Active clinical trials for "Back Pain"

the purpose of this trial is to investigate and compare between lumbopelvic stabilization and pilates exercises on gait cycle phases and maximum peak pressure on the foot in chronic nonspecific low back pain?

To determine the effects of Hamstring stretching using a pressure Biofeedback unit on muscle length, pain, and functional status in patients with low back pain.

This study aims to assess the feasibility of procedures for conducting a pragmatic cluster nonrandomized controlled trial and to collect data on the effectiveness of a previously validated approach that takes into account all the pain and disability drivers associated with low back pain - the Pain and Disability Drivers Management Model (PDDM). The overall objective is to provide data to assess the feasibility of implementing a multisite pragmatic cluster nonrandomized clinical trial to determine the effectiveness of the PDDM on short-term patient-related outcomes compared to the most recent clinical practice guidelines to improve the management of patients living with low back pain.

Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a common public health issue, and it is one of the main causes of disability among adults of working age. Suture embedding acupuncture is one of the most often used interventions for the treatments of cLBP. The investigators will investigate the efficacy and safety of suture embedding acupuncture for cLBP in this single center, parallel, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.

The Mezieres method was born in France with the physiotherapist Francoiçe Mezieres, who in the middle of the previous century began a series of observations that led her to rediscover body characteristics to understand it in a revolutionary way. Among the most important contributions is the first description of muscle chains, from which different global physiotherapy techniques have emerged. The method also proposes a form of intercorporal relationship different from that used in classical physiotherapy and gives way for people who receive this treatment to improve their body disposition and make use of their body in a conscientious manner. From this, in the present study we try to understand this method as one of the ones that promotes the "Use of self". In addition to identifying other aspects related to the meaning of the corporal intersubjectivity for the physiotherapist and for the person being treated, looking for the subjective construction of effectiveness and determining the objective effectiveness by means of objective measurements of the body. The present research project use a mix method, it aims quantify the bodily benefits when applying the method and understand from the subjectivity the implications for the self during the body activity of the Mezieres Method. The study will be mixed and in parallel with 82 people diagnosed with mechanical back pain. Three assessments will be made: one initial, one at the end of the intervention and one last follow-up six weeks after the end of the treatment. The tests to be used will assess pain, functional limitation related to low back pain, quality of life related to health, flexibility, range of motion and posture. For the intervention, participants will be divided into 2 groups, group one will receive Method Mézières and group two will receive conventional physiotherapy according to the protocols of a clinical institution in Bogotá. Parallel to the intervention, the participating individuals and physiotherapists will keep a field diary that will facilitate the understanding of the body experience by performing the method studied. At the end of the study, it is intended to know the objective effectiveness by means of the comparison made in the two groups in the variables studied. In addition, an interpretation of the body experience is expected when performing the Mezieres Method in comparison with conventional physiotherapy. This interpretation of hermeneutic character will revolve around the theoretical construction of the "Use of self"; This concept is recognized as a technology of the self that will be pursued through the Mézières Method. By promoting the "Use of self" the person can recognize their body and appropriate what happens with their locomotor system, decreasing the symptoms of pain and improving the prognosis of care for people who have these symptoms.

Back pain during pregnancy is common with up to 90% of pregnant women experiencing either low back pain (PLBP), pelvic girdle pain (PGP) or a combination of both pains. Although pregnant women seek out various forms of pain relief methods such as pain medication, exercise, education, pelvic support belts, and chiropractic treatments, there is limited evidence with regards to the efficacy of these treatments. Recently manual therapists, such as chiropractors, have used tape in an effort to relieve pain from musculoskeletal injuries with varying results. In the pregnant population, there have been limited studies to date on the role of taping and pregnancy-related back pain and none of this research delineates the efficacy of tape with respect to the 3 pain patterns experienced by pregnant women.

Non-specific low back pain is a common condition. Insoles are one of the many treatment form for chronic nonspecific LBP. The investigators hypothesized the contact total insole group will present pain reduction and functional improvement. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of contact total insole for people with nonspecific chronic low back pain and the impact of this insole on function, quality of life, load distribution in the plantar region, gait variables and satisfaction with insole use.

RATIONALE: Exposure in vivo therapy aims to reduce pain-related fear - a key maintaining factor of chronic low back pain- while increasing level of daily functioning, despite the pain. This is done by exposing patients to their most feared activities/movements, while behavioral experiments are performed that serve to correct catastrophic (erroneous) beliefs about pain. Yet, performing exposure exercises might be very threatening for patients and might encourage them to build in subtle safety-seeking behavior. Whether safety-seeking behavior should be allowed or not during therapy is heavily debated. Whereas some argue that it will only interfere with therapeutic progress because it prevents the disconfirming experience exposure tries to offer, other argue that it will facilitate therapeutic progress because it enhances one's sense of control, if used judiciously. So far (clinical-)experimental studies have provided mixed evidence nor have they lead to any clinical recommendation. Hence, in a replicated single-case experiment, we will compare exposure therapy with versus exposure without safety-seeking behavior versus exposure only. STUDY POPULATION: Participants are chronic low back pain patients seeking treatment, who fulfill all inclusion and exclusion criteria and participate voluntarily. INTERVENTION: All participants receive exposure therapy at the rehabilitation department of the academic hospital in Maastricht, but with different recommendations for the use of safety-seeking behavior. We will assess: 1) daily measures of fear, pain intensity and self-reported achievement of goals and 2) non-daily measures of pain disability, pain-related fear, pain catastrophizing, pain solutions, need to control and safety-seeking behavior. To measure to the influence of safety-seeking behavior on actual level of functioning, two behavioral performance tasks will also be presented, ie. a bag carrying task and a personalized task. BURDEN AND RISKS: There are no risks associated with participation to this study that are not otherwise related to rehabilitation and movement in general and participation is completely voluntary. Participants are requested to fill out questionnaires on a daily basis at home (computerized if possible), as well as on different time points during the study and at follow up and perform two behavioral performance tasks. This study could help to further improve the beneficial long-term effects of exposure.

Rationale Statement of the Problem. Low back pain is a significant societal problem in the United States, affecting approximately one-fourth of all Americans at any given time. Non-pharmacological therapies have not been well studied although preliminary evidence shows the utilization of bracing may be beneficial in reducing pain and medication usage. Hypotheses or Key Question. The investigators hypothesize that the use of an inelastic lumbar brace may decrease opioid use in chronic low back pain patients on a stable opioid regimen. The investigators propose to conduct a randomized controlled study to test our hypothesis. Specific Objectives. AIM 1: To evaluate the opioid consumption in chronic low back pain patients on a stable opioid regimen in a three armed trial, after an intervention of an in-elastic lumbar brace, elastic abdominal binder (standard care), and no brace (control). AIM 2: To evaluate changes in secondary endpoints such as pain intensity, quality of life, and functional capacity. Long Term aims: To decrease patient's chronic pain level, improve overall daily function, decrease overall opioid intake and improve quality of life.

The aim of this investigation is to determine whether the use of painPREMIER will significantly improve function in patients with low back pain in an occupational health clinical setting. painPREMIER is a tool that assists clinicians in the accurate diagnosis of back pain and associated problems in order to treat them most effectively.