Active clinical trials for "Fractures, Bone"

This is a Phase III clinical randomized control trial to investigate differences between patient with an infected nonunion treated by PO vs. IV antibiotics. The study population will be 250 patients, 18 years or older, being treated for infected nonunion after internal fixation of a fracture with a segmental defect less than one centimeter. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the treatment (group 1) PO antibiotics for 6 weeks or the control group (group 2) IV antibiotics for 6 weeks. The primary hypothesis is that the effectiveness of oral antibiotic therapy is equivalent to traditional intravenous antibiotic therapy for the treatment of infected nonunion after fracture internal fixation, when such therapy is combined with appropriate surgical management. Clinical effectiveness will be measured as the primary outcome as the number of secondary re-admissions related to injury and secondary outcomes of treatment failure (re-infection, nonunion, antibiotic complications) within the first one year of follow-up, as defined by specified criteria and determined by a blinded data assessment panel. In addition, treatment compliance, the cost of treatment, the number of surgeries required, the type and incidence of complications, and the duration of hospitalization will be measured.

This study is an international, single arm, multicenter, prospective follow-up, non-significant risk, Post-Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF), which is designed to collect safety and performance data on commercially available Perform® Fracture. Data collected from this study will be used for purposes, including but not limited to, PMS, peer-reviewed publications, education materials, future regulatory submissions, and/or product development.

Ankle injuries are common in musculoskeletal practice with high incidence rate in physically active individuals. Ankle injuries are complex to managed and further complicated with the high recurrence rate, chronic ankle instability, and osteoarthritis (Herzog et al., 2019). The prime ankle stabilizer against valgus forces is the deltoid ligament, which is a triangle band of strong connective tissues to prevent inward ankle rotation. The deltoid ligament is vital for maintaining ankle stability against valgus forces by its deep and superficial components as it restrains eversion and external rotation of the talus on the tibia (Lee et al., 2019). The superficial components of the deltoid ligament are the tibiospring, tibionavicular, tibiocalcaneal and superficial posterior tibiotalar ligaments, while the deep components are the anterior and posterior tibiotalar ligaments. The deep components of the deltoid ligament are the main stabilizers for the ankle joint, while the superficial components have minimal stabilization role (Michelsen et al., 1996; Pankovich, 2002; Jeong et al., 2014). Retraction of the deltoid ligament could cause medial ankle instability, pain, reduce function and early osteoarthritis (Lee et al., 2019). The deltoid ligament is essential for normal functioning of the foot and ankle and to maintain the normal kinematics of the talocrural kinematics. Dodd, Halai and Buckely (2022) discussed based on Ramsey and Hamilton's (1976) and Lubbeke et al..'s (2012) studies that a one mm lateral shift of the talus reduces the contact area of the tibiotalar up to 42%, and medial-sided injuries including an injury to the deltoid ligament would lead to long-term arthritis (Ramsey and Hamilton, 1976; Lubbeke et al., 2012; Dodd, Halai amd Buckley, 2022). More importantly, the deltoid ligament frequently raptures in association with ankle fractures (Wang et al., 2020). However, a recent systematic review stated that there is no consensus regarding deltoid ligament repair and its associated effectiveness and complications (Dodd, Halai and Buckely, 2022). Moreover, no study has explored the long-term effect of deltoid ligament repair in reducing post-traumatic ankle instability and osteoarthritis in patients with weber B fibula fractures. Therefore, the aim of the study is to determine the effect of deltoid ligament repair in patient with Weber B fibular fracture using randomized controlled trial design and two years follow-up period.

The main objectives of this study are to confirm the long-term safety, performance, and clinical benefits of the G7 Freedom Constrained Vivacit-E Acetabular Liners in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.

The purpose of this phase 2 randomized control trial will be to evaluate the effect of glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) therapy in the setting of lower extremity trauma to reduce short- and long-term muscle damage, acute rhabdomyolysis, and acute kidney injury. The study will consist of 40 patients with femur or tibial shaft fractures randomized to the GIK arm (using a well-described systemic GIK protocol; n = 20) or the control arm (using isotonic saline; n = 20). The use of systemic GIK is expected to decrease the overall amount of lower extremity muscle cell death and result in improved muscle function in the postoperative period. Additionally, the investigators hypothesize that GIK will lead to less severe rhabdomyolysis and a concomitant decrease in the incidence of AKI that results from the byproducts of muscle cell death.

The Depuy Synthes Locking Compression Plate (LCP) Variable Angle Patella Plating System is an FDA approved device. The purpose of this study is to see how well the Depuy Synthes LCP Variable Plating System work in fixing a broken kneecap (patella). Depuy says that the device will improve healing when compared to traditional ways of repairing a broken patella. The goal of this randomized control trial is to learn how well the LCP Variable Plating System works to fix a broken patella (kneecap) compared to traditional fixation methods, in male and females, age 18 to 74, with a patellar fracture, and being treated at Hartford HealthCare The Bone and Joint Institute or Hartford Hospital. The main question it aims to answer are: To understand if the Depuy Synthes LCP Variable Angle Plating System will provide a better way to help patients recover from a broken patella. Participants will evaluated at specific time points: post-op day 1, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 month post-surgery. Participants will be asked to: Complete surveys at all evaluation timepoints. Have x-rays(radiographs) taken at the 6 week, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, and 1 year timepoints. Participants will have a passive range of motion tests done at 6 week, 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, and 1 year timepoints. Participants would have strength and balance tests done at the 3 month, 6 month, 9 month, and 1 year timepoints.

The aim is to clinical trials compare the lumbar plexus block method with the erector spinae plan block method in terms of analgesic efficacy and possible complications. İn patients for femur fracture surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. is erector spinae plane block as effective as lumbar plexus block for postoperative analgesia in femur fractures? 2. Is erector spinae plane block effective for reducing opioid consumption compared to lumbar plexus block?

Study is a prospective observational, performed in the context of normal clinical practice, of patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures identified as candidates for kyphoplasty treatment with porous trabecular titanium microspheres (see whether to put commercial name and company). The study does not involve any interference with the patient's diagnostic-therapeutic course The objective of the study is the clinical-radiological evaluation of the efficacy of kyphoplasty treatment with trabecular porous titanium spheres in terms of pain control and reduction of kyphotic deformity following fracture. Further evaluation of the safety of the treatment in terms of absence of intraoperative adverse events and material-related toxicity.

Shoulder fractures are painful injuries and are the third most common fracture in adults. More and more people are having these injuries each year. Problems such as pain, swelling and lack of movement and strength can last for many months and some people never get back to their previous levels of ability with the injured arm. Information that is given to people following this injury can be very difficult to understand. To improve the information that is given to people following a shoulder fracture, it is necessary to understand what it is like to live with a shoulder fracture and what is important to people recovering from this injury. This study will interview people who have had a shoulder fracture at around one month and around 4-6 months after their injury. These people will be identified from a physiotherapy waiting list. The interviews will explore people's views on their injury, their recovery and how their needs and priorities change over time.

A large proportion of older adults living in long term care homes are frail and have osteoporosis. With age, there is a gradual and progressive decline in bone quality and quantity and an increase in frailty, which is associated with increased fracture risk. Additionally, fractures pose a significant burden to the health and quality of life of long term care residents and contribute to high healthcare costs. Despite the high prevalence of osteoporosis, falls, and fractures in long term care, the management of osteoporosis is not optimal among long term care residents at risk of fracture. The aim of this study is to co-design a service provision (i.e., PREVENT - Person-centred Routine Fracture PreEVENTion) with healthcare providers in long term care and to determine the feasibility of implementing PREVENT in long term care settings.