Active clinical trials for "Esophageal Neoplasms"

This randomized phase II trial studies how well botulinum toxin type A works in preventing complication after surgery in patients with esophageal cancer. Botulinum toxin type A may cause less complications of nausea and vomiting after surgery.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with functional features of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) are advancing imaging technologies that have potential to overcome limitations of conventional staging methods, radiation treatment planning and the assessment of tumor response in esophageal or esophagogastric cancer. This study aimed to explore the value of MRI for the prediction of tumor response to chemoradiotherapy and accurate target volume delineation as compared to CT simulation for patients with unresectable or potentially resectable esophageal or esophagogastric cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy. The average CT texture features are also extracted before and during treatment to establish a model to predict the prognosis or side effects (e.g. radiation pneumonitis or esophagitis) of patients.

Worldwide, esophageal cancer is the 6th most common cause of cancer-related death. Currently curative resection remains the cornerstone of the therapy. Despite advances in anesthesia, operative techniques and postoperative management, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) occur frequently accounting for about 30% of all postoperative complications. Most importantly, PPCs have much been associated with postoperative mortality. The diaphragm is the most important respiratory muscle and its respiratory function would be inevitably damaged when esophagectomy is performed through the left posterolateral thoracotomy (Sweet procedure) because the diaphragm must be dissected for the purpose of stomach moralization. Meanwhile, Ivor-Lewis approach may effectively avoid diaphragm injury because the stomach can be managed through a laparotomy whereas an additional abdomen incision is needed. Both procedures are routinely used in practice when surgically managing esophageal cancer. The investigators hypothesize that Ivor-Lewis procedure might be superior to the left-thoracotomy route during esophagectomy in preventing PPCs.

RATIONALE: Gathering information about patients' quality of life during radiation therapy for cancer may help doctors plan the best treatment. PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying quality of life in patients undergoing radiation therapy for primary lung cancer, head and neck cancer, or gastrointestinal cancer.

Background: Owing to controversial staging and classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction (AOG) before surgery, the choice of appropriate surgical approach remains problematic. In a retrospective study, preoperative staging of AOG and the impact of preoperative misclassification on outcome were analysed. Methods: Data from patients with AOG were analysed from a prospectively collected database with regard to surgical treatment, preoperative and postoperative staging, and outcome.

Patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer often have weight loss, swallowing problems, and poor appetite. This may affect their ability to tolerate cancer treatment. The purpose of this study is to see if the researchers can apply a set of nutrition guidelines designed specifically for patients with cancer who are older than 65 years of age. The questions will allow them to assess the nutritional status and make appropriate referrals. If the patients are having swallowing problems or losing weight, the researchers want to address the nutritional problems early in the course of their treatment.

In patients with esophageal cancer (EC) neo-adjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by surgery with curative intent leads to objective responses in 45 to 60%, whereas 20-35% of the patients had no residual tumor (ypT0N0) at pathologic examination. The absolute survival benefit of response to nCRT is 15%, but still 14% of the patients develop locoregional failure in the CROSS trial. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography ((FDG-PET-CT) is able to distinct responders from non-responders, but still misses significant clinical evidence. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown potential benefits, which might be enhanced by combining both methods. PET/CT and DWI-MRI more precisely correlate anatomic and metabolic FDG-avid lesions and seem to assess post-treatment changes, especially regarding nodal staging. Both techniques claim an important role in selection of patients with clinical complete response (cCR) and indirectly with pathologic complete response (pCR) after nCRT. However, the exact role and complementary effects of both techniques is still unknown. For appropriate judgment of response, secure standard endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) / biopsy of potential suspected lesions, both nodal or residual tumor, seen on PET/CT or DWI/MRI or during EUS will be performed <2 weeks before surgery, approximately 6-10 weeks after nCRT and compared with the situation at primary staging. Patients with clinical complete response (cCR) resembling pathologic response (pCR= ypT0N0) after nCRT may refrain from surgical resection and related morbidity and mortality. However, patients without early (2wk after commencement) response during nCRT course may not benefit from nCRT. DWI-MRI seems effective in pre-treatment prediction of treatment outcome. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), which indirectly measures tissue density, can be used to determine the likelihood of tumor response to treatment. High ADC before treatment has shown to predict an unfavorable response. Tumors with low ADC values on presentation generally respond better to treatment. An increased ADC in patients during and after nCRT could be used to predict early pathologic response i.e. discrimination of "responders and non-responders" to nCRT.

Rationale: For resectable esophageal cancer the standard therapy is 5 weeks of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery 6-8 weeks afterwards. Surgery is performed independent of the response to nCRT and is associated with substantial morbidity. A pathological complete response (pCR) after nCRT is seen in 28-34% of patients. Pathological non-responders (pNR) most probably do not benefit from nCRT but are exposed to its toxicity and delay from surgical therapy inevitably occurs in this group. Early identification of non-responders during nCRT would allow individualized decision making in continuation or discontinuation of nCRT. Furthermore, a tool is desirable to accurately assess the treatment response after nCRT to identify patients with a complete response. Studies in rectal cancer reported that tumor resection could be omitted in patients with persisting clinical complete response after 12 months. Also, in some esophageal cancer studies, complete responders in surgical and non-surgical treatment groups had comparable overall survival. These findings indicate the possibility to perform nCRT as sole treatment in patients with a complete response. Conversely, if residual tumor is demonstrated, this will support the decision to move to surgery. Objective: Diagnostic study to assess the distinct and combined value of anatomical and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and combined 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) in the evaluation of treatment response to nCRT for patients with esophageal cancer. Study design: Multi-center diagnostic study investigating the value of MRI and PET-CT in the imaging before, during and after nCRT for assessment of response to nCRT for resectable esophageal cancer. Imaging response measurements will be compared with the histopathological tumor regression grade (TRG) of the resection specimen as gold standard. Study population: 50 patients (>18 years) presenting at the UMC Utrecht or M.D. Anderson Cancer Center with resectable esophageal cancer, as determined by endoscopy and biopsy, computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), receiving nCRT prior to surgery. Procedure: In addition to the conventional diagnostic work-up for esophageal cancer including a standard PET-CT before nCRT, two PET-CT scans will be performed during and after nCRT as well as three MRI scans before, during and after nCRT at the same time points. The first MRI (and standard-of-care PET-CT) scan session will be within the 6 weeks prior to the start of nCRT. The second scan session will take place after 10-14 days after the start of nCRT. The third and final scan session will be planned 1-2 weeks before surgery. Main study parameters/endpoints: Determination of the distinct and combined diagnostic value of anatomical and functional MRI and PET-CT in the evaluation of treatment response to nCRT for patients with esophageal cancer. Important imaging parameters include apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, standardized uptake values (SUV) and volume measurements for the different time points. The differences of these values between time points are of particular interest (delta-ADC, delta-SUV, delta-volume). The sensitivity (%), specificity (%), negative predictive value (%), positive predictive value (%), and accuracy (%) of the different imaging parameters for correctly identifying histopathological complete response will be calculated.

RATIONALE: Chemoprevention is the use of certain drugs to keep cancer from forming, growing, or coming back. The use of esomeprazole and aspirin may prevent esophageal cancer in patients with Barrett's metaplasia. It is not yet known whether esomeprazole is more effective with or without aspirin in preventing esophageal cancer in patients with Barrett's metaplasia. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying esomeprazole with or without aspirin to compare how well they work in preventing esophageal cancer in patients with Barrett's metaplasia.

This pilot clinical trial studies how well ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) works in imaging lymph nodes in patients with stage IIB-IIIC esophageal cancer. Ferumoxytol is a form of very small iron particles that are taken up by cells in normal lymph nodes and may work better in imaging patients with esophageal cancer when paired with MRI.