Active clinical trials for "Osteoarthritis"

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of heparin-conjugated gel for treating ankle joint cartilage lesions compared to the conventional microfracture method. It involves 40 participants aged 18 to 65 with localized cartilage defects (Outerbridge II-IV) in the ankle's talus bone. Participants will be divided into two groups: the main group and the control group. The main group will undergo a two-stage process. Initially, adipose tissue will be collected via lipoaspiration from osteoarthritis patients. This tissue will be used to isolate mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and extract growth factors, resulting in a biocomposite hydrogel. In the second stage, arthroscopy will be performed to apply the hydrogel for cartilage treatment. The control group will undergo standard microfracture surgery, a known cartilage repair method. The study's main objective is to compare heparin-conjugated gel treatment to microfracture in terms of cartilage repair and patient outcomes. A 12-month follow-up will assess short-term and potential mid-term effects. Data will be analyzed using Microsoft Excel and Statistica 13.0 for descriptive and comprehensive statistical analysis. Quantitative indicators will be assessed using appropriate tests (Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon T, χ2) to determine significant differences between groups. The study addresses key questions: Does heparin-conjugated gel offer better cartilage repair, functional improvement, and pain reduction than microfracture? Does the hydrogel approach better preserve joint integrity and slow degeneration? Are there complications with either method? This study combines cellular and surgical components to explore innovative cartilage lesion treatments. Comparing with microfracture and using a thorough follow-up, it aims to enhance cartilage repair techniques and patient outcomes.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis, affecting millions of people worldwide and it is common in an aging population. Surgical shoulder replacement (arthroplasty) is typically considered when non-surgical measures, such as physiotherapy or medication, have failed. There are two commonly performed surgical replacement procedures in patients who have advanced shoulder OA, and are 65 years of age and older: "Total Shoulder replacement or Arthroplasty (TSA)" and "Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RTSA)". Few studies have compared the two procedures. Surgeons face uncertainty regarding which procedure to perform in patients 65 years of age and older. This pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) will compare the "TSA" and "RTSA" procedures, in patients 65 years of age and older. Participants will be assigned at random, (like flipping a coin), to one of the two groups (TSA or RTSA). The overall goal of this pilot study is to determine which procedure produces better functional and quality of life outcomes with fewer complications within the first 12-months after surgery. Moreover, pilot data will help determining the feasibility of conducting a larger trial comparing TSA versus RTSA surgical management in 65 years of age and older participants with advanced shoulder OA.

LLLT is in use to treat different musculoskeletal condition. Osteoarthritis is one of the conditions needing LLLT for therapeutic effects. LLLT has been used in different previous studies using different points on joint and also on acupuncture points. This study is going to compare the effectiveness of LLLT on both points. Omega xp device is going to be used in this study.

Knee osteoarthritis is a disabling problem affecting over 15 million adults in the United States. Many people who have knee arthritis also experience painful meniscal tears. There are a number of different treatments that can be used to manage meniscal tears in the presence of knee arthritis. Treatments include surgically removing the damaged part of the meniscus; strengthening exercises to improve pain and function; manual therapy including massage and mobilization; acupuncture; and others. The combination of surgery and exercise therapy was long thought to be the best treatment. However, recent studies have shown that surgery followed by physical therapy is no more effective than physical therapy by itself. While physical therapy alone has been shown to result in similar pain relief as arthroscopic surgery, researchers have not yet done studies to determine what type of physical therapy is best for people with knee arthritis and meniscal tears. In the "TeMPO" Trial, we will be comparing 4 different, non-operative physical therapy regimens in order to gain a better understanding of how physical therapy works and what regimen will best reduce pain and improve function in persons with meniscal tear and osteoarthritis. The four arms in this randomized trial will contain different combinations of therapeutic treatments including in-clinic therapist-supervised exercise, in-clinic topical therapies, and exercises to be completed at home. Subjects in three of the arms will also receive motivational SMS (text) messages intended to improve adherence to the home exercise regimen. TeMPO is designed as a randomized controlled trial. Participants will be assigned randomly to one of the four arms. All arms include therapies that have been previously shown to work in clinical settings. One arm also contains some placebo treatments. The placebo treatments will help us to understand what aspects of physical therapy actually make people feel better. Our hypothesis is that subjects in the arm that includes in-clinic physical therapy and a home exercise regimen will experience more pain relief than subjects in each of the other arms. Also, we expect that subjects in the arm that receives the home exercise regimen and SMS messages will experience more pain relief than subjects in the arm that receives home exercise without the SMS messages.

As many as 20% of patients are unhappy with the results of total knee replacement (TKR). Various changes to surgical technique have tried to address this but have not led to a significant improvement in the numbers of patients satisfied with their operation. Recently, attention has focussed on alignment of the leg. When viewed from the front, a number of people do not start with a straight, mechanically aligned leg. Traditionally, when implanting a knee replacement, the surgeon tries to put the shin bone half of the knee replacement perpendicular to the floor to equalise stresses on the in and outside of the joint. However, this may result in the alignment of the leg changing considerably, straining the soft tissues around the knee and contributing to dissatisfaction with TKR. There has been a move by some surgeons to change practice, and to implant the TKR in a way that replicates the alignment of the patient's own original knee- alternative alignment. Studies looking at alternative alignment have not shown any loss of satisfaction with results of TKR and indeed are showing some signs that in the short term, function of the knee may be better with the new technique. The research team are planning to run a study comparing the knee replacement used in Exeter- the Triathlon- when put in place using traditional alignment versus using the alternative alignment methods. The outcomes will be assessed in various ways including patient satisfaction questionnaires, measuring muscle strength, flexibility around the knee, and by assessments of alignment of the new knee on X-rays and Computerised Tomography scans. The research team will look at short term results for satisfaction and function of the knee, and in the long term look at wear and survivorship to see if patient satisfaction with TKR can be improved.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, phase 3 study to determine the safety and efficacy of TG-C in subjects with Kellgren and Lawrence Grade 2 or 3 Osteoarthritis of the Knee, Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) medial joint space narrowing (JSN) Grade 1 or 2 of the knee joint. TG-C is to be administered by a single intra-articular injection to the damaged joint area via ultrasound guidance. Patients will be followed for 24 months for safety and efficacy.

The study proposes to compare performances and safety of intra-articular injections of aMAT with those of a control group (PRP injections) for the treatment of symptomatic OA of the knee. The end-points will be determined evaluating the performances of the treatment group in terms of improvement of the symptomatology, functional recovery and radiological appearance.

Patients with medial gonarthritis are randomised to a unicompartmental or a total knee replacement. Primary outcome: Thigh muscle cross sectional area and radiological attenuation measured by CT Secondary aims: functional tests, gait analysis, health related quality of life and patient related outcome.

This is a prospective open-label clinical study of 50 patients to determine safety and treatment potential of autologous cell therapy for pain and inflammation associated with Osteoarthritis of the hip. Follow-up will consist of a larger sample including 4,000 patients.

Knee arthroplasty is a successful surgical treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis. Most patients are satisfied with the result, however, 10% of the patients have remained dissatisfied over the last decades despite the advantages of the surgical procedure. Previous studies suggest that rehabilitation needs to be individualized and that some patients request additional support. Patient empowerment is a patient-centered strategy to increase, amongst other, patient engagement, participation, and motivation. Patient empowerment can be defined as a "process that helps people gain control over their own lives and increases their capacity to act on issues that they themselves define as important". One way of increasing patient empowerment is through motivational interviewing. Motivational interviewing is an evidence-based approach in which patients are supported to identify behavior changes toward their own individual goals. The aim of this study is to investigate if motivational interviewing could increase satisfaction in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. Furthermore, we want to examine role MI in this patient group with interviews of both MI-practitioners and patients as well as detailed investigations about the MI sessions.