The Use of Mucograft® to Treat Gingival Recession
Primary Purpose
Gingival Recession
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Syrian Arab Republic
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mucograft
Connective Tissue Graft
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Gingival Recession focused on measuring gingival graft, free gingival graft, coronally advanced flap, reduced keratinized gingiva
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Presence of Type I or II (Miller Classification) of gingival recession
Exclusion Criteria:
- Smoking
- Pregnancy or lactating
- Presence of any systematic diseases can affect the periodontal surgery.
- Subjects with significant moderate to severe periodontal disease.
- Patients under orthodontic treatment
- Presence of restorative materials (e.g. crown)
- Effectiveness of frenum
- Subjects have failed to maintain good plaque control.
- Subjects having previous surgical treatment for covering the recession in the chosen area.
Sites / Locations
- Department of Periodontics, University of Damascus Dental School
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Mucograft
Connective tissue graft
Arm Description
One side of the mouth will be subjected to Mucograft in this split-mouth study design.
The opposite side of the mouth will be subjected to a connective tissue graft.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in the Clinical Attachment Level Index
Clinical Attachment Level is dependent on measuring the pocket depth as well as the amount of gingival recession using specific tools. The measurement is going to be recorded in millimeters.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in Probing Depth
Probing depth is going to be measuring using a specific tool (UNC-15 probe).
Change in Gingival Recession
Gingival recession is measured from the cemento-enamel junction to the gingival margin of the recessed tissues.
Change in Gingival Biotype
Gingival biotype is assessed by an endodontic file which used to determine the thickness of the gingival tissues (i.e. thick or thin).
Change in Root Coverage Index
The amount of root exposure will be measured and compared to the total length of the root
Change in Resistance to Muscular Pull
The cheeks or lips are going to be retracted by hand or by a mirror in order to see the movement of the free gingival tissues. The movement will be esitmated in millimeters.
Change in Color Match Index
Shrinkage index at three months
Shrinkage index at six months
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02986191
First Posted
November 29, 2016
Last Updated
February 3, 2018
Sponsor
Damascus University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02986191
Brief Title
The Use of Mucograft® to Treat Gingival Recession
Official Title
Clinical Applications of 3D Collagen Matrix (Mucograft®) in the Management of Gingival Recession: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 20, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Damascus University
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Twenty patients with gingival recession will be enrolled in this trial. Gingival recession will be treated in one side by applying Mucograft® with coronally advanced flap (CAF) while on the opposite side a connective tissue graft (from the palate) will be applied with a CAF.
Patients will be followed for 3 and 6 months by measuring the clinical indexes and statistical analyses will be performed to compare the results and to assess the success of Mucograft®.
Detailed Description
Many surgical techniques have used to treat gingival recession such aas repositioned flaps, autologous soft tissue grafts (connective tissue graft or free gingival grafts) or allografts like acellular dermal which can be used as substitutes for palatal donor tissue. Mucograft® (3D collagen matrix) is also an allograft from porcine origin and is designed for soft tissue regeneration and considered the ideal solution to autogenous soft tissue grafts and it provides an ideal matrix for blood vessel and soft tissue ingrowth.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gingival Recession
Keywords
gingival graft, free gingival graft, coronally advanced flap, reduced keratinized gingiva
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Mucograft
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
One side of the mouth will be subjected to Mucograft in this split-mouth study design.
Arm Title
Connective tissue graft
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The opposite side of the mouth will be subjected to a connective tissue graft.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Mucograft
Intervention Description
This method of grafting will be used to treat the gingival recession using coronally advanced flaps.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Connective Tissue Graft
Intervention Description
This will be used in the traditional manner to correct gingival recession
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the Clinical Attachment Level Index
Description
Clinical Attachment Level is dependent on measuring the pocket depth as well as the amount of gingival recession using specific tools. The measurement is going to be recorded in millimeters.
Time Frame
Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Probing Depth
Description
Probing depth is going to be measuring using a specific tool (UNC-15 probe).
Time Frame
Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Title
Change in Gingival Recession
Description
Gingival recession is measured from the cemento-enamel junction to the gingival margin of the recessed tissues.
Time Frame
Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Title
Change in Gingival Biotype
Description
Gingival biotype is assessed by an endodontic file which used to determine the thickness of the gingival tissues (i.e. thick or thin).
Time Frame
Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Title
Change in Root Coverage Index
Description
The amount of root exposure will be measured and compared to the total length of the root
Time Frame
Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Title
Change in Resistance to Muscular Pull
Description
The cheeks or lips are going to be retracted by hand or by a mirror in order to see the movement of the free gingival tissues. The movement will be esitmated in millimeters.
Time Frame
Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Title
Change in Color Match Index
Time Frame
Measurements will be done at :(1) one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively and (3) at six months exactly post-operatively
Title
Shrinkage index at three months
Time Frame
Measurements will be done at two time points to calculate the amount of shrinkage :(1) at one hour before applying the graft, (2) at three months exactly post-operatively.
Title
Shrinkage index at six months
Time Frame
Measurements will be done at two time points to calculate the amount of shrinkage :(1) at one hour before applying the graft, (2) at six months exactly post-operatively.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Presence of Type I or II (Miller Classification) of gingival recession
Exclusion Criteria:
Smoking
Pregnancy or lactating
Presence of any systematic diseases can affect the periodontal surgery.
Subjects with significant moderate to severe periodontal disease.
Patients under orthodontic treatment
Presence of restorative materials (e.g. crown)
Effectiveness of frenum
Subjects have failed to maintain good plaque control.
Subjects having previous surgical treatment for covering the recession in the chosen area.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Haydar Barakat, DDS MSc
Organizational Affiliation
PhD Student in Periodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Suleiman Dayoub, DDS MSc PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Associate Professor of Periodontics, Department of Peridontics, Univ. of Damascus Dental School
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Periodontics, University of Damascus Dental School
City
Damascus
ZIP/Postal Code
DM20AM18
Country
Syrian Arab Republic
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20417009
Citation
Herford AS, Akin L, Cicciu M, Maiorana C, Boyne PJ. Use of a porcine collagen matrix as an alternative to autogenous tissue for grafting oral soft tissue defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jul;68(7):1463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.054. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21837302
Citation
Nevins M, Nevins ML, Kim SW, Schupbach P, Kim DM. The use of mucograft collagen matrix to augment the zone of keratinized tissue around teeth: a pilot study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(4):367-73.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22254233
Citation
Rocchietta I, Schupbach P, Ghezzi C, Maschera E, Simion M. Soft tissue integration of a porcine collagen membrane: an experimental study in pigs. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Feb;32(1):e34-40.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21721988
Citation
Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L. Treatment of gingival recession defects using coronally advanced flap with a porcine collagen matrix compared to coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2012 Mar;83(3):321-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110215. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23050490
Citation
Jepsen K, Jepsen S, Zucchelli G, Stefanini M, de Sanctis M, Baldini N, Greven B, Heinz B, Wennstrom J, Cassel B, Vignoletti F, Sanz M. Treatment of gingival recession defects with a coronally advanced flap and a xenogeneic collagen matrix: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Jan;40(1):82-9. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12019. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24597764
Citation
McGuire MK, Scheyer ET. Randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate a xenogeneic collagen matrix as an alternative to free gingival grafting for oral soft tissue augmentation. J Periodontol. 2014 Oct;85(10):1333-41. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.130692. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26469812
Citation
McGuire MK, Scheyer ET. Long-Term Results Comparing Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix and Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafts With Coronally Advanced Flaps for Treatment of Dehiscence-Type Recession Defects. J Periodontol. 2016 Mar;87(3):221-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.150386. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
The Use of Mucograft® to Treat Gingival Recession
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs