search
Back to results

Telephone Intervention to Increase Patient Preparedness and Satisfaction Trial (TIPPS): A Randomized Control Trial (TIPPS)

Primary Purpose

Prolapse, Stress Urinary Incontinence

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Preoperative telephone call three days before surgery
Sponsored by
University of Texas at Austin
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Prolapse

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Speak and read English: Only English-speaking women will be allowed to participate because the questionnaires used in the study are validated only in English and Swedish; they are not validated in other languages.
  • Planned surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and/or stress urinary incontinence

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 years of age
  • Do not read or speak English
  • Unable to participate in a telephone call (dementia, hard of hearing, deaf)
  • Scheduled for surgery in 3 days or less

Sites / Locations

  • Seton Midtown Medical Tower
  • Pelvic Floor Integrated Practice Unit at the University of Texas Health Austin

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Preoperative telephone call

No preoperative telephone call

Arm Description

Patients will receive routine preoperative counseling in the clinic plus a provider initiated telephone call 3 days before surgery.

Patients will receive routine preoperative counseling in the clinic.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Surgical preparedness
Patient Preparedness Questionnaire, Modified Preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire

Secondary Outcome Measures

Surgical satisfaction
Decision Regret Scale and Satisfaction with Decision Scale, Scale of 1-5, Scoring consists of reversing the scores of the 2 negatively phrased items, then taking the mean of the 5 items (range, 1-5).
Patient-reported outcomes
Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory - 20
Cost-effectiveness
The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions

Full Information

First Posted
March 11, 2019
Last Updated
October 2, 2020
Sponsor
University of Texas at Austin
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03890471
Brief Title
Telephone Intervention to Increase Patient Preparedness and Satisfaction Trial (TIPPS): A Randomized Control Trial
Acronym
TIPPS
Official Title
Telephone Intervention to Increase Patient Preparedness and Satisfaction Trial (TIPPS): A Randomized Control Trial Evaluating the Effect of Preoperative Telephone Calls on Patient Preparedness and Satisfaction in Urogynecologic Surgery
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 5, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 11, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 11, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Texas at Austin

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Surgical preparedness improves patient satisfaction and perioperative outcomes. In urogynecology, interventions to increase preoperative patient preparedness have not been adequately studied. Our objective is to evaluate the ability of preoperative provider-initiated telephone calls to increase patient preparedness for surgery. The investigators will conduct a randomized control trial comparing surgical preparedness between provider-initiated telephone call three days before surgery plus usual preoperative counseling versus usual preoperative counseling alone among women planning to undergo pelvic reconstructive surgery as measured by the Preoperative Patient Questionnaire (PPQ) and the Modified Preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire (Modified PCSQ). Surgical satisfaction, perioperative outcomes, and medical costs will be also be compared between the two groups. Our hypothesis is that preoperative telephone calls will result in improved surgical preparedness. This novel approach in preoperative counseling has the potential to positively impact perioperative patient care. The investigators will also conduct an ancillary qualitative study of sexually active women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery who are enrolled in the randomized control trial. This work will aim to describe the patient experience, concerns, and the quality of the first sexual encounter following surgery. This ancillary study will lay the foundation for future investigations into how to better counsel patients and discuss sexual activity after surgical repair.
Detailed Description
Increased surgical preparedness is linked to improved surgical satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes. Interventions that increase preparedness for surgery are needed. The impact of a provider-initiated preoperative telephone call on surgical preparedness is unknown. The objectives of this study are to compare patient preparedness between women who receive a preoperative provider-initiated telephone call plus the usual preoperative counseling in the clinic versus usual preoperative counseling alone. The investigators hypothesize that a provider initiated preoperative telephone call will increase surgical preparedness and satisfaction, as well as improve perioperative outcomes. The investigators will test our working hypothesis by using the approach of randomizing patients undergoing surgery for SUI and/or POP to either a provider-initiated telephone call three days before surgery plus usual preoperative counseling or usual preoperative counseling alone. The rationale for this aim is that successful completion of the proposed research will contribute a missing, fundamental element to our understanding of preoperative counseling. It is our expectation that a preoperative telephone call three days before surgery will result in improved surgical preparedness. Such a finding would be of importance because it would provide evidence to support a novel method in preoperative counseling that positively impacts patient care. Patients enrolled in the ancillary sexual function study will be scheduled for one-on-one telephone interview 2-4 months after surgery. Major themes of the interviews will be used to better describe the patient experience of return to sexual activity after surgery. The investigators are also planning on performing a cost analysis. A provider-initiated telephone call before surgery requires the allocation of new resources that may result in additional perioperative costs. However, if telephone calls improve perioperative outcomes, an overall decrease in perioperative costs may be observed due to a decrease in direct and non-direct costs. Direct costs are attributable to the use of a health care intervention or illness and can be further classified in medical and non-medical costs. Medical care costs include emergency room visits, hospital admissions, unplanned clinic visits, clinic telephone calls. Non-medical costs include transportation, gas, and parking. Indirect costs include lost wages for the patient or caregiver. The objective of aspect of the study is to determine the difference in cost-effectiveness between women who receive a provider-initiated telephone call 3 days before surgery plus the usual preoperative counseling in the clinic versus the usual preoperative counseling alone from the patient and societal perspectives. The investigators hypothesize that preoperative telephone calls will be more cost-effective for both patients and society. The investigators will test our working hypothesis by using the approach of resource costing method. It is our expectation that preoperative telephone calls will improve perioperative outcomes resulting in overall cost to both the patient and society that will compensate for the additional perioperative costs associated with a telephone call before surgery.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prolapse, Stress Urinary Incontinence

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
We will conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing a provider-initiated preoperative telephone call plus usual clinic counseling to usual clinic counseling alone in women planning pelvic reconstructive surgery for SUI and/or POP.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
150 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Preoperative telephone call
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will receive routine preoperative counseling in the clinic plus a provider initiated telephone call 3 days before surgery.
Arm Title
No preoperative telephone call
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients will receive routine preoperative counseling in the clinic.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Preoperative telephone call three days before surgery
Intervention Description
Patients will receive a provider-initiated telephone call three days before surgery. In order to standardize counseling across providers, each provider will use a telephone script addressing the following components: Purpose of the surgery, alternatives to the surgery, surgical benefits, surgical risk (such as infection, bleeding, injury to other organ systems), potential surgical complications (such as mesh erosion, voiding dysfunction, urinary retention requiring indwelling catheter), bowel complaints (such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea), and postoperative expectations (such as Foley management, pain management, activity restrictions, and diet. The following ERAS-specific components will be incorporated into the counseling: management of chronic medical conditions, cessation of alcohol and tobacco, and daily exercise until surgery. Questions from patients and total counseling time will be recorded.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Surgical preparedness
Description
Patient Preparedness Questionnaire, Modified Preparedness for Colorectal Cancer Surgery Questionnaire
Time Frame
Baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Surgical satisfaction
Description
Decision Regret Scale and Satisfaction with Decision Scale, Scale of 1-5, Scoring consists of reversing the scores of the 2 negatively phrased items, then taking the mean of the 5 items (range, 1-5).
Time Frame
Will be measured at postoperative visit 4-8 weeks after surgery.
Title
Patient-reported outcomes
Description
Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory - 20
Time Frame
Will be measured at baseline and at the postoperative visit 4-8 weeks after surgery.
Title
Cost-effectiveness
Description
The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions
Time Frame
Will be measured at baseline and at the postoperative visit 4-8 weeks after surgery.

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: At least 18 years of age Speak and read English: Only English-speaking women will be allowed to participate because the questionnaires used in the study are validated only in English and Swedish; they are not validated in other languages. Planned surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and/or stress urinary incontinence Exclusion Criteria: Less than 18 years of age Do not read or speak English Unable to participate in a telephone call (dementia, hard of hearing, deaf) Scheduled for surgery in 3 days or less
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rebecca Rogers, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Tenured Processor, Department of Women's Health at UT Austin
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Seton Midtown Medical Tower
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pelvic Floor Integrated Practice Unit at the University of Texas Health Austin
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78712
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Telephone Intervention to Increase Patient Preparedness and Satisfaction Trial (TIPPS): A Randomized Control Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs