Active clinical trials for "Back Pain"

Although dry-needling with or without manipulation has shown to be a useful technique to reduce pain in patients with low back pain (LBP), it is unclear which of these two dry-needling techniques would have a greater effect on the lumboscaral multifidus (LM) muscle activation, which is essential in LBP rehabilitation. Therefore, the purposes of the study are: 1) to investigate whether or not dry-needling would change muscle activity of the LM muscles in asymptomatic healthy adults and in individuals with LBP, respectively, and 2) to compare the effects of two dry-needling techniques on LM muscle activation and pressure pain threshold (PPT) in asymptomatic healthy adults and individuals with LBP, respectively.

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is the most frequent complaint in the clinical practice. Electroacupuncture treatment may be effective, however, the evidence supporting this possibility is still limited, especially in older adults. Methods: A five-arm randomized controlled trial with patients and evaluators blinded to the group allocation. A total of 125 participants with non-specific low back pain will be randomly assigned into one of five groups: three electroacupuncture groups (low, high and alternating frequency), a control and a placebo group. The electroacupuncture will be applied twice a week (30 minutes per session) for 5 weeks. The primary clinical outcome will be pain intensity. The secondary outcomes include: quality of pain, physical functioning, perceived overall effect, emotional functionality, patient satisfaction and psychosocial factors. Patients will be evaluated before the first session, immediately after the last, and followed-up after 6 and 12 months to check the effects in the medium and long term. Discussion: Results of this trial will help clarify the therapeutic effect of different frequencies of electroacupuncture for chronic low back pain in older adults and to determine the most effective electroacupuncture frequency.

The objective of this study is to verify whether the combined approach (osteopathic manipulative treatment -OMT- and cognitive training -CT) is more effective in the long term than the individual approaches (OMT or CT) in patients with chronic lumbar pain, evaluating the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the Rolland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) questionnaire

Multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial with parallel economic evaluation. Patients will be allocated 1:1 to activated 10kHz SCS plus usual care (intervention) or sham 10kHz SCS plus usual care (control) and followed up to 6 months.

Chronic low back (CLBP) pain is an important public health and socioeconomic problem worldwide and, despite the volume of research in the area, it remains a difficult condition to treat. There are some evidences that altered heart rate variability (HRV) parameters are associated with different clinical disorders, such as chronic low back pain. For instances, diminished parasympathetic activity has been explored as a potential therapeutic target. Considering the dynamic interaction between brain and heart, neuromodulatory strategies targeting this relationship could exert a positive influence on cardiac autonomic system and pain modulation systems. Transcranial direct current (tDCS) stimulation is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique that has been presenting recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain. However, tDCS application focusing on brain-heart interaction has not been extensively explored, especially on chronic pain conditions. This study aims to investigate the effects of tDCS on HRV in chronic low back pain patients. Sixty patients will be randomized into two distinct groups to receive either tDCS (anodal) or tDCS (sham) in a single session protocol. The primary clinical outcome (HRV parameter) will be collected before, during and post-tDCS. The data will be collected by a blind examiner to the treatment allocation.

The variabilities in the management approaches for patients with LBP reflect uncertainty about the optimal approach. Therefore, there is a need for the implementation of early treatment strategies relying on an evidence-based knowledge to treat the problems and reduce the risk for recurrence and chronicity of LBP. Advice is considered as the 'first in line' for the treatment of patients with LBP and is recommended in all international guidelines, yet it is under-utilized by the general practitioners. The current evidence in favor for the advice of staying active for patients with LBP is limited, with small or no benefits in pain relief, functional improvement or sick leave compared to rest in bed. Consequently, there is a huge gap between the evidence and practice. So, the current study aimed at filling this gap and expanding the previous findings by investigating the effect of the advice of staying active on the level of perceived pain, physical activity level, postural control and functional disability in patients with low risk LBP (with a total score of three or less based on the STarT Back Tool score).

Low back pain is the leading course of disability , affecting patients' health and work. Recently, studies have reveal the fact that patients get insufficient physical activity and easily let acute stage turn to chronic type. Although acupuncture for low back pain is worldwide popular, the mechanism of single acupoint for low back pain is still unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study is the investigators choose the most frequent used acupoint and modified single acupoint method to assess the efficacy of single acupoint to acute low back pain.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Soovu Labs pain Relief System in a group of users that represent people most likely to purchase and use the units. This study is called an In Home Users Trial (IHUT). The device is called Soovu and was determined by the FDA to be Class II 510(k) except (C190061 November 2019). Relevant endpoints include ease of use, pain relief, quality of life, and long-term effectiveness.

This study is conducted to answer the following question: What is the effect of lumbar repositioning feedback and transverses abdominis training on lumbar proprioception in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain?

. To investigate the effect of Vojta method on static balance ,dynamic balance, quality of life in patients with chronic non - specific low back pain