Active clinical trials for "Prostatic Neoplasms"

Metformin is used widely in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. It has off-label indications for use in the prevention of diabetes and in hyperinsulinar obesity. In medical practices, the implementation of metformin for these off-label indications is variable, often at the level of the provider. Multiple retrospective investigations have also shown a clinical benefit in men with prostate cancer who are incidentally treated with metformin. This pragmatic study will test the feasibility of enrolling patients who have glucose intolerance (as defined by HbA1c of 5.7-6.4%) and/or who have increased BMI (BMI greater than or equal to 25 kg/m2) to a randomized pragmatic study of metformin plus lifestyle modification information versus lifestyle modification information only. For purposes of the scope of this project and the study's feasibility, this will be implemented in a group of prostate cancer patients, who may have additional benefits from metformin.

This clinical trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of [161Tb]Tb -PSMA-I&T in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

100 mCi of [177Lu]Ludotadipep, the dose determined in the phase 1 clinical trial (FC705-1), was administered repeatedly up to 6 times at intervals of 8 weeks (±2 weeks) to patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in order to assess the safety and efficacy.

The goal of this prospective study is to test the efficacy of Echolaser transperineal focal therapy in patients with low- and intermediate risk prostate cancer. The main question it aims to answer are: 1. short and intermediate term oncological outcomes after laser focal therapy, 2. functional outcomes and quality of life after treatment. Participants affected by low risk prostate cancer will undergo trans perineal laser focal therapy. Multiparametric prostate MRI will be perform after 3 and 12 months for oncological control. Re-fusion biopsy will be perform after 12 months. Functional outcomes and quality of life will be assess at 3, 6 and 12 months.

This study will evaluate whether simvastatin reduces intraprostatic immunosuppressive microenvironment through YAP-mediated T-reg dysfunction, and increases intraprostatic anti-tumor immune response in men recently diagnosed with localized prostate cancer electing to receive prostatectomy for their care. Half the men will be randomized to receive statins for 8 weeks prior to their surgery, while the other half will receive standard of care.

In recent years, quite a few studies have demonstrated the possibility of 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy as a viable treatment option in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), which has been shown desired effect. To increase tumor accumulation and retention for radioligand therapy, and reduce dosage of 177Lu, we conjugated a truncated Evans blue (EB) molecule and DOTA chelator onto PSMA-617 (EB-PSMA) and labeled it with 177Lu. This study is designed to assess the efficiency and response to 177Lu-EB-PSMA (55 mCi) in patients with mCRPC.

The study is an open label, multi-centre, randomized phase III study. The patients will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio to treatment consisting of Arm A: MD-SBRT in addition to standard treatment Arm B: Standard treatment Study population: Patients with hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) with oligometastatic disease detected by PSMA-PET/DT. This includes patients with de novo oligometastatic HSPC and recurrent HSPC after primary RT or prostatectomy. Primary endpoint: Failure free survival (time to castration resistant prostate cancer, CRPC) Secondary endpoints: Predictive value of investigated biomarkers in blood and imaging Acute and late toxicity after MD-SBRT PROM at 3 months, 1, 3 and 5 years Overall survival Differences in outcome between patients by strata Stratification: To avoid imbalance between treatment arms the minimisation method will be used to achieve balance between de novo oligo-metastatic and oligo-recurrent patients, as well as treatment site. Safety evaluation: Adverse events and side effects graded according to CTCAE v5.0 will be collected every 6th month. Serious Adverse Events are to be reported within 24 hours throughout the study duration. Statistical methods: Survival endpoints will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method with differences compared using the stratified log-rank test. Randomization time is set as baseline time. Pre-planned subgroup analysis will occur based on pre-specified stratification variables. A Cox multivariable regression model will be used to determine factors predictive of survival. Safety analysis will be performed with Mann-Whitney U-test or Fishers exact test. Criteria for evaluation: Per protocol (patients that have started study treatment) and Intention to treat (all included patients). Planned sample size: 114 patients Analysis plan: The primary end point will be analysed after pre-specified number of events have occurred or at 60 months of follow up. Safety analysis of acute toxicity will take place after median follow up of 6 months. Safety analysis of late toxicity will be analysed after study closure. Duration of the study: Three to five years inclusion. 60 months of follow-up after randomization of the last patient.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 over a change of androgen receptor-directed therapy (ARDT) treatment in prolonging radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) in Chinese metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, who were previously treated with another ARDT as last treatment and who have not been exposed to a taxane-containing regimen in castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) or hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) settings and who are considered appropriate for delaying taxane-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint of rPFS will be assessed via blinded independent centralized review of radiographic images provided by the treating physician and as outlined in Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) guidelines.

This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of AZD5305 when given in combination with new hormonal agents (NHAs) in patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

To learn if using cryotherapy to treat only the part of the prostate known to contain cancer is effective in controlling prostate cancer