Active clinical trials for "Prolapse"

Surgical correction of the prolapse in the anterior compartment remains one of the major challenges in urogynecology. Paravaginal defect in level II of vaginal fixation results in the majority of cystoceles. Clinically, these defects are often combined and/or may be bilateral. Hence, careful assessment and individualized planning of the surgical procedure is essential to optimize cystocele repair outcome. Several surgical techniques and approaches have been used for cystocele repair. After the ban on transvaginal meshes, the interest in native tissue repair has risen. Paravaginal defect repair is an effective surgery for paravaginal defect reconstruction. There is a current trend to utilize transvaginal surgery instead of more invasive transabdominal surgery. A novel method of transvaginal paravaginal defect repair - TOCR (transobturator cystocele repair) was suggested. The principle objective of the present trial is to compare its efficacy and safety to preexisting method of native tissue cystocele repair.

to investigate the effect of electromagnetic field therapy on sciatica and postural control in lumbar disc prolapse patients BACKGROUND: lumbar disc prolapse is a clinical condition resulting from compression of lumbar nerve roots resulting in decreased postural control and alleviating sciatic pain Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy is an easy, non-invasive, safe, and relatively new treatment method that is used with growing interest in physical and rehabilitation medicine. Historically, the benefits from magnetotherapy have been reported for patients with musculoskeletal and neurological disorders

This trial is designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of two native tissue repair procedure with conventional surgical instruments in Chinese apical prolapse female patients (POP-Q II-IV) and compare the outcome in prolapse women randomized to Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) and Ischial spinous fascia fixation (ISFF).

Prospective long-term evaluation of the performance and safety of Calistar S for transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair in women with anterior POP with or without apical vaginal involvement

it is aimed to examine the effect of laparoscopic pectopexy surgery without mesh on Pelvic Organ Prolapse Measurement (POP-Q) and quality of life of the patient.

This study will examine whether surgeons should add a prophylactic posterior colpoperineorrhaphy to a mesh-augmented apical prolapse repair.

The aim of the study is to assess at one year the effectiveness of the vaginal patch plastron in comparison of the anterior colporraphy through a combined definition of success: anatomic and functional.

Degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) due to leaflet prolapse is frequent and can be surgically repaired in the vast majority of patients. Despite the efficacy of mitral valve repair, an ongoing international controversy exists regarding the need to perform early surgery in asymptomatic patients with severe MR and no sign of LV dysfunction in whom the probability of successful and durable repair is very high. In this group of patients, differing views of the risks of uncorrected severe MR exist: considered as benign by those supporting medical "watchful waiting" or associated with significant excess mortality/morbidity by those advocating early surgery. This controversy can only be resolved by a randomized controlled trial which is still lacking. The main objective is to demonstrate the superiority of early mitral valve repair in patients with asymptomatic severe MR due to leaflet prolapse compared to an initial conservative management in terms of all-cause death and cardiovascular morbidity during five years follow-up.

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common problem among women. Apical prolapse (AP) is a prolapse of the uterus, or vaginal cuff, in women post hysterectomy. Apical fixation to the sacrospinous ligament (SSLF) was first introduced in 1968 by K.RICHTER. .In a large review study, the subjective cure rate after SSLF ranged from 70 to 98%, while objective cure rate was 67-97%. The success rates of SSLF in a randomized study comparing SSLF to uterosacral ligament fixation after two years were 63.1%. In women with combined apical and anterior wall prolapse, SSLF can be performed in two ways: anterior access through the anterior vaginal wall or posterior approach through the posterior vaginal wall. A retrospective comparison of the two methods was performed, demonstrating some efficacy to the anterior approach over the posterior approach mainly in respect to the vaginal length. From the literature review to date, no comparisons were made between the methods in a randomized controlled trial. Objective: To compare the success rates between two approaches (anterior and posterior) for SSLF

Introduction: Pelvic organ prolapse is a common gynecological disease, which about 50% of women develop in the course of their lives. There are many different options for surgical care, e.g. the uterus-preserving sacrospinal fixation (= sacrospinal hysteropexy = SSHP). This technique has been increasingly used in recent years. However, there is still no data on whether the fixation sutures should be performed with absorbable or non-absorbable threads. Internationally, both types of threads are routinely used and both types of threads are described in publications. So far, there is no comparative data on the effectiveness and subjective results. The aim of this study is to compare subjective symptom improvement Materials & Methods: This is a randomized, single-center superiority study. The sacrospinal fixation is performed according to a standardized method and two different types of threads (absorbable PDS sutures vs. non-absorbable Prolene sutures) are used for the fixation suture. Patients are randomized to either the absorbable PDS sutures group or the non-absorbable Prolene sutures group. The primary outcome of interest is the subjective symptom improvement 12 months after surgery (evaluated using the German version of the pelvic floor questionnaire). Secondary outcome variables are anatomical outcomes, condition-specific quality of life, and adverse events. 52 patients will be included in the study. The results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and the results will be presented at scientific meetings.