure at two time points: baseline (pre-) and treatment end (at week 24). - The Acceptability of Intervention Measure is a four item questionnaire and the scoring is based on a scale ranging from 1 = completely disagree to 5= Completely Agree. Higher scores are associated with greater acceptability of the intervention.
Requesting Direct Verbal Feedback From Participants to Assess Elements of the Program that Work Well, to Acquire Suggestions, and to Seek Suggestions to Determine Feasibility and Acceptability
Finally, investigators will conduct an exit interview with each participant to assess the acceptability of the intervention, the delivery of the intervention via telehealth, and their satisfaction with their treatment outcomes. Investigators will also solicit suggestions for improvements to the program for future interventions.

Secondary Outcome Measures

To measure changes from pre- to post-weight-loss intervention for 1) body mass.
To assess change in body mass index (BMI), height (measured in meters) and weight (measured in kilograms) will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2. Weight will be reported at baseline and after week 24 of the intervention. Participants' height (in meters) will be collected from the electronic medical record at baseline.
To measure changes from pre- to post-weight-loss intervention for 2) Qualitative Changes in Mammographic Breast Density
To assess mammographic breast density changes, investigators will measure mammographic density of annual mammogram pre- and post-weight-loss program. The qualitative MBD as reported by Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) scores are collected from the clinical radiologist reports.
To measure changes from pre- to post-weight-loss intervention for 2) Quantitative Changes in Mammographic Breast Density
To assess mammographic breast density changes, investigators will measure mammographic density of annual mammogram pre- and post-weight-loss program. Quantitative MBD will be analyzed using LIBRA, which is a fully-automated, free, and publicly available program that estimates MBD. Following digital segmentation, the LIBRA software analysis provides breast area, absolute dense area, and area percent density for each image of a mammographic study. Mean breast area (cm^2), mean dense area (cm^2), and quantitative MBD (%) will be calculated for each mammographic study as described.

Full Information

First Posted
April 8, 2021
Last Updated
August 28, 2023
Sponsor
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04855552
Brief Title
Telehealth Weight Loss Program for Breast Cancer Survivors
Acronym
TWL
Official Title
Pilot Telehealth Weight Loss Program for Breast Cancer Survivors
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
July 19, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a single-arm longitudinal group to examine patient-reported outcomes, body mass and mammographic density changes pre- and post- weight loss intervention of breast cancer survivors using video conferencing telehealth visits.
Detailed Description
Participants will receive weekly group sessions of lifestyle counseling for the first 20 weeks, followed by every other week sessions in weeks 22 and 24, for a total of 6 months of intervention. These group sessions, with 6 participants per group, will be delivered virtually via a HIPAA Compliant Teleconference Platform. The expected number of participants is at least 2 and no more than 6 in this 90-min group sessions which will be provided by a counselor from Penn Center for Weight and Eating Disorders. The content of the sessions addresses the domains associated with behavioral weight management, including nutrition, exercise, stress and emotion management, and lifestyle modification strategies (to improve adherence to the diet and activity plan). Participants will monitor energy intake and physical activity daily to help them achieve recommended calorie and activity goals. Self-monitoring will be encouraged online with MyFitnessPal.com, which will be shared with the study staff to increase accountability and provide opportunity for feedback to participants. Each participant will also be mailed a digital scale so they can weigh themselves each week and report their weight to the group leader. Participants will be encouraged to start with at least 10 minutes of moderately vigorous physical activity (e.g., brisk walking, swimming), at least five days per week, building up to at least 30 minutes per day (150 minutes per week) by week 6. The primary objective is to assess feasibility and acceptance of telehealth weight loss intervention by the participants. The participants will be asked to complete the following surveys at two time points: baseline (pre-) and treatment end (at week 24). The participants will complete the following psychosocial measures. City of Hope Quality of Life (COH-QOL) Instrument - Breast Cancer Patient (QOL-BC) The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Short Form - that assess the types and intensity of physical activity and sitting time in which people routinely engage. It provides an estimate of total physical activity in MET-min/week and time spent sitting. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (Depression) Acceptability of Intervention Measure Finally, investigators will conduct an exit interview with each participant to assess the acceptability of the intervention, the delivery of the intervention via telehealth, and the patients' satisfaction with their treatment outcomes. Investigators will also solicit suggestions for improvements to the program for future interventions. The secondary objectives are to measure changes from pre- to post weight-loss intervention for 1) body mass and 2) mammographic breast density. To assess body mass changes, weight will be reported at baseline and after week 24 of the intervention. The scale will be mailed to participants at the beginning of the study. Participants' height from the electronic medical record will be used. Percent weight loss will be calculated to assess weight change across participants. To assess mammographic breast density changes, investigators will measure mammographic density of annual mammogram pre- and post weight-loss program. Annual mammograms are routinely performed for breast cancer survivors except for those who have had bilateral mastectomy. Two annual mammograms will be used to measure mammographic density. The annual mammogram performed between 1 month - 12 months prior to weight loss program initiation will be used as baseline (pre-intervention). The post-intervention mammogram will be the first annual mammogram performed after weight loss program. If routine annual mammogram occurs during the 20-week weight loss program, then the next annual mammogram will be used for breast density assessment. Therefore, study duration for each participant from enrollment to completion (mammographic density) is estimated to be up to 24 months.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cancer Survivors, Cancer of Breast, Body Weight, Overweight and Obesity
Keywords
Breast Cancer, Cancer Survivor, Body Mass Index, Telehealth, Breast Carcinoma, Overweight, Obese

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Single-arm longitudinal group to examine patient-reported outcomes, body mass, and mammographic density changes pre-and post-intervention.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
12 patients (and possibly up to 20) (2 telehealth groups with at least 6 participants; 1 group leader per group)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
22 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Single-Arms Longitudinal Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Behavioral weight-loss program via telehealth (video conferencing). Participants will receive weekly group sessions of lifestyle counseling for the first 20-weeks, followed by every other week sessions in weeks 22 and 24, for a total of 6-months of intervention.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Behavioral Weight-loss Program Via Telehealth
Intervention Description
Investigators will use a manual based on the DPP, as adapted previously for the endometrial cancer population and now adapted for breast cancer survivors. Dr.Courtney McCuen-Wurst, has extensive experience in working with persons with overweight and obesity with medical comorbidities. She also has experience leading group interventions at our Center via telehealth. The content of the sessions addresses the domains associated with behavioral weight management including nutrition, exercise, stress and emotion management, and lifestyle modification strategies (to improve adherence to the diet and activity plan). Participants will monitor energy intake and physical activity daily to help them achieve recommended calorie and activity goals. Self-monitoring will be encouraged online with MyFitnessPal.com, which will be shared with the study staff to increase accountability and provide opportunity for feedback to participants.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Behavioral Weight-Loss Program Via Telehealth - Weight Measures
Intervention Description
Each participant will also be mailed a digital scale (Eat Smart) so they can weigh themselves each week and report their weight to the group leader; patients will be encouraged to take a picture of their weight on the scale after they step off (the number remains for 3-seconds) and send the picture to Dr. McCuen-Wurst. Participants will be encouraged to start with at least 1-minutes of moderately vigorous physical activity (e.g. brisk walking, swimming), at least five days per week, building up to at least 30-minutes per day (150-minutes per week) by week-6.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Validated Surveys of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Intervention Description
The following surveys will be completed by participants pre- and post-intervention: COH-QOL Instrument - Breast Cancer Patient (QOL-BC) International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Short Form Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (Depression) Acceptability of Intervention Measure The following survey will be completed post-intervention • Exit interview regarding acceptability of the program. The following measurements/clinical tests results will be collected and compared pre- and post-intervention: Anthropometric measurements: height (self-report); weight (as measured on scale provided by study) Mammographic breast density estimated in annual clinical mammogram
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Determine feasibility and Acceptability Using the City of Hope Quality of Life Instrument - Breast Cancer Patient to Assess Changes in Quality of Life
Description
To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a weight loss program via telehealth for breast cancer survivors. The participants will be asked to complete the City of Hope Quality of Life Instrument (COH-QOL) - Breast Cancer Patient (QOL-BC) at two time points: baseline (pre-) and treatment end (at week 24). COH-QOL Instrument - Breast Cancer Patient (QOL-BC) - 46 items The scoring is based on a scale of 0 = worst outcome to 10 = best outcome. Some items have reverse anchors and the value should be scored as the reverse of the item circled, e.g., if a patient selected "4" then their score on a reverse anchor would be 10 - 4 = 6.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Determine feasibility and Acceptability Using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire to Assess Changes in Physical Activity
Description
To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a weight loss program via telehealth for breast cancer survivors. The participants will be asked to complete the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) at two time points: baseline (pre-) and treatment end (at week 24). The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Short Form This is an open-ended questionnaire surrounding individuals' last 7-day recall of physical activity.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Determine feasibility and Acceptability Using the Patient Health Questionnaire to Assess Changes in Measures of Depression
Description
To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a weight loss program via telehealth for breast cancer survivors. The participants will be asked to complete the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (Depression) at two time points: baseline (pre-) and treatment end (at week 24). - The PHQ-9 is a nine item questionnaire and the scoring is based on a scale of 0= best outcome to 3 = worst outcome. Total scores range from 0 to 27 and higher scores are associated with higher severities of depression, ranging from minimal to severe.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure to Assess Acceptability and Feasibility
Description
To determine the feasibility and acceptability of a weight loss program via telehealth for breast cancer survivors. The participants will be asked to complete the Acceptability of Intervention Measure at two time points: baseline (pre-) and treatment end (at week 24). - The Acceptability of Intervention Measure is a four item questionnaire and the scoring is based on a scale ranging from 1 = completely disagree to 5= Completely Agree. Higher scores are associated with greater acceptability of the intervention.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Title
Requesting Direct Verbal Feedback From Participants to Assess Elements of the Program that Work Well, to Acquire Suggestions, and to Seek Suggestions to Determine Feasibility and Acceptability
Description
Finally, investigators will conduct an exit interview with each participant to assess the acceptability of the intervention, the delivery of the intervention via telehealth, and their satisfaction with their treatment outcomes. Investigators will also solicit suggestions for improvements to the program for future interventions.
Time Frame
24 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To measure changes from pre- to post-weight-loss intervention for 1) body mass.
Description
To assess change in body mass index (BMI), height (measured in meters) and weight (measured in kilograms) will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2. Weight will be reported at baseline and after week 24 of the intervention. Participants' height (in meters) will be collected from the electronic medical record at baseline.
Time Frame
24 Months
Title
To measure changes from pre- to post-weight-loss intervention for 2) Qualitative Changes in Mammographic Breast Density
Description
To assess mammographic breast density changes, investigators will measure mammographic density of annual mammogram pre- and post-weight-loss program. The qualitative MBD as reported by Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) scores are collected from the clinical radiologist reports.
Time Frame
24 Months
Title
To measure changes from pre- to post-weight-loss intervention for 2) Quantitative Changes in Mammographic Breast Density
Description
To assess mammographic breast density changes, investigators will measure mammographic density of annual mammogram pre- and post-weight-loss program. Quantitative MBD will be analyzed using LIBRA, which is a fully-automated, free, and publicly available program that estimates MBD. Following digital segmentation, the LIBRA software analysis provides breast area, absolute dense area, and area percent density for each image of a mammographic study. Mean breast area (cm^2), mean dense area (cm^2), and quantitative MBD (%) will be calculated for each mammographic study as described.
Time Frame
24 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: History of in situ or invasive breast cancer Have completed breast cancer surgery, adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy (as indicated) and adjuvant radiation therapy (as indicated) at least 6-months prior to enrollment Not on active treatment for other cancer for at least 6-months prior to enrollment Currently cancer free Overweight or obese (BMI of 25 kg/m^2 or greater) Have internet access and videoconferencing capability Exclusion Criteria: Current use of weight loss medication (OTC or prescription) or participation in behavioral weight loss program Currently participating in a behavioral weight loss program Self-report of alcohol or substance abuse within the past 12-months, including at-risk drinking (current consumption of more than 14 drinks per week) Undergone bilateral mastectomy History of Bulimia nervosa Inability to provide informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julia C Tchou, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Pennsylvania
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania (Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania)
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32133391
Citation
Goodwin PJ, Segal RJ, Vallis M, Ligibel JA, Pond GR, Robidoux A, Findlay B, Gralow JR, Mukherjee SD, Levine M, Pritchard KI. The LISA randomized trial of a weight loss intervention in postmenopausal breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2020 Feb 21;6:6. doi: 10.1038/s41523-020-0149-z. eCollection 2020.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28948213
Citation
Ligibel JA, Barry WT, Alfano C, Hershman DL, Irwin M, Neuhouser M, Thomson CA, Delahanty L, Frank E, Spears P, Paskett ED, Hopkins J, Bernstein V, Stearns V, White J, Hahn O, Hudis C, Winer EP, Wadden TA, Goodwin PJ. Randomized phase III trial evaluating the role of weight loss in adjuvant treatment of overweight and obese women with early breast cancer (Alliance A011401): study design. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2017 Sep 21;3:37. doi: 10.1038/s41523-017-0040-8. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26804708
Citation
Krouse RS, Grant M, McCorkle R, Wendel CS, Cobb MD, Tallman NJ, Ercolano E, Sun V, Hibbard JH, Hornbrook MC. A chronic care ostomy self-management program for cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2016 May;25(5):574-81. doi: 10.1002/pon.4078. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28660430
Citation
Williams AD, So A, Synnestvedt M, Tewksbury CM, Kontos D, Hsiehm MK, Pantalone L, Conant EF, Schnall M, Dumon K, Williams N, Tchou J. Mammographic breast density decreases after bariatric surgery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Oct;165(3):565-572. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4361-y. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16835425
Citation
Eliassen AH, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Willett WC, Hankinson SE. Adult weight change and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. JAMA. 2006 Jul 12;296(2):193-201. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.2.193.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14634673
Citation
Parker ED, Folsom AR. Intentional weight loss and incidence of obesity-related cancers: the Iowa Women's Health Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003 Dec;27(12):1447-52. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802437.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22672203
Citation
Birks S, Peeters A, Backholer K, O'Brien P, Brown W. A systematic review of the impact of weight loss on cancer incidence and mortality. Obes Rev. 2012 Oct;13(10):868-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01010.x. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25467785
Citation
Howell A, Anderson AS, Clarke RB, Duffy SW, Evans DG, Garcia-Closas M, Gescher AJ, Key TJ, Saxton JM, Harvie MN. Risk determination and prevention of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Sep 28;16(5):446. doi: 10.1186/s13058-014-0446-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29223719
Citation
Hardefeldt PJ, Penninkilampi R, Edirimanne S, Eslick GD. Physical Activity and Weight Loss Reduce the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis of 139 Prospective and Retrospective Studies. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Aug;18(4):e601-e612. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28260236
Citation
van den Brandt PA, Schulpen M. Mediterranean diet adherence and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: results of a cohort study and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2017 May 15;140(10):2220-2231. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30654. Epub 2017 Mar 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19026373
Citation
Christou NV, Lieberman M, Sampalis F, Sampalis JS. Bariatric surgery reduces cancer risk in morbidly obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 Nov-Dec;4(6):691-5. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.08.025. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19148123
Citation
Adams TD, Stroup AM, Gress RE, Adams KF, Calle EE, Smith SC, Halverson RC, Simper SC, Hopkins PN, Hunt SC. Cancer incidence and mortality after gastric bypass surgery. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 Apr;17(4):796-802. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.610. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19556163
Citation
Sjostrom L, Gummesson A, Sjostrom CD, Narbro K, Peltonen M, Wedel H, Bengtsson C, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Dahlgren S, Jacobson P, Karason K, Karlsson J, Larsson B, Lindroos AK, Lonroth H, Naslund I, Olbers T, Stenlof K, Torgerson J, Carlsson LM; Swedish Obese Subjects Study. Effects of bariatric surgery on cancer incidence in obese patients in Sweden (Swedish Obese Subjects Study): a prospective, controlled intervention trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Jul;10(7):653-62. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70159-7. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Ursin G, Quershi SA. Mammographic density - a useful biomarker for breast cancer risk in epidemiologic studies. Norsk Epidemiologi. 2009, 10: 59-68.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24817500
Citation
Casagrande DS, Rosa DD, Umpierre D, Sarmento RA, Rodrigues CG, Schaan BD. Incidence of cancer following bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2014 Sep;24(9):1499-509. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1276-0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32653468
Citation
Wijesooriya NR, Mishra V, Brand PLP, Rubin BK. COVID-19 and telehealth, education, and research adaptations. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020 Sep;35:38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32311034
Citation
Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, Gellad ZF, Cho A, Phinney D, Curtis S, Roman M, Poon EG, Ferranti J, Katz JN, Tcheng J. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jun 1;27(6):957-962. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa067.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29051047
Citation
Sun V, Ercolano E, McCorkle R, Grant M, Wendel CS, Tallman NJ, Passero F, Raza S, Cidav Z, Holcomb M, Weinstein RS, Hornbrook MC, Krouse RS. Ostomy telehealth for cancer survivors: Design of the Ostomy Self-management Training (OSMT) randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Jan;64:167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11092283
Citation
The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The Diabetes Prevention Program: baseline characteristics of the randomized cohort. The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Diabetes Care. 2000 Nov;23(11):1619-29. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.11.1619.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29086522
Citation
Haggerty AF, Hagemann A, Barnett M, Thornquist M, Neuhouser ML, Horowitz N, Colditz GA, Sarwer DB, Ko EM, Allison KC. A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study of Technology-Based Weight Loss Interventions among Endometrial Cancer Survivors. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Nov;25 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S102-S108. doi: 10.1002/oby.22021.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26303303
Citation
Keller BM, Chen J, Daye D, Conant EF, Kontos D. Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography. Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Aug 25;17:117. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0626-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22894417
Citation
Keller BM, Nathan DL, Wang Y, Zheng Y, Gee JC, Conant EF, Kontos D. Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation. Med Phys. 2012 Aug;39(8):4903-17. doi: 10.1118/1.4736530.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Analytics, C.f.B.I.C.a. The Laboratory for Individualized Breast Radiodensity Assessment. 2014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35751715
Citation
Burkbauer L, Goldbach M, Huang C, Lewandowski J, Krouse R, Allison K, Tchou J. Awareness of link between obesity and breast cancer risk is associated with willingness to participate in weight loss intervention. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Aug;194(3):541-550. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06546-y. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Telehealth Weight Loss Program for Breast Cancer Survivors

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs