Active clinical trials for "Fractures, Bone"

Supracondylar humeral fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children and cast immobilization continues to remain as the recommended treatment for modified Gartland's classification Type I and Type IIa injuries. Apart from plaster of Paris and fibreglass casts, the use of waterproof, tubular hybrid mesh (HM) casts have been gaining traction for cast immobilization. Although the use of HM cast has been reported to have similar clinical outcomes and overall patient satisfaction scores to the fibreglass cast, the results of the recent studies are only limited and generalizable only to paediatric distal radius fractures. As the application method of HM and fibreglass casts are fundamentally different, it has not been reported if the difference in application duration between the cast materials is significant and its potential implications in outpatient clinic operation. Hence, through a randomized controlled trial, this study primarily aims to investigate if the clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and duration of cast application with the HM casts would be comparable with fibreglass casts in children with supracondylar humeral fractures. Through this study, the investigators hope to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the respective casting material which may better aid physicians in deciding a more appropriate cast material for treating paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures with cast immobilization and the implications of casting duration on clinic operations.

The study deals with the topic of treatment of Jones fracture, comparing surgical and conservative approach. The fracture occurs especially in highly active individuals.

The objective of this study is to compare a minimal invasive approach with the conventional flexor carpi radialis approach for volar plating of distal radial fractures.

Trochanteric fractures represent about half of the hip fractures (with femoral neck fractures as the other half). Trochanteric hip fractures are almost always treated surgically with internal fixation of the fracture. However there is a debate ongoing for what is the appropriate implant to use. For stable fracture patterns the evidence seems to be in favor of the sliding hip screw, but for the unstable fractures it is more unclear whether to use a intramedullary nail or sliding hip screw with or without a lateral support plate (TSP). The role of the TSP in clinical use remains unclear and very little has been published about this, but it is believed to be an important contributor of stability to the sliding hip screw construct. We are planning a randomized controlled trial on trochanteric hip fractures to establish a method for implanting the tantalum markers, to observe the fracture healing process and to further investigate the role of the TSP.

Patients who present with fragility fractures are consistently under-evaluated and under-treated for underlying osteoporosis. This point of care represents a lost opportunity to prevent future fractures. The medical field treats the fracture as if the fall is the problem, but bone quality is the real problem. Studies have consistently shown that the recommendations of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and World Health Organization are not being followed. Orthopedics treats the patients for their fractures and primary care physicians focus on general health but no one is taking responsibility for bone health. Strategies to convince primary care to assume care have not succeeded. On the other hand, strategies where orthopedics takes some responsibility have shown success. This prospective 2-arm study will evaluate the success of effort by an academic orthopedic department in osteoporosis evaluation and treatment. We hypothesize that with greater effort by the orthopedic department, the better the adherence to standards of care. A cost benefit analysis will be made in parallel.

The objective of this research is to prospectively evaluate a group of patients with shaft compound fracture of the tibia, treated with a biplanar external fixator or locked intramedullary reamed nail. The investigators evaluate the quality of life, bone healing and postoperative complications.

The purpose of this prospective randomized study is to add to the body of knowledge on the treatment of minimally displaced distal radius fractures in patients over 60 years of age. The investigators believe that treating minimally displaced distal radius fractures in people over 60 with a removable splint and early range of motion will provide greater patient satisfaction, fewer complications, and earlier functional returns to pre-injury for these patients compared to those treated with a short arm cast which immobilizes the limb for at least four weeks, and has been shown to lead to longer recovery and possible residual stiffness. The investigators hope to provide sufficient evidence in directing treatment that will give the most efficacious and the most satisfactory return of prior function to patients. Since distal radius fractures in the elderly are common because of poorer bone quality, the elderly proportion of the population is increasing, and controlling health costs is of current concern, answering the question of which treatment produces the best results for all these concerns is of increasing importance now.

The investigators will be looking at geriatric distal femur fractures. The investigators will prospectively enroll these patients and allow patients to either weight bear as tolerated or limit their weight bearing post operatively. The investigators will evaluate functional outcomes.

The primary objective of this study will be to evaluate the functional outcome of patients who present with a distal fibula fracture who were treated with either intermedullary nail (IMN) fixation or plate fixation.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether telemedicine video calls for follow-up visits between patients and their orthopaedic trauma surgeons has an impact on patient satisfaction, quality of life, and treatment adherence. This study will also assess the feasibility of telemedicine as a medium for follow-up visits.