Active clinical trials for "Fractures, Bone"

The survivors after hip fracture often report severe pain and loss of physical functioning. The poor outcomes cause negative impact on the person's physical functioning and quality of life and put a financial burden on society. It is important to continue and progress the functional training that already started at the hospital, while the patients are transferred to short-term stays in a nursing home before they are returning to home. The aim presently is to examine the effects of a functional training program by a RCT design, initiated by the physiotherapist and performed by the nurses, on physical functioning while the patients are at short term stays in primary health care.

To compare the clinical efficacy of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plate and screw for postieror malleolar fractures.

Research question: Do patients using a neutral rotation brace post surgery have improved functional outcome and external rotation of the shoulder compared to current best practice using a polysling holding the proximal humerus in internal rotation? Primary objectives: To compare post-operative functional outcome scores obtained at 6 weeks, 9 weeks, 3 months and 1 year. (Scores at 6 weeks and 3 months in clinical review and postal scores at 9 weeks and 1 year) between patients held in neutral versus current standard rotation. These will be compared to scores taken pre-operatively. Benefits: There may be no extra benefits to patients from this trial however the results from the trial will help improve treatment for future patients at this hospital, and others across the country. Risks/disadvantages: The operation is the same in both groups studied, the study is investigating the use of the two different slings. The post-operative treatment is also the same, and all patients on the trial will receive the same amount of physiotherapy. It isn't anticipated that there will be any additional risk from this trial.

For simple fractures treated in the emergency department with cast immobilisation only, ibuprofen has been shown to be superior to, or a least or equivalent to codeine with less side effects. These and other studies have commented that their results may not be applicable to children who have fractures that require reduction. There is currently no literature on the management of postoperative pain following reduction of paediatric fractures. The investigators aim therefore is to investigate whether either of the two most commonly prescribed analgesics is superior to the other for postoperative pain management following closed reductions of paediatric forearm fractures. Also, if one agent has more side effects than the other.

To examine the effect of two different transfusion regimens on rehabilitation after hip fracture surgery.

Distal radius (Colle's) fractures in adult patients are commonly reduced in the emergency department before casting. Standard of care currently requires that x-rays be performed before and after fracture reduction, and inadequate reductions may be subject to repeat attempts and are at a higher risk to require surgery. This study will assess the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in addition to standard care as a tool to decrease the angulation at the fracture site after a reduction is performed. If this angulation is decreased, it would suggest that POCUS for distal radius fracture reduction could decrease the number of failed reduction attempts and therefore the number of repeated reduction attempts.

This is a single site feasibility trial to test whether daily administration of Teriparatide, in participants with Weber type B ankle fractures that are being conservatively managed, is superior to the standard care treatment with regard to the rate of healing.

The aim of the study is to investigate whether a simple intervention improves the physical functioning and reduce mortality after surgery for elderly hip fracture patients in a period of one year follow up. We hypothesized that the postoperative intervention program decreases the mortality in one year and improves mobility. This study is a randomized controlled trial designed as a prospective intervention and a historical control group from the previous three months admitted operated hip fracture patients from another study and with bone mineral density and measurement of weight and height done. The study will include patients of both sexes, 50 years and older, after their approval to participate and applying exclusion criteria. A baseline assessment will be done for the included hip fracture patients, who will be admitted to Trauma Unit of Assiut University Hospitals and will be surgically treated for a period of 1 year. The exclusion criteria include patients with major accidents, polytrauma, pathological fractures and bilateral hip fractures. Also patients with thyroid malfunctions, renal diseases, cardiac diseases, long term immobilization, liver diseases and musculoskeletal disorders. Two well-trained nurses will carry out the personal interviews in the Trauma Unit ward with each patient and/or patients 'relatives using a structured questionnaire. Data collection will be done after providing informed consent. Bone mineral density, weight and height for every patient will be done. The follow up phone calls will be done for every patient at 3 months, 6 months and one year postoperative. Intervention group: Patients in the intervention Group will be provided with postoperative health education intervention program, which includes nutrition education for improving general and bone health and physical exercise training for the patient and his relative before discharge. This group will receive the usual care prior to the start of intervention and participating in the study. The phone calls will include questions about: if the patient is alive or not. If not, subsequent detailed questions about causes and timing of death will be filled in. If the patient is alive, subsequent questions about nutrition, commodities and physical activity will be filled in. Assessment of physical activity will be done by the Western Ontario And McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).

It was reported that satisfactory postoperative outcome was difficult to obtain for the pelvic or acetabular fracture in old people. The less invasive surgical method was conducted in this study. Then, the clinical results were compared with the patients treated using traditional methods to assess the less invasive method.

A prospective, randomised study is to investigate the feasibility of conducting a superiority randomised controlled trial comparing the application of combined autologous PRP and concentrated autologous bone marrow (PRP-BMA) in addition to standard of care (either reamed intramedullary nailing or fine wire ring external fixator) for patients presenting with fresh tibial diaphyseal fractures.