Active clinical trials for "Respiratory Insufficiency"

Recent observations have suggested a role of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in the pathophysiology of severe COVID-19. The aim of the study is to assess efficacy and safety of aerosolized DNase I to remove NETs and decrease respiratory distress in patients with COVID-19.

Patients are invited to participate in a trial to test a new way to optimise long-term use of non-invasive ventilation using remote monitoring. Breathing difficulties during sleep are frequently treated using home mechanical ventilation, also called non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Breathing difficulties during sleep affect many patients with conditions such as chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD), neuromuscular conditions and obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Left untreated they can cause breathlessness, headaches, sleepiness and lead to hospitalisations and other severe adverse health outcomes. The best available treatment for chronic types of sleep-disordered breathing is NIV. However, not every patient eligible tolerates this treatment because it requires patients to sleep with a nasal or full-face mask that is connected with a tube to a machine. Although NIV is recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), many patients who should be on NIV use the treatment insufficiently within months. Using remote monitoring to identify problems with treatment adherence early on may help to identify clinical problems, troubleshoot user- or device-dependent problems, avoid delays in treatment and safe healthcare resources in the long-term. The investigators invite patients who use NIV to participate in this trial when they have difficulties with the treatment (NIV). This study will evaluate compliance and efficacy of a remote monitoring device (T4P device, SRETT, Paris/France) that will be connected to the standard NIV machine to remotely monitor usage. Patients will be randomly assigned to the remote monitoring using NIV for three months at home, or to usual care which is NIV without this monitoring. The primary outcome measure of this study is the improvement in adherence and compliance, as indicated by the average usage of NIV, as well as symptom scores to assess treatment effects.

Clinicians perform rapid sequence induction, laryngoscopy, and tracheal intubation for more than 5 million critically ill adults as a part of clinical care each year in the United States. One-in-ten emergency tracheal intubations is complicated by life-threatening hypoxemia. Administering supplemental oxygen prior to induction and intubation ("preoxygenation") decreases the risk of life-threatening hypoxemia. In current clinical practice, the most common methods for preoxygenation are non-invasive positive pressure ventilation and facemask oxygen. Prior trials comparing non-invasive positive pressure ventilation and facemask oxygen for preoxygenation have been small and have yielded conflicting results. A better understanding of the comparative effectiveness of these two common, standard-of-care approaches to preoxygenation could improve the care clinicians deliver and patient outcomes.

Preterm infants often suffer from apnea of prematurity (AOP; a cessation of breathing) due to immaturity of the respiratory system. AOP can lead to oxygen shortage and a low heart rate which might harm the development of the newborn, especially the central nervous system. In order to prevent oxygen shortage, infants are treated with non-invasive respiratory support and caffeine. Despite these treatments, many preterm newborns still suffer from AOP and need invasive mechanical ventilation. Although this will result in complete resolution of AOP, invasive mechanical ventilation has the disadvantage of being a major risk of chronic lung disease and impaired neurodevelopmental outcome. Restrictive invasive ventilation is therefore advocated nowadays in preterm infants. Doxapram is a respiratory stimulant that has been administered off-label to treat AOP. Doxapram, as add-on treatment, seems to be effective in treating AOP and to prevent invasive mechanical ventilation. It is unclear if a preterm infant benefit from doxapram treatment on the longer term. This study compares doxapram to placebo and hypothesizes that doxapram will protect preterm infants from both invasive ventilation (and related lung disease) and AOP related oxygen shortage (and related impaired brain development).

Patients suffering lung failure, possibly from COVID-19 or hypoxic lung failure, will need life-saving support from a breathing machine. Any patient needing this support requires drugs to keep them sleepy, or "sedated" to be comfortable on this machine. Sedation is made possible by using drugs given through a vein. Unfortunately, these drugs are in short supply worldwide due to the high number of COVID-19 patients needing these machines. Another way to provide sleep is by using gases that are breathed in. These are used every day in operating rooms to perform surgery. These gases, also called "inhaled agents" can also be used in intensive care units and may have several important benefits for patients and the hospital. Research shows they may reduce swelling in the lung and increase oxygen levels, which allows patients to recover faster and reduce the time spent on a breathing machine. In turn, this allows the breathing machine to be used again for the next sick patient. These drugs may also increase the number of patients who live through their illness. Inhaled agents are widely available and their use could dramatically lesson the pressure on limited drug supplies. This research is a study being carried out in a number of hospitals that will compare how well patients recover from these illnesses depending on which type of sedation drug they receive. The plan is to evaluate the number who survive, their time spent on a breathing machine and time in the hospital. This study may show immediate benefits and may provide a cost effective and practical solution to the current challenges caring for patients and the hospital space, equipment and drugs to the greatest benefit. Furthermore, the study will be investigating inflammatory profile and neuro-cognitive profiles in ventilated patients. Finally, this trial will be a team of experts in sedation drugs who care for patients with proven or suspected COVID-19 who need lifesaving treatments.

A prior research indicated that asynchrony between the patient and ventilator occurred in 33 percent of 19,175 breaths, and was seen in every patient. The most prevalent kind of asynchrony was ineffective triggering (68%), followed by delayed termination (19%), double triggering (4%) and premature termination (3%). Asynchrony between the patient and ventilator increased considerably with decreasing levels of peak inspiratory pressure, positive end-expiratory pressure, and set frequency.Despite this, more asynchrony categories exist, and there is no widely accepted categorization. Major asynchronies, however, include auto trigger, ineffective effort, and double trigger, while minor asynchronies include early/late cycle, trigger delay, and spontaneous breaths during a mandatory breath. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of a closed-loop synchronization controller with conventional control of synchronization during invasive mechanical ventilation of spontaneous breathing of pediatric patients in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

The purpose of this research study is to learn more about the connections between the brain, nerves, and diaphragm after experiencing a cervical spinal cord injury (SCI).The main question it aims to answer is: Changes in respiratory function and recovery using stimulation and respiratory exercise training in spinal cord-injured individuals. Participants will complete a maximum of 55 study visits. They will be asked to complete about 40 treatment sessions which include multiple stimulation sessions over the scalp and neck, followed by about 60 minutes of respiratory training. Assessment sessions will be completed prior at baseline, after 20 sessions and after 40 sessions of study treatment.

Rationale: Despite the lack of clear clinical protocols, High Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO) is used as post-extubation respiratory support. Although HFNO seems to reduce the need for re-intubation, scepticism on its use persists as the mechanism of action in post-extubation patients remains undefined. Monitoring weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation while monitoring respiratory effort might help to determine the added value of HFNO surrounding extubation. We hypothesize that HFNO, compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT), prevents de-recruitment of the lung and reduces respiratory effort, and so provides a physiologic clarification for the reduction in the need for reintubation. Objective: Determine the physiological effect of HFNO compared to COT in the extubation phase regarding respiratory effort and lung aeration. Study design: A physiologic, randomized clinical study comparing two standard of clinical care therapies. Study population: Adult patients on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for >72 hours, who are scheduled for extubation. Intervention (if applicable): Before extubation, patients are randomized to receive COT (reference group) or HFNO as oxygenation regimen after extubation. Main study parameters/endpoints: The main outcome is the difference in change in lung respiratory muscle effort (mean ΔPES) at 24 hours post-extubation between the study groups. Secondary parameters are differences in changes in respiratory effort at 2 and 4 hours post-extubation, difference in change in lung aeration (mean ΔEELI), differences in tidal volume, Lung Ultrasound (LUS) score, dyspnea score, and respiratory and sputum parameters between patients undergoing different post-extubation oxygenation regimens.

Clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of salbutamol for the treatment of neonates with a gestational age between 32 and 42 weeks with transient tachypnoea of the newborn (TTN).

Pain after acute burn injury is complex with much still not understood. The primary mechanism is believed to be nociceptive, but is interwoven with aspects of somatogenic, neuropathic, and psychogenic pathways. As such, opioid receptor agonists are an essential component for pain management after burn injury. The majority of wound care and dressing changes are completed in non-intubated patients and rates of respiratory depression concerning. Oliceridine is a biased, selective MOR agonist approved for treatment of acute pain. To date there is no literature of use in patients with burn injuries. While it should be effective, efficacy and the potential for reduced adverse events need to be quantified. Current practice and guidelines, plead for better analgesia for patients with burn injuries.