Active clinical trials for "Bacteremia"

Gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) is a frequent hospital & community-acquired infection, yet there is as yet no evidence from randomized studies on the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy. This point-of-care, multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial will randomize 500 patients with GNB on day 5 of appropriate antibiotic therapy to either (1) a total of 7 days of antibiotic therapy, (2) a total of 14 days of antibiotic therapy, or (3) an individualized duration of antibiotic therapy (guided by the patient's clinical course & C-reactive protein levels). The primary outcome is the incidence of clinical failure at day 30.

To determine the efficacy of the administration of 7 to 14 days of cefepime in a continuous infusion vs an intermittent (every 8 hours) administration, in adult patients hospitalized in Bogotá with sepsis and bacteremia caused by gram negative bacilli. The outcome was the rate of clinical cure and microbiological cure after 7 and 14 days of initiation of therapy and rates of relapse after 28 days. Hypothesis: The administration of beta lactams in continuous infusion allows a clinical or microbiological cure greater than the intermittent administration.

This study will evaluate the maximum safe dose of the true human monoclonal antibody, 514G3, in the treatment of patients with Staphylococcus Aureus bacteremia. Preliminary evidence of efficacy will be evaluated as well. Patients will receive 514G3 plus antibiotics or placebo plus antibiotics in approximately a 3 to 1 ratio.

The continuous increase in the bacterial resistance rate and the slow arrival of new therapeutic options have turned into an antibiotic crisis. One of the strategies proposed by stewardship programs to try to change this situation described worldwide is the use of antibiotics with the lowest possible antimicrobial spectrum. Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia is a good example of how this strategy would be applied. The empirical treatment of nosocomial bacteremia by Enterobacteriaceae comprises in several cases one or two antibiotics with antipseudomonal activity, being much less common than desirable a subsequent change to narrower spectrum antibiotics based on susceptibility data ("de escalation"). This is because the safety of de escalation is based only on expert advice and some observational studies, so their efficacy and safety is questioned by many clinicians and therefore its use is lower than desired. In fact, a recent systematic review of the Cochrane Library concluded that randomized studies to support this practice are needed. Investigators propose a "real clinical practice-based" randomized trial to compare the efficacy and safety of continuing with an antipseudomonal agents vs. de-escalation according to a pre-specified rule, in patients with bacteraemia due to Enterobacteriaceae.

Vabomere™, (meropenem-vaborbactam) is being compared to the Best Available Therapy in the treatment of adults with selected serious infections due to Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

The primary objective is to investigate the ability of systemic intravenous antibiotic plus antibiotic/anti-biofilm (i.e. N-acetylcysteine) lock catheter technique in eradicating uncomplicated catheter associated bacteremia and salvaging the infected vascular catheter. Secondary objectives include duration to clearance of bacteremia, future recurrence of bacteremia, need for catheter removal and death.

Bacteremia is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in critically ill adults. Although bacteria in the bloodstream (bacteremia) may arise from variable infectious foci (most commonly central vascular catheter related, lung, urinary tract, intra-abdominal, or skin and soft tissue sources), because of the high attendant morbidity and mortality of bacteremia, these patients collectively represent a critically important group to study. The consequences of the excessive antimicrobial use for individual patients, range from rash, gastrointestinal upset and diarrhea, to anaphylaxis, neutropenia, renal failure, toxic epidermal necrolysis, death, and a marked increase in ICU and hospital drug costs. One particularly concerning complication, Clostridium difficile infection, has increased in incidence and severity over the past decade. Much of this burden could be prevented through reduction in unnecessary antibiotic use. Another major consequence of excessive antibiotic use is antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotic resistance is not only a concern for the patient who receives antibiotics, but also for neighbouring patients in the ICU, as well as future patients in the ICU and the hospital at large - through patient-to-patient transmission, and environmental contamination. No previous randomized controlled trials have directly compared shorter versus longer durations of antimicrobial treatment in these patients. The investigators will conduct a multi-center randomized concealed allocation trial of shorter duration (7 days) versus longer duration (14 days) antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with bacteremia admitted to ICU. Eligible, patients will be randomized to either 7 days or 14 days of adequate antimicrobial treatment. The selection of type, dose and route of antibiotics will be at the discretion of the treating physicians, but the duration of treatment (7 versus 14 days) will be determined by randomization group. The randomization assignment will not be communicated to the study research coordinator, study critical care or infectious diseases investigators or clinicians until day 8. The primary outcome for the main trial will be 90-day mortality. The study will be initiated at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto, Ontario, and then rolled out to a second site at Kingston General Hospital in Kingston, Ontario. These sites will be sufficient to meet the sample size goals for the pilot RCT, but if additional funds are obtained the investigators will also roll out to the other Canadian ICUs listed below. The goal of adding these additional sites will be to increase the generalizability of the findings with respect to trial feasibility

This is a 2-part study, with Part A being the randomized, controlled portion of the study in patients with ABC hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP), ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), or bacteremia. Part B is the single-group portion of the study and includes ABC infections that are resistant to or have failed colistin or polymyxin B treatment, as detailed in the inclusion criteria.

This is a randomized, double blinded, prospective, multicenter, clinical trial of the use of Heparin versus Gentamicin as a pos-dialysis catheter lock solution.

Staphylococcus aureus is a frequent cause of primary or secondary bacteremia. It is also responsible for many cases of infective endocarditis, for which the therapeutic management is specific. The frequency of infective endocarditis among Staphylococcus aureus bacteremias varies between 2.7% and 23.4%. Many factors associated with the risk of developing endocarditis in patients with S. aureus bacteremia have been described. Two parameters of potential interest remain excluded from this work: blood culture growth time, a marker of bacterial inoculum, and the presence of bacteriuria, which is common during bacteremia. The objective of this study is to evaluate the interest of these two parameters in the prediction of the presence of endocarditis during S. aureus bacteremia. Investigators will conduct a retrospective study including all patients managed for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and in whom a urine culture was performed. The primary objective is to describe the factors associated with the occurrence of endocarditis in patients managed for S. aureus bacteremia and who received a urine cytobacteriological examination (UCE). The secondary objectives are: to evaluate the factors associated with the occurrence of S. aureus bacteriuria in patients with S. aureus bacteremia and to evaluate the risk factors for mortality in patients managed for S. aureus bacteremia.