Active clinical trials for "Carcinoma, Hepatocellular"

More than 80% of patients with cancer will be exposed to anaesthesia at some point in their treatment. There is increasing evidence that perioperative events, including the type of anaesthesia drugs utilised, have an impact on cancer recurrence and metastases. Although potentially and theoretically curative, surgical resection, manipulation and trauma may disseminate tumour cells and reduce immunity. There have been a number of suggestions as to why cancer may be, paradoxically, worsened by surgery and what methods may be used to mitigate this. One of these is propofol based total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA), whereby the traditional inhalational anaesthetic drugs are avoided. Commonly used inhalational drugs, such as sevoflurane and desflurane, are pro-inflammatory. Propofol, however, has anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative properties, induces apoptosis and has specific inhibitory effects on tumour cell growth in vitro. Laboratory investigations, animal models, retrospective clinical studies and initial clinical research are producing evidence that inhalational anaesthesia facilitates tumour recurrence and metastasis, whilst TIVA can prolong survival. This randomised, controlled trial will look at the effects on DNA damage and biomarkers of immunity and inflammation of inhalational anaesthesia versus TIVA in patients undergoing surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma, a common tumour in the Southern Chinese population, for whom surgery is potentially-curative. It will focus on subjects undergoing open and laparoscopic hepatectomy and investigate changes in biomarkers of inflammation, immunity and gene expression from the patients' blood samples taken before, during and after surgery. Patients will also be followed-up for cancer recurrence, morbidity and five-year mortality. Results could represent a breakthrough in knowledge of how anaesthetic agents impact the results of cancer surgery, and have important implications for a more disease- sensitive approach to improving management and outcomes in these patients.

Cadonilimab is a first-in-class bispecific, humanized IgG1 antibody targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4, which has the potential to boost immune surveillance in tumors. The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluated the efficacy and safety of cadonilimab combined with TACE in patients with intermediate-stage unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cadonilimab combined with regorafenib in patients with HCC who progressed on systemic therapy.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality and the sixth most prevalent cancer in the world. Standard treatments for early-stage HCCs include resection, liver transplantation, and percutaneous ablation, with 5-year survival rates of over 50 percent. Less than one-third of patients, however, are candidates for hepatic resection, and the use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be significantly limited in cases with unfavorable tumor location and poor visibility on images, which increase the risk of technical failures and complications after RFA. Recent advancements in radiotherapy and imaging have made it possible to deliver optimal radiation doses on the tumor site while minimizing exposure to normal organs. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a method of high-precision radiation therapy that concentrates high-dose radiation to HCC in a short period of time to maximize the therapeutic effect on the tumor and minimize the side effects on normal tissues. Prospective and retrospective studies on SBRT for HCC have demonstrated its efficacy for local tumor control in small HCC. On the basis of these promising clinical results, a number of studies have compared the efficacy of RFA and SBRT. However, there is no strong evidence from randomized controlled trials comparing SBRT and RFA. In order to evaluate and compare the local efficacy and clinical outcomes of SBRT and RFA in patients with recurrent HCC, we conduct this non-inferiority trial.

A Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib (Apatinib) Versus Camrelizumab as Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) at High Risk of Recurrence After Curative Resection or Ablation.

This is an open-label, multi-center, single-arm, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab as a neoadjuvant therapy in subjects with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

This phase II trial studies how well cabozantinib-s-malate works in treating younger patients with sarcomas, Wilms tumor, or other rare tumors that have come back, do not respond to therapy, or are newly diagnosed. Cabozantinib-s-malate may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for tumor growth and tumor blood vessel growth.

This study will investigate if nivolumab will improve recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to placebo in participants with HCC who have undergone complete resection or have achieved a complete response after local ablation, and who are at high risk of recurrence

This is a Phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter, global study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab versus sorafenib as a first-line systemic treatment in participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. This study also includes a substudy investigating the safety, tolerability, PK, and preliminary efficacy in HCC in Japanese participants. In Japan, preliminary safety and tolerability will be evaluated (Safety Run-In Substudy) before Japanese participants are recruited in this Phase 3 study.

A phase II clinical trial is utilized to examine whether BMS-986253 (25 subjects) or Cabiralizumab (25 subjects) when combined with Nivolumab offers improved radiographic objective response rates (ORR) over Nivolumab monotherapy (25 subjects) in advanced HCC patients.