Active clinical trials for "Carcinoma"

This prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study evaluates the efficacy and safety of treatment with Sorafenib (Nevaxar) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion after radical resection compared to conventional therapies.

This study will enroll patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) that have residual Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA after curative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The purpose is to evaluate the survival in these patients treated with apatinib (YN968D1), an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (phase IIa) and to compare the survival in these patients treated with apatinib versus placebo (phase IIb).

The purpose of this study is to test if an experimental drug called Durvalumab (Medi4736) given by intravenous (IV) infusion is effective in treating carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the bladder that no longer responds to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and to collect information on the safety of these drugs and whether they cause any side effects.

This pilot phase 0 trial studies how well enzalutamide works before surgery in treating patients with kidney cancer. Androgens are a type of hormone produced by the body that may cause kidney tumors to grow. Anti-hormone therapy, such as enzalutamide, may lessen the amount of androgens produced by the body and keep kidney tumors from growing.

The purpose of this trial is to determine the benefit of the combination of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine given for 6 cycles, followed by maintenance nab-paclitaxel alone, in patients with cisplatin-ineligible or cisplatin-incurable advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC).

This is a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus placebo in participants with RCC who are at high risk of disease recurrence following nephrectomy.

This is a Phase 1b/2 multi-center, open-label study to establish the initial safety and to determine a recommended Phase 2 dose of B-701 in combination with pembrolizumab, and to determine safety, tolerability and efficacy of B-701 (vofatamab) plus pembrolizumab in the treatment of subjects with locally advanced or metastatic UCC, who have progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy and who have not received prior immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Primary Objectives: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum recommended dose of SF1126 in combination with nivolumab in adult patients with advanced (unresectable or metastatic) HCC and Child-Pugh A or Child-Pugh B7 cirrhosis. To determine the recommended phase II dose of SF1126 in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced (unresectable or metastatic) HCC and Child-Pugh A or Child-Pugh B7 cirrhosis. Secondary Objectives: To describe the safety and tolerability of SF1126 in adult patients with underlying liver disease by ongoing evaluation of adverse events. To determine pharmacokinetics in HCC patients. To assess the effect of SF1126 in combination with nivolumab on progression-free survival and overall survival. Primary Endpoint: The primary endpoint is the rate of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) at within 56 days of starting treatment, and the maximum tolerated dose or maximum recommended dose of SF1126 in combination with nivolumab. Secondary Endpoints: Adverse events related to SF1126 (description, timing, grade [CTCAE v4.03], severity, seriousness, and relatedness). Pharmacokinetics in HCC patients. The proportion of patients remaining progression-free by radiographic criteria as assessed by RESIST v1.1 at 4 months, and, as available, median progression-free survival and overall survival estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

The study will be conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of irinotecan combined with cisplatin (IP regimen) and etoposide combined with cisplatin (EP regimen) in advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal pancreatic and esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma. In this prospective randomized phase II study, the investigators aim to compare the survival benefit as well as the safety for irinotecan combined with cisplatin (IP regimen) versus etoposide combined with cisplatin (EP regimen) in advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal pancreatic and esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma.

This study is being done to find out the side effects (unwanted effects) that are caused in patients with cancers who are given SGN-2FF. This study will also attempt to find the most suitable dose in the disease or condition being studied and look at other effects of SGN2FF, including its effect on cancer. This study has several different parts. Part A will try to find the highest safe dose. Part B will enroll more patients to be treated at the highest safe dose or a lower dose to better understand how well SGN-2FF is tolerated. Part C will try to find the highest safe dose of SGN-2FF when it is given combined with pembrolizumab. Pembrolizumab is a standard treatment for cancer. Part D will enroll more patients to be treated at the highest safe dose of SGN-2FF combined with pembrolizumab or a lower dose of SGN-2FF to better understand how well SGN-2FF is tolerated when it is given with pembrolizumab.