Active clinical trials for "Rhinitis, Allergic"

This study compared the safety and efficacy of a generic fluticasone furoate (Lek Pharmaceuticals) nasal spray to the reference listed drug in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Additionally both the test and the reference formulations were tested for superiority against a placebo nasal spray.

This trial is a follow-up study of the ICAC-12 Phase I/II trial (NCT00829985), and is designed to study biomarkers of the immune response to allergen immunotherapy and the safety of this therapy in a pediatric population.

The trial will evaluate the nasal congestion symptom relief of the approved 10 mg phenylephrine (PE) dose and the higher 20 mg, 30 mg, and 40 mg PE doses compared with placebo in participants with histories of seasonal allergic rhinitis, using loratadine as background medication.

This study is designed to assess the effectiveness of mometasone furoate nasal spay (MFNS) once daily (QD) compared with placebo in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) in reducing the total nasal symptom score and the total ocular symptom score.

This study will investigate the effectiveness of desloratadine in treating subjects with allergic rhinitis who meet the criteria for persistent allergic rhinitis (PER)

This is a randomized, double blind, active and placebo controlled, 4 way crossover study in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Patients will receive a single dose of bilastine 20 mg, Cetirizine 10 mg, Fexofenadine 120 mg, and placebo in the Vienna Challenge Chamber.

The objective of this trial is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the administration of a depigmented and polymerized allergen extract of Phleum pratense in the rhinoconjunctivitis and/or asthma of slight or moderate intensity, due to allergy to grass pollen.

The primary objective is to assess the effect of fluticasone propionate (FLU) on the relative bioavailability (AUC0-∞) of azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) when administered as fixed AZE-FLU combination product (TEST) compared to a similar formulation without containing FLU (i.e. AZE alone; REF). The secondary objectives are to compare the relative bioavailability (AUC0-∞) of AZE when administered either as fixed AZE-FLU combination product (TEST) or as marketed AZE product Astelin® Nasal Spray (COMP); To compare the effects of FLU on other pharmacokinetic parameters of AZE (AUC0-tlast, CL/f, Cmax, tmax, t½); To assess adverse events.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of four times a day treatment with nasal carbon dioxide in patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis symptoms.

Ragweed MATAMPL has been developed to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with hypersensitivity to ragweed pollen (hay fever). This novel formulation is designed to provide a vaccine that will be efficacious with only four escalating dose injections administered before the start of the pollen season. In this Follow-up Study the Efficacy will be assessed by exposing allergic subjects to Ragweed pollen in an environmental exposure chamber EEC. Patient symptomatic response to pollen and patient quality of life in the EEC will be determined. Patients who previously completed two EEC portions of study Ragweed MATAMPL 204 and who had been treated with either Ragweed MATA MPL or Placebo before the 2005 ragweed season will be enrolled.