Active clinical trials for "Brain Injuries"

This study will determine (i) the magnitude of immediate and sustained effects of a current clinical standard interactive computer attention processing training (APT) when combined with intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a type of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and (ii) determine how APT + iTBS changes the neurocognitive system of attention in individuals with persistent attention deficits related to mTBI and PTSD.

The DEXCON-TBI trial is a multicenter, pragmatic, randomized, triple-blind, placebo controlled trial to quantify the effects of the administration of dexamethasone on the prognosis of TBI patients with brain contusions and pericontusional edema. Adult patients who fulfil the elegibility criteria will be randomized to receive dexamethasone or placebo. Patients who have suffered a head injury and have one or more cerebral contusions with visible pericontusional edema in the CT scan can be included in the study. The doses of dexamethasone will be a short and descending course: 4mg/6 hours (2 days); 4 mg/8 hours (2 days); 2 mg/6 hours (2 days); 2 mg/8 hours (2 days); 1 mg/8 hours (2 days); 1 mg/12 hours (2 days). The primary outcome is the Glasgow Scale Outcome Extended (GOSE) performed one month and 6 months after trauma. Other secondary outcomes are: compare the number of episodes of neurological deterioration; compare the symptoms associated with TBI; compare the presence of adverse events during treatment; compare the volume of pericontusional edema before and after 12 days of treatment in both groups of patients; and compare the results of the neuropsychological tests between the two groups of patients one month and 6 months after the TBI. The main analysis will be on an ''intention-to-treat´´ basis. A descriptive analysis of the baseline variables will be made for each treatment group. Logistic regression will be used to estimate the effect of dexamethasone and placebo on GOSE at one month and at 6 months, dichotomized in unfavorable outcome (GOSE 1-6) and favorable outcome (GOSE 7-8). Since the severity of the initial injury will determine significantly the final outcome of the patient, to assess the effect of dexamethasone, efficacy will also be analyzed using the 'sliding dichotomy'. A subgroup analysis will be carried out by stratifying the patients as they present more or less than 10mL of pericontusional edema in the preinclusion CT. We will perform an interim analysis with the patients included during the first year to calculate the conditional power. An independent statistician will blindly perform this analysis. At the same time a safety analysis will be also perfomed. A study with 600 patients would have about 80% power (two sided alpha=5%) to detect a 12% absolute increased (from 50% to 62%) in good outcome.

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial with an open-label extension to evaluate the efficacy of growth hormone (GH) on cognitive functions of retired professional football players with growth hormone deficiency (GHD).

This study evaluates the addition of Salovum, an egg yolk powder enriched for antisecretory factor, to standard care of participants with severe traumatic brain injury. Half of the participants will be administered Salovum while the other half will be given a placebo egg yolk powder, not enriched for antisecretory factor. Intracranial pressure (ICP), partial brain oxygen pressure (PtbO2), microdialysis of metabolites and inflammatory mediators and trauma intensity level (TIL) will be assessed in all patients.

Protocol Summary The present study was developed to better understand the effects and benefits of individualizing rehabilitative treatments based on subgroup classifications determined by a standardized clinical examination. The primary aim is to evaluate the response to individualized therapy on recovery, as measured by The Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) and standardized clinical examination, when compared to an active control. The secondary aim is to evaluate the Pre and Post treatment state of the participants via a rapid advanced electroencephalography (EEG) when compared to the active control who will be provided the current standard form of therapy for persistent symptoms. The EEG changes will be compared to the standardized clinical examination findings as well as the RPQ. Sample Size: N= 50 Study Population Participants will be eligible for study participation if they meet the following inclusion criteria: 21-years and older; diagnosed with postconcussion syndrome; and have adequate language skills in English to read and take part in rehabilitation treatment program. Participants will be excluded should: they have an unremarkable or normal clinical examination; have a chronic infectious disease; uncontrolled hypertension; other neurological disorders (not attributed to their primary diagnosis); cancer treatment (other than basal cell carcinoma), craniotomy, or refractory subdural hematoma long-term use of psychoactive medications that would compromise their ability to comprehend and perform study activities; those with pacemakers or elevated cardiovascular risk; ongoing litigation surrounding their injury; have been diagnosed with a moderate or severe brain injury prior to enrolment; post-concussive symptoms persisting beyond 12-months. Study Design The investigators will be conducting a 12-week case-crossover randomized controlled trial. Participants will undergo 6-weeks of care in their respective streams. After 6-weeks, participants will undergo a re-examination. They will then crossover and undertake the alternative treatment for 6-weeks. At the end of 12-weeks, participants will undertake the endpoint examinations. Start Date: May 2023 End Date: September 2025 Primary Objective: The primary aim is to evaluate the response to individualized therapy on recovery, as measured by The Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) and standardized clinical examination, when compared to an active control.

The goal of this clinical trial is to extend the accessibility of the Diabetes Prevention Program Group Lifestyle Balance (DPP-GLB) modified for people with TBI (GLB-TBI) to reduce health inequities and reach a broad and diverse sample. To increase the accessibility and reach of the GLB-TBI we will conduct a randomized control trial (RCT) to assess intervention efficacy of telehealth delivery of the GLB-TBI (tGLB-TBI). Results will provide a scalable telehealth weight-loss program that clinicians and community workers across the country can use to help people with TBI lose weight and improve health.

By longitudinal, prospective research in children with neurodisabilities including severe motor impairments and their parents to explore the beneficial effects of participating in an intensive habilitation program on the child's adaptive functioning and parental empowerment in order to treat and reduce the consequences of early brain damage.

Approximately 5.3 million people live with a long-term disability resulting from a traumatic brain injury (TBI) and between 5-8% of those older than 60 suffer from Alzheimer's disease or other forms of dementia (ADRD). Consequences of these conditions can result in dramatic and persistent changes in functioning, impacting not only the patients, but also loved ones who become informal support persons. Many existing services help the family in the moment, but do not address long-term wellness. Thus, the purpose of this research study is to compare the effect of two different types of group wellness treatments for individuals with chronic mild TBI, moderate to severe TBI, and ADRD and their support persons.

Intractable high intracranial pressures (ICP) are associated with poor functional outcomes and mortality, so the SCALPEL trials aims to evaluate the effect of decompressive craniectomy against decompressive laparotomy to lower those pressures in diffuse TBI. The primary outcome measure for that evaluation is functional outcome after 12 months on the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E).

Brain edema is one of the main mechanisms of secondary brain injury and one factor in the prognosis of traumatic brain injury . The clinical study of glibenclamide in the treatment of brain edema after traumatic brain injury is designed to evaluate whether glibenclamide treatment can improve the blood NSE and S100β levels of severe traumatic brain injury , so order to explore the efficacy and adverse effects of this drug in the treatment of traumatic brain injury .