search
Back to results

Understand FoG in PD: Behavioral Physiology and Clinical Application

Primary Purpose

Parkinson Disease, Freezing of Gait

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Taiwan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Clinical evaluations
Sponsored by
National Taiwan University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Parkinson Disease focused on measuring Parkinson's disease, freezing of gait, context-dependency, transcranial magnetic stimulation, visual cues

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

  • Individuals with Parkinson's disease
  • Healthy control subjects

Exclusion criteria:

  • unable to follow the instructions
  • have other neurological diseases other than PD
  • have pacemaker implanted in their body
  • have a history of seizure
  • have a family history of epilepsy

Sites / Locations

  • National Taiwan University HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

PD+FoG

PD-FoG

Control

Arm Description

PD patients with FoG

PD patients without FoG

age-matched non-disabled adults

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOG-Q)
The New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOG-Q) will be used to evaluate the freezing frequency and severity of the patients with PD. It composes of 3 parts; in the first part, a video clip will be shown to the participants with PD and help to classify whether an individual is a freezer or non-freezer. The second and third part of the questionnaire is designed for freezers only. PartⅡassesses the severity of FoG according to the frequency and duration of the freezing episodes, while PartⅢevaluates the impact of freezing on daily activities, such as walking. The reliability and internal consistency of the NFOG-Q have been well-established for patients with PD (Nieuwboer et al., 2009).
Context-dependent behavior
A modified finger sequence task is specifically designed to evaluate context-dependent behavior for patients with PD. The participants will be instructed to put their index and middle fingers of both hands on a designated location of an enlarged key-board. The participants will first practice the three sequences for a total of 324 practice trials on the first day. Ten minutes and 24 hours after practice, to control for the medication status, the participants will be tested under the SAME and SWITCH conditions.With these 2 testing conditions, we will be able to calculate a variable called Switch Cost, which is the performance difference between the SWTICH and the SAME conditions normalized by the SAME condition [100% * (SWITCH - SAME)/SAME]. The Switch Cost will be used as an indicator of context-dependency.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)
The UPDRS contains 4 sections, and PartIIIwill be used in this study to evaluate the motor disturbances of patients with PD. Excellent internal consistency and validity has been established for UPDRS (Goetz et al., 2008).
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
The MoCA evaluates several cognitive domains, including visuospatial processing, naming, short-term memory, digit forward and backward span, verbal fluency, abstract concept, counting, and orientation. The MoCA has been found to be a valid and reliable tool to screen for cognitive dysfunctions in patients with PD (Gill, Freshman, Blender, & Ravina, 2008).
The Stroop Color-Word test
The Stroop Color-Word test involves congruent and incongruent conditions.The goal of the participants is to read out the ink color of the word, but not the color word name itself, as accurately and as soon as possible (Dubois et al., 2007; Ridley, Johnson, & Braisted, 1978).
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
10MWT assesses the walking ability of the participants. The participants will be instructed to walk in their comfortable walking speed and their fastest walking speed for 10 meters. Gait speed, stride length, and cadence will be calculated.
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test
The TUG evaluates the balance ability of the participants. The participants will be seated on a comfortable chair with hip and knee flexed at 90 Upon a 'Go' signal, the participants will stand up from the chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, and sit back down to the chair. The time to complete the procedure will be measured.
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire(PDQ-39)
The PDQ-39 specifically assess quality of life in patients with PD. PDQ-39 contains 39 questions embedded in 8 different domains. PDQ-39 has now become the most widely accepted and reliable measure to determine the overall health status for patients with PD (Jenkinson, Peto, Fitzpatrick, Greenhall, & Hyman, 1995).
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
To compare the neurophysiological characteristics of PD patients with FoG, PD patients without FoG, and non-disabled adults, a TMS device (The Magstim Company Ltd, Whitland, UK) will be used. TMS outcomes will include resting motor threshold (RMT), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), cortical silent period (CSP), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF).
Electroencephalogram (EEG)
While performing the modified finger sequence task, the electroencephalogram (EEG) will be used to monitor and record brain activity. Comparisons will be made between the first block of practice, last block of practice, and the two testing conditions.
The short FoG and festination assessment score
The short FoG and festination assessment score, developed by Ziegler and colleagues (2010), will be used to clinically assess freezing and festination episodes over a short time course. The participants will initially sit on a chair for 30 seconds, then they will be instructed to stand up and walk to a floor mark with 40 radius and make 360 turn clockwise and counter-clockwise. Then, the participants will walk through a door, turn around and walk back to the chair. The participants will be required to walk in a fast but safe speed. This evaluation approach has been demonstrated to be feasible and reliable for assessing the severity of freezing and festination.

Full Information

First Posted
December 6, 2016
Last Updated
December 6, 2016
Sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Collaborators
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02987140
Brief Title
Understand FoG in PD: Behavioral Physiology and Clinical Application
Official Title
Understand Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease: Behavioral Physiology and Clinical Application
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
December 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2019 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Collaborators
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The overall goals of this proposed study are to investigate the behavioral and neurophysiological mechanisms of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing freezing of gait (FoG). More specifically, we aim to determine the behavioral changes in context-dependency and changes in corticomotor excitability associated with FoG.
Detailed Description
Background: Freezing of gait (FoG) is a debilitating symptom for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). FoG not only impairs walking but also significantly increase fall risks and decrease quality of life for patients with PD. Despite the critical consequences, the mechanisms associated with this phenomenon are not well understood. Clinically, FoG often occurs when individuals with PD are approaching a narrow pathway or crossing a busy street. This observation leads to the hypothesis that FoG is associated with context-dependent motor performance, a phenomenon that an individual demonstrate poorer performance if the learned motor task is carried out in an unfamiliar context. Whether the occurrence of freezing episodes is a result of context-dependency has not been systematically investigated. Moreover, the changes in corticomotor excitability associated with FoG have not been well-established. Objectives: The objectives of this proposal are to understand the behavioral and neurophysiological mechanisms of FoG. The specific aim is to examine the behavioral changes in context-dependency and changes in corticomotor excitability associated with FoG. Methods: a total of 70 participants, including PD patients with FoG, PD patients without FoG, and age-matched non-disabled adults, will be recruited. The participants will undergo behavioral and neurophysiological examinations. Behavioral evaluations will include context-dependent motor performance, FoG, disease severity, and walking and balance functions. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalogram will be used to measure corticomotor excitability of the participants. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and regression analysis will be performed to compare and determine the relationship between FoG, behavioral outcomes, and corticomotor excitability. Statistical significance level is set at p < 0.05.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson Disease, Freezing of Gait
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, freezing of gait, context-dependency, transcranial magnetic stimulation, visual cues

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
70 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PD+FoG
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
PD patients with FoG
Arm Title
PD-FoG
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
PD patients without FoG
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
age-matched non-disabled adults
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Clinical evaluations
Intervention Description
Participants will receive clinical evaluations, and practice the finger sequence task used to assess context-dependency along with EEG assessment. On the second day, the participants will receive the TMS assessment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOG-Q)
Description
The New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOG-Q) will be used to evaluate the freezing frequency and severity of the patients with PD. It composes of 3 parts; in the first part, a video clip will be shown to the participants with PD and help to classify whether an individual is a freezer or non-freezer. The second and third part of the questionnaire is designed for freezers only. PartⅡassesses the severity of FoG according to the frequency and duration of the freezing episodes, while PartⅢevaluates the impact of freezing on daily activities, such as walking. The reliability and internal consistency of the NFOG-Q have been well-established for patients with PD (Nieuwboer et al., 2009).
Time Frame
30 mins
Title
Context-dependent behavior
Description
A modified finger sequence task is specifically designed to evaluate context-dependent behavior for patients with PD. The participants will be instructed to put their index and middle fingers of both hands on a designated location of an enlarged key-board. The participants will first practice the three sequences for a total of 324 practice trials on the first day. Ten minutes and 24 hours after practice, to control for the medication status, the participants will be tested under the SAME and SWITCH conditions.With these 2 testing conditions, we will be able to calculate a variable called Switch Cost, which is the performance difference between the SWTICH and the SAME conditions normalized by the SAME condition [100% * (SWITCH - SAME)/SAME]. The Switch Cost will be used as an indicator of context-dependency.
Time Frame
40 mins
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)
Description
The UPDRS contains 4 sections, and PartIIIwill be used in this study to evaluate the motor disturbances of patients with PD. Excellent internal consistency and validity has been established for UPDRS (Goetz et al., 2008).
Time Frame
30 mins
Title
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Description
The MoCA evaluates several cognitive domains, including visuospatial processing, naming, short-term memory, digit forward and backward span, verbal fluency, abstract concept, counting, and orientation. The MoCA has been found to be a valid and reliable tool to screen for cognitive dysfunctions in patients with PD (Gill, Freshman, Blender, & Ravina, 2008).
Time Frame
10 mins
Title
The Stroop Color-Word test
Description
The Stroop Color-Word test involves congruent and incongruent conditions.The goal of the participants is to read out the ink color of the word, but not the color word name itself, as accurately and as soon as possible (Dubois et al., 2007; Ridley, Johnson, & Braisted, 1978).
Time Frame
5 mins
Title
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Description
10MWT assesses the walking ability of the participants. The participants will be instructed to walk in their comfortable walking speed and their fastest walking speed for 10 meters. Gait speed, stride length, and cadence will be calculated.
Time Frame
5 mins
Title
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test
Description
The TUG evaluates the balance ability of the participants. The participants will be seated on a comfortable chair with hip and knee flexed at 90 Upon a 'Go' signal, the participants will stand up from the chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, and sit back down to the chair. The time to complete the procedure will be measured.
Time Frame
5 mins
Title
The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire(PDQ-39)
Description
The PDQ-39 specifically assess quality of life in patients with PD. PDQ-39 contains 39 questions embedded in 8 different domains. PDQ-39 has now become the most widely accepted and reliable measure to determine the overall health status for patients with PD (Jenkinson, Peto, Fitzpatrick, Greenhall, & Hyman, 1995).
Time Frame
10 mins
Title
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Description
To compare the neurophysiological characteristics of PD patients with FoG, PD patients without FoG, and non-disabled adults, a TMS device (The Magstim Company Ltd, Whitland, UK) will be used. TMS outcomes will include resting motor threshold (RMT), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), cortical silent period (CSP), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF).
Time Frame
45 mins
Title
Electroencephalogram (EEG)
Description
While performing the modified finger sequence task, the electroencephalogram (EEG) will be used to monitor and record brain activity. Comparisons will be made between the first block of practice, last block of practice, and the two testing conditions.
Time Frame
40 mins
Title
The short FoG and festination assessment score
Description
The short FoG and festination assessment score, developed by Ziegler and colleagues (2010), will be used to clinically assess freezing and festination episodes over a short time course. The participants will initially sit on a chair for 30 seconds, then they will be instructed to stand up and walk to a floor mark with 40 radius and make 360 turn clockwise and counter-clockwise. Then, the participants will walk through a door, turn around and walk back to the chair. The participants will be required to walk in a fast but safe speed. This evaluation approach has been demonstrated to be feasible and reliable for assessing the severity of freezing and festination.
Time Frame
20 mins

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Individuals with Parkinson's disease Healthy control subjects Exclusion criteria: unable to follow the instructions have other neurological diseases other than PD have pacemaker implanted in their body have a history of seizure have a family history of epilepsy
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ya-Yun Lee, PHD
Phone
886-2-33668155
Email
yayunlee@ntu.edu.tw
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ya-Yun Lee, PHD
Organizational Affiliation
National Taiwan University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National Taiwan University Hospital
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
100
Country
Taiwan
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ya-Yun Lee, PHD
Phone
02-33668155
Email
yayunlee@ntu.edu.tw

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Understand FoG in PD: Behavioral Physiology and Clinical Application

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs