Active clinical trials for "Arthritis"

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most common inflammatory rheumatoid disease in France, affecting 0.3% of the general population. Without effective treatment, the persistent inflammation causes invalidating pain and joint destruction, leading to major functional disability. Biological agents have been proposed for patients with RA who have the most severe form of the disease and that are inadequate responder patients to conventional synthetic Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). TNF inhibitors (TNFi) are historically proposed as the first biological DAMRD for inadequate responder patients to csDMARDs. A diverse therapeutic arsenal has become available in recent years with the development of non-anti-TNFα drugs whose mechanisms of action are different from the classical TNFi. This new biotherapy class includes tocilizumab and abatacept, two drugs recently available for subcutaneous administration that enables ambulatory care for patients who would otherwise require repeated in-hospital care. The role of these new treatments in the therapeutic strategy has been emphasized by studies that demonstrated their efficacy as first-line treatments. However, in clinical practice, TNFi remain the most common first-line treatment for the majority of patients, non-anti-TNFα biological agents being reserved for inadequate responder patients. In second line, several studies have investigated therapeutic strategies for inadequate responder patients to TNFi. Current data suggest that it could be wise to change the therapeutic target after failure of a first-line treatment with TNFi. Data about the comparative efficacy of different biologics proposed after failure of a first-line treatment with TNFi are in progress. Meta-analyses from registries and academic trials conducted in France and The Netherlands suggest that non-anti-TNFα agents would have equivalent or superior efficacy compared with a second TNFi. This finding suggests clinicians to switch for an alternate therapeutic target after failure of a first-line TNFi. Data comparing different non-anti-TNFα biologics in inadequate responder patients to TNFi are scare. Industrial trials have demonstrated sustained biological efficacy of non-anti-TNFα biologics after failure of a TNFi. However, there is very little solid data on the direct comparison between them.

This is a 16-week, open-label study to identify factors that help predict clinical responses to DMARD therapies for RA (Rheumatoid Arthritis) patients. All patients will receive a starting dose of DMARD medication(s) which may be adjusted by the investigator as needed. If a subject becomes intolerant to a DMARD medication the subject will be withdrawn from the study at the discretion of the investigator. Visits (prior to week 16) where withdrawal is determined to be necessary will be considered end of study. End of study data (week 16) as well as study serum will be collected. (Serum only collected on those subjects who have consented to the addendum Serum and DNA of this study). A portion of the blood collected at baseline, week 8 and week 16 with the addendum portion of the study is for future research and will be utilized attempting to look to detect the generation of superoxide radicals. The radicals have been shown to be associated with inflammation and may correlate with the progression of RA. If this is true, then treatment with RA should decrease the levels of these radicals signaling response to treatment.

The Researchers are trying to compare two different types of intraarticular injections (injection in the joint) for treating the symptoms of moderate to advanced basilar thumb arthritis. One injection is ketorolac (an NSAID) and the other is triamcinolone (a corticosteroid).

This study will evaluate the retention rates of two advanced therapies, Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF) and Janus kinase inhibitor (JAK) in the treatment of adults with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) over a two year period. It will also examine the ability to embed a clinical trial in a clinical situation using an electronic medical record (EMR).

The Study objectives are: To compare the efficacy and safety of Etanercept, lyophilisate for solution for injection and Enbrel, lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection, which are used as subcutaneous injections at a dose of 25 mg 2 times a week for 24 weeks in combination with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To prove the therapeutic equivalence of Etanercept, lyophilisate for solution for injection and Enbrel, lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. To evaluate the immunogenicity of Etanercept, lyophilisate for solution for injection.

Use of Biocellular and cellular approaches to treatment of Osteoarthritis (OA), musculoskeletal aging processes, pain, and degenerative changes are to be studied with minimally invasive protocols, and non-pharmaceutical means to relieve OA and its associated issues. Traditional surgical interventions have not yielded convincing long-term outcomes, including total joint replacement surgeries and medical management of the supportive structures. This study is to use a person's own stem/stromal Cells (autologous) plus HD-PRP (important healing growth factors and signal molecules) in such cases of OA for long-term minimally invasive treatments. Baseline (existing) findings are documented, and thence tracked as to progress deemed to be result of the intervention.

SPEED is a three arm interventional trial nested within a cohort (Trials Within Cohorts or TWiCs design). This tests more aggressive early therapy in patients newly diagnosed with moderate to severe PsA. Arm 1 will receive standard step up therapy in the cohort and act as the control group. Arm 2 will receive early combination conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Arm 3 will receive early tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor therapy.

Investigational and comparative study between the anti-inflammatory effectof both angiotensin reeptor blockers and statins on rheumatoid arthritis disease activity on Egyptian patients

To evaluate the efficacy of Tofacitinib in reducing inflammation in the sacroiliac joints and spine on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with active Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) with axial Involvement (BASDAI [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index] ≥ 4 and total backpain ≥ 4 despite treatment with NSAIDs plus evidence of active inflammation in the sacroiliac joints or spine on MRI).

The main objective is to assess if a treat-to-target strategy implementing structured imaging assessments leads to better patient outcome in terms of sustained remission compared to a conventional treat-to-target strategy in psoriatic arthritis. Main inclusion criteria are: >18 years of age, Clinical diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), Fulfillment of ClASsification of Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria, Indication for treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs according to treating physician Primary endpoint: Sustained remission, defined as Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) at 16, 20 and 24 months Secondary endpoints: Individual and composite disease activity measures and remission criteria, inflammation assessed by ultrasound, health related quality of life and adverse events. Study design: A two-arm, parallel-group, single-blind, treatment strategy study where patients are randomized 1:1 to a conventional treat-to-target follow-up strategy with structured clinical assessment of disease activity or an imaging informed treat-to-target follow-up strategy with both structured clinical assessment of disease activity and structured imaging assessment of disease activity. Duration of follow-up is 24 months. All patients are treated according to an algorithm based on current European recommendations. The conventional treatment target, applicable to both arms and the sole target in the conventional arm, is all of: Disease Activity index in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) remission (≤3), Enthesitis ≤1, Psoriasis Body Surface Area ≤3% Intervention: A treat-to-target treatment strategy incorporating information from ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons and entheses (at every visit), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of spine and sacroiliac (SI)-joints at baseline and 1 year, in addition to clinical information. Specifically, this means that these additional measures will be added to conventional treat to target: If evidence of enthesitis or axial inflammation on imaging the patient will progress directly to biological disease modifying antirheumatic drug in the treatment algorithm If evidence of ongoing inflammation (power Doppler>0) on ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons or enthesis, the patient will be classified as not having reached their treatment target