Active clinical trials for "Angina Pectoris"

This study aims to address the following questions on the effects of testosterone therapy in men with coronary ischaemia: Does the anti-anginal effect persist long term? Many of the published studies are acute single dose trials and none of the chronic studies have assessed patients formally beyond a few months. The investigators' earlier studies were limited to 3 months. Does testosterone therapy in men affect the levels of measurable atheroma? There is currently no in-vivo human evidence that androgen therapy inhibits or reduces levels of atheroma, although there is abundant evidence in animals to suggest a potential improvement. This study addresses the two issues and would be of one-year duration but would be the longest trial of testosterone therapy in men with cardiovascular disease. The primary endpoint is the change in time to ST- segment depression of > 1mm during exercise testing.

Chronic angina pectoris refractory to medical and revascularization therapies is a disabling medical condition and a major public health problem. Patients with refractory angina have limited treatment options. One proposed therapy modality is transcatheter implantation of a reduction stent in the coronary sinus. Coronary sinus reduction stents have been shown to reduce angina burden considerably and to improve quality of life. The reduction stent is assumed to increase myocardial perfusion and reduce myocardial ischemia, but the mechanism of action is poorly understood. The aim of this project is to assess the myocardial ischemia burden in patients with refractory angina who are undergoing a transcatheter coronary sinus reducer procedure. This is a clinical non-randomized self-controlled cohort study with blinded outcome adjudication for changes in myocardial perfusion. Patients with refractory angina will be systematically examined before implantation of the coronary sinus reduction stent and after 6 months. The primary outcome, changes in myocardial perfusion on the gold standard 15O-H2O PET/CT will be evaluated on blinded perfusion scans where the stent is invisible. To provide context to the findings, we will also evaluate whether changes in myocardial ischemia are associated with less angina and better cardiac function parameters. Effects of stent implantation on angina symptoms and quality of life could be affected by a placebo effect. Treatment options for patients with refractory angina is needed, and results from the present study will explore if coronary sinus reduction stents are improving myocardial ischemia in this patient group. Signs of improved objective perfusion will inspire confidence in the method.

The primary purpose of this trial is to determine the safety of XC001 (AdVEGFXC1) in patients who suffer from angina caused by coronary artery disease and have no other treatment options. Subjects in this study will receive one of four intramyocardial doses of XC001 that expresses human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) which induces therapeutic angiogenesis (revascularization).

Patients with refractory angina pectoris have low quality of life and reduced exertional capacity. Studies have shown that the coronary sinus reducer (CSR) implantation improves the quality of life. However, to date there are no firm objective data on improvement of exertional capacity. Studies have shown a large influence of placebo effect after interventional procedures, which is even more pronounced than in medically treated patients. As angina pectoris presents entirely subjective perception of chest discomfort, its improvement may be influenced by this effect in up to 30 %. The investigators will study weather the CSR implantation improves aerobic exertional capacity in comparison to optimal medical therapy alone. Further, the investigators will explore the extent of myocardial reversible ischemia reduction and possible influence on hrECG markers of left ventricular arrhythmogenicity. 40 patients with refractory angina CCS class (Canadian cardiovascular society) II-IV and confirmed reversible ischemia will be included. Patients will be randomized into two groups. The first group will undergo CSR implantation procedure. The second group will present a sham control group with placebo procedure. At inclusion and after 6 months the investigators will perform cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), single photon emission tomography for detection of reversible ischemia (SPECT), high resolution ECG (hrECG), echocardiography and asses the subjective burden of angina according to CCS score and the quality of life according to the Seattle angina Questionnaire (SAQ).

This is a randomized pharmacological study evaluating the effects of ivabradine in patients with residual angina after PCI. The role of ivabradine in patients with angina, without systolic dysfunction, is not yet clear. The investigators performed in all patients an echostress to evaluate the effects of therapy with ivabradine after 30 days in terms of exercise tolerance and diastolic function.

The study included 511 patients who underwent PCI because of angina during 2010-2011 at three Korean hospitals. Clopidogrel-naïve patients received either a loading dose (LD; 600 mg at 2-24 h before the procedure) or routine maintenance therapy (75 mg/day for ≥5 days) plus either a 300-mg reload (RL) or only the maintenance dose (MD).

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of treatment with Liraglutide on the coronary microvasculature and angina symptoms, in overweight patients with microvascular dysfunction and angina pectoris but no coronary artery stenosis.

This is a prospective cohort study to examine the efficacy of ESMR application in patients with refractory angina despite optimal medical therapy, not suitable for further PCI or CABG. Characteristics such as angina class scores (CCS class score), nitroglycerin consumption and hospitalization were compared at baseline and 1, 6 and 12 months after ESMR therapy. The effect on cardiac perfusion was assessed at 6 months.

Selection of a treatment strategy for patients with symptoms due to coronary artery disease requires consideration of patient preferences. In current clinical practice, patient preferences for treatment may not be known prior to diagnostic coronary angiography. The investigators will test an internet-based shared decision-making tool which will provide education and solicit preference information prior to angiography. The investigators seek to determine if this tool can accurately assess patient preferences, and if these preferences will lead to a change in clinical management.

This is a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, single-center (North Florida- South Georgia VA Medical Center) study. The study objective is to determine if ranolazine improves angina symptoms at 4 months compared with placebo among stable coronary artery disease patients who have demonstrable myocardial ischemia, but who do not undergo revascularization