Active clinical trials for "Arthritis"

The reason for this study is to see if the study drug ixekizumab is safe and effective in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) categories of enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) (including juvenile onset ankylosing spondylitis [JoAS]) and juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA).

The study will aim to estimate the efficacy of apremilast compared with placebo in the treatment of juvenile psoriatic arthritis (JPsA) in pediatric participants 5 to less than 18 years of age.

This is a Phase I/II Randomized Double-Blinded Standard of Care (Corticosteroid) vs. Sterile Amniotic Fluid for Osteoarthritis

Adalimumab is a recombinant monoclonal antibody (IgG1 subclass) against human TNF-α (Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha). It is an immunosuppressive medication predominantly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis autoimmune disease. It is also used for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and Crohn's disease etc. Adalimumab binds specifically to TNF-α and blocks its general cytokine effects, thereby reducing TNF-induced inflammation and halting tissue destruction. Adalimumab was approved for medical use in the United States in 2002. It is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines. It is available as a biosimilar medication. In 2017, it was the 169th most commonly prescribed medication in the United States, with more than three million prescriptions. Adalimumab is an expensive product which is indicated in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, etc. Each patient will be provided the study drug free of cost in this study which will benefit them immensely. The advent of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies has given a major boost to the treatment of individuals suffering from autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis. Adalimumab is one such therapeutic monoclonal antibody used for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis marketed with brand name Humira by Abbvie Ltd. (USA) was the only adalimumab biosimilar available for patients in Bangladesh until recently. Incepta Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Bangladesh has introduced Bangladesh's first locally manufactured adalimumab biosimilar Advixa that is available at a fraction of Humira's cost. This study aims to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of the Adalimumab biosimilar (Advixa) in comparison to Adalimumab (Humira) as reference. The biosimilar Advixa being a local product will a cost-effective alternative to imported drugs currently available in the market. Objectives of the Protocol General objectives- To assess the Pharmacokinetic between Test Product (A): Adalimumab (Advixa) 40 mg/ 0.4 ml of Incepta Pharmaceuticals Ltd of Bangladesh and the corresponding Reference Product (B): Humira 40 mg/ 0.4ml of Abbvie Ltd in normal, healthy, adult, human subjects in a Parallel group study. To evaluate the safety between two products. To assess efficacy, tolerability and safety of biosimilar adalimumab (Advixa, Incepta) in compared with reference adalimumab (Humira, AbbVie) in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Specific objectives- Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameters: For Cmax and AUC0-t the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the test and reference products should be contained within the acceptance interval of 80.00-125.00%. Safety assessment: Evaluation and comparison between references vs. test drug in terms of safety end point. Efficacy assessment: The primary endpoints will be - Proportion of patients with an ACR20 response in both the treatment groups at week 12. Evaluation and comparison of safety between references vs. test drug. The secondary endpoints will be - Change in Disease Activity Score of 28 joints - CRP (DAS28-CRP), Proportion of patient with an ACR50 response and Proportion of patients with an ACR70 response in both the treatment groups at week 12.

The main objective is to assess if a treat-to-target strategy implementing structured imaging assessments leads to better patient outcome in terms of sustained remission compared to a conventional treat-to-target strategy in psoriatic arthritis. Main inclusion criteria are: >18 years of age, Clinical diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), Fulfillment of ClASsification of Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria, Indication for treatment with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs according to treating physician Primary endpoint: Sustained remission, defined as Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA) at 16, 20 and 24 months Secondary endpoints: Individual and composite disease activity measures and remission criteria, inflammation assessed by ultrasound, health related quality of life and adverse events. Study design: A two-arm, parallel-group, single-blind, treatment strategy study where patients are randomized 1:1 to a conventional treat-to-target follow-up strategy with structured clinical assessment of disease activity or an imaging informed treat-to-target follow-up strategy with both structured clinical assessment of disease activity and structured imaging assessment of disease activity. Duration of follow-up is 24 months. All patients are treated according to an algorithm based on current European recommendations. The conventional treatment target, applicable to both arms and the sole target in the conventional arm, is all of: Disease Activity index in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) remission (≤3), Enthesitis ≤1, Psoriasis Body Surface Area ≤3% Intervention: A treat-to-target treatment strategy incorporating information from ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons and entheses (at every visit), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of spine and sacroiliac (SI)-joints at baseline and 1 year, in addition to clinical information. Specifically, this means that these additional measures will be added to conventional treat to target: If evidence of enthesitis or axial inflammation on imaging the patient will progress directly to biological disease modifying antirheumatic drug in the treatment algorithm If evidence of ongoing inflammation (power Doppler>0) on ultrasound assessment of joints, tendons or enthesis, the patient will be classified as not having reached their treatment target

Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) is a type of auto-immune condition that affects roughly 90,000 Canadians. Patients with PsA often experience joint pain, skin problems, and issues with mobility that negatively impact their quality of life. Compared to the general population, patients with PsA are at a higher risk of having obesity (excess body weight). Although there is no cure for PsA, medications can be helpful for symptoms, and weight loss can provide an added benefit to the effectiveness of medications. Behavioral weight loss treatment (BWLT) is a proven way to lose weight and keep it off. BWLT usually includes individual or group sessions with a health professional to learn strategies and tools to change behaviours and thoughts in order to support weight loss. However, few studies have designed a BWLT with the unique needs of patients with PsA in mind. Before testing new treatments for chronic disease in large, expensive studies, it is important to do smaller-scale research to make sure that a future large study will be successful. In line with this, the objective of our study is to test the feasibility of a future, large study of a BWLT for patients with PsA and obesity. In other words, our small feasibility study will investigate how convenient, reasonable, and acceptable the future study's procedures are, using a small group of people with PsA and obesity. People who have PsA and obesity will take either a special BWLT program, or receive usual care for PsA from a community-based rheumatologist. Those in the BWLT group will complete 16 online group sessions to help them learn cognitive and behavioral changes to help improve their health and manage weight. After 24 weeks, we will determine study completion rates, examine patient satisfaction, and assess whether the BWLT was provided to people as-designed. We believe this research will help with efforts to provide more effective treatments to patients with PsA to help them lose weight and improve their quality of life through reduced pain and symptoms.

Phase 2 study of the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and efficacy of KPL-404 in subjects with moderate to severe Rheumatoid Arthritis.

This randomized clinical trial (RCT) aims to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of different partial wrist fusion techniques in participants with post-traumatic wrist arthritis. Participants with stage II or III scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) or scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups: Group A (partial wrist arthrodesis without triquetral excision i.e. four-corner arthrodesis), or Group B (partial wrist arthrodesis with triquetral excision i.e. three-corner or capitolunate arthrodesis with triquetral excision). The results of this study will provide evidence to guide surgeons in determining the ideal wrist fusion technique in the management of patients with post-traumatic wrist arthritis requiring surgery.

The rationale for this study is to investigate whether in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients in stable remission a reduction or complete discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy can be achieved in a treat-to-target approach while maintaining in remission. Due to the lack of reliable data that answers the question of how to safely reduce medication in which patients, this study will test a pragmatic treatment algorithm that can be applied in clinical practice and that offers a gradual reduction with escape strategies in order to facilitate the maintenance of remission.

The need for exploration of more definitive and cost effective non-arthroplasty treatments of osteoarthritis (OA) has been demonstrated by the orthopedic and health economic research. Embolotherapy of neovessels associated with OA joints has been shown to be promising in patients with knee OA. There is a need for level one evidence drawn from randomized clinical trials to prove the safety, feasibility and efficacy of knee embolotherapy compared to standard of care. This randomized pilot study will assign 10 patients with mild-moderate OA to undergo geniculate artery embolization plus standard of care (defined in this study as: physical therapy and oral anti-inflammatory medications, with a maximum of 1 joint injection at the time of enrollment) and 10 patients to receive only medical standard of care (also having had a maximum of 1 joint injection prior to enrollment). The goal of this pilot study is to obtain preliminary estimates of safety and efficacy of embolotherapy to provide sustained symptom control and modify disease progression in patients with mild to moderate knee OA.