Minnelide Along With Abraxane Plus Gemcitabine in Patients With Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the...
Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the PancreasA Phase 1b, Open-Label, Safety, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacodynamic Study of an Anti-super-enhancer Minnelide Once a Day on Days 1 to 5, Days 8 to 12 and Days 15 to 19 Along with Abraxane Plus Gemcitabine in Patients with Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
Pressure Enabled Intrapancreatic Delivery of SD-101 With Checkpoint Blockade for Locally Advanced...
Locally Advanced Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaThis study is an open-label, phase 1/1b study of the pressure-enabled intrapancreatic infusion of SD-101, a TLR 9 agonist, alone or in combination with intravenous checkpoint blockade in adults with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
FOLFOX and Bevacizumab in Combination With Botensilimab and Balstilimab (3B-FOLFOX) for the Treatment...
Metastatic Colon AdenocarcinomaMetastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma5 moreThis phase I/II trial tests the safety, side effects, best dose, and efficacy of FOLFOX and bevacizumab in combination with botensilimab and balstilimab (3B-FOLFOX) in treating patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer that has spread from where it first started (primary site) to other places in the body (metastatic). Chemotherapy drugs, such as FOLFOX, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Bevacizumab is in a class of medications called antiangiogenic agents. It works by stopping the formation of blood vessels that bring oxygen and nutrients to tumor. This may slow the growth and spread of tumor. Balstilimab and botensilimab are in a class of medications called monoclonal antibodies. They bind to proteins, called PD-L1 and CTLA-4, which is found on some types of tumor cells. These PD-1 and CTLA-4 proteins are known to affect the body's defense mechanism to identify and fight against tumor cells. The combination of these drugs may lead to improved disease control and outcomes in patients with MSS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Second-line Treatment With Serplulimab, Lenvatinib, and Paclitaxel in Advanced Gastric Cancer After...
Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction AdenocarcinomaThis is a prospective, single arm, multicenter phase II study to assess the effectiveness of Serplulimab, Lenvatinib and Paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma after first-line immunotherapy.
Efficacy and Safety of Tislelizumab for Lung Adenocarcinoma With Asymptomatic Brain Metastatic
Lung AdenocarcinomaBrain metastasis of lung cancer is one of the most important metastasis pathways in patients with life-threatening diseases. This study explore the efficacy and safety of Tislelizumab combining with platinum-containing drug chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of Lung Adenocarcinoma With Asymptomatic Brain Metastatic. Meanwhile, Related biomarkers were explored to provide theoretical basis for efficacy evaluation and resistance mechanism.
A Study of TRK-950 When Used in Combination With Ramucirumab and Paclitaxel in Patients With Gastric...
Gastric AdenocarcinomaGastric Cancer1 moreThis study will assess the efficacy, safety, optimal dose and ADA and NAbs development of TRK-950 at two separate dose levels in combination with ramucirumab and paclitaxel (RAM+PTX) as compared with RAM + PTX treatment alone in participants with gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.
A Clinical Study of SI-B001 Combined With Docetaxel in the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Adenocarcinoma...
Non-small Cell Lung AdenocarcinomaSquamous Cell Carcinoma of LungMain objectives: To evaluate the benefit of SI-B001+ docetaxel on overall survival (OS) of bidotaxel. To evaluate the benefit of SI-B001+ Docetaxel over Docetaxel's progression-free survival (PFS) based assessment. Secondary objectives: To evaluate the investigator-evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) benefit of SI-B001+ Docetaxel against docetaxel; To evaluate the difference of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and duration of response (DOR) between SI-B001+ docetaxel and bidocetaxel. To evaluate the type, frequency and severity of adverse events (TEAE) and drug-related adverse events (TRAE) during treatment with SI-B001+ docetaxel in comparison with docetaxel. The pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of SI-B001 will be evaluated. The immunogenicity of SI-B001 will be evaluated. Subject quality of life.
Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Plus Serplulimab in Patients With Locally Advanced...
Gastroesophageal Junction AdenocarcinomaInvestigators conduct the clinical trial to further explore the efficacy and safety of Neoadjuvant chemoradiation Plus Serpluimab in Patients with locally advanced Adenocarcinoma of Gastroesophageal Junction
Gentuximab Combined With Paclitaxel Compared With Placebo Combined With Paclitaxel for Gastric Adenocarcinoma....
Adenocarcinoma of StomachTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of Gentuximab Injection and Paclitaxel Injection in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma after first-line treatment failure compared with Placebo and Paclitaxel Injection.
Combined S-1 With DC+CIK As Maintenance Therapy For Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Ductal AdenocarcinomaAdvanced Solid TumorThe goal of this randomized phase 2 controlled clinical trial is to study safety, efficacy of S-1 combined DC+CIK maintenance therapy compared with S-1 alone in improving clinical benefit rate (CBR) among advanced PDAC patients. The main objectives aim to be achieved through this study are : To evaluate the safety of DC+CIK combined immunotherapy when administered with the chemotherapy S-1 as maintenance therapy following first-line chemotherapy regime to advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients. To demonstrate the superiority of of DC+CIK combined immunotherapy in improving clinical benefit rate (CBR) of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients when administered with the chemotherapy S-1 as maintenance therapy following first-line chemotherapy regime. To investigate the ability of S-1 combined DC+CIK maintenance therapy in reducing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients' circulating cancer stem cells (CSCs). In this study, subjects who achieve at least stable disease or partial response will be randomized in ratio of 1:1 into treatment group: DC-CIK plus S1 (27 patients) and control group: S-1 alone (27 patients). For treatment group, they will be infused with DC first, followed by CIK immune cells on day 1. DC+CIK immunotherapy will be repeated for another 2 times (day 8 and 15) as one cycle. All patients are left to rest for a week (start from day 21) prior to receive another 3 times of infusion (day 28, 35 and 42) if condition allowed. Additional third cycle can be performed on those who tolerate well with no toxicity or respond very well. Patients from treatment group will be assessed for their eligibility to receive booster dose on following conditions: 1) tumour achieves partial response or stable disease and 2) ECOG-PS performance status of 0-2 and 3) doesn't exhibit grade 1 and 2 toxicities to improve tumour control. Additionally, S-1 will be given twice daily after meals for 2 weeks as first cycle along with DC+CIK. Next second cycle of S-1 will be given after 7-days (1 week) rest. The cycles will be repeated every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal with consent. Dose of S-1 will be determined according to the body surface area. Meanwhile, patients from control group will receive S-1 alone as maintenance therapy twice daily after meals for 14 days (2 weeks) as one cycle. The next cycle of S-1 will be given after 7-days rest. The cycles will be repeated every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal with consent.