Active clinical trials for "Alcoholism"

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a Brief Motivational Intervention (BMI), in reducing alcohol consumption among patients with hazardous or harmful drinking admitted in emergency department (ED). Patients aged 16 to 24 and who tested positive for blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.5g/l. or above are enrolled. Patients receive either an information leaflet or an information leaflet plus a referral to a psychologist. BMI is provided by the psychologist. BMI consists in a first face-to-face interview (35-45 minutes) plus a telephone interview, at 1 and 2 months. Minors' parents are also invited to attend the BMI session. If necessary, patients can be referred to relevant care and treatment services for alcohol misuse. In a simple blind, randomised controlled clinical trial of 280 patients, 140 patients are allocated to the treatment group and 140 to the control group. Randomisation is stratified according to patient's age (16-17 or 18-24). Opaque and sealed randomized envelops are used for randomisation. Alcohol consumption is measured by self-report at 3 months. The principal criteria used to assess the reduction of alcohol use at 3 months follow-up is the number of alcoholic drinks in the last week. Other events such as ED readmission, quarrels related to alcohol, drinking and driving, sexual intercourse without protection will also be assessed. It is the first clinical trial in France comparing these two interventions among young patients in ED with this design.

An alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) approach will be adapted for use in a large military hospital setting, and then pilot tested in a military emergency department (ED) to assess its potential for effectiveness and for further testing in a large-scale trial. SBIRT is an "opportunistic" approach whereby all adult patients in the ED are screened by Health Educators for their alcohol use, and then, taking advantage of a "teachable moment," are delivered a brief, motivational intervention matched to their level of risk. The feasibility/formative research activities in the first phase (Phase I) of the study are not summative research, and therefore, do not lend themselves to testable hypotheses. Hypotheses with regard to the pilot randomized trial in Phase II are as follows: Participants in the SBIRT intervention will show relatively greater reductions over a six month period (or less increase) than the brochure/usual care control group in the prevalence of past-month heavy drinking, frequency of heavy drinking, past week number of drinks, and the AUDIT-based drinkers' index. Alcohol use-related motivation/readiness to change and controlled drinking self-efficacy will show greater change in the SBIRT intervention group relative to the brochure/usual care control group. In addition, exploratory analyses will examine the following: Sociodemographic/military variables (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, gender, branch of service, officer/enlisted status, PTS) and social-psychological factors (e.g., baseline readiness to change, self efficacy) will mediate or moderate changes in alcohol misuse.

This study examines whether an integrated alcohol/substance abuse, suicide, and HIV prevention protocol is associated with lower onset and frequency of alcohol and other drug use, suicidal behavior, and high risk sexual behavior among adolescents receiving community based mental health care.

Young adults are in a critical period where they can be influenced to avoid a trajectory of high-risk drinking and harmful outcomes in the later adult years. The Emergency Department might offer a unique opportunity to reach young adults, if an easy to implement screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment was available. The investigators are investigating the feasibility and accuracy of ED-initiated and outpatient-continued assessment of drinking behavior in young adults using a computer-driven text messaging platform. Based on the subject's response to weekly assessments, the computer platform will send personalized motivational messages in real-time.

The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of drug testing on risk and protective factors of substance abuse among adolescents; examine whether drug and alcohol testing among high school athletes leads to reduced drug and alcohol use; and assess the use of drugs and alcohol among student athletes and non-athletes.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of topiramate (250mg) or lamotrigine (250mg) versus placebo in reducing alcohol consumption and decreasing symptoms of PTSD in patients with comorbid AD and PTSD.

This study explores whether giving families a choice of family-based prevention programs to prevent adolescent alcohol use will make a difference in program recruitment, retention, completion, as well as adolescent outcomes. Half of the families are assigned to a traditional random control trial condition and half are assigned to a choice condition. Further, this effectiveness study is being implemented by Kaiser Permanente Health Care system, and explores the issues of implementing such programs within such settings.

This study will compare the effects of GSK598809 and placebo in alcohol dependent volunteers. A placebo is a pill with no drug in it (i.e. dummy drug) but it is made to look exactly like the real drug. Subjects will be given one dose of GSK598809 during one visit and placebo during the other visit. These dosing visits will be at least 1 week apart. The study is randomised, which means that a computer programme will decide by chance (like tossing a coin), the order in which subjects will receive GSK598809 or the placebo, or in other words, whether they will receive GSK598809 or placebo first. The study is blinded, which means the subjects will not know whether they are receiving study drug or placebo first and neither will the doctors at the institute. If necessary for reasons of safety, the study staff can find out exactly what the subject has received. The study will last for approximately 4 weeks but could be up to 6 weeks, depending on length of time between screening and dosing. From screening the subjects will be alcohol-abstinent, they may be put on medication for treatment of withdrawal symptoms and then will have at least 7 days without any medication before beginning the study medication. During the study the subjects will be inpatients at the Central Institute of Mental Health. All subjects will be required to fill out questionnaires, perform behavioural tasks and undergo MRI and functional MRI (fMRI) scans.

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate an intervention, Supporting Survivors and Self: An Intervention for Social Supports of Survivors of Partner Abuse and Sexual Aggression (SSS). SSS trains potential recipients of IPV or SA disclosure on the best methods of responding to a victim's disclosure. Consenting college students will be randomized into the SSS intervention or a wait-list control condition. Evaluation data will be multi-informant (i.e., data from both informal supports and victims) and multi-method (i.e., qualitative and quantitative). The investigators hypothesize that individuals receiving the SSS intervention, compared to individuals in the wait-list control condition, will provide less negative and more positive social reactions to victims' disclosure.

This project expands upon the proof-of-concept work done under the pilot project in order to get Interventionaire© poised for more widespread use. Interventionaire© is designed to deploy a computerized interactive questionnaire to patients in a physician waiting room. The information gathered is intended to be a conversation starter for primary care providers and patients (who may feel more at ease with the computer in revealing health risk behaviors, like alcohol abuse). Widespread use of Interventionaire© could result in a substantial cost savings by delivering a wide reaching and highly acceptable prevention strategy for integrating risky health behavior screening and brief intervention into mainstream medical practice.The investigators overall hypothesis is that participants receiving the computerized intervention will have greater improvement than those receiving the attention control condition.